climate change
tortuga lingua


#1 Feb 20, 2013
climate change is total BS -

intelligent people use it as an identification badge or red flag ,..
people who do believe in it ,...are brain washed , politically correct progressives ,... liken to the " walking dead " zombies

proof that they simply can not think for them self's ,.. arguing with them is futile ,....its liken to the old cliche ' dont argue with an idiot you can never win
John Boy

Westmoreland, TN

#2 Feb 21, 2013
"tortuga lingua"--

--correctly stated, "climate change is total BS"

"Man-made" global warming is a fraud perpetrated on the American people and the world largely by the huckster of the century, Al Gore.

Al "invented" man-made global warming -- right after he finished "inventing" the internet.

Al was not always an environmentalist. The Gores were "sold" a tract of land near Hartsville, Tn (by Russian oil man, Armand Hammer) that had an operating zinc mine on it. That mine paid Al Jr "royalties" of $20,000 for 25 years and has released millions of pounds of potentially toxic substances into the Caney Fork watershed in the process.

Armond Hammer (young Al's benefactor) was a Russian oil man who owned Occidental Petroleum. He had "old dad", Al Gore Sr, in his pocket all during his tenure in the Senate.

Old Al, was --bought and paid for-- by the oil man, Armand Hammer, so much so that he was referred to, by his Senate colleages as "The Senator from Occidental".

When it became politically profitable to be an environmentalist, Al shut down the zinc mine and invented "man-made" global warming. He has worked that scam to accumulate vast wealh. He is an unscrupulous opportunist, this inventer of man-made global warming, Al Gore, Jr.

The earth has warmed and cooled alternately since the beginning of time. That is controlled by the phases of the sun and our solar system.(by mother nature)

Greenland is called that because, that place, much of it now frozen wasteland was once warm with lush abundant green vegetation. We have not yet fully recovered from the ice age that occured since that period of time.

Global warming is a vast scam intended to scare us all into accepting massive wealth re-distribution schemes -- to confiscate money from the capitalists, and also ordinary citizens, of the world and push us further towards socialism.

It is a total fraud.


#3 Feb 24, 2013
Prof. Richard Parncutt of the University of Graz, Austria, for his recent suggestion that climate skeptics deserve the death penalty. Parncutt, a professor of the psychology of music (really) thinks himself a green version of John Rawls apparently, and posted his extensive case for why the death penalty for climate skeptics would be fully just on his blog back in October. Now that the post actually got read, he’s taken it down, but not before several screens shots were made to preserve it for digital posterity, not to mention digital “posteriority”(a new term of mine, meaning exactly what you think). He actually thinks global warming “deniers” deserve more harsh treatment than Behring Brevik, the Norwegian mass murderer who killed 77 people in 2011 (in a country with tough gun control, incidentally). Here’s some relevant excerpts:

In this article I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential G[lobal] W[arming] deniers. But before coming to this surprising conclusion, please allow me to explain where I am coming from...

GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate...

I don’t think that mass murderers of the usual kind, such Breivik, should face the death penalty. Nor do I think tobacco denialists are guilty enough to warrant the death penalty, in spite of the enormous number of deaths that resulted more or less directly from tobacco denialism. GW is different. With high probability it will cause hundreds of millions of deaths. For this reason I propose that the death penalty is appropriate for influential GW deniers. More generally, I propose that we limit the death penalty to people whose actions will with a high probability cause millions of future deaths... the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for GW deniers who are so influential that one million future deaths can with high probability be traced to their personal actions. Please note also that I am only talking about prevention of future deaths – not punishment or revenge after the event.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Bob Barnes arrested on drugs 49 min Cleanuptime 6
Big Ronnie Rodgers 1 hr Stfu 7
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 4 hr effem 170,545
Looking for a Psychic 9 hr buckwheat 2
pva 15 hr nobro 83
Rats/informants. It's that time again. 17 hr Seriously 16
News Wes Bottoms, Russell Springs, KY at Journey to ... 20 hr USA 14
charles barnes (Oct '13) 23 hr Mr Twister 25

Columbia Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbia Mortgages