Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201888 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214923 Sep 7, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Chill out fruitloop.
High five!
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#214924 Sep 7, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
The no longer PRIVATE BSA is holding its conference in TN today. Because of the gays forcing their way into the PRIVATE organization they are now refering to it as the "New" Alternative BSA. Wouldn't be easier to just start your own scouting organization and name it GLBTSA? it would have saved thousands of dollars by not having to change the rule guidlines on what a scout should be. This is another huge inconvinience to the private and hetero community. The GAY cult has an agenda, and that is to fuck up what has been right for ever ... You homos need to start your own schools, and social organizations just like we did. The BSA has lowered its standards and as long as the gay cult continues this roll we will all be second class.
Right on.Just exchange ssm for BSA and that's what's going to happen. I'd have no problem letting the gays have the 'marriage' moniker and re-name legit marriage 'moral union'.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214925 Sep 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>why wouldn't you believe me? when you pestered me to show my support for marriage equality, i didn't hesitate at all and gave you that proof.
you, on the other hand, have been asked to do the same and have nto done it once.
you are clearly a hypocrite just in the fact that you beleive you can ask me to support my position, but feel you do not have to do the same. and the fact that you really do not support marriage equality at all.
More of the same nonsense from you again? You are a liar. You do not support marriage equality.

When I ask for you to prove you would support me marrying my sister you run away. Get a real argument.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214926 Sep 7, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Dumbass, the question was cultures, not countries. Oh yeah they both start with c and you don't know the difference. Look who's a moron, you.
YUK!YUK!YUK! The guy's a dope. Like woodyticks.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#214927 Sep 7, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
My 30% quote is a figure is a factual statement. The other numbers include:
--Over 41% of the U.S. population lives in a state with either marriage or a broad legal status such as civil union or domestic partnership.
--Over 43% of the U.S. population lives in a state that provides some form of protections for gay couples.
RE: your comment about the freedom to choose... We have made a choice. And the choice that people are making is that same-sex couples should have the right to marry and the LGBT citizens should be treated equally under the law.
Like I said, you aren't very good with math.

And no, WE didn't choose, a judge chose. The WE went against you twice, that's why you cried to the men in black.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#214928 Sep 7, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a contradiction in that last paragraph. Are you arguing for SSCs to marry, technically to have their relationships called "marriage", or BGLT folks to be treated equally under the law? To be treated equally would imply same treatment. Thus a lesbian woman and a straight woman should be treated the same regardless of sexual attraction.
He has no idea what he is arguing. He knows what he wants, he position and talking points are based purely on that emotional basis, anything which contradicts that position is simply dismissed.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#214929 Sep 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
High five!
I love it when they get all pissy over the simplest things. " I am F'n(*&^(&%, god)(*&(* mother,(*&(*piece of (*&(*,, you ^%%(**(&,,, ass%^(*&,,, cock(*&)(*& ,,,bitch(*&(*,,&moron% ^$^%$&^$ calm.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#214930 Sep 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
YUK!YUK!YUK! The guy's a dope. Like woodyticks.
I just wish it wasn't so easy making them look stupid, need more of a challenge. Think I'll go talk to my birds.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#214931 Sep 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
More of the same nonsense from you again? You are a liar. You do not support marriage equality.
When I ask for you to prove you would support me marrying my sister you run away. Get a real argument.
yet i can show the posts where i clearly state my support for marriage equality and you cannot.

i can also show the posts where you were asked to show your support and you have not yet do so. why is that francis? because you are a lying hypocrite. proven over and over again.
commonpeeps

Monrovia, CA

#214932 Sep 7, 2013
blah da blah da blah da blah.
Gustavo

Hawthorne, CA

#214933 Sep 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You should be a scoutmaster Bluto now that it's OK to be gay. You could teach the boys gay stuff. Like redecorating the campsite and such.
You missed the point stupid .. go back to your drugs
Gustavo

Hawthorne, CA

#214937 Sep 7, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Hard to keep up with the silly jackass he changes his socks so often.
So ... you don't change your panties! at least he changes his socks.
YUK YUK YUK YUK! moron
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214938 Sep 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>why wouldn't you believe me? when you pestered me to show my support for marriage equality, i didn't hesitate at all and gave you that proof.
you, on the other hand, have been asked to do the same and have nto done it once.
you are clearly a hypocrite just in the fact that you beleive you can ask me to support my position, but feel you do not have to do the same. and the fact that you really do not support marriage equality at all.
I don't believe you. You are lying. You don't really support a man marrying his adult daughter. Or Mormon Joe marrying three hot 18 year old brides. Do you now Tick? Convince me. I think you are lying to avoid revealing your hypocrisy.

Get on it! Hup Hup! I want to hear your enthusiastic support. No lukewarm nonsense.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214939 Sep 7, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>I just wish it wasn't so easy making them look stupid, need more of a challenge. Think I'll go talk to my birds.
I have a pet rat that makes more sense than some of these silly jackasses.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214940 Sep 7, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>
You missed the point stupid .. go back to your drugs
No, I got the point. It was that you want to be a gay scoutmaster. Teach the boys cooking and campsite redecorating. Sewing frilly tent curtains and such. Felching around the campfire.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214941 Sep 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yet i can show the posts where i clearly state my support for marriage equality and you cannot.
i can also show the posts where you were asked to show your support and you have not yet do so. why is that francis? because you are a lying hypocrite. proven over and over again.
Try to relax and get on topic. This is not about I hurt your feelings and now you're trying to get even, it's about good people being denied equality by people like you.

OK Power trooper? Get over yourself.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#214942 Sep 7, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
<quoted text>
So ... you don't change your panties! at least he changes his socks.
YUK YUK YUK YUK! moron
Bluto defends Jizzy. Politics makes strange bedfellows.

Bluto and Jizzy. It doesn't get much funnier than that!

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#214943 Sep 7, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
The no longer PRIVATE BSA is holding its conference in TN today. Because of the gays forcing their way into the PRIVATE organization they are now refering to it as the "New" Alternative BSA. Wouldn't be easier to just start your own scouting organization and name it GLBTSA? it would have saved thousands of dollars by not having to change the rule guidlines on what a scout should be. This is another huge inconvinience to the private and hetero community. The GAY cult has an agenda, and that is to fuck up what has been right for ever ... You homos need to start your own schools, and social organizations just like we did. The BSA has lowered its standards and as long as the gay cult continues this roll we will all be second class.
Racial integration was not inexpensive nor easy. Any kind of equality movement that upsets traditional organizations is difficult.

But that's the price you pay to "get it right".

The way I see it, these organizations got to play unfairly for many, many years. Now it's time to pay the piper.

So stop your belly-aching. You have nothing to complain about.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#214944 Sep 7, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said, you aren't very good with math.
And no, WE didn't choose, a judge chose. The WE went against you twice, that's why you cried to the men in black.
If the founding fathers believed that a judiciary wasn't necessary to make sure that various organizations needed to be kept in check from a constitutional standpoint, then they wouldn't have created that branch.

As free Americans we have ever right and responsibility to take an action to the courts for a decision. We weren't the first country to create this kind of system.

"Majority rules" didn't fly during the civil rights era and it's not flying now. The bottom line is that sections of DOMA didn't pass Constitutional muster. And that's why those sections were overturned.

Now it's your turn to cry.

And by the way, my math skills are OK. I don't have to be a genius to figure out basic percentages. If you have different numbers, then I'd be happy to look at them.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#214945 Sep 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
In the face of medical proof, proving it is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning, and a clear abuse of design, you justify it.
Why?
Because it is the only way for gays to portray the intimacy of marriage.
The inherent harm, unhealthiness and demeaning nature of anal sex not only exposes homosexuality as a sexual defect, a failure of mating behavior, it disqualifies equating ss couples to marriage.
When someone points that out, you don't counter with medical proof, you mount a personal attack.
Sad.
As I've said repeatedly recently, if anal sex were the harmful and demeaning act that you portray it to be, then our country would grind to a halt. Anyone who has ever engaged in it would be too ill and too emotionally spiritless to participate in society.

But that isn't the case.

There are risks involved with anal sex. But these risks can easily be eliminated if the proper care is taken.

Besides, as has also been pointed out to you multiple times, not all gay people participate in anal sex. If you let your imagination run free for just a few seconds, I'm sure you can figure out that there are many other ways to be intimate with someone.

This is especially true for lesbians.

No one is trying to copy the kind of intercourse that heterosexuals engage in. That's a ridiculous insinuation. Gay men know what they like and that's what they do.

And "In the End" it all boils down to one simple fact, Kim... It's none of your business.

I think that's what bites at you the most.

The fact that you don't get to tell others what they must do in order to live in your own notion of an ideal world just pisses you off to no end. Your desire to dominate creation is your Achilles heel. It gnaws at you so much that you have spent hundreds (thousands?) of hours reading and preparing comments to post on these TOPIX forums.

What a waste it's been. All you've managed to do is show what an ass you are, make up a few contrived and canned opinions, and write some ridiculous poems.

We've become your mistress, Kim. You probably show us more attention than you do your wife.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Crows Landing Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bella Esmail Moore-Your whole family including ... Aug 17 BELLA ESMAIL MOORE 2
What's that factory west of I-5 at Crow's Landing? (Apr '06) Aug 10 garympdx 71
lander ave Jul '16 joe mama 1
News Former hospital destroyed Jul '16 Dave Esper 1
Assyrian Community- Bring these two into Illino... Jul '16 Bella Esmail Moore 1
reward - reward - bring these 2 assyrians into ... Jul '16 BELLA ESMAIL MOORE 1
Highway from Patterson to The Bay area (Aug '07) Jun '16 Buddy 21

Crows Landing Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Crows Landing Mortgages