Oh Heavenly Marijuana! Boulder, Colorado ministry lets you buy,...

[chuck]

hello....does anyone know the address to the place?

[Allan]

Colorado Kidd wrote:

Other that a minority of patients in need,(who I have deepest sympathy for) it is just an excuse for do-nothing, burned out hippies to get legally baked. Boulder is full of them.....the 60's are long gone man. You can BS some but not most of us !!

Who is US ???
You are in the minority Kidd , so wake up and smell the beautiful cannabis flowers

[Northern Cali Sac-town]

just pass the Law why dont you.

[Tony]

LEGALIZE NOW! Alcohol and prescription drugs kill more people in the US. I have never heard of anyone dying from cannabis.

[Religion]

It seems that, Heidi was making fun of anothers religion?

Is public mockery of someones religion a hate crime? I believe it is.

[legalize freedom]

Just legalize! It is a plant "God" put here, it has medical purposes that help people.
And to all the people who say they are against it is full of bologna because if it were legal you as do i would smoke everyday.
LDS people are against it but how many lds people look at porn and drink some type of caffeine.
Marijuana is not bad it never has been

[Paul Smith]

Someone better talk to this priest before the United Nations sends in it multi-nation army.

UNODC is a global leader in the fight against illicit drugs and international crime. Established in 1997 through a merger between the United Nations Drug Control Programme and the Centre for International Crime Prevention,

[benjamin]

BTDT wrote:

<quoted text>
When I want some half wit fool to perform a study that says whatever I want it to say I’ll drop you a line. Till then we get to deal with both drunks and now stoners behind the wheel. Both are impaired. We just need a better working definition.
DWI needs to include a measurable, definable level of THC in the blood that renders one Too “Impaired” to drive. They idea that THC does no such thing fails the smell test of anyone who has done it as an adult.
Go get just as fried as you want. Just don’t toke and drive.

normaly when I want a half wit telling me facts I read a government report. That being said I agree that some measurable limit needs to be determined, however someone who smoked a joint two days ago will still have THC in their blood. As long as someone can pass a field sobriety test they should be let go. People should be safe and know their limits. The side of heavy prescription medications say not to drive of operate machinery until you know the effects they will have on you. The same should be applied to cannabis. When used responsibly by adults it is a safer recreational drug than alcohol. Maybe thats the point, the states likes busting people for D.U.I.

[Parks and Rec]

Eastwood wrote:

<quoted text>
It's called DOPE for a reason genus !!

They call heroin dope too. Are you saying anything labeled as 'dope' all does the same thing to you?

This is not an argument.

[Parks and Rec]

irishman420 wrote:

<quoted text>
actually there is no proven way to test drivers for smoking pot. there are two ways that they would test if your impaired. one is the roadside test, the other is checking your pulse several times to see if your heartbeat is irregular. but police can't PROVE beyond a reasonable doubt that your high. its not like they have a breathalyzer for pot.

You can blow HALF the legal limit or even zeros and if you fail the roadside the police can site you w/ a DUI.

[Cid]

I agree with Robert... I see no reason for not legalizing marijuana!

[pearl2purl]

Rev Brandon wrote:

Jesus was almost certainly a cannabis user and an early proponent of the medicinal properties of the drug, according to a study of scriptural texts published this month. The study suggests that Jesus and his disciples used the drug to carry out miraculous healings.
The anointing oil used by Jesus and his disciples contained an ingredient called kaneh-bosem which has since been identified as cannabis extract, according to an article by Chris Bennett in the drugs magazine, High Times, entitled Was Jesus a Stoner? The incense used by Jesus in ceremonies also contained a cannabis extract, suggests Mr Bennett, who quotes scholars to back his claims.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jan/06/s...

I will be anxiously searching for this evidence, as I also feel, as a natural healer, that this medicine has valuable properties for us to use. I have always believed that all herbs, minerals and such were put here for us to use RESPONSIBLY, and as long as we do this it will be a blessing ...
Love that they (archaeologists) have "busted" the oldest stash in the world to date ... proving the material (thought to be coriander at the time) to be cannabis. I knew it was when I saw those HUGE tiger-striped seeds!!! Had to be a
"Kush" strain, if I'm not mistaken ...

[bud 420 24 7]

awesome

[offended]

I have found much relief from the use of MMJ over the past few months. Previously I had migraines that would send me straight to bed and my only options were synthetic medications that would inevitably lead to an opiate hangover. Now because of my licence, I have more options including ingesting the medication in tincture form rather than harming my lungs by smoking. Regardless of whether the anchors believe that MMJ is valid or not, I find it terribly rude they way the laugh whenever they comment on it. I understand the idea of a pot ministry is different from MMJ but it is still in the same vein. Calling the document "funny" and then laughing as you pass it around is a gross violation of a reporters duty to remain neutral while reporting facts. To top it off this station is not the only one to giggle like stoned teens when the word marijuana comes up. Please take your responsibilities seriously and report without bias, smirks, or giggles.

[Offended Too]

offended wrote:

I have found much relief from the use of MMJ over the past few months. Previously I had migraines that would send me straight to bed and my only options were synthetic medications that would inevitably lead to an opiate hangover. Now because of my licence, I have more options including ingesting the medication in tincture form rather than harming my lungs by smoking. Regardless of whether the anchors believe that MMJ is valid or not, I find it terribly rude they way the laugh whenever they comment on it. I understand the idea of a pot ministry is different from MMJ but it is still in the same vein. Calling the document "funny" and then laughing as you pass it around is a gross violation of a reporters duty to remain neutral while reporting facts. To top it off this station is not the only one to giggle like stoned teens when the word marijuana comes up. Please take your responsibilities seriously and report without bias, smirks, or giggles.

Far Out.....I'm offended too....lets fire one up and grub down on some Cheetos !!

[chuck]

Still all i hear are people ranting and raving.....all i want is the address in Boulder.....can anyone help me out here? What's the address to the thc ministry, please.

[Len]

Colorado Kidd wrote:

Other that a minority of patients in need,(who I have deepest sympathy for) it is just an excuse for do-nothing, burned out hippies to get legally baked. Boulder is full of them.....the 60's are long gone man. You can BS some but not most of us !!

Quite obvious to me that the Gov't propaganda and BS worked very well on you.

[Colorado Kidd]

Len wrote:

<quoted text>
Quite obvious to me that the Gov't propaganda and BS worked very well on you.

Yeah maaannn……it’s a government conspiracy maaannn.
Typical pot head paranoia……stay in your house and hug your lava lamp, The CIA is probably watching you right now.

[Len]

Colorado Kidd wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah maaannn……it’s a government conspiracy maaannn.
Typical pot head paranoia……stay in your house and hug your lava lamp, The CIA is probably watching you right now.

OHHHH, you got me !!!! Your wit is too much for my brain to bear (sarcasm, since you may not pick up on it)

It's not paranoia, it's called researching the facts, you ought to try it sometime since all you have is stereotypes and Gov't misinformation rattling around in your head. Such a Lemming.

[Jack Davis]

I don't know why TV stations and reporters always have to slant the news instead of reporting it. In this case the writing in the opening paragraph clearly demonstrates a bias against the entire pot-smoking idea.

Just face up to the fact that some people want to smoke marijuana for whatever reason like others drink wine or scotch. I am not a user, by the way, but it seems silly that a drug like this that has far, far fewer documented untoward effects than liquor should be denied to people who want to use it--especially if it helps fight chronic pain.

Many of these reporters are the same folks who are regular binge drinkers and who probably drive drunk on a weekly basis. Hypocrites. Give me a break.