Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201808 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169947 Dec 5, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
My opinion?
Is it your opinion that- Lincoln, slavery, the southern states, and the 13th Amendment are NOT related to the Civil War?
By the way this is yet another lie.

I never stated Lincoln, slavery, the Southern states and the 13th Amendment were not related to the Civil War.

Disagree???

Find the post liar or better yet stick to the subject at hand...gays marrying.
GodZilla

Toronto, Canada

#169948 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Muskets, cannons, cavalries, brother killing brother over ideology, the decimation of the South, etc. was all related to the Civil War.
Are we discussing gay marriage or are we discussing the Civil War DUMBFUCK.
The inclusiuon of the 13th Amendment was used as an illustration to your dumb as a rock ass in explaining why the Amendments exist.
Now if you're so fucking lost in this topic of same sexed marriages that you want to discuss the fashions women wore in 1862 I suggest you find another thread moron.
And that's called hitting the nail on the head my friend! LoL,Thanks for all you put up with and keeping the thread on track! AK is famous for babbling on about nothing that has to do with the topic,like many others on here like Dandy Randy the douche and Mike who is even worse and is usually off topic with every meaningless post he writes! Mike claims to be for equality but it's funny as the only one's he's ever supported are the bigots and the one's who are against equality! To bad as they've driven off most of the good souls who used to post here!
Dan C

Roseville, CA

#169949 Dec 5, 2012
GodZilla wrote:
<quoted text>
And that's called hitting the nail on the head my friend! LoL,Thanks for all you put up with and keeping the thread on track! AK is famous for babbling on about nothing that has to do with the topic,like many others on here like Dandy Randy the douche and Mike who is even worse and is usually off topic with every meaningless post he writes! Mike claims to be for equality but it's funny as the only one's he's ever supported are the bigots and the one's who are against equality! To bad as they've driven off most of the good souls who used to post here!
AK is a game player. He'll eventually just start lying as some means of saving face and it will be about then I'll stop responding to his nonsense.

This posting is nothing other than an excercize in having fun. It might be an insight to some of those opposed to gay marriage but little else.

I have more than a few Tea Party friends that are close an dear to me and one thing I've noticed is they don't play games like Mike and AK do. They merely determine a stance in their mind either on religion or something else and will staunchly refuse to effectively argue the subject of same sex marriage based on an opinion and set of reasoning they lodged there like a grape seed jammed in between two teeth.

If our leaders listened to rationale rather than emotional response gays would have been able to be married nationwide back in 2004.

It will happen eventually anyway.

I get tired of dealing with Mike and AK and others myself and will be gone for awhile but this TOPIX is like a bad habit.

I'm beat...gotta sleep given I'll be at work in 6 hours.

Sorry for the wordy posts. And have a good week...myself I'm jazzed we're slapping eight million Christmas lights on the SUV again this year only to drive around and blind people while tempting cops to ticket us.

LOL!!!
DorN

La Puente, CA

#169950 Dec 5, 2012
It is legal for a gay MAN to marry a atraight WOMAN.
It is also legal for a gay WOMAN to marry a straight MAN.
That does not seem right to me.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169952 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Never said that liar.
Next.
Yes you did liar.

"Next". What a jerk!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169953 Dec 5, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did the founders include "harm" in their idea of personal freedom and liberty?
If you are going to cite the founders, I suggest you not interject your own opinions into their words.
And when the founders spoke of "freedom and liberty" they included PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Your freedom to be you included my freedom to be free from you. But since we have become a society where we will cater to failure, punish success, and pander to those with a hand out- we are a long way from every truly being as free as we once were.
Dan just likes the sound of some words and he thinks it makes him sound smart but it's so silly!: "inherent harm" "a full set of liberties" "our government was formatted" and much more!

I love Dan-speak. It's so dopey!

Funny!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169954 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
I begin to wonder if you call your own dick a troll at this point.
Do you now? That's a strange fantasy but keep that kind of stuff to yourself Romeo!

Dick a troll. What a perv!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169955 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah....I'm familiar with Constitution and the introduction of the Amendments by our Founding Fathers in that they knew there would be aspects dealing with the freedoms of Americans that would come up.
Very forward thinking by them.
Lincoln was able to pass the 13th Amendment for instance which abolished slavery.
So no dumbfuck...it's not a matter of me interjecting anything. It's already there and has been acted upon.
As far as freedoms which groups and some individuals clamor for they are reviewed on the basis of harm. Fact.
You really need to go to school one day or at least do a little studying prior to holding your obviouss idiotic opinions which you seem so willing to share in here.
Now there's a group who think having sex with little boys is the best treat out there. And many of them think it should be made legal. They think it should be a right...an allowed freedom. They claim the little boys like it and it only adds to their experience in life.
Now hopefully you're in the same camp I am in that we know it produces harm. Therefore it will never be a freedom the members of NAMBLA (the pedophiles group who thinks little Boy Scouts are a tasty treat) will be able to have because of this.
As far as gays wanting to marry...they should be able to. There is no inherent harm found and it is a freedom a grouping of Americans want.
Now before you go back to playing your sad game of why not polygamy you need to take that up with the government...not me. They determined harm in it. I myself could care less unless those reasons I gave earlier apply.
Kindle. They make Kindles which are online books. Get one. Read a little about the world and especially our nation before spouting off even more ignorance.
Have a good night punk.
Too long and dumb but I suffered through it.

Hey Dan, before you go back to your sad game of why not same sex marriage take it up with the government not me...bla bla bla..

How does that sound bigot? Wanting marriage equality is a "sad game" for polygamists but a noble righteous cause for same sex marriages?

Please explain and justify this dopey bigoted nonsense. We won't wait.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169956 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee...I don't know about that...it was your internet buddy "Hudson" who talking about jerking off.
He's not MY buddy in here...
LOL!!!
You said his dick was a troll jackass. What was that about?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169957 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Err...
...Here's what you stated in the post of which I was referring to;
"So because they are small in number they do not deserve equal rights?
Interesting, in less than a page you have managed to single-handedly dismantle two of your argument's- the argument of equality in marriage rights, and the -a vote of the majority cannot take away the rights of the majority.
Congratulations moron."
Again...no one gives a shit if polygamists get married.
I'll say it again...no one cares if polygamists get married.
Third time since you're fucking stupid...no one cares if polygamists get married.
---Where did I state they should be denied getting married because of their numbers moron.
You lying sack of shit.
I'd bet hard earned money you can't hold a job longer than 3 months because your reasoning is so polluted.
Am I right??
LOL!!!
Now you're changing your tune! Glad our posts made you aware of your bigotry and that you're working on losing it. But come all the way jackass, lose the "I don't give a sh!t" you're not very convincing you support equal rights when you say it like that.

What, now you're Mormon Mike all of a sudden? Too funny!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169958 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
You never mentioned 'secession'.
You advised of 'succession' dumbfuck.
Your post #169895;
"So you do not believe in the right of succession?
---Go to school, you ignorant moron before entering any more posts....really.
Because as it is you're just being stupid.
Our founders did."
Dan pounces on a typo since he's lost the argument. Priceless!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#169959 Dec 5, 2012
People, look up the term "democratic republic"

the US is the first example given.

We are both a democracy of the representative type, and a republic.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169960 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
There are more than ten Amendments to the Constitution. And freedoms are duly argued in regards to harm they may cause.
You sir are a complete fool.
So dumb. But so silly-funny too!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169961 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no reason to be angry.
I'm not gay.
I instead give you facts and you in turn play games.
You're fast approaching the point of being too worthless and stupid to respond to.
This is the part where Dan suddenly wants to return to his exciting active social life which us losers don't have!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169962 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
The point behind the Amendments dealt with the fact they were set in motion my foolish friend.
There were never intended to stop at ten and our country was intended to live past the deaths of our Founding Fathers by them.
Rights are determined in part by harm. If they are proven to cause harm then they in turn are rejected.
Amendments "set in motion" another funny Dan-ism! Keep em coming you big dopey galoot! I love it.

Too Funny!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169963 Dec 5, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Your right Dan- I cannot identify the elements of a BSAIC civil right.
Perhaps you could explain it to me?
Oh boy! This should be good.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169964 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Really.
There are many rebublic formats of government of which some are not wholly based on the democratic format.
Please...you tire me with your stupidity.
"rebublic formats" and "democratic formats" Wow!

Too Funny!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169965 Dec 5, 2012
Ralphie wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is WasteWater when we need him. ROTFLMAO
You're so silly toots!

"Ralphie"?

Where's Lulu and that dopey parrot?

Fun!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169966 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
So your wording of 'succession' was actually to mean 'secede'.
Interesting.
Hardly a typo but maybe when you head to the store and ask them where the apples are and you meant oranges it was their fault for the misunderstanding as well.
You're an idiot.
Cut and paste from one of your dopey posts: "There are many rebublic formats of government". What's rebublic?

When you go to the store and ask them bla bla bla...

What a dope!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169967 Dec 5, 2012
Dan C wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah I did.
You are too stupid to respond to so it's mt bad for doing so.
Too Funny!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Costa Mesa Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Anti-Asian discrimination claims at Harvard rev... 25 min Ainu 1
Doctors Internet 59 min Lisa DDS 1
News Gang member gets 40 to life for shooting father... (Apr '10) 2 hr ahmoc 161
Passtcert vmware 2v0-641 practice exams 14 hr howard 1
How to Stop iTunes’ Long Backup Process for iPhone 15 hr WenBoarman 1
Review: National Servicing Center 17 hr Mortgage Scam 1
News Buena Parka s La Mirada Boulevard closure doesn... (Oct '14) Wed bp bill 4
More from around the web

Costa Mesa People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]