Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
UrNumber2

Canton, OH

#17474 Jan 27, 2013
Rakk wrote:
<quoted text>
Ohio has had the same temps in the past during the same season. Did you forget all the emails that proved must data on man made global warming false!
You mean the emails that were later found to be blown out of proportion by the oil lobby? Let's ask the highest temps in recorded weather history who is right. For the idiots who are calling 60 degree temps in January "normal" here in Ohio, not according to the 45 years I've lived here. Now tell us some more about how you know more than NASA and the overwhelming majority of experts on global weather trends. Oh and wipe that crude oil from around your mouth when you speak to me.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#17475 Jan 27, 2013
UrNumber2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry if I don't live my life in fear of what's spoon fed to me like you do. Is Capitalism so fragile? Wonder why?
Because with 'progressives' making it harder for someone to be successful with 'wealth distribution', it is clearly easier for many to sit on their duffs as recipients of that 'redistribution' while the hard working, budget keepers supplying goods & services get beat down.
Don't get me wrong, I believe in safety nets & assistance, NOT perpetual support like it has become for so many.
In a convaluted way, even that is a sample of capitalism.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#17476 Jan 27, 2013
UrNumber2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry if I don't live my life in fear of what's spoon fed to me like you do. Let's ask Joe McCarthy how that whole "commie behind every bush" tactic worked out. Red Scare 2.0 blah blah blah. Is Capitalism so fragile? Wonder why?
Capitalism? No. Freedom? Yes.

When we have a person in power who is supported by communists, then it's something that everybody should worry about.

Let's take a look at DumBama's record when it comes to problems and solutions:

Global Warming......... more government
Health Care ..........more government
School Shootings........more government
School Loans..........more government
Birth Control Pills.......more government
Bank Loans..........more government
Tobacco Usage..........more government
Firearms Choice.........more government
ATM fees..........more government
Green Energy..........more government
Economy..........more government

So what's wrong with more government? The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.

Let me put it another way. Maybe this happened to you or somebody you knew when you were younger:

You turn 18 years old, now officially an adult. You can join the military if you desire, smoke cigarettes legally, register to vote, be legally responsible for your own actions, move to your own apartment, a variety of freedoms you didn't have while under age.

Just getting started in life, you have limited resources when it comes to money. As most parents do, they offer to keep housing you, but you must help support the household. They charge you room and board.

You're 18 now and go out with your friends and get drunk. You come home at 3:00am bombed out of your mind. Your father approaches you the next day and demands "As long as you live here, you will not come home drunk at 3:00am!" "But dad, I'm 18 now, I can do as I please." "I don't care how old you are, you still live here!"

Maybe a week later, you bring home your girlfriend to stay the night. Like hell. Your parents make you take her right back home. No sleepovers. Hey! What about a party? I'll have all my friends over and they can stay here all night so I don't have to worry about going home! Like hell. Your parents won't let you have this party.

Yes, you are 18, but because you live under somebody else's roof, you live by their rules. Want to make your own rules? Get your own house or apartment. Then you can bring your girlfriend over for the weekend, go out and get drunk, throw a party.

People who live under governments roof really don't have maximum freedom. That's what's wrong with government everything. Want real freedom? Move out of governments house.
Rakk

Pickerington, OH

#17477 Jan 27, 2013
UrNumber2 wrote:
<quoted text>You mean the emails that were later found to be blown out of proportion by the oil lobby? Let's ask the highest temps in recorded weather history who is right. For the idiots who are calling 60 degree temps in January "normal" here in Ohio, not according to the 45 years I've lived here. Now tell us some more about how you know more than NASA and the overwhelming majority of experts on global weather trends. Oh and wipe that crude oil from around your mouth when you speak to me.
Well remove the oil from around my mouth! Sure, as soon as you remove your mouth from Al Gores ass!! Here are some facts for you! The earth has always had climate change! If you disagree feel free to look at the different levels of soil, they all tell a story and don't lie or have anything to gain, unlike nefarious individuals involved with some of these large push green organizations.
ByeByeHasbeens

Canton, OH

#17478 Jan 28, 2013
Rakk wrote:
<quoted text>
Well remove the oil from around my mouth! Sure, as soon as you remove your mouth from Al Gores ass!! Here are some facts for you! The earth has always had climate change! If you disagree feel free to look at the different levels of soil, they all tell a story and don't lie or have anything to gain, unlike nefarious individuals involved with some of these large push green organizations.
Let's compare how much money the oil industry has spent on debunking global warming compared to how much Al Gore has made off of it. Besides, you touchy feely doomsday preppers were singing your little Koch wh0re song a decade before Gore mentioned it. Get your inbred @ss back in your end times Bible bunker. We'll leave our environment to the big boys. You know, the one's you voted against.

"We don't have to protect the environment, the Second Coming is at hand"

James Watt Sec. of Interior, in charge of our environment under Ronald Reagan...I forget, was that before Al Gore?
ByeByeHasbeens

Canton, OH

#17479 Jan 28, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Capitalism? No. Freedom? Yes.
When we have a person in power who is supported by communists, then it's something that everybody should worry about.
Let's take a look at DumBama's record when it comes to problems and solutions:
Global Warming......... more government
Health Care ..........more government
School Shootings........more government
School Loans..........more government
Birth Control Pills.......more government
Bank Loans..........more government
Tobacco Usage..........more government
Firearms Choice.........more government
ATM fees..........more government
Green Energy..........more government
Economy..........more government
So what's wrong with more government? The larger the government, the smaller the citizen.
Let me put it another way. Maybe this happened to you or somebody you knew when you were younger:
You turn 18 years old, now officially an adult. You can join the military if you desire, smoke cigarettes legally, register to vote, be legally responsible for your own actions, move to your own apartment, a variety of freedoms you didn't have while under age.
Just getting started in life, you have limited resources when it comes to money. As most parents do, they offer to keep housing you, but you must help support the household. They charge you room and board.
You're 18 now and go out with your friends and get drunk. You come home at 3:00am bombed out of your mind. Your father approaches you the next day and demands "As long as you live here, you will not come home drunk at 3:00am!" "But dad, I'm 18 now, I can do as I please." "I don't care how old you are, you still live here!"
Maybe a week later, you bring home your girlfriend to stay the night. Like hell. Your parents make you take her right back home. No sleepovers. Hey! What about a party? I'll have all my friends over and they can stay here all night so I don't have to worry about going home! Like hell. Your parents won't let you have this party.
Yes, you are 18, but because you live under somebody else's roof, you live by their rules. Want to make your own rules? Get your own house or apartment. Then you can bring your girlfriend over for the weekend, go out and get drunk, throw a party.
People who live under governments roof really don't have maximum freedom. That's what's wrong with government everything. Want real freedom? Move out of governments house.
Or how about Bush I...elect head of CIA=smaller government
GW Bush's torture camps=smaller government
GW's unpaid Medicare plan=smaller goverment
GW's unfounded and unpaid for Holy war that he lied to Congress about...smaller government.

GW's Patriot Act...More "Freedom"?

Give yourself a rest, clown.
Rakk

United States

#17480 Jan 28, 2013
ByeByeHasbeens wrote:
<quoted text>Let's compare how much money the oil industry has spent on debunking global warming compared to how much Al Gore has made off of it. Besides, you touchy feely doomsday preppers were singing your little Koch wh0re song a decade before Gore mentioned it. Get your inbred @ss back in your end times Bible bunker. We'll leave our environment to the big boys. You know, the one's you voted against.

"We don't have to protect the environment, the Second Coming is at hand"

James Watt Sec. of Interior, in charge of our environment under Ronald Reagan...I forget, was that before Al Gore?
Well you Labeled me as a "doomsday prepper" when I am not! Actually I am quite the opposite! Along with all your other meaningless insults you are apparently a very ignorant individual who themselves deny being a doomsday prepper but yet you support programs of an individual that creates, supports and makes money (mostly tax payers) off of company's that make a assertion to be green then fail! Al gore does not even follow his own methods to reduce a carbon foot print. So continue to follow the Piper into a blindness pit of wasteful spending to line his pockets with our money. At any rate you yourself are a doomsday prepper! if not then perhaps you would not believe the garbage that is being spit out by these individuals. I bet you watch an inconvenient truth as a learning tool with out even doing your own research. Oops did I just make an accusations against you like you did me! Tool bag!
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#17481 Jan 28, 2013
ByeByeHasbeens wrote:
<quoted text>
Or how about Bush I...elect head of CIA=smaller government
GW Bush's torture camps=smaller government
GW's unpaid Medicare plan=smaller goverment
GW's unfounded and unpaid for Holy war that he lied to Congress about...smaller government.
GW's Patriot Act...More "Freedom"?
Give yourself a rest, clown.
Now what freedoms did you lose with the Patriot Act? How about all of your friend? How about your family? You do know that DumBama recently extended our surveillance act, don't you?

Bush lowered taxes for most all working Americans--many which enjoy those tax breaks today. He also introduced privatization of some of your Social Security contributions. Democrats didn't like that too much.

So Bush lied to Congress about our Holy War? He must have started pretty darn early, because here is what Democrats had to say before Bush even stepped foot in the White House:

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#17483 Jan 28, 2013
UrNumber2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry if I don't live my life in fear of what's spoon fed to me like you do. Let's ask Joe McCarthy how that whole "commie behind every bush" tactic worked out. Red Scare 2.0 blah blah blah. Is Capitalism so fragile? Wonder why?
Guess they need to be reminded occasionally.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#17484 Jan 28, 2013
Philip Greene
“Unapologetic True Journalist”

Since: Dec 09

Forty years ago, Richard M. Nixon looked around and did not like what he saw and decided it was up to him to change it. He decided that he was the only person who had the answers to the problems the country faced. He decided that only he could save the nation.

From there, it was one minute step to deciding that anyone who was not with him must be against him; anyone who did not actively support his programs or, worse yet, who opposed them, must be an enemy of the state and therefore his enemy. Messiahs normally do not see the possibility that they just might be occasionally wrong.

That self-assurance and arrogance of purpose finally led to Nixon’s downfall by his own hands. A nation breathed a sigh of relief that we had dodged despotism and the first steps toward tyranny.

But it seems that the Republican Party, in its desire to embrace what it sees as “traditional values” has revived the Nixon Legacy and is heading down the exact same course.

Since January, the GOP has taken very public and very aggressive moves to pursue and threaten their opponents. Just like Nixon – whether it is actually written, as his was, or whether it exists only in thought, the Republicans have an enemies hit list and they are going to go after anyone who has dared side against them; even those who have simply failed to support them in their righteous cause.

The list has few surprises since most of the names on it have long been a target of the GOP – Public Broadcasting, Labor Unions, and Civil Rights activist groups. One surprise is the AARP, the latest enemy to be identified and singled out for retribution – and make no mistake about it, that is exactly what all this is about.

The Republican dominated House Ways and Means Committee is seeking to strip AARP of its non-profit status. They openly admit – in a change from their other hit list campaigns – that this is specifically because the organization supported the Republican-hated Obamacare. In other words, they want to eliminate the organization, as they seek to do with unions and the independent voice of public broadcasting, simply because they dared to oppose the Righteous Right.

No longer are they hiding behind budget balancing or security reasons; now they are coming straight out and saying they want to cripple these targets merely because they are opponents. Now it’s simply a matter of,“If you don’t fall in line and get in step, we are going to come after you with whatever weapon we can pick up.”

And that is called political terrorism. Not to mention a full frontal assault on Freedom.

There are no other words for it. They are now openly pursing a course of single party rule; any opposition must be completely and totally crushed so that nothing stands in their way. It explains completely why they have refused to compromise, to debate and why they have refused to even acknowledge the need for meeting in the middle to serve as many people as possible. Their purpose is no longer to serve the interests of the people, but to serve the interests of the party.

Or perhaps that should be “The Party.”

We as a nation can sneer, wave dismissively, deny that it could happen here (forgetting conveniently that it nearly did during the McCarthy years) and ignore the fact that this nation is currently being shoved down the path to Soviet-style single party rule; yes, we can continue doing that right up till the time we look around and see that everything that we have worked for and stood for as a people and a nation is gone. No one wants to believe that a place like America could ever be so vulnerable, so susceptible to the failures of other nations.

But we are – the more so because of our denial. And if we continue to deny, even the possibility that it may be happening, we certainly create the viral breeding grounds where the disease of intolerance will mature into despotism.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#17485 Jan 28, 2013
Wow! Napoleonic Complexity. ;-)

Gun owners are compensating for a small penis. forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php... ...

Sep 24, 2009 ... Thread: Gun owners are compensating for a small penis.... People who carry guns present a danger to the public at large, are suspect at best ...
Compensating for Something - Television Tropes & Idioms tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Compensat... - Similarto Compensating for Something - Television Tropes & Idioms

Shrek (while looking at Lord Farquaad's huge castle)... If you actually have a small penis, it would unfortunately make you an Acceptable Hard Luck Target. See also Phallic ... There is a joke about a man who wants to buy a gun. He tries every ...
Do psychiatric professionals actually believe fast car ... boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.ph...

We have all heard that a man driving a fast car or big truck or nice boat is ... I think that most mental health pros would think that the purchase of .... notion that love of guns is somehow a compensation for having a small penis.
If men only own guns to compensate for a small penis, what ... answers.yahoo.com/question/index...

If men only own guns to compensate for a small penis, what about women ... Men and women own guns to protect ourselves from dangerous violent felons.... autonomy and independence or control, restrictions and big govt?

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#17486 Jan 28, 2013
Higher Taxes for Middle Class and Poor coming to a GOP Controlled State near you. Ohio included.

KRUGMAN: Makers, Takers, Fakers - Democratic Underground www.democraticunderground.com/10022272168

11 hours ago ... KRUGMAN: Makers, Takers, Fakers - GOP=a party that holds a large proportion of Americans in contempt. OP-ED COLUMNIST Makers, Takers ...
JG, Caesarea: Paul Krugman, "Makers, Takers, Fakers": The New ... jgcaesarea.blogspot.com/2013/01/paul-krugman-...

19 hours ago ... Paul Krugman, "Makers, Takers, Fakers": The New York Times Part of a "Captive Media" Conspiracy? In case you didn't know, there's a ...
OpEdNews - Quicklink: Paul Krugman: Makers, Takers, Fakers www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Paul-Krugman-Maker... ....

21 hours ago ... Quicklink: Paul Krugman: Makers, Takers, Fakers - Quicklink: Republicans have begun acknowledging that their party needs to improve its ...
Krugman: GOP Class Warriors Are 'Makers, Takers, Fakers'- Topix www.topix.com/us-house/bobby-jindal/2013/01/k... ...

8 hours ago ... Republicans have a problem. For years they could shout down any attempt to point out the extent to which their policies favored the elite over ...
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#17487 Jan 28, 2013
Cousin DuPrees Cousin wrote:
Philip Greene
“Unapologetic True Journalist”
Since: Dec 09
Forty years ago, Richard M. Nixon looked around and did not like what he saw and decided it was up to him to change it. He decided that he was the only person who had the answers to the problems the country faced. He decided that only he could save the nation.
From there, it was one minute step to deciding that anyone who was not with him must be against him; anyone who did not actively support his programs or, worse yet, who opposed them, must be an enemy of the state and therefore his enemy. Messiahs normally do not see the possibility that they just might be occasionally wrong.
That self-assurance and arrogance of purpose finally led to Nixon’s downfall by his own hands. A nation breathed a sigh of relief that we had dodged despotism and the first steps toward tyranny.
But it seems that the Republican Party, in its desire to embrace what it sees as “traditional values” has revived the Nixon Legacy and is heading down the exact same course.
Since January, the GOP has taken very public and very aggressive moves to pursue and threaten their opponents. Just like Nixon – whether it is actually written, as his was, or whether it exists only in thought, the Republicans have an enemies hit list and they are going to go after anyone who has dared side against them; even those who have simply failed to support them in their righteous cause.
The list has few surprises since most of the names on it have long been a target of the GOP – Public Broadcasting, Labor Unions, and Civil Rights activist groups. One surprise is the AARP, the latest enemy to be identified and singled out for retribution – and make no mistake about it, that is exactly what all this is about.
The Republican dominated House Ways and Means Committee is seeking to strip AARP of its non-profit status. They openly admit – in a change from their other hit list campaigns – that this is specifically because the organization supported the Republican-hated Obamacare. In other words, they want to eliminate the organization, as they seek to do with unions and the independent voice of public broadcasting, simply because they dared to oppose the Righteous Right.
No longer are they hiding behind budget balancing or security reasons; now they are coming straight out and saying they want to cripple these targets merely because they are opponents. Now it’s simply a matter of,“If you don’t fall in line and get in step, we are going to come after you with whatever weapon we can pick up.”
And that is called political terrorism. Not to mention a full frontal assault on Freedom.
There are no other words for it. They are now openly pursing a course of single party rule; any opposition must be completely and totally crushed so that nothing stands in their way. It explains completely why they have refused to compromise, to debate and why they have refused to even acknowledge the need for meeting in the middle to serve as many people as possible. Their purpose is no longer to serve the interests of the people, but to serve the interests of the party.
Or perhaps that should be “The Party.”
We as a nation can sneer, wave dismissively, deny that it could happen here (forgetting conveniently that it nearly did during the McCarthy years) and ignore the fact that this nation is currently being shoved down the path to Soviet-style single party rule; yes, we can continue doing that right up till the time we look around and see that everything that we have worked for and stood for as a people and a nation is gone. No one wants to believe that a place like America could ever be so vulnerable, so susceptible to the failures of other nations.
A lot like nobama...weird
WeWonUDidnt

Canton, OH

#17491 Jan 30, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Now what freedoms did you lose with the Patriot Act? How about all of your friend? How about your family? You do know that DumBama recently extended our surveillance act, don't you?
Bush lowered taxes for most all working Americans--many which enjoy those tax breaks today. He also introduced privatization of some of your Social Security contributions. Democrats didn't like that too much.
So Bush lied to Congress about our Holy War? He must have started pretty darn early, because here is what Democrats had to say before Bush even stepped foot in the White House:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =hjgquIN4RrwXX
That fact that you are not sure that Bush lied to Congress about Iraq having WMDs speaks volumes about your reality. Now did the Dems say go after SD before or after the photo of Rummy smiling and shaking hands with him? Thanks though for the link to another sour grapes loser like yourself.
Juan

United States

#17492 Jan 30, 2013
Im rep
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#17493 Jan 30, 2013
WeWonUDidnt wrote:
<quoted text>
That fact that you are not sure that Bush lied to Congress about Iraq having WMDs speaks volumes about your reality. Now did the Dems say go after SD before or after the photo of Rummy smiling and shaking hands with him? Thanks though for the link to another sour grapes loser like yourself.
It's you who insinuated that Bush lied. Yet years earlier, we have Democrats talking about the same thing: weapons of mass destruction.

So the question I pose is if Bush lied, then Democrats must have lied too--particularly Bill Clinton.

Thanks for playing.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#17495 Jan 30, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
It's you who insinuated that Bush lied. Yet years earlier, we have Democrats talking about the same thing: weapons of mass destruction.
So the question I pose is if Bush lied, then Democrats must have lied too--particularly Bill Clinton.
Thanks for playing.
I have said this B4 & I'll say it again... We KNOW that Saddam had WMD's! Even organizations like the U.N. & Amnesty International & another organization that prefers to stay impartial; Doctors Without Borders Knew that WMD's were used against Iran & the Kurds so why is this still an argument? That baffles me. He certainly didn't drop them down an empty oil well!
We & the world should be more concerned about where they went. Did some go to Syria, buried in secret bunkers, just buried somewhere or a combination thereof?? He wouldn't let inspectors in for the longest time. We should remember that when the '100 hr' land war ran him out of Kuwait, many of his jets were sent to his former enemy, Iran & he had his troops ignite oil wells as they withdrew. And he was firing Scuds at Israel which was a non-combatant. He used human shields which included children. He was ruthless & somewhat unpredictable but always power hungry & narcissistic.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#17496 Jan 30, 2013
Tennessee state senator: Reduce welfare payments to families ... blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2013/01/25/te... ...

4 days ago ... If the children don't produce, it could impact the pay of the teacher and the ... is an idiot and has helped make East TN the laughingstock of the nation..... babies to get government support knew that they will have to pay money,... On one hand, the parents wanted the children to have good grades, but did ...

That is how you get parents to be more responsible. You take away the kids food money. Why didn't someone think of that sooner?
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#17497 Jan 30, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I have said this B4 & I'll say it again... We KNOW that Saddam had WMD's! Even organizations like the U.N. & Amnesty International & another organization that prefers to stay impartial; Doctors Without Borders Knew that WMD's were used against Iran & the Kurds so why is this still an argument? That baffles me. He certainly didn't drop them down an empty oil well!
We & the world should be more concerned about where they went. Did some go to Syria, buried in secret bunkers, just buried somewhere or a combination thereof?? He wouldn't let inspectors in for the longest time. We should remember that when the '100 hr' land war ran him out of Kuwait, many of his jets were sent to his former enemy, Iran & he had his troops ignite oil wells as they withdrew. And he was firing Scuds at Israel which was a non-combatant. He used human shields which included children. He was ruthless & somewhat unpredictable but always power hungry & narcissistic.
Much of Bush's information came from other countries. Tony Blair stood behind his findings until his last day in power. We had Iranian scientists telling our agents of Saddam's plan for nuclear capabilities and the fact that his WMD's were designed to be portable.

The UN sent a dozen or so people to inspect Iran. Iran is about the size of Texas. There is no way for them to cover every inch. Even the UN admitted that Saddam's record of destroying his WMD's were as phony as a three dollar bill.

Bill Clinton removed UN security forces so he could send bombs to Iran. This was his response to Saddam refusing to let inspectors into certain locations.

Point of all this is that Democrats made politics out of this even though they were actually on the same side of this issue as Bush before he took leadership. Our involvement there had nothing to do with 911, but to prevent another possible 911 from happening.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#17498 Jan 30, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Much of Bush's information came from other countries. Tony Blair stood behind his findings until his last day in power. We had Iranian scientists telling our agents of Saddam's plan for nuclear capabilities and the fact that his WMD's were designed to be portable.
The UN sent a dozen or so people to inspect Iran. Iran is about the size of Texas. There is no way for them to cover every inch. Even the UN admitted that Saddam's record of destroying his WMD's were as phony as a three dollar bill.
Bill Clinton removed UN security forces so he could send bombs to Iran. This was his response to Saddam refusing to let inspectors into certain locations.
Point of all this is that Democrats made politics out of this even though they were actually on the same side of this issue as Bush before he took leadership. Our involvement there had nothing to do with 911, but to prevent another possible 911 from happening.
Agreed. Thanx for the additional info that blows the nay sayers away, Why are the blind so blind? Thanx to the biased press that has little idea as to the truth & facts & lies to the public.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbia Station Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
John Zalic, BOTTOM FEEDER Jun 23 Casimer Nowakowski 2
Attorney John Zalic , Worthless Jun 23 Casimer Nowakowski 2
Animal Planet Investigates Petland (May '10) Jun 15 Smoozie Q 38
News Obituaries 10/26/11 (Nov '11) Jun 12 Roger Terri 44
Russell James Holt (RJ) May '15 vicious 1
The Harell Clan - Drug Dealers all week - Open ... May '15 reader1 2
News Local Woman Dies After Jumping From Moving Car ... (Oct '09) May '15 Family 60
More from around the web

Columbia Station People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Columbia Station Mortgages