Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,862

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217669 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
It's 'SunMad' and not 'summaid' and no. I don't like raisins.
Might explain why I don't like you given your brain reflects what one looks like.
Too funny! "It's SumMad not summaid". What a dope.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217670 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm "hetero". Probably so much so I slept with your wife BEFORE she got fat and ugly leaving you with second hand goods and a reason she was never satisfied with you in bed.
Morality in itself can be determined on a personal level. Doesn't apply to shared situations.
Now...the is an aspect such as shared morality. Aspects in knowing murder, rape, pedophelia, theft, etc. is considered "bad" or "evil".
Unofrtunatle for your sorry ass same sex marriage does not include itself in that format therefore your determination of gay marriage as being 'immoral' is one you and some other biased others must carry around like a wet unwanted backpack but it is not shared.
As far as the 'Feds' claiming gays are second class that is an outright bullshit fabricated make-believe ignorant dumbass lie from you....a prejudicial idiot given it was the 'Feds' that allowed same sex marriages in the states they did MORON.
LOL!!!!
God DAMN buddy...AS stupid as you are I wouldn't be surprised to see you busting up a flat screen TV to save the people trapped "inside"...LOL!!!!
What?

LOL!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217671 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm "hetero". Probably so much so I slept with your wife BEFORE she got fat and ugly leaving you with second hand goods and a reason she was never satisfied with you in bed.
Morality in itself can be determined on a personal level. Doesn't apply to shared situations.
Now...the is an aspect such as shared morality. Aspects in knowing murder, rape, pedophelia, theft, etc. is considered "bad" or "evil".
Unofrtunatle for your sorry ass same sex marriage does not include itself in that format therefore your determination of gay marriage as being 'immoral' is one you and some other biased others must carry around like a wet unwanted backpack but it is not shared.
As far as the 'Feds' claiming gays are second class that is an outright bullshit fabricated make-believe ignorant dumbass lie from you....a prejudicial idiot given it was the 'Feds' that allowed same sex marriages in the states they did MORON.
LOL!!!!
God DAMN buddy...AS stupid as you are I wouldn't be surprised to see you busting up a flat screen TV to save the people trapped "inside"...LOL!!!!
Calm down Don Juan.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217672 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Between this and the fool who wanted to marry his car I could care less.
It has no connection to same sexed marriages.
Next.
"same sexed". Too funny!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217673 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Whaaa???
Your uncle...is...is he molesting you?? With 'Momma' watching??
I'm trying to determine what your drunken rant is getting at here...
We'll tell you all about it when you're sober.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217674 Sep 22, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
Word on the street is that you like corn.
And Crisco.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217675 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
What "people"???
People like YOU Gus baby???
LOL!!
Personally I could give a shit LESS what losers like you think about me or anyone else.
"...give a sh!t less"? Wha?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217676 Sep 22, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate commies more then you Nazi pigs. Anyway I stand for the Constitution of the USA...You want it ripped apart because you hate gay people....SORRY YOUR LOSING THE WAR FUROR BOY.
YOU WONT ANSWER MY QUESTION WILL YOU PUNK?????????? You know I got you trapped so you just twist and twist....YOU LSOE GAME OVER SET AND MATCH...RUN OFF TO CHURCH NOW NAZI.
You have evoked Danth's law and Godwin's Law both in the same post. Very good!

And now you're gonna tell me they are not laws when you violate them.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217677 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFL!!!!!!!!!
Best video I've seen yet. And oddly enough accurate as hell.
Thank Veryvermilion.
That's the best video you've seen yet?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217678 Sep 22, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Like most Nazi pigs you have nothing so you just spew hate and nasty attacks.. Typical.
Likewise.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#217679 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not opinion, science.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
Therefore, ss marriage is an oxymoron, moron.
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Right.
Well then heterosexual couples who cannot reproduce are also a "defective failure of mating behavior" as well.
It would be interesting to see you talk your shit to them.
And "cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior"???
ROFL!!!!
We let obese couples have obese children. Hardly "evolutionary". You want to go to battle with them next??
And "cross cultural"??? Funny....but several foreign countries allow same sexed marriages.
You're an idiot. Wear the sign.
I'm proud of you Danny boy, you are finally trying to post something of substance!

1. Couples that are incapable of procreation were (and still are in many places), unaware of the condition until after marriage. It has never been a problem.

To use those rare and sad situations to justify calling a 100% barren and destitute half gendered couple married is silly stupid.

2. I've already posted the scientific discussion of "cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior". Perhaps you should not try to engage in discussing things you are incapable of understanding.

3. Every culture in known human history has had marriage from start to finish. That Danny boy is 'cross cultural'. While ss couples have briefly and rarely appeared, they have never established themselves and spread. This current situation is far to brief to provide an exception.

Strike three, you're out! But hey, keep trying sonny!!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#217680 Sep 22, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Since your wife is currently barren, you and she experience "a defective failure of mating behavior".
You need to IMMEDIATELY divorce from one another. You don't deserve to be in a marriage.
These are your rules, Kimmy, not ours. And since they come from your collection of idiocy known as "How Everybody Should Live Their Lives", you should lead by example. Well, you could just shut your mouth too and not continue to make an ass of yourself.
My wife's not barren. In fact, we are going to try for a child today. I'm looking forward to it.

If you are referring to her age, that has never been a failure of mating behavior. Nor has a medical condition.

But more importantly, and this is clearly a shock to you, so sit down on your hemorrhoid pillow, these conditions have ALWAYS been accepted in marriage!!!

However, a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half has never been considered marriage in a single culture from start to finish. They simply don't come close to equating to marriage.

I hope you are okay with this shock. Call me if you want to talk.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#217681 Sep 22, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
We use homosexuality in the animal kingdom not to justify our existence. Rather, we use it to educate others, who believe it to be unnatural, about its existence in nature.
It's kind of like talking to a child about "the birds and the bees". We have to dumb it down (that's concept you should understand) for idiots such as yourself.
That you continue to deny homosexuality's natural presence in the world--that you continue to claim that homosexuals need to be "cured", only goes to show that you are in denial.
That's what they say about a person who can observe reality, but refuses to accept it.
Now you are shifting again. However, the writer was using animals to justify a behavior You call it 'education'. By that definition, eating shit and licking butts are natural too. Most scientists I read call animal anal sex a painful expression of domination. Gays bring a whole new dimension to the birds and the bees...

I would have to deny my own presence if what you said were true. I claim all humans are broken, quit playing the whining victim.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#217682 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
"Robotic sloganeering"
LOL!!!
-You need to get with KiMare.
Between the 2 of you I think you could come up with a whole new DICTIONARY of bullshit terminology.
Big words, new words are difficult for you aren't they? You tend to stick with really simple obscene and foul words. Got to be frustrating...

I'm sorry.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#217683 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't dictate classic morality. Nor did any one religion.
It is far more basic than those things.
Honesty and responsibility would cover most of what I am saying.
If I birth a child, I take care of that child.
If I make the marriage vow, I keep the marriage vow.
If I don't qualify for marriage, I don't manipulate a fraudulent fake.
If I have a sexual disorder, I face it honestly, and certainly don't demand that others deny it with me.
What would happen if GLBT's admitted with honesty and responsibility that they represent a confused crossover point of gender and sexuality?
I do nothing more than point out reality. And look at your hate. Do you ever stop and think about that?
<quoted text>
1. Other than being your typical hateful ad homoan gay twirl attack, what does your post have to do with mine?
2. You lie. That isn't my definition.
3. My definition fits my marriage perfectly.
The only thing you did was prove your immorality.
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Look, Kim, you are the one who insists that a couple who is mutually sterile and unable to engage in mating behavior cannot have a full marriage.
That describes every marriage in which a couple, gay or straight, is unable to produce children.
You also claim that the essence of marriage is to tie a man to a wife so that he can provide resources for his family--so that the doesn't just mate with a woman and wander off to find another woman to impregnate, leaving his family in the lurch.
You have done your duty. You and your wife have raised your children to maturity. They no longer need your resources as parents. They are on their own and independent--or they should be at their age.
This being the case, by your own logic, you should move on. You and your wife no longer possess the essence of marriage. You no longer need the benefits and protections of marriage.
These are your words, Kim. You don't like having them turned against you. That's why you claim that they are an attack.
I'm simply trying to show you that your own ideas and beliefs about marriage are clearly incorrect.
"There is none so blind as he who will not see."
See my last post to you, it answers your claims once again.

However, none of what you distort and lie about changes this;

A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#217684 Sep 22, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFL!!!!!!!!!
Best video I've seen yet. And oddly enough accurate as hell.
Thank Veryvermilion.
You are right on, it is as 'accurate as hell' where the father of all lies resides.

The very first chapter of the Bible indicates marriage as between a man and woman. That is affirmed by Jesus and Paul.

Clearly a gay twirl ad homoan lie.

Smirk.

Since: Jul 13

Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

#217685 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife's not barren. In fact, we are going to try for a child today. I'm looking forward to it.
If you are referring to her age, that has never been a failure of mating behavior. Nor has a medical condition.
But more importantly, and this is clearly a shock to you, so sit down on your hemorrhoid pillow, these conditions have ALWAYS been accepted in marriage!!!
However, a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half has never been considered marriage in a single culture from start to finish. They simply don't come close to equating to marriage.
I hope you are okay with this shock. Call me if you want to talk.
Smile.
How does it not equate to marriage? Perhaps you are using an outdated definition of the word marriage; the ability of procreation is not a criteria to be considered married. Same sex marriages were tolerated in a lot of civilizations and cultures. Biblical attitudes condemn it, but not all people in this world follow Western ideology.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#217686 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not opinion, science.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
Therefore, ss marriage is an oxymoron, moron.
<quoted text>
I'm proud of you Danny boy, you are finally trying to post something of substance!
1. Couples that are incapable of procreation were (and still are in many places), unaware of the condition until after marriage. It has never been a problem.
To use those rare and sad situations to justify calling a 100% barren and destitute half gendered couple married is silly stupid.
2. I've already posted the scientific discussion of "cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior". Perhaps you should not try to engage in discussing things you are incapable of understanding.
3. Every culture in known human history has had marriage from start to finish. That Danny boy is 'cross cultural'. While ss couples have briefly and rarely appeared, they have never established themselves and spread. This current situation is far to brief to provide an exception.
Strike three, you're out! But hey, keep trying sonny!!!
Dan is not feeling well this morning after a long hard night of alcohol fueled straight bashing. I doubt we'll be hearing from for a while.

Since: Jul 13

Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

#217687 Sep 22, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
See my last post to you, it answers your claims once again.
However, none of what you distort and lie about changes this;
A ss couple will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior.
"Pointlessly duplicate gendered"
You are asserting a very subjective remark here. To whom is it pointless? Same sexes marry for economical and familial reasons. When their partner is in the hospital, they can visit them as they will be the spouse. Clearly, not a pointless union in their perspective.
Leeched

Azusa, CA

#217688 Sep 22, 2013
Glendora POA
5 year deal - 32%
As a negotiator, I normally shy away from long-term contracts, however, in Glendora, the City was committed to entering into a 5-year MOU. After several rounds of negotiations, the POA, led by its President, James DeMond, was able to work out the salary and benefit package to a level where the POA was comfortable in agreeing to a 5-year MOU. The new contract calls for a 32% salary increase over the 5-year deal (compounded). Specifically, officers will receive in year one-5%, year two-5%, year three-6%, year four-6%, and year five 6%. By the final salary increase (July 2010) base pay for

police officers in Glendora will be $90,000 per year. The Cafeteria Plan for medical insurance will also increase $30 per year during the term of the contract. FTO pay was increase from $90 to $140 per pay period and Court Overtime was increase from a minimum of two hours to a minimum of three hours overtime pay per appearance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Colfax Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Nevada City Tri Counties Bank Robbed Mar 31 joe 1
Patient blacklisting happens (Jul '06) Mar 26 karen 32
News Burglary Suspects Arrested in Lake of the Pines Mar '15 TBL 1
Review: Auburn Smoke Shop Feb '15 Ray493 1
legit pain P.I.L.L.S Feb '15 hju 1
Grass Valley Predator Drugs, Rapes 16 Year Old ... Feb '15 Disgusted 1
New book about "A Place Called Pinecrest." (Jan '09) Feb '15 Peter Pinecrest 5
More from around the web

Colfax People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]