Gay/Straight Club Hot Topic in Lexington 5 Board Meeting

[Gee Whiz]

Thats it wrote:

<quoted text>
Sick, gay shhhit??? I bet you chase the gurls just for the back entrance.

At least if they are going thru the backdoor, no one's getting pregnant LOL

[WTH]

Gee Whiz wrote:

<quoted text>
Divorce happens because it's the easy way out and it's too easy to obtain. The whole 'sanctity of marriage' argument is a joke. Straight people need to clean up around their own back door before they start sweeping someone else's porch.

I agree. It is too easy for married people to walk away than to deal with the issues at hand.

[WTH]

Gee Whiz wrote:

<quoted text>
At least if they are going thru the backdoor, no one's getting pregnant LOL

I believe that was what this person was saying....or that married couples do have anal and oral sex. If they deny it..they are lying their arse off!

[WTH]

Hecktor wrote:

Man that gay stuff is whack. I had a girl licking below my sack and she was getting my doonkey hole and I was like dam girl you need to quit that...but it did feel kind of good. But I aint bout that gay shit mane. And me getting my girl in the butt is alright. Girls can do it. But I cant undastand dudes doing it. I know a dude getting it in the butt is gay as helll but what about the dude doing the sticking? If he can get it up, why dont he get a girl and see it's better? Somebody please tell me dam. Is it cuz girls dont like them and they turn punk? What?

Somethings should be kept private! I really didn't need to know your business.

[Get_Over_It]

Gee Whiz wrote:

<quoted text>
And most gay couples have a better quality of life. Nice homes, more disposable income, nice cars, and don't feed off the system. No illegitate kids running around taxing the welfare and school systems.
I'd say it was safe to say that the majority of people really have no idea who they may know and respect who are gay;. Not all gays are limpwristed hairdressers, or drag queens. People would be surprised if they really knew. Sure there are over the top people in every group of people. Are all religous fanatice indicative of all Christians? NO! Is a 20 yo unwed mother of 4 who happens to be black indicative of all black women? NO! Are all people who are proud of their Southern heritage members of the KKK? NO!
SO before people ASSume that all gay people are alike, then you need to think back to the assumtions [ep[;e make that tick you off about your own background, lifestyle, and ethnicity.

Totally agree. It is much easier for someone to say that the stereotype doesn't apply to them when it is about their own subgroup. For whatever reason they still assume that all other stereotypes are wrong about other groups though.
Some people I just don't understand!

[i had fun]

Spot On wrote:

RWW and William - You've taken this forum from a GSA discussion to a theological fight between two people who purport to love God. You guys are off-topic and fighting with each other using the same reference material...
I'm all about God. I love my spirituality and worshipping God (in my own introspective and personal way), but man, you two would make it pretty difficult for a non-believer to want to be a believer when you both use the Holy word of God to argue against each other...

This is the "real-est" post I've seen on this entire website so far. In any story.

[Spot On]

i had fun wrote:

<quoted text>
This is the "real-est" post I've seen on this entire website so far. In any story.

Thanks bt I'm just keeping it real. I like RWW (he and I have had some fun spirited debates and discussions in the past). He (just like me) sometimes needs a swift kick in the rear to stay on topic. LOL

[Piper]

Spot On wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks bt I'm just keeping it real. I like RWW (he and I have had some fun spirited debates and discussions in the past). He (just like me) sometimes needs a swift kick in the rear to stay on topic. LOL

I actually find it more entertaining when a thread digresses. Some of the more intellectual debates have stemmed from that. It keeps my attention!

[rwwllms]

Spot On wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks bt I'm just keeping it real. I like RWW (he and I have had some fun spirited debates and discussions in the past). He (just like me) sometimes needs a swift kick in the rear to stay on topic. LOL

Sometimes people take themselves and these forums way too seriously. That's when I get to play.:-)

As far as the gay issue is concerned, I don't think it's right or natural. BUT, I'm not going to go around bashing 'em and fighting 'em. My life philosphy is 'leave me alone and I'll leave you alone'. Don't force your beliefs on me and I won't force mine on you. Judgment is reserved for God and God only. Gays will have to answer to him, not me.

Now, as for a gay club in a public school, NO. If schools aren't allowed to teach about having a responsible and healthy sex life then they shouldn't be allowed to endorse a gay lifestyle either. I don't care what the gays claim, that club is all about sex. Because who you choose to have sex with is the main criteria for being gay or straight. After all you can't have a color tv/ black&white tv awarness club without discussing what makes a color tv a color tv and how it's different from a black & white tv, and why one is better than the other. Think about it. Use logic not emotion.

[Spot On]

rwwllms wrote:

<quoted text>
Sometimes people take themselves and these forums way too seriously. That's when I get to play.:-)
As far as the gay issue is concerned, I don't think it's right or natural. BUT, I'm not going to go around bashing 'em and fighting 'em. My life philosphy is 'leave me alone and I'll leave you alone'. Don't force your beliefs on me and I won't force mine on you. Judgment is reserved for God and God only. Gays will have to answer to him, not me.
Now, as for a gay club in a public school, NO. If schools aren't allowed to teach about having a responsible and healthy sex life then they shouldn't be allowed to endorse a gay lifestyle either. I don't care what the gays claim, that club is all about sex. Because who you choose to have sex with is the main criteria for being gay or straight. After all you can't have a color tv/ black&white tv awarness club without discussing what makes a color tv a color tv and how it's different from a black & white tv, and why one is better than the other. Think about it. Use logic not emotion.

Your analogy at the end was wheelie insightful. Sometimes, breaking it down to simplistic thoughts like that can make it clearer for people. I for one agree with you and have seen GSA's devolve into sessions that are very gay inclusionary (or exclusionary for us straights). No matter how you slice it, gay or straight is a direct reference to one's secual preference so though the topics probably wouldn't turn into who's plugging whom, they are still very sexually charged topics of discussion.

Heck, even when discussing tolerance, one must understand that which they are expected to tolerate... thus leading to what? More sexual discussion...

It's not a healthy discussion for gay or straight teenagers IMHO.

[rwwllms]

Spot On wrote:

<quoted text>
Your analogy at the end was wheelie insightful. Sometimes, breaking it down to simplistic thoughts like that can make it clearer for people. I for one agree with you and have seen GSA's devolve into sessions that are very gay inclusionary (or exclusionary for us straights). No matter how you slice it, gay or straight is a direct reference to one's secual preference so though the topics probably wouldn't turn into who's plugging whom, they are still very sexually charged topics of discussion.
Heck, even when discussing tolerance, one must understand that which they are expected to tolerate... thus leading to what? More sexual discussion...
It's not a healthy discussion for gay or straight teenagers IMHO.

Thank You.

[WTH]

rwwllms wrote:

<quoted text>
Sometimes people take themselves and these forums way too seriously. That's when I get to play.:-)
As far as the gay issue is concerned, I don't think it's right or natural. BUT, I'm not going to go around bashing 'em and fighting 'em. My life philosphy is 'leave me alone and I'll leave you alone'. Don't force your beliefs on me and I won't force mine on you. Judgment is reserved for God and God only. Gays will have to answer to him, not me.
Now, as for a gay club in a public school, NO. If schools aren't allowed to teach about having a responsible and healthy sex life then they shouldn't be allowed to endorse a gay lifestyle either. I don't care what the gays claim, that club is all about sex. Because who you choose to have sex with is the main criteria for being gay or straight. After all you can't have a color tv/ black&white tv awarness club without discussing what makes a color tv a color tv and how it's different from a black & white tv, and why one is better than the other. Think about it. Use logic not emotion.

rwwwllms wrote:
as for a gay club in a public school, NO. If schools aren't allowed to teach about having a responsible and healthy sex life then they shouldn't be allowed to endorse a gay lifestyle either. I don't care what the gays claim, that club is all about sex. Because who you choose to have sex with is the main criteria for being gay or straight

Teenagers are all about sex! LOL..Remember those hormones??
Public schools~~~~ do ~~~~give out condoms. Some public school do teach sex Ed. These kids have no one to relate to, they are outsiders that will never 'fit' in because society SAYS their life style is wrong. These kids need someplace to go to or some to listen when no one else does.
I agree they should have a place for gays in public schools. These are kids too! What ever guidance they require it should be available.
Times a changing and we will eventually have to change with the times.

I can remember when our worst nightmare was blacks and whites going to school together. The riots! Now look...we as society think nothing of it.

[Boo]

The alliance doesn't promote sex but supports a person who happens to be gay and in H.S. Once a straight kid hits puberty, he starts having an attraction to the opposite sex, for a gay person, it's the same sex. Straight teenagers act on those feelings in H.S.: dating the opposite sex, going to dances, and the prom with the opposite sex. The prom doesn't promote sex (although there is plenty of it then) and neither does this club. A gay student would be harrassed to no end if he ever showed his true self in H.S. and all this club wants to do is promote tolerance.

[Wreckinball]

Who they want to screw is acceptable and who they want to pray to is not. REALLY?

[Get_Over_It]

Wreckinball wrote:

Who they want to screw is acceptable and who they want to pray to is not. REALLY?

Neither is the business of anyone else.

[Bible Is Bullshit]

People, wake up. The bible is a bunch of bullshit. It is not the word of God. It was written by men and marketed by religious leaders to keep the people under their control. What better way to be able to control people than to have control over their fears. Eternal damnation? Now that's the way to get people's attention.

[Beth]

So many people completely miss the point on the Gay-Straight Alliance. It isn't about sex. It's about sexual orientation. There is a huge difference.

It is a very positive thing to give gay people understanding. It is the morally correct thing to do. It is morally reprehensable to wrap this issue as a religious issue. Should we have protests against girls wearing make-up? Its in the Bible. Should we have protests against girls cutting their hair? It's in the Bible. Should we have protests against eating pork? It's in the Bible.

[underhay]

Beth wrote:

So many people completely miss the point on the Gay-Straight Alliance. It isn't about sex. It's about sexual orientation. There is a huge difference.
It is a very positive thing to give gay people understanding. It is the morally correct thing to do. It is morally reprehensable to wrap this issue as a religious issue. Should we have protests against girls wearing make-up? Its in the Bible. Should we have protests against girls cutting their hair? It's in the Bible. Should we have protests against eating pork? It's in the Bible.

but... but... i like bacon!

[underhay]

Homer: Are you saying you're never going to eat any animal again? What about bacon?

Lisa: No.

Homer: Ham?

Lisa: No.

Homer: Pork chops?

Lisa: Dad, those all come from the same animal.

Homer: Heh heh heh. Ooh, yeah, right, Lisa. A wonderful, magical animal.

[Get_Over_It]

Beth wrote:

So many people completely miss the point on the Gay-Straight Alliance. It isn't about sex. It's about sexual orientation. There is a huge difference.
It is a very positive thing to give gay people understanding. It is the morally correct thing to do. It is morally reprehensable to wrap this issue as a religious issue. Should we have protests against girls wearing make-up? Its in the Bible. Should we have protests against girls cutting their hair? It's in the Bible. Should we have protests against eating pork? It's in the Bible.

Good luck on that arguement. Don't you know that the rules against things that the believers do were set aside by the new testament? It is just those things that they are not guilty of that are still being enforced.
Funny how that works out isn't it?