Adams criticizes court ruling on Glen...

Adams criticizes court ruling on Glendora redevelopment

There are 9 comments on the San Bernardino County Sun story from Sep 12, 2010, titled Adams criticizes court ruling on Glendora redevelopment. In it, San Bernardino County Sun reports that:

Although a state appeals court recently ruled against a Glendora redevelopment effort, Assemblyman Anthony Adams is maintaining his steadfast support of the city.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at San Bernardino County Sun.

Render Maxis

Hesperia, CA

#1 Sep 12, 2010
Anthony Adams, he of "no new taxes " fame is now offering us legal opinion. Is this the same A.A. that cannot pass the "bar" exam? What of the Atlas Pac, A.A.?You know, the ruse of the check of the supposed illegal signatures on the recall A.A. petitions. Now you may say you have never been recalled as well as being able to say that you were not voted out of the "Central Committee." You remember the arrangement that was made to allow you to withdraw as chairman instead of being voted out. Sound familiar?
Glendora Politics visited

Glendora, CA

#2 Sep 13, 2010
Anthony was lining up his politicial favors and friends when he backed Glendor in their "City of Bell" attack on the good people of California, in favor of Glendora politicial allies and money doners.

In the end Anthony Adams lost and so did Glendora, once for bad press in the newspapers but they spent $800,000 dollars to make a WRONG a RIGT in Califonria's Supreme Court system, they lost their alos.
Crack Pot

Glendora, CA

#3 Sep 14, 2010
Anthony Adams has been shown once again why his a crack pot, who was backed by special interest money all along!

So long Anthony!!!

Covina, CA

#4 Sep 17, 2010
Look who is in the drivers seat on this issue, and it's not Anthony Adams nor the City of Glendora, California.

But id you ever had a chance to watch or attend one of these City Council meetings, you would be suprised to learn Glendora is doing or has done nothing wrong?

If that not more baloney!
Pet for Rev in Supreme

Glendora, CA

#5 Sep 18, 2010
Petitioning for Review in the Supreme Court

Q: When will the petition for review be decided?

A: Once it receives a petition for review, the court has at least 60 days in which to make its decision. It assigns the case to legal staff to draft a conference memorandum, which summarizes the case facts, outlines the issues, and makes a recommendation to the court whether the case presents sufficiently important issues for review.

A decision to review is made at the court’s weekly conference—at which over 250 petitions are usually considered—if at least four justices vote to accept a particular case for review.
Anthony gives big

La Puente, CA

#7 Sep 24, 2010
Parties and Attorneys

Case Number S184829 Date Description Notes
07/26/2010 Petition for review filed Defendant and Appellant: Glendora Redevelopment Project

Defendant and Appellant: City Council of the City of Glendora.

Defendant and Appellant: City of Glendora
Attorney: Dean Alan Bochner

07/27/2010 Record requested

07/28/2010 Received Court of Appeal record one file folder/briefs

09/22/2010 Time extended to grant or deny review The time for granting or denying review in the above-entitled matter is hereby extended to and including October 22, 2010, or the date upon which review is either granted or denied.
Anthony Adams deep holed

La Puente, CA

#8 Oct 14, 2010
Anthony Adams LOST "big time" and so did the entire Glendora, California City Council, City Managers (2).

Chris Jeffers
Brenda Fisher
Kebn Herman
Jeff krigal
Gene Murabito
Karen Davis
Terry Kent
Mark Kelly
Gary Clifford
W. Leech
Douglas Tessitor
Sheep dip Adams Donnelly

West Covina, CA

#9 Dec 29, 2011
Gov Jerry Brown deserves lots of credit for leading on this. He brought the issue to everyone's attention, forced it through the legislature, and now the state is less socialist.

The RDAs are independent little governments - funded with eminent domain abuse and slices of new tax money - accountable to almost nobody. As the other guy says, these are effective developer bailouts.

The state budget battle was in voter minds, where RDA interests were known mostly to those in the inner-circles. What takes the cake is RDA siphoning off tax money to spend on lobbying! Jerry Brown has untangled the mess; he will be judged on how long this lasts.

It's interesting is down. I'm interested in what those Republican-Communists have to say about this. They've been battling to silence the supporters of Communist Redevelopment Agencies among them, which seems to be most of those guys.

La Puente, CA

#10 Dec 21, 2012
This is what happens to BAD cities who try and steal from the tax payers of California.

The state Department of Finance has demanded in recent weeks that 19 Orange County cities and the county itself turn over a combined $263 million in unused funds previously earmarked for low- and moderate-income housing.

This is what happens when your sheep DIPPED WITH THE ADAMS bull.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Claremont Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 14 min Trojan 34,182
News Mana s body found inside refrigerator on Ontari... Sep 17 Jeannette 1
RV Parking in Glendora (Jun '09) Sep 16 The Rs 12
News Water stock offered on Web (Jul '08) Sep 12 Nathan 11
News Local Vagos motorcycle club president faces mur... (Dec '09) Sep 11 Trooper 24
News A "rally for love" celebrated Saturday after th... Sep 10 concerned res 1
Poll east side pomona rifa (Mar '08) Sep 9 Big Sean 267

Claremont Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Claremont Mortgages