Some FACTS for "facts"
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Jon

Newark, OH

#1 Jul 30, 2013
Before you go posting any future threads on the person you have been harassing. Here's the Ohio Revised Code on Menacing by Stalking. I condensed it down to fit your situation.

2903.211 Menacing by stalking.
(A)

(1) No person by engaging in a pattern of conduct shall knowingly cause another person to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the other person or cause mental distress to the other person.

(2) No person, through the use of any electronic method of remotely transferring information, including, but not limited to, any computer, computer network, computer program, or computer system, shall post a message with purpose to urge or incite another to commit a violation of division (A)(1) of this section.

(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of menacing by stalking.

(6) "Computer," "computer network," "computer program," "computer system," and "telecommunications device" have the same meanings as in section 2913.01 of the Revised Code.

(7) "Post a message" means transferring, sending, posting, publishing, disseminating, or otherwise communicating, or attempting to transfer, send, post, publish, disseminate, or otherwise communicate, any message or information, whether truthful or untruthful, about an individual, and whether done under one's own name, under the name of another, or while impersonating another.

There's the FACTS and the law.
facts

United States

#2 Jul 30, 2013
Well its a good thing I'm not doing that.
Jon

Newark, OH

#3 Jul 30, 2013
You might want to re-check yourself. This is exactly what you've been doing with your "Liz" threads. Deleted or not deleted. Everything stays on the Internet.
Jon

Newark, OH

#4 Jul 30, 2013
Re-read the section on posting via computer. You're a little slow I see.
Jon

Newark, OH

#5 Jul 30, 2013
How about reading this part of the ORC "facts". I think you overlooked it.

7) "Post a message" means transferring, sending, posting, publishing, disseminating, or otherwise communicating, or attempting to transfer, send, post, publish, disseminate, or otherwise communicate, any message or information, whether truthful or untruthful, about an individual, and whether done under one's own name, under the name of another, or while impersonating another.
heckaler with a heckler

Columbus, OH

#6 Jul 30, 2013
1st ammendment,right along with my 2 nd,will not be violated,i am allowed,begged,urged,even required by my fore fathers to defend these rights with whatever means i deem right,so fuck anyone of you,cops included to think you will tread on me,remember murder is legal here when it comes to your rights..ask nikki leasure.
Jon

Newark, OH

#7 Jul 31, 2013
heckaler with a heckler wrote:
1st ammendment,right along with my 2 nd,will not be violated,i am allowed,begged,urged,even required by my fore fathers to defend these rights with whatever means i deem right,so fuck anyone of you,cops included to think you will tread on me,remember murder is legal here when it comes to your rights..ask nikki leasure.
Wow aren't you the educated one! Nobody is talking about murder moron, but you might want to take the time to re-read this entire thread and the laws being broken. Here's a snippet for you:

Cyberstalking. Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet, email or other electronic communications to stalk, and generally refers to a pattern of threatening or malicious behaviors. Cyberstalking may be considered the most dangerous of the three types of Internet harassment, based on a posing credible threat of harm. Sanctions range from misdemeanors to felonies.

Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it may generally be defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.

Read the part about solely dedicating to tormenting a individual on blog entries. Explain your reason to the judge. See, "facts" has no FACTS. I have plenty of facts to back myself up.

Waiting for the druggie accusations towards me to start. Bahawaaaa. Good luck on that. With my profession, I'm totally drug and alcohol free.
youradumbinbred

Chicago, IL

#8 Jul 31, 2013
Ditto Jon, it has said the same of me and everything facts tries to defend.'Must be a druggie junkie and Liz's friend' lmao not the case 'facts' you jealous psychotic lunatic idiotic inbred moron! While you keep posting the citizens will too, bc I enjoy giving my two cents towards your clueless lazy behind. As for Liz, if you need copies of anything, in my job I was able to do just that:) I was looking back at all the inconsistency of posts. I too back on may 23 said id be embarrassed if I were Liz but idk her.'Facts' replied ' you don't want to she's this n this' well facts you'll soon be eating your two cents worth! And I'm smiling the entire time!:)) keep up your posts and comments loser! Once again probably too early for their lazy non working a**. Usually why no response before noon. Lmao
facts

United States

#9 Jul 31, 2013
youradumbinbred wrote:
Ditto Jon, it has said the same of me and everything facts tries to defend.'Must be a druggie junkie and Liz's friend' lmao not the case 'facts' you jealous psychotic lunatic idiotic inbred moron! While you keep posting the citizens will too, bc I enjoy giving my two cents towards your clueless lazy behind. As for Liz, if you need copies of anything, in my job I was able to do just that:) I was looking back at all the inconsistency of posts. I too back on may 23 said id be embarrassed if I were Liz but idk her.'Facts' replied ' you don't want to she's this n this' well facts you'll soon be eating your two cents worth! And I'm smiling the entire time!:)) keep up your posts and comments loser! Once again probably too early for their lazy non working a**. Usually why no response before noon. Lmao
Looks like I'm going to have tons of company. Since you claim I'm breaking the law, you guys are too with what your doing to me. So see you all when they get us LOL.
Jon

Newark, OH

#10 Jul 31, 2013
facts wrote:
<quoted text>Looks like I'm going to have tons of company. Since you claim I'm breaking the law, you guys are too with what your doing to me. So see you all when they get us LOL.
Not CLAIMING you're breaking the law, you ARE BREAKING the law. As I have posted the Ohio Revised Code on Menacing by Stalking. We are in no way shape or form tormenting or harassing you. Only posting the FACTS, Grow up and stop blaming others for YOUR actions on Topix. You are deliberately tormenting this girl and don't think for one minute that everything you post "facts" is not noticed not only by the rest of us, but more than likely a detective waiting to speak with you. Every time one of the threads you spew and is removed, gee there you are with a new one on here about her. In case you are ignorant to the law, here's you refresher:

Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it may generally be defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.
facts

United States

#11 Jul 31, 2013
Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Not CLAIMING you're breaking the law, you ARE BREAKING the law. As I have posted the Ohio Revised Code on Menacing by Stalking. We are in no way shape or form tormenting or harassing you. Only posting the FACTS, Grow up and stop blaming others for YOUR actions on Topix. You are deliberately tormenting this girl and don't think for one minute that everything you post "facts" is not noticed not only by the rest of us, but more than likely a detective waiting to speak with you. Every time one of the threads you spew and is removed, gee there you are with a new one on here about her. In case you are ignorant to the law, here's you refresher:
Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it may generally be defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.
Just because you post legal definitions doesn't mean your not harassing me. Get a life, your no better than anyone else, you proved that in the thread about you. Maybe you need mental help.
heckaler with a heckler

Columbus, OH

#12 Jul 31, 2013
Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow aren't you the educated one! Nobody is talking about murder moron, but you might want to take the time to re-read this entire thread and the laws being broken. Here's a snippet for you:
Cyberstalking. Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet, email or other electronic communications to stalk, and generally refers to a pattern of threatening or malicious behaviors. Cyberstalking may be considered the most dangerous of the three types of Internet harassment, based on a posing credible threat of harm. Sanctions range from misdemeanors to felonies.
Cyberharassment. Cyberharassment differs from cyberstalking in that it may generally be defined as not involving a credible threat. Cyberharassment usually pertains to threatening or harassing email messages, instant messages, or to blog entries or websites dedicated solely to tormenting an individual. Some states approach cyberharrassment by including language addressing electronic communications in general harassment statutes, while others have created stand-alone cyberharassment statutes.
Read the part about solely dedicating to tormenting a individual on blog entries. Explain your reason to the judge. See, "facts" has no FACTS. I have plenty of facts to back myself up.
Waiting for the druggie accusations towards me to start. Bahawaaaa. Good luck on that. With my profession, I'm totally drug and alcohol free.
I am the educated one,takin to a supreme court,youd be amazed by your rights.now,if i am stalking someone....a.k.a,some of the numbnuts on here,wouldnt they have to be a person?your stalking a phantom,the postname,say?Buckwheat.but Buckwheat is on here talkin smack?you reply back..how is that stalking?some of us are not stalking,only replying,even if we threatin ol buckwheat,now..we dont know where,or even who buckwheat is?so i dont see it.
Jon

Newark, OH

#13 Jul 31, 2013
heckaler with a heckler wrote:
<quoted text>I am the educated one,takin to a supreme court,youd be amazed by your rights.now,if i am stalking someone....a.k.a,some of the numbnuts on here,wouldnt they have to be a person?your stalking a phantom,the postname,say?Buckwheat.but Buckwheat is on here talkin smack?you reply back..how is that stalking?some of us are not stalking,only replying,even if we threatin ol buckwheat,now..we dont know where,or even who buckwheat is?so i dont see it.
Ever heard of the court order that the judge signs to obtain all threads and IP addresses there bright one?

Re-read the ORC I posted. You missed a few points. I'm not deliberately tormenting anyone. Nice try.

Dismissed.
Jon

Newark, OH

#14 Jul 31, 2013
facts wrote:
<quoted text>Just because you post legal definitions doesn't mean your not harassing me. Get a life, your no better than anyone else, you proved that in the thread about you. Maybe you need mental help.
Oh forgive me for not starting thread after thread after you harassing and tormenting you after the first 10 were removed by the mods.

Please, you need mental help before anyone. All your numerous threads and rants proved that one. Whoever you are, you are breaking the law, you got proved on the FACTS, and now you're scared as a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar.

I'd be scared too. But talking to you and your alter ego Heckler is like talking to 2 little arguing pre-school kids arguing on the playground. Guess when you are finally charged, you will think twice.

If you had enough sense to put your real name on here, maybe those you have a problem with could actually confront you one on one. I actually think you're James Bond. Haven't seen wackadoo post on here for a min.

I find it amusing that you feel I'm harassing you posting the FACTS you told me to prove to you. Grow up. And good luck in court!
facts

United States

#15 Jul 31, 2013
Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever heard of the court order that the judge signs to obtain all threads and IP addresses there bright one?
Re-read the ORC I posted. You missed a few points. I'm not deliberately tormenting anyone. Nice try.
Dismissed.
I beg to differ. Dismissed yourself.
Jon

Newark, OH

#16 Jul 31, 2013
facts wrote:
<quoted text>I beg to differ. Dismissed yourself.

The only thing you will be begging for is for the mercy of the court at your sentencing. Just saw the Liz Sowers thread was just removed. How long will it take you to get a new one started?!

Just keep piling that evidence up.

And for the record, you are dismissed. From the whole site. Everyone is tired of the madness you spew.
facts

United States

#17 Jul 31, 2013
Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
The only thing you will be begging for is for the mercy of the court at your sentencing. Just saw the Liz Sowers thread was just removed. How long will it take you to get a new one started?!
Just keep piling that evidence up.
And for the record, you are dismissed. From the whole site. Everyone is tired of the madness you spew.
no begging from me. now be a good little boy and leave.
youngRestless

United States

#18 Jul 31, 2013
Its true, Ive been sick of "facts" for months. And to reiterate what everyone else is saying- we are not guilty of harassment, simply we are responding to YOUR posts. In YOUR posts, you put liz's first and last name, locations where she stays, and you write personal information about her and things she does/doesn't do. Therefore- you are committing a crime, we are simply responding to your harassment of Liz
facts

United States

#19 Jul 31, 2013
youngRestless wrote:
Its true, Ive been sick of "facts" for months. And to reiterate what everyone else is saying- we are not guilty of harassment, simply we are responding to YOUR posts. In YOUR posts, you put liz's first and last name, locations where she stays, and you write personal information about her and things she does/doesn't do. Therefore- you are committing a crime, we are simply responding to your harassment of Liz
i am simply responding to your harassment of James. In YOUR posts you put out the same info on him. What's the matter Liz, you can dish it out but not take it.
Anon

Chicago, IL

#20 Jul 31, 2013
Jon wrote:
<quoted text>
The only thing you will be begging for is for the mercy of the court at your sentencing. Just saw the Liz Sowers thread was just removed. How long will it take you to get a new one started?!
Just keep piling that evidence up.
And for the record, you are dismissed. From the whole site. Everyone is tired of the madness you spew.
Amen!! She has no idea how fed up people are of even seeing facts. My stepdad is a sheriff and he's going over this forum and some others? He said they're already onto the ones about a Liz. So I guess helping the mental doesn't work. Owell. Not my battle lol

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Circleville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
addicts prison rehab 22 min Caroline Rose Roy 6
The Truth behind the Truth of the 72 indictments 29 min Caroline Rose Roy 19
material witness ?? 41 min Safety Bob 3
Kristy Hixson 1 hr UTrashy 2
Brian Emerson "Opie" 3 hr oh gawd 30
tara Lambert jailed on conspiracy to commit mur... 3 hr Angela Certain 31
72 indictments handed down.... 3 hr Angela Certain 117
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Circleville Mortgages