Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201862 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181631 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>Hardly. You're too stupid.
Ad hominem dopiness.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181632 Feb 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
1. If marriage is dumbed down to a friendship as a civil right, it does not matter what laws will be affected.
2. Which brings us to your claim that gay marriage won't affect any standing laws. A silly assertion that your own example proves will require legal changes among numerous other consequences.
Smile.
How does smae sex marriage change any laws?

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181633 Feb 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem dopiness.
Ad hominem ,Hello Frankie
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181634 Feb 27, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
OK let me put it in very simple terms for you.
You are trying to say that one leads to another which leads to another etc
Work to get poly legal in one state, a state that already recognizes same sex marriages ( else your argument won’t work ) and then we can discuss if one led to the other.
If Utah recognizes poly, that won’t work, because Utah does not ( and will not soon ) recognize same sex marriages.
The Brown case is in a state ( I think ) which does not recognize same sex marriages so that certainly would not apply as one leading to the other.
The only way you can even start to make the case that one leads to the other is to get Poly recognized in a state that does recognize same sex marriages ( and preferably not in any state that does not ) and then you can just barely start to make the case that one leads to the other.
after that you can work on your sister, and then perhaps your goat if you really want to carry it that far.:)
But before you can make any argument that one leads to another, you need to get one state to recognize it, a state that currently recognizes same sex marriage.
So far… you got zip
Go get google glass and we will watch, it will be fun!
I am saying legalizing same sex marriage will make it much easier to legalize polygamy.

And it will, it's logical, grasshopper. Glad it makes you so silly mad. It makes me happy. I like same sex marriage being allowed I also like poly marriage being allowed.

Marriage is good for society ALL marriages. Not just Big D approved marriages. You have no say in anyone's equal rights. You don't matter. Just grin and bear it. Won't hurt you at all.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#181635 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why aren't the Browns asking for it?
One step at a time.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181636 Feb 27, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
One step at a time.
And Neil Andblowme or whatever his current sock is cringes with each step!

Good! He has found some people find social change very painful.

No pain for Neil Andblowme, no gain for equality.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181637 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
You disagree with that statement?
What statement? The one where I called you an idiot?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181638 Feb 27, 2013
Funny how when Jizzybirdy shows up, the judge-it rigging goes into high gear!

You gotta try and make it credible Jizzy you big stupid galoot!

Too funny. What a dope.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181639 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text> So what? Are you attempting to use an appeal to popularity to prove your point?
That's one of your sidekick Jizzybirdy's best arguments against polygamy. It's not popular enough.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181640 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't make up the rules in Logic. It's Logic 101.
The slippery slope argument is what it is.
The Slippery Slope is a fallacy in which a person asserts that some event must inevitably follow from another without any argument for the inevitability of the event in question. In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed.
let's try this ploy:
In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed.
In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed.
In most cases, there are a series of steps or gradations between one event and the one in question and no reason is given as to why the intervening steps or gradations will simply be bypassed.
Making the connection between same-sex marriage legalization leading to poly and incestuous marriages does not meet the definition of a slippery slope argument as the connection is already being made. Both in the US and in other countries.

Perhaps you should read that definition a little slower next time.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#181641 Feb 27, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>How does smae sex marriage change any laws?
Did you really ask this question?

Tax Laws/ Social Security Laws/ Business Law/Medical Laws and Regulations/Insurance Laws and Regulations......
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181642 Feb 27, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you really ask this question?
Tax Laws/ Social Security Laws/ Business Law/Medical Laws and Regulations/Insurance Laws and Regulations......
Jizzybird's stupidity often baffles me too.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181643 Feb 27, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Making the connection between same-sex marriage legalization leading to poly and incestuous marriages does not meet the definition of a slippery slope argument as the connection is already being made. Both in the US and in other countries.
Perhaps you should read that definition a little slower next time.
Xavier Breath or whatever his current sock is gets very angry and irrational.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181644 Feb 27, 2013
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you really ask this question?
Tax Laws/ Social Security Laws/ Business Law/Medical Laws and Regulations/Insurance Laws and Regulations......
Why its still two people.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181645 Feb 27, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Xavier Breath or whatever his current sock is gets very angry and irrational.
Damn you are stuck on stupid
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181646 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text> No it isn't. Bigamy laws were on the books well before DOMA.
We know that Miss thing. But a law that says marriage is only one man one woman effectively bans polygamy too.

It's demise is one more step in the right direction towards true equality. Sorry to horn in on your equal protection, I know, so gauche.

But rights are not limited no need to be greedy! We won't take much anyway, just the same as what you got. That's fair right? Xavier?...right?...Xavier?...

We're here! Were Poly! And we're in Mona Lott's face!(and it makes him silly-mad and stupid!)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#181648 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? What law is that?
Equal rights for friendships to be called marriage with no legitimate reason to limit the number.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#181649 Feb 27, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You said "anytime, anywhere"
wrong... the time is now, the place is here in the US
I'm referring to the time period of a culture as a whole. You attempt to equate the brief decade of gay 'marriage' pursuit with the consistent practice of polygamy throughout the history of America... while ignoring the prevalence and acceptance of polygamy past and present.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#181650 Feb 27, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text> So what? Are you attempting to use an appeal to popularity to prove your point?
Apparently you are not aware of what the point was.
Smirk.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#181651 Feb 27, 2013
Lilith_Kill_Christains wrote:
<quoted text>Hey Spanky Rizzo... STFU
Great argument. Are you a student of Jizzybirdy?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Crows Landing Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Assyrian Community ( ROMEL ESMAIL WANTED FOR FR... Jun 8 Bella Esmail Moore 3
What's that factory west of I-5 at Crow's Landing? (Apr '06) May 30 Denny R 67
romel esmail & bella esmail moore (Oct '15) May '16 Romel Esmail wanted 9
Teen Challenge Exposed! (Nov '07) May '16 Aspen 236
News Panel favors higher density for Stanislaus housing (Sep '13) May '16 Laura 2
News Top firefighters from Merced County honored for... Apr '16 Lucy Jane 1
do not move to the city of patterson!!!!!!!!!!!... (Apr '10) Apr '16 Buddy 8
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Crows Landing Mortgages