Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52052 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37274 Jan 27, 2013
Marengo Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Just remember, according to Kuntmare that's just a friendship.
Apparently, Kuntmare gets banged by zher friends.
No, I'm a redeemed cynic who remains barbarian.

You must be thinking of the sitcom 'Friends' where everyone banged everyone of the opposite sex, but only one couple got married.

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37275 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
Hope that clears things up for you blondie!
Smile.
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
If it has absolutely NO effect on your life, then you just need to butt out then. I don't care how much you don't like it or how much against god or evolution you think it is, the fact is that it has NOTHING to do with you because it is not YOUR life. It is the life of the person that is involved in it. YOU are not god, you are not king, or president. What you think about gay marriage is just that... your OPINION... and you can't use YOUR OPINION to withhold the rights from other consenting adults that live in this country... it doesn't work that way. You have the balls to call me blondie, but you can't even figure out that YOUR opinion isn't the basis for the laws in this country... hahahahahaha!!!!
The first question that must be answered is, are marriage and gay couples the same relationship.

Every other question can only be justified by first equating the two relationships.

Logic and reason are the legitimate basis for rights and laws. You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.

Once again, at it's most basic essence, Marriage is the cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are a direct defective conflict with the very core goal of evolution. Literally 'unmarriage'.

Give a logical reasoned answer to that straight primary question, blondie, and we can go on from there.

SMile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37276 Jan 27, 2013
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
And by the way Gregory, uh I mean Kimare... does the wifey know you troll message boards about homosexuality?
Sitting right next to me laughing at you trying to bully me...

Why does a legitimate cause need to resort to such tactics...

Snicker.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37277 Jan 27, 2013
TXgurl wrote:
Hey Kimare/Watchmann/Gregory... Here is a post by you on your blog. Seems like you like to talk the talk, but not walk the walk...
Narcissism
“Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live.”
Oscar Wilde
Since you are asking others to live as you wish to live, aren't you being narcissistic?
And as far as you saying you are not a christian but a "barbarian" that is a lie, too... most of your posts on your blog are about religion and how a man is dominant over women. That brings up another enigma... since you say you are a hermaphrodite, isn't that a problem? You don't have a husband to dictate over the female part of you and tell her what to do.
Interesting you bring narcissism up...

You are asking the country, including the single birthplace of every type of relationship in existence, to pretend that gay couples (as opposed to every other type of loving relationship) is the same as marriage. This ignores the basic distinction that marriage fulfills evolution's primary goal, and gay unions are a direct defective failure of it.

It is YOUR claim that is narcissistic blondie.

All of my posts are about faith married to reason and logic (that's a double pun). I'm not religious as you have discovered and cannot handle.

Apart from any religion, why is it that human history has males as primary leaders in every culture (with very short term rare exceptions)?

Smile.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#37278 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
..........
Yet it's not, of course, since most folks engage in the mating behavior loooong before they marry, if they even choose to marry, with no restrictions other than their own choices and beliefs.

And, of course allowing gay folks the ability to legally marry won't change the mating habits of a single straight person.

It WILL, however, be a good thing for that gay couple, and for their children.

You have children, you should be able to understand this.

I understand your overwhelming need to prove you are right, but you have yet to prove that children with unmarried parents do better than those whose parents make that formal commitment. You have yet to prove that sending a message to gay youth that the healthy good idea.

You have never proven that elderly couples are more secure if they never legally marry.

I know you kike the sound of these words and concepts you have created in your own mind, but all the smirking in the world won't help to make them rational in the real world. The smirks don't help families and children.

What is your purpose in the world if it is not to help others?

It is just to stand as the Watchman who judges but never acts, secure in the knowledge that you alone MUST be right, as harm falls on those around you?

That's just sad. And nothing to smirk about.
Get Over It

Tempe, AZ

#37279 Jan 27, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet it's not, of course, since most folks engage in the mating behavior loooong before they marry, if they even choose to marry, with no restrictions other than their own choices and beliefs.
And, of course allowing gay folks the ability to legally marry won't change the mating habits of a single straight person.
It WILL, however, be a good thing for that gay couple, and for their children.
You have children, you should be able to understand this.
I understand your overwhelming need to prove you are right, but you have yet to prove that children with unmarried parents do better than those whose parents make that formal commitment. You have yet to prove that sending a message to gay youth that the healthy good idea.
You have never proven that elderly couples are more secure if they never legally marry.
I know you kike the sound of these words and concepts you have created in your own mind, but all the smirking in the world won't help to make them rational in the real world. The smirks don't help families and children.
What is your purpose in the world if it is not to help others?
It is just to stand as the Watchman who judges but never acts, secure in the knowledge that you alone MUST be right, as harm falls on those around you?
That's just sad. And nothing to smirk about.
And as usual,a post that has the ring of truth to it ! To me,it's just common sense,logic and plain Ol humanity towards others! They really have nothing,especially the poster you were replying to! Anyway,great post!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37280 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet it's not, of course, since most folks engage in the mating behavior loooong before they marry, if they even choose to marry, with no restrictions other than their own choices and beliefs.
And, of course allowing gay folks the ability to legally marry won't change the mating habits of a single straight person.
It WILL, however, be a good thing for that gay couple, and for their children.
You have children, you should be able to understand this.
I understand your overwhelming need to prove you are right, but you have yet to prove that children with unmarried parents do better than those whose parents make that formal commitment. You have yet to prove that sending a message to gay youth that the healthy good idea.
You have never proven that elderly couples are more secure if they never legally marry.
I know you kike the sound of these words and concepts you have created in your own mind, but all the smirking in the world won't help to make them rational in the real world. The smirks don't help families and children.
What is your purpose in the world if it is not to help others?
It is just to stand as the Watchman who judges but never acts, secure in the knowledge that you alone MUST be right, as harm falls on those around you?
That's just sad. And nothing to smirk about.
Of course there are foolish violations of mating behavior. The simple reality is, in higher life forms, the constraint of marriage is intended to honor the integrity of the person and protect the fruit. Social facts show that the the results of mating behavior outside of marriage have devastating effects. Hardly a point of argument in your favor.

The health of children in a default situation is dependent on as closely as possible having the role models of mothers and fathers. That is proved by the base rating of single parents, only recently superseded by lesbian couples in the largest, latest and most scientific study to date on all family types.

I have no need to 'prove' I am right. As a cynic, reality and truth are my base line. You are diverting from your inability to logically argue with the point made in my post you responded to. Your claim is simply a cheap ad homoan attack.

Address the point I made in my previous post, and then we can move on to the followup issues.

Smile.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#37281 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did. I simply said marriage is a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating behavior.
Well then. If YOU said it, who are we to question your authority? We temporary forgot about your omnipotence.
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37282 Jan 27, 2013
What is your all the same person your new counter, to deflect?

Why don't you pull up the posts where I told you, you had enough grease in your hair to crank a school bus? Lesbian? I don't know but I am sure your some kind of queer!

If you are a woman and if you are the woman in that video than lesbianism is your only hope for romance, at least with the light on.

Now that your so talking so much tell about all the nasty diseases reserved for primarily homosexuals!
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
?????? Are you kidding me? I am not looking for "Lukes" affection. You, Luke, Samatha, Lone Gunmen... you are all the same person. You need to quit pretending. No way I would go for a loser like you, anyways. Besides, I am a lesbian and a soon to be happily married one at that, so YOU don't flatter yourself.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#37283 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
You are funny when you make shit up. "direct defective violation".... hahahahahahahaha No malice aforethought in THAT science is there?

More old KiMerde. Settling into the twilight of his life and becoming more irrelevant with each passing day.
really

AOL

#37284 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Sitting right next to me laughing at you trying to bully me...
Why does a legitimate cause need to resort to such tactics...
Snicker.
Is she washing your feet with her hair Oh Exalted One?
really

AOL

#37285 Jan 27, 2013
Brenda Lee Johnson wrote:
Don't flatter yourself, Luke is notorious for getting women fuzzy headed and ducking out! I know of at least 6 women he has and none of them have ever even been able to kiss him I am embarrassed for you, what a joke.
<quoted text>
Of course Luke hasn't kissed them, he only likes boys!
Cool Hand Luke

Scranton, PA

#37286 Jan 27, 2013
No, I have never had the compulsion to lick another mans ass or let him stick his dick in mine.
really wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course Luke hasn't kissed them, he only likes boys!

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37288 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
What is your all the same person your new counter, to deflect?
Why don't you pull up the posts where I told you, you had enough grease in your hair to crank a school bus? Lesbian? I don't know but I am sure your some kind of queer!
If you are a woman and if you are the woman in that video than lesbianism is your only hope for romance, at least with the light on.
Now that your so talking so much tell about all the nasty diseases reserved for primarily homosexuals!
<quoted text>
Really? No man will have me? I have been married twice as a cover-up to me being a lesbian... I left both of them, neither of them left me. I also have 3 biological children, all made the good old fashioned way. I could go out and find a man right now... if I wanted one... but I don't. And I showed your quotes, you thought that woman in the video was cute ;)
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37289 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
No, I have never had the compulsion to lick another mans ass or let him stick his dick in mine.
<quoted text>
Thank goodness
.
You would break your back trying to get into that position

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37290 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke wrote:
What is your all the same person your new counter, to deflect?
Why don't you pull up the posts where I told you, you had enough grease in your hair to crank a school bus? Lesbian? I don't know but I am sure your some kind of queer!
If you are a woman and if you are the woman in that video than lesbianism is your only hope for romance, at least with the light on.
Now that your so talking so much tell about all the nasty diseases reserved for primarily homosexuals!
<quoted text>
Oh, and please do tell me what diseases are set aside JUST for lesbians... I would like to know. hahaha

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37291 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Sitting right next to me laughing at you trying to bully me...
Why does a legitimate cause need to resort to such tactics...
Snicker.
Does she know about your affair, Greg? I found a letter online from one of your church members about how you took a woman from her husband and had a 14 year affair with her. I bet she knows... but she bows down to her almighty husband who does all of her thinking for her.

“Free to buy cake”

Since: Jul 07

wherever I like.

#37292 Jan 27, 2013
Cool Hand Luke's appearances are amazingly timed to radical events in Kimare's posts. Funny how that happens. Sometimes you just want to be more smarmy than usual, but you don't want it tied to your registered profile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37293 Jan 27, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Two consenting gay adults are still a direct defective violation of the very essence of evolution.
Jane Do0do0 wrote:
<quoted text> You are funny when you make shit up. "direct defective violation".... hahahahahahahaha No malice aforethought in THAT science is there?
More old KiMerde. Settling into the twilight of his life and becoming more irrelevant with each passing day.
School is in session. I'm not sure if this is for an adult or a child based on your comprehension skills.

The fundamental goal of evolution is survival of the fittest. That is only accomplished by procreation.
-An inability to procreate stops survival.
-A lack of desire to procreate stops survival.

Gay couples fail on the second point. That makes them a direct defective failure. Simply a fact.

After a desperate search to explain homosexuality's place in evolution because of that basic failure, the most likely explanation is an epi-marker mistake (defect).

Why do you hate the truth? Will that change it?

Smile.
really

AOL

#37294 Jan 27, 2013
Marengo Jon wrote:
Cool Hand Luke's appearances are amazingly timed to radical events in Kimare's posts. Funny how that happens. Sometimes you just want to be more smarmy than usual, but you don't want it tied to your registered profile.
So you have noticed that too? I thought I was the only one.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Coal City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Capone's 2 hr fan 6
Giant drug party with over 2000 people in Wilmi... 6 hr Francis 8
sidewalk blocked in front of rosati's causing h... 6 hr Bruce 6
Trailer Park in diamond 8 hr daughter 7
Beware Heroin Dealers You Are Going Down Mon Photo Album 38
power lifting meet Mon comet 5
News Peotone Town Chatter (Jul '12) Jul 23 jim k 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Coal City Mortgages