I wasn't wrong, based on what had happens PRIOR to my statement. It HAD moved on at that time.<quoted text>
59 was in direct response to 58 so it was only appropriate that 58 be included as part of the discussion. Either way you were wrong. But you lack the character to issue a mea culpa.
Who said it was YOUR responsibility? All I said was you don't get to declare when a discussion is over and when people have "moved on". It's obvious you did so because you didn't want to address your obvious contradiction. Which you STILL don't.
I was here long enough and you apparently cared enough to have a discussion up to and until your position was being shown up for the contradiction it is.
Of course it does. You claim his plan, if he exists, includes everything...bad and good, yet also claim that you don't believe that he wants people to behave badly. No one creates a plan that he does not WANT to come to fruition. Yoiu can't have it both ways. If bad is part of his plan then he cannot NOT want it to happen.
Your MO when you are being shown up for a fool is to either
a) ignore and claim the conversation has moved on...or
b) claim your antagonist is some dog with a bone
My conversation was with YOU. No one else. And your interest in engaging in it was just fine until you were exposed as a phony. Then your interest conveniently disappears.
You lack any semblance of character.
You ARE like a dog with a bone. Saying so is not foolish at all when it's no more than the truth.
Yes, JUST with me, which proves you don't really care, and are just nitpicking. Which means you're only here for attention (just like Dic and Worships Himself), and are not worth bothering with.
I couldn't care less what you think of me. You're not that important.