Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
Pops

Dayton, OH

#33311 Aug 27, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Well I never ate a thing on food stamps the entire time I was growing up. Why do you suppose I ate food purchased by my parents and other kids today need to be on SNAP's? I have a tenant that's on disability, and they wouldn't give him one dime.
Whoa there. I have had food stamps twice in my life. Once for 2 months & once for 1 month & I needed them. I was quite thankful. Both times for medical reasons. Once because of a bloodclot & the other for a broken collarbone, ruptured lung & 3 separated ribs.
I will add that my 1 month of stamps lasted me 7 weeks & the 2 month time the stamps lasted 10 weeks. I still used coupons & bought generic/store brands, & chicken or ground beef instead of steaks. I & my sons (single parent) were far from hungry.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#33312 Aug 27, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Whoa there. I have had food stamps twice in my life. Once for 2 months & once for 1 month & I needed them. I was quite thankful. Both times for medical reasons. Once because of a bloodclot & the other for a broken collarbone, ruptured lung & 3 separated ribs.
I will add that my 1 month of stamps lasted me 7 weeks & the 2 month time the stamps lasted 10 weeks. I still used coupons & bought generic/store brands, & chicken or ground beef instead of steaks. I & my sons (single parent) were far from hungry.
Freeloader. Did you sell your TV and your car before accepting that handout?
Pops

Dayton, OH

#33313 Aug 27, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Freeloader. Did you sell your TV and your car before accepting that handout?
Good question. I tried to sell the ex-wife....NO takers! lol
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#33314 Aug 27, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Support that in thought & or words but it would NEVER be legal in our lifetimes if ever. IF OUR constitution is still honored.
Where in our Constitution does it say anything about food stamps?
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#33315 Aug 27, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Holy groveling.
Truthful and groveling are two entirely different words.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#33316 Aug 27, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, Ray, but I'm not listening to your "sob stories" anymore. You have convinced me that people that make excuses for their bad behavior need to be dealt with harshly. Why should you get healthcare if you refuse to pay for it?
<quoted text>
I've paid for my healthcare my entire life. It's called a "benefit."

The people that decided to elect a Socialist community organizer are responsible for me losing that benefit. I'm not responsible for that--DumBama voters are. If you voted for that incompetent, and he set forth to do exactly what he said he was going to do which is to destroy our healthcare system, how did that become my fault or responsibility when it was the DumBama voters that did this to me????

Apples and oranges. Sure, there are people (like Pops) who needed emergency assistance and it should be there for that reason only. But it should not be a lifestyle. 47 million Americans on food stamps and it's been that way for several years now. Obviously, those people are not using SNAP's as a temporary benefit. They are using it as a never ending income.
Pops

Dayton, OH

#33317 Aug 27, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in our Constitution does it say anything about food stamps?
Ok Ray. You are now being influenced by the Libs & deflecting or changing the subject. The Constitution has nothing to do with foodstamps & there has been NO implications as to such. Get your act together, regroup & get back to being yourself. Go back to being reasonable & thoughtful.
OR quit posing as a pragmatic conservative,
Old Guy

Mason, OH

#33318 Aug 27, 2014
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are so poor that your kids need SNAP programs then you have no business breeding. I suppprt sterilizing people on welfare before they increase the population.
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Support that in thought & or words but it would NEVER be legal in our lifetimes if ever. IF OUR constitution is still honored.
It's an interesting problem. If you want to buy a $100,00 car you've got to have the cash or a line of credit. A 2014 baby will cost at least that much to raise, but you can have as many kids as you want without a credit check.

Here's my modest proposal: at puberty each young man will receive a reversible vasectomy. Before it gets turned on, the young man (and his partner) will have to establish a $100,000 account to be drawn on to raise the child. Those parents will have to create additional accounts if they wish more than one child.

No more welfare kids. No more unplanned kids. No abortions!

What's not to like?
ino

Clyde, OH

#33319 Aug 27, 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025453...

ObamaCare is Really Pissing Me Off Right Now
Okay, I just have to vent...

As some of you may recall, I was an early "volunteer" for the Affordable Care Act, signing up during that tumultuous month of October 2013 back when the Healthcare.gov web-site was experiencing so many problems, before things got mostly fixed come December. I had originally signed up for a Platinum plan through SelectHealth, the monthly premium being $85 after the advanced premium tax credit was applied, which didn't seem too bad at the time.
Read More @ Link
Old Guy

Mason, OH

#33320 Aug 27, 2014
ino wrote:
http://www.democraticundergrou nd.com/10025453873
ObamaCare is Really Pissing Me Off Right Now
The headline might give some the wrong idea. This article ends with "I mean, don't get me wrong -- I really like my current plan and truly believe the ACA has been a godsend overall..."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025453...
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#33321 Aug 28, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
It's an interesting problem. If you want to buy a $100,00 car you've got to have the cash or a line of credit. A 2014 baby will cost at least that much to raise, but you can have as many kids as you want without a credit check.
Here's my modest proposal: at puberty each young man will receive a reversible vasectomy. Before it gets turned on, the young man (and his partner) will have to establish a $100,000 account to be drawn on to raise the child. Those parents will have to create additional accounts if they wish more than one child.
No more welfare kids. No more unplanned kids. No abortions!
What's not to like?
I know you're not serious, but you are in the right direction.

If you apply for any kind of welfare, you must be fixed first on the taxpayer dime. If you don't want to be fixed, then don't accept government assistance. If you somehow manage to get that reversed and have children after receiving welfare, no more increases in benefits. You get X for a welfare check or X for food stamps and if you have more children, then spread your benefits further. If you can't take care of your children on the benefits we give you, the government takes them away and puts them in a foster home.

Working parents limit the size of their family based on income. There is nothing wrong with doing the same to people that apply to take our hard earned money.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#33322 Aug 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in our Constitution does it say anything about food stamps?
Where in our constitution does it say anything about box trucks?
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#33323 Aug 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Truthful and groveling are two entirely different words.
True. And you grovel.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#33324 Aug 28, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Ok Ray. You are now being influenced by the Libs & deflecting or changing the subject. The Constitution has nothing to do with foodstamps & there has been NO implications as to such. Get your act together, regroup & get back to being yourself. Go back to being reasonable & thoughtful.
OR quit posing as a pragmatic conservative,
He's a Limbaugh ventriloquist dummy. You are just catching on?
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#33325 Aug 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you're not serious, but you are in the right direction.
If you apply for any kind of welfare, you must be fixed first on the taxpayer dime. If you don't want to be fixed, then don't accept government assistance. If you somehow manage to get that reversed and have children after receiving welfare, no more increases in benefits. You get X for a welfare check or X for food stamps and if you have more children, then spread your benefits further. If you can't take care of your children on the benefits we give you, the government takes them away and puts them in a foster home.
Working parents limit the size of their family based on income. There is nothing wrong with doing the same to people that apply to take our hard earned money.
Be a lot cheaper to supply them with birth control, oops, wait a minute. That's right, it's against the Corporations that you worship religion.
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#33326 Aug 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you're not serious, but you are in the right direction.
If you apply for any kind of welfare, you must be fixed first on the taxpayer dime. If you don't want to be fixed, then don't accept government assistance. If you somehow manage to get that reversed and have children after receiving welfare, no more increases in benefits. You get X for a welfare check or X for food stamps and if you have more children, then spread your benefits further. If you can't take care of your children on the benefits we give you, the government takes them away and puts them in a foster home.
Working parents limit the size of their family based on income. There is nothing wrong with doing the same to people that apply to take our hard earned money.
If you have a job, you shouldn't need assistance, oops, wait a minute. Keep bowing down to those corporate, taxpayer subsidized sponges. Burger King is in the top 10 on that list.
Kasim

London, UK

#33327 Aug 28, 2014
zczx
Canton

Canton, OH

#33328 Aug 28, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>BOTTOM LINE , the nation & the world lost. National debt is near $17,000,000,000,000, the southern border is NOT secure, unemployment is now near what Obama PROMISED it would be in his 1st term, years ago. There seems to be MORE military action & deaths throughout the Arab world than in any of our lifetimes with the 'Western world' being an avowed target.
And so much more. So I repeat, WE ALL have lost.
Nope. I, like all my taxpaying, hard working friends are doing A OK right now but thanks for your concern. So were you "winning" back when GW Bush wanted to give amnesty to every illegal alien in this country or is that one of those many things we are supposed to completely forget because you feel ashamed about not making a peep over it? For you to claim there is more death in the Arab world now then before is as absurd as it is twisted by your racist views of or current president. You know, that thing that became obvious to every American after about the 5th or 6th "scandal" was proven bogus and when easily accessible and fact checked information on the internet showed us how blatantly moderate our current president is when compared to Conservative demigod Ronald Reagan. You lost, old gummer and the fact that you still can't admit doesn't change that fact in the least. It just proves more of what us thinking Americans knew all along.
Canton

Canton, OH

#33329 Aug 28, 2014
We are all so very concerned about the 30 something dollars you have to pay each year to feed poor people and your tears over it never get old, but why do you keep ignoring those thousands you dish out to cover corporate subsidies for companies that leech off of our infrastructure and dodge paying their taxes? Is this like that deficit thingy you guys keep whining about, despite the fact that the you voted for the GOP that has increased the deficit exponentially more than the Democrats? Just because Conservative Bible elected GW Bush was too conniving to put the cost of his meaningless war on the books, by no way means that it was free. Hang on. I'll move out of the way so you Tea Baggers can voice your outrage over the fact that your grandchildren will be paying for Bush's war their entire lives....Ready? Go!!!

Ahhh ha ha ha ha ha ha! Zing! Once again, you are left with your inbred mouth smashed in with the facts. Eat those facts and know that I'll be sure to remind you of every Obamacare Death Panel absurd claim you try to shamefully sweep under the rug on a regular basis.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#33330 Aug 28, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in our constitution does it say anything about box trucks?
Who said it did?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbia Station Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
new stadium Jan 6 another neighbor 1
News Drunk man claims FBI bugged his tooth; wanted w... Dec '16 Tara Biddulph 1
Lights on Saddlebrook Ln Dec '16 Neighbor 1
Review: Patient First - John Kavlich MD (May '09) Oct '16 Chrissy 65
The Harell Clan - Drug Dealers all week - Open ... (May '15) Oct '16 Middie 5
white trash in columbia station= midview area (Jan '14) Mar '16 MIDVIEW MIDDIE 1974 3
Cowardly Thomas Truelson (Mar '13) Mar '15 Secrets 3

Columbia Station Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbia Station Mortgages