Arrest

Posted in the Connersville Forum

Comments (Page 3)

Showing posts 41 - 60 of75
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
just sayin

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Dec 4, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

i think the fat s.o.b. should be hung by his balls then shot
Duh

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

4

2

1

So his defense is...he thought it was legal to give a minor pornographic materials. In the state of Indiana to purchase pornographic materials you must be 18 yrs old, so his defense is invalid. He knew exactly what he was doing was illegal no matter what his intentions were,he broke the law and should be punished accordingly.
wow

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

I never said ignorance was his defense. I said he was NOT a pedophile.
noe

Round Lake, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Dec 5, 2012
 
Explain wrote:
I don't understand how he's a pedo like everyone is saying he is. He didn't prey on the kids, right? He sent boys pictures of girls I thought? Being a pedo means he wants to have sex with the underage boys, not send them pictures of straight sex and girls.
Did I miss something in the news stories here?
no, he's not, people just dont read the whole thing all they see is the title and they make their own conclusions i mean what he did was wrong yeah but he didnt try to get with the teens only sent them pictures of girls and sex basically hes just a really creepy idiot who gave porn to teenagers and probably shouldnt be around kids for a long time after he gets out of jail
not passing judgment

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

I guess every father should be arrested if their 16yr old sons finds their stash of Playboys. Smh.
wondering

Rockford, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

noe wrote:
<quoted text>
no, he's not, people just dont read the whole thing all they see is the title and they make their own conclusions i mean what he did was wrong yeah but he didnt try to get with the teens only sent them pictures of girls and sex basically hes just a really creepy idiot who gave porn to teenagers and probably shouldnt be around kids for a long time after he gets out of jail
he was obviously getting off on doing this which is a pedophile in my book!
Eddie

Downers Grove, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

not passing judgment wrote:
I guess every father should be arrested if their 16yr old sons finds their stash of Playboys. Smh.
Only if the fathers sends the material to their children or other children. Doesn't anyone who is defending this guy believe that sending the porn could have been his way of soften up the boys so he could rape them? Brian likes the dudes sexually. We will never know true intent, but a 42 year old man should not be sending porn to 16, 17 year old boys. Period! I would be willing to bet he thought it was ok, due to him thinking the age of consent to have sex is 16. I do not know if there is an age of consent, but people seem to think there is. And I would bet Brian did too.
llo

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

not passing judgment wrote:
I guess every father should be arrested if their 16yr old sons finds their stash of Playboys. Smh.
Find versus give. One is a minor finding legally-owned entertainment located in the same household by way of chance or subterfuge, the other carries intent to illegally distribute the material on the part of the responsible adult. Both have consequences, but the "accidental discovery" example's consequences are varied by situation and multifaceted by nature while the latter "intentionally gave" example is flat-out illegal in any condition.

The man in question here very intentionally gave adult material to a minor. That is illegal under any condition. Whether he knew it was or whether he meant to cause harm is irrelevant to the act itself.
Hugh

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Much to do about nothing. I wish I would have had access to naked pictures of women at age 16 or 17. Oh i did. It was every dad's stash of Playboy and late night Skinamax.
I agree

Paoli, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Hugh wrote:
Much to do about nothing. I wish I would have had access to naked pictures of women at age 16 or 17. Oh i did. It was every dad's stash of Playboy and late night Skinamax.
It is totally laughable how some people on here are making this giant deal about this situation. Calling names like pedophile and predator is uneducated at best. How naive are these people thinking the teen-agers cant see this type of materials whenever and wherever they want. How are we to know the very same pictures he passed on by the cell phone werent passed to him by a minor or how many times the minors passed these pictures among themselves before this happened. Is there no law for minors possessing adult materials or providing other minors with adult materials via cell phone. How many times has an adult taken their children to the cinema or rented a movie to watch at home with the warning of content brief nudity or strong sexual content right there on the screen and allowed the minor to view the movie anyway. He broke the law, yes but circumstances as they are should be taken into consideration on what to charge him with and the severity of the sentence. To put him in prison for this would be a miscarriage of justice. Hell it is illegal for these damn soccer moms to be speeding in a residential neighbor with a cell phone glued to their ear but they do it anyway and could hurt a child alot quicker than anything Brian has ever done. If you are going to blame anybody or anything in this case blame modern technology and the very slack restrictions on how easy this material is accessible to anybody who wishes to view it.
Who is twisted

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

You label this guy a pervert and think it is deplorable behavior.

But you let your kids or condone;

Go to R rated movies
Play adult rated video games
Watch inappropriate shows on tv or the internet
Use illegal drugs
Drink alcohol
Be disrectful

You voted for politicans that;

Admit to using cocaine and other drugs
Support Infanticide
Have sex with interns
Support Legalization of marijuana and other drugs
Support abortion but not the death penalty
Support gay marriage

A fat simpleton sending pictures of women to the mentioned teens should be the least of your concerns.
I agree

Paoli, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Totally agree point in case if you sold the movie Roadhouse at a yard sale to a minor and he/she went home to watch it and the part where Patrick Swayze gets up out of bed and his total naked ass is right there in your face big as Dallas, are they gonna arrest me for providing adult materials to a minor, better yet are they going to get Wal-mart for selling the same movie to a minor
wow

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Some of you need to look up the definition of a pedophile before you start calling someone a name like that. I'm not defending this guy by any means, but I don't see how he is a predator. From what I read, all he did was send pictures of naked women to some teenagers. That is wrong and he should have felt wrong doing it. But, jumping to all these conclusions are ridiculous. Everything that everyone is saying is a bunch of assumptions and conclusions that have no real basis. I know plenty of grown men that forward text messages with pictures of naked women to each other. Does that mean these men are trying to soften up their friends so that they can have sexual relations with them? I doubt it. I would be more concerned if he had been sending them pictures of himself. I feel like everyone has made a huge deal out of something stupid. No, I wouldn't want a grown man sending my teenage son pictures of naked women, but I wouldn't have found it necessary to go to authorities either. I would have definitely had a talk with this man about how I felt about his behavior. People jump to extremes with everything anymore, and it's all because they jump to ridiculous assumptions. Has anyone ever heard the saying "to assume makes an ass out of u and me"? Think about that one.
Right At You

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Dec 5, 2012
 
Lets see what Mr Maines does! You would think he would help him.(BUSTED)
ummmm

Portage, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Walmart IDs kids the register not allowed the sale without ID . my kids got refused a game just for that reason.
I agree wrote:
Totally agree point in case if you sold the movie Roadhouse at a yard sale to a minor and he/she went home to watch it and the part where Patrick Swayze gets up out of bed and his total naked ass is right there in your face big as Dallas, are they gonna arrest me for providing adult materials to a minor, better yet are they going to get Wal-mart for selling the same movie to a minor
wow

Madison, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

I can remember being in elementary school at 4-h and thinking that he was weird. My mom would tell me not to be alone around him. At age 23 now this story really isn't a big surprise. No i don't think he is a pedophile unless more hidden evidence comes out. However, he can't play the I didn't know it wasn't ok act. Yes they might have been just the dirty fowards people send around on phones. But those are sent around by peers. Not a adult to children. So I guess people defending this it would be ok for your kids high school teacher or coach to be sending stuff like this no it wouldn't. I'm not saying hang the man but I think we should all be able to agree he over stepped a boundary.
yoyo

Connersville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Dec 5, 2012
 
agree wrote:
<quoted text> Everyone with kids will be sleeping better at night knowing the pedophile predator is off the streets. You people that sit here and defend this guy answer me this, how would you feel if it was you're child getting pictures sent to by this man? Would you let this guy watch you're child alone?
well i would end him but we dont know all the facts maybe the kid or kids started the sending of pic if they did they need to do time as well but its the same old connersville
I agree

Marengo, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ummmm wrote:
Walmart IDs kids the register not allowed the sale without ID . my kids got refused a game just for that reason.
<quoted text>
I would be willing to wager money that I could send a minor to Walmart and they could buy a movie that has nudity in it.
crazy mom

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#61
Dec 5, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

this is so funny! Not what the man did but how it all came down.

One 17 year old boys Mother walked in and caught him masterbating to porn on his phone. The mother flipped out! Went crazy nuts! You know, like they did back in the 50's over this subject. Took the boys phone, computer, video games, etc and cut him off from all contact with friends. Basically grounded him.

So that not being enough she goes thru his cell phone and finds the phone number that the porn came from. She then takes it to police and alas we are now talking about it on topix.

This mother is NUTS! All teenage boys masterbate. She just didn't want to think her son would! She should have just turned around and walked out the door and closed it behind her.

The boy is 17, a junior in high school and has to live with the fact that everyone now knows that 1) his mom caught him wacking the weasel, and 2) his mom is a total NUTCASE!

If the man intentionally sent porn to minors, then he should be punished. I just thought everyone would like to know how he got caught.

This is true. I feel sorry for the boy, the shame and embarrassment this mother has put on this poor kid!
Parent

Liberty, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62
Dec 5, 2012
 
You are absolutely correct!
cvillewoman wrote:
sexual predators often choose a job or hobby to get close to children. 4H would be a great way of doing this.Thry "groom" the children into being their friend.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 41 - 60 of75
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

73 Users are viewing the Connersville Forum right now

Search the Connersville Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Wade Whitaker 12 min Looking for Wade 8
angie benz 20 min mike 13
Word Association Game (Jan '10) 36 min Vector aka Victor Perkins 3,142
Keep A Word, Drop A Word (Mar '10) 40 min Vector aka Victor Perkins 7,064
Alphabet Game 42 min Vector aka Victor Perkins 955
Five letter word game (Jan '11) 46 min Vector aka Victor Perkins 3,621
Four Vowel Word Game (Jul '13) 50 min Vector aka Victor Perkins 936
Lying Mayor 2 hr Only a few 54
Swifty stations are done! 5 hr SUE 8
•••
•••
•••
•••

Connersville Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Connersville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••