27 Dead in CT School Shooting

27 Dead in CT School Shooting

Posted in the Clearfield Forum

First Prev
of 10
Next Last
NRA Ban

Clearfield, PA

#1 Dec 14, 2012
Is Gun Control necessary yet?
gun owner

Clearfield, PA

#2 Dec 14, 2012
NRA Ban wrote:
Is Gun Control necessary yet?
No, people control ic necessary
Pro NRA

Clearfield, PA

#3 Dec 14, 2012
People control is necessary, not gun control. Guns do nothing without people - insane or otherwise.
freaks

Clearfield, PA

#4 Dec 14, 2012
we already have gun control and if you ever legally purchased a firearm you would know this

there is no solution to lunacy ffs
Case XX

Clearfield, PA

#5 Dec 14, 2012
20 students were also stabbed at a school in China, is knife control necessary?
Hexamethylene

Clearfield, PA

#6 Dec 14, 2012
What kind of gun did Timothy McVeigh use when he killed 168 people?
FrackWater

Clearfield, PA

#7 Dec 14, 2012
Usually when people set out to kill someone they choose guns because they are the most effective and simplest way to do it.
It is very difficult to make a bomb, and there is no guarantee that it will work. And using a knife is far less effective than a gun.
Do we send our soldiers into battle armed only with knives? No we give them in with guns.
To argue that one can kill just as easily without a gun is absolutely absurd.
I agree we need some people control, people should be controlled so they cannot buy assault weapons or high capacity magazines.
gun owner

Clearfield, PA

#8 Dec 14, 2012
FrackWater wrote:
Usually when people set out to kill someone they choose guns because they are the most effective and simplest way to do it.
It is very difficult to make a bomb, and there is no guarantee that it will work. And using a knife is far less effective than a gun.
Do we send our soldiers into battle armed only with knives? No we give them in with guns.
To argue that one can kill just as easily without a gun is absolutely absurd.
I agree we need some people control, people should be controlled so they cannot buy assault weapons or high capacity magazines.
bravo frackwater.
Remember 911

Clearfield, PA

#9 Dec 14, 2012
FrackWater wrote:
Usually when people set out to kill someone they choose guns because they are the most effective and simplest way to do it.
It is very difficult to make a bomb, and there is no guarantee that it will work. And using a knife is far less effective than a gun.
Do we send our soldiers into battle armed only with knives? No we give them in with guns.
To argue that one can kill just as easily without a gun is absolutely absurd.
I agree we need some people control, people should be controlled so they cannot buy assault weapons or high capacity magazines.
Hijackers killed thousands using box cutters.
Get a clue

Canton, OH

#10 Dec 14, 2012
FrackWater wrote:
Usually when people set out to kill someone they choose guns because they are the most effective and simplest way to do it.
It is very difficult to make a bomb, and there is no guarantee that it will work. And using a knife is far less effective than a gun.
Do we send our soldiers into battle armed only with knives? No we give them in with guns.
To argue that one can kill just as easily without a gun is absolutely absurd.
I agree we need some people control, people should be controlled so they cannot buy assault weapons or high capacity magazines.
A quick google search, followed by a trip to Agway will build you a bomb that goes boom everytime. All for under $50.00.
to close to home

Clearfield, PA

#11 Dec 14, 2012
Remember 911 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hijackers killed thousands using box cutters.
The topic here was gun control. We all know the devastation the box cutters caused. The difference is this was not a single insane person with a gun. It was a terrorist attack. It was carefully planned out by a number of people over a very long time. They took a lot of time to make sure that their plan would be succesful. It almost was until the HERO'S aboard flight 93 took their hi-jackers box cutters and shoved them up their asses. They probably would not have been as succesful if these hi-jackers had guns. Make no mistake that these hi-jackers were insane to know they were going to lose their lives regardless. The difference is the cowards that planned this mission did it with great planning and commitment. We do need to keep better eyes on those who purchase gun's, but it's the people purchasing the gun, not the gun that does the shooting. Most of us want a gun for hunting, or to defend ourselves. Even defending ourselves we do not want to kill someone, but we know that we may have to. The type of person that buys a gun with the sole intention of going on a killing spree is to hard to detect. The same as looking at a young man and saying he may become a drug addict, rapist,child molestor, or any other type of criminal. If they out law guns, then only the bad guys will have them. Think about this for a few moments. Is that what you want?
wtf x 2

Clearfield, PA

#12 Dec 14, 2012
Remember 911 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hijackers killed thousands using box cutters.
Hijacked planes - 2977 victims, Box cutters - 0 victims.

You could potentially rob a gun store with a box cutter but completing a mass murder inside the store? Very, very doubtful.

You must have watched some Timothy Burton rendition of a 9/11 movie somewhere.
a takes a village

Clearfield, PA

#13 Dec 14, 2012
wtf x 2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hijacked planes - 2977 victims, Box cutters - 0 victims.
You could potentially rob a gun store with a box cutter but completing a mass murder inside the store? Very, very doubtful.
You must have watched some Timothy Burton rendition of a 9/11 movie somewhere.
Guns used - Zero

People will conduct mass killings no matter what laws or regulations are in place.
kobidog

Julian, PA

#14 Dec 14, 2012
kobidog

Julian, PA

#15 Dec 14, 2012
"84,999,989 Firearm owners Killed No One Today." Anybody that thinks that Banning all guns would've prevented what happened today or any of these incidents is Delusional!!
Ford vs Chevy

Clearfield, PA

#16 Dec 14, 2012
93 people died today in car accidents. Where's the outcry to ban cars? Oh yeah, we love our cars too much to ban them.
kobidog

Julian, PA

#17 Dec 14, 2012
The world is full of violent people. It always has been and always will be. All things a side, the 2nd amendment is to protect you from our government. The same government that kills millions of innocent people with their unjust wars. They rack up debt and pass the burden to you. They give arms to terrorists and take over governments that they don't like. The last thing you want is not to protect yourself. America is about to have a civil war, now is not the time to be a bleeding heart. Now is the time to rise up and keep the power to the people. The right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
FrackWater

Clearfield, PA

#18 Dec 14, 2012
Get a clue wrote:
<quoted text>A quick google search, followed by a trip to Agway will build you a bomb that goes boom everytime. All for under $50.00.
However, it's pretty rare for someone to use fertilizer bombs to kill people in this country.
Usually, when someone sets out to kill, they choose guns.
Wayne La Pierre

Oley, PA

#19 Dec 14, 2012
FrackWater wrote:
Usually when people set out to kill someone they choose guns because they are the most effective and simplest way to do it.
It is very difficult to make a bomb, and there is no guarantee that it will work. And using a knife is far less effective than a gun.
Do we send our soldiers into battle armed only with knives? No we give them in with guns.
To argue that one can kill just as easily without a gun is absolutely absurd.
I agree we need some people control, people should be controlled so they cannot buy assault weapons or high capacity magazines.
In the military, they have bayonets (ie knives!)on the end of their rifles, Tard! and have you ever heard of a swiss army knife. The retards always come out of the woodwork after something like this.
FrackWater

Clearfield, PA

#20 Dec 14, 2012
a takes a village wrote:
<quoted text>
Guns used - Zero
People will conduct mass killings no matter what laws or regulations are in place.
Yes people have been killing each other since there have been humans on the earth, but rapid fire assault weapons with large capacity magazines make killing large groups of people much much easier.
I am not saying ban all guns, just assault style weapons with large capacity magazines. There is no rational purpose for civilians to own these guns.
They are the gun of choice of mass murderers and mentally stunted adults who like to pretend they are Rambo at the shooting range.
They are not needed for hunting or self defense. No one should have them outside of law enforcement and the military.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Clearfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Watch the walkers demonstrate their mental inst... 2 hr ihw 45
Charges filed against congressional district 5 ... 2 hr ihw 50
Fact is the tax receipts were fake 2 hr Hippo Critt 61
Do the Riverwalkwhore's pay taxes to Clearfiel... 3 hr Hippo Critt 5
add a word/drop a word and 'stuff' (Nov '16) 5 hr texas pete 131
Clearfield County Judges 22 hr Frustrated 6
Look at the town crumbling Sat Bincat 44

Clearfield Jobs

Personal Finance

Clearfield Mortgages