let the n .w. a. c. p. handle jamie bryant court case.

this is the only way to have a fair trail .we have not forgot you pete we love and miss you so and you can bet we will be there for opening statements in sept.

Did you mean NAACP?

time to pay for it son wrote:

this is the only way to have a fair trail .we have not forgot you pete we love and miss you so and you can bet we will be there for opening statements in sept.

what a retard you are!!

theres no reason to be ugly!i believe you made a spelling mishap as well.its not stoooopid i believe the word you want is stupid!

i believe i meant to spell stupid as stoooopid, whereas dumba$$ put NWACP. LOL LOL!!! and as far as a fair trial? better take that sh*t outta this town!! ha supporting jamie btw ;)

It would appear that the thread starter has a bit of difficulty with the English language and seems to be confusing the wrestling federation with a civil rights group. The gist of the message is that they think Jamie Bryant will somehow get away with murder & possibly hit the trail after his trial. That's highly doubtful and I doubt the NAACP has any interest in this particular case. There was no racial motivation in this murder, just a dope fiend versus his alleged dealer. I would like to think that a jury of 12 people will see it for what it is and put Jamie Bryant where he belongs, behind bars for life. He has no place in a civilized society. As nice as Pete was it is unfortunate that if you live by the sword you die by the sword. Lifestyle choices can be the death of you.

WTF wrote:

It would appear that the thread starter has a bit of difficulty with the English language and seems to be confusing the wrestling federation with a civil rights group.

lmmfao! Oh my, I cannot stop laughing! My gut hurts now!

oh my whew!

NWACP = Natives, Whites, And Colored People

I believe that time to pay for it son is trying to speak of all of petes dear friends that want jamie to pay for petes death.and if a person hits the wrong keys or makes a typeing error that is no crime .i believe that time to pay for it is trying to express how much pete ment to them with love.and really when a killer gets less time than a drug dealer thats wrong and there is a lot of that going on in covington just think back to scott persinger . we love and miss you scott.

NWACP wrote:

oh my whew!
NWACP = Natives, Whites, And Colored People

this could work!

SToooopid wrote:

i believe i meant to spell stupid as stoooopid, whereas dumba$$ put NWACP. LOL LOL!!! and as far as a fair trial? better take that sh*t outta this town!! ha supporting jamie btw ;)

well we know you believe in murder wink wink bang bang of course you would defend a murder pete did not deserve to die over a drug fix.

ok ha wrote:

<quoted text>well we know you believe in murder wink wink bang bang of course you would defend a murder pete did not deserve to die over a drug fix.

as a matter of fact i do believe in murder, esp when you are defending yourself or what is yours wink wink bang bang ker plunk ;)

hay dummy stoooopid in cov va. why dont you just say it and stop being a coward you think if a black guy killed a white guy that it would be ok and by the way your boy jamie is a creacker who got way there on crack what you think about your boy if he gets the chair or a life time trip to prison that would be so funny. your boy jamie love to suck on a crack stem and could not get a date without takeing ad vanage of a minor skum bag of the earth a would pull the handle to fry jamie and laugh when you could smell the hair burning.

SToooopid wrote:

<quoted text>as a matter of fact i do believe in murder, esp when you are defending yourself or what is yours wink wink bang bang ker plunk ;)

are you insinuating that there may be a self defense theory and that the killer was protecting his property from a burglar? seriously? or are you referring to another situation that just recently had a seemingly unjust outcome?

WTF wrote:

<quoted text>
are you insinuating that there may be a self defense theory and that the killer was protecting his property from a burglar? seriously? or are you referring to another situation that just recently had a seemingly unjust outcome?

not referring to anything except ha oks comment, i said i believe in murder when defending yourself or your property, always have, always will.

excuse me but the crack head wasn't defending himself or his property he just wanted a free quick crack high and he deserves to punished to the max he is an animal!

Ok i just found this site and i am Pete's best friend i read all comments and people have a right to their opinion i am asking why would he Pete have to rob Jamie we all know what life both led something terrible happened to my loved one at the hands of a desperate man no matter what u say about him or what he may have done wrong in life he didn't deserve to die and if it was the other way around wouldn't you want your friend alive .

hay unbelievable thats what i have been trying to say you nailed it i loved pete we had so much fun together i miss him so much.

He didn't deserve to die, no one has the right to take someone's life, unless theres no other option, I.e., self defense. But they both knew the risks of dealing/seeking drugs. Everyone knows the element that exists in drug circles, at any time of the day, especially, in the middle of the night. It's a bad scene, risky behavior, with risky people who are on drugs. Let's not pretend this happened over tea and crumpets. Take care to make better decisions for yourself and your family.

Thanks i appreciate the support in this in the after math of what has happened to my dear friend