Georgia Family Settles Autism Suit

Georgia Family Settles Autism Suit

There are 117 comments on the WLTX Columbia story from Mar 6, 2008, titled Georgia Family Settles Autism Suit. In it, WLTX Columbia reports that:

The parents of a nine-year-old Georgia girl who won a government settlement described today how their hearts were broken as they watched her deteriorate into an irritable, odd-behaving toddler after she got ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WLTX Columbia.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#62 Apr 11, 2013
Funny, since all the links Winnipeg spams is 'opinion and observations. That is not physical or meaningful, its only blah blah'. For instance one recent spam is to a site of parental stories. Another is to Age of Autism, an observational study of mortality Guinea-Bissau in 1984-1987 with the conclusion "the effect is unlikely to be due to higher-risk children having received vaccination. The role of DTP in high mortality areas needs to be clarified".(You'd think some would be able to understand the end result prior to even sharing such a study!) Another link actually tells you there's a threat if you open it, and one is a dead link. This is what is evidence??
As for the name-calling, considering Winnipeg's revealed age on another article, there must be something seriously wrong since the maturity level simply is not there.
Vaccines Cause Autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#63 Apr 11, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
We provide links to genuine peer reviewed studies. All you ever provide is links to conspiracy theory sites with no peer reviewed studies/evidence to back up their anti-vaccine nonsense.
As for calling us names, that's really funny coming from someone calling himself 'Autism 4 Dummies'. So that would be 'Autism 4 Dummies' by a dummy. It describes you perfectly.
You provide weak biased and dishonest studies dick. But you don't know the difference between fake and real science. Ask mumsy she'll explain.
Vaccines Cause Autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#64 Apr 11, 2013
friend wrote:
Funny, since all the links Winnipeg spams is 'opinion and observations. That is not physical or meaningful, its only blah blah'. For instance one recent spam is to a site of parental stories. Another is to Age of Autism, an observational study of mortality Guinea-Bissau in 1984-1987 with the conclusion "the effect is unlikely to be due to higher-risk children having received vaccination. The role of DTP in high mortality areas needs to be clarified".(You'd think some would be able to understand the end result prior to even sharing such a study!) Another link actually tells you there's a threat if you open it, and one is a dead link. This is what is evidence??
As for the name-calling, considering Winnipeg's revealed age on another article, there must be something seriously wrong since the maturity level simply is not there.
Another huge stool sample from a confirmed liar who provides little to any forum but personal attack. Its very sad to hear she has a child, poor thing.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#65 Apr 11, 2013
Talk about personal attacks... Did I hit a nerve by chance??!! So sorry, it's not my problem that you don't either read the links you provide or don't at all understand the misrepresentation of the links.
Vaccines Cause Autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#66 Apr 11, 2013
friend wrote:
Talk about personal attacks... Did I hit a nerve by chance??!! So sorry, it's not my problem that you don't either read the links you provide or don't at all understand the misrepresentation of the links.
I read them AND comprehend them. I don'y invent evidence or exaggerate or lie like you do. You're really quite pathetic.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#67 Apr 11, 2013
Then go ahead and explain the link from Age of Autism, an observational study of mortality Guinea-Bissau in 1984-1987 with the conclusion "the effect is unlikely to be due to higher-risk children having received vaccination. The role of DTP in high mortality areas needs to be clarified". Just what exactly is the importance or evidence that provides??? It was copied directly from the lin you gave, AoA.
ric99

Grimsby, UK

#68 Apr 11, 2013
Vaccines Cause Autism wrote:
<quoted text> You provide weak biased and dishonest studies dick. But you don't know the difference between fake and real science. Ask mumsy she'll explain.
So the Winnipeg dummy's definition of "weak biased and dishonest studies" is any study that doesn't conclude that vaccines cause autism, regardless of how rigorous the analysis is. On the other hand, he defines Wakefield's 'proven' dishonest paper as being real science. Did he learn science from his mumsy?
DUH MOMENT

Winnipeg, Canada

#69 Apr 11, 2013
stayhome wrote:
Vaccines don't cause autism. Period.
Thanks for the duh
DUH MOMENT

Winnipeg, Canada

#70 Apr 11, 2013
friend wrote:
Then go ahead and explain the link from Age of Autism, an observational study of mortality Guinea-Bissau in 1984-1987 with the conclusion "the effect is unlikely to be due to higher-risk children having received vaccination. The role of DTP in high mortality areas needs to be clarified". Just what exactly is the importance or evidence that provides??? It was copied directly from the lin you gave, AoA.
Who has to explain high risk children except to a dunce like you? Its why autism is 1 in 50 USA
DUH MOMENT

Winnipeg, Canada

#71 Apr 11, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
So the Winnipeg dummy's definition of "weak biased and dishonest studies" is any study that doesn't conclude that vaccines cause autism, regardless of how rigorous the analysis is. On the other hand, he defines Wakefield's 'proven' dishonest paper as being real science. Did he learn science from his mumsy?
What a stupid sod. Provide links to rigorously analyzed studies dufus. Where did I say I DEFINE Wakefield's paper as anything a-hole? You and friend of pharma, invent and talk bee ess and think you are worthy of acceptence? Try growing up first.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#73 Apr 11, 2013
As predicted, he cant explain it. And where did you define Wakefield's paper? Many places but let's start here
http://www.topix.com/forum/health/autism/TED3...
Vaccines Cause Autism

Winnipeg, Canada

#74 Apr 11, 2013
friend wrote:
As predicted, he cant explain it. And where did you define Wakefield's paper? Many places but let's start here
http://www.topix.com/forum/health/autism/TED3...
I commented on it fool thats not defining it. Get a dictionary.
ric99

Grimsby, UK

#75 Apr 12, 2013
DUH MOMENT wrote:
<quoted text>What a stupid sod. Provide links to rigorously analyzed studies dufus. Where did I say I DEFINE Wakefield's paper as anything a-hole? You and friend of pharma, invent and talk bee ess and think you are worthy of acceptence? Try growing up first.
You defined Wakefield (from his paper) as being "a doctor who tried to help autistic children when no one else in medicine would", when he has been proved to be a fraud, yet you insist on calling honest peer reviewed studies "junk science" without producing a scrap of evidence to support what you say. What does that make you?
Autism 4 Dummies

Winnipeg, Canada

#76 Apr 12, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
You defined Wakefield (from his paper) as being "a doctor who tried to help autistic children when no one else in medicine would", when he has been proved to be a fraud, yet you insist on calling honest peer reviewed studies "junk science" without producing a scrap of evidence to support what you say. What does that make you?
What an imbecile. You contribute nothing because you're a useless TROLL

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#77 Apr 12, 2013
Notice that yours truly above is trying to provoke readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion?? And hasn't yet addressed the flaws in his misrepresentation of Hannah Poling??
DUH MOMENT

Winnipeg, Canada

#78 Apr 12, 2013
friend wrote:
Notice that yours truly above is trying to provoke readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion?? And hasn't yet addressed the flaws in his misrepresentation of Hannah Poling??
Just like you.
ric99

Lincoln, UK

#79 Apr 13, 2013
Autism 4 Dummies wrote:
<quoted text>What an imbecile. You contribute nothing because you're a useless TROLL
How predictable. When challenged to produce logical reasoning to support his claim that all the peer reviewed studies showing no link between vaccines and autism are "junk science", the Winnipeg dummy resorts to insults. Could it be that he doesn't have any logical reason for calling them "junk science", so he starts throwing his toys out of his play pen and screaming.
MMR CAUSES AUTISM

Winnipeg, Canada

#80 Apr 13, 2013
ric99 wrote:
<quoted text>
How predictable. When challenged to produce logical reasoning to support his claim that all the peer reviewed studies showing no link between vaccines and autism are "junk science", the Winnipeg dummy resorts to insults. Could it be that he doesn't have any logical reason for calling them "junk science", so he starts throwing his toys out of his play pen and screaming.
What a steaming turd you are. You provide nothing and when challenged to you still don't.
ric99

Market Rasen, UK

#81 Apr 13, 2013
MMR CAUSES AUTISM wrote:
<quoted text>What a steaming turd you are. You provide nothing and when challenged to you still don't.
You’re either a liar, or your dementia is getting worse. A short time ago I posted this:-

“Here is just a small sample of the “Many Links” that have been posted here. Of course your dementia has caused you to forget them, and the fact that you claimed that they were “rubbish/junk science” without giving any scientifically rigorous reasons for saying this.”:-

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19952979
http://articles.cnn.com/2008-09-03/health/mea...
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/MMR...
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.13...
http://adc.bmj.com/content/93/10/832
http://journals.lww.com/pidj/Documents/Lack_o...
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa02...

You again stated that these were all “junk science” again without giving any scientifically rigorous reasons for this judgement. So put up, or shut up, because nyone who reads this forum (who isn't an anti-vaccine nutter like you) knows by now that you have no real/credible evidence that vaccines cause autism.

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#82 Apr 13, 2013
I wouldn't even bother. You know he's so predictable, he wont go through each link and discuss it. He will just give his predictable post, which will continue to include childish name-calling. Imagine, a man of his age behaving like that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sheriff: 4 Investigators Fired, One Performed S... (Oct '07) Fri Hillary 336
News So How Did "The Sopranos" End? (Jun '07) May 23 Anonymous 39
News Xcon Art May 21 awesome 1
News Gang Presence in South Carolina (Jun '07) May 14 Carnival cruiser 222
News Resident runs throughout Aiken County for ALS a... (Aug '15) May 14 Georgia ALS 52
News An Egg Roll Tour of the Midlands May 13 SILVER 2
Katie Sheridan and Chris Bickel (Mar '15) May 12 Katies_Meat_Hangers 6
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbia Mortgages