#1 May 13, 2013
Ha ha, I couldn't have posted this poll at a better time.
Now that the DOJ is overstepping it's bounds with the mainstream media we might actually start hearing the truth about this slimy hitler wanna be libtards elected!
#2 May 13, 2013
This administration is trying to get affordable healthcare for all. I know there are an awful lot of Repubs enjoying what Obamacares has brought to their table (especially keeping the 18 - 26 children on their plans).
This administration is trying to save Medicare for all.
This administration is trying to stop the GOP from getting rid of the "retirement age". How any employers do you know who want 65 - 85 year old employees on their payrolls, not to mention their healthcare plans?
This administration does NOT want to send any more Americans into other countries' civil wars and wants to shut down GITMO.
This administration wants to put people back to work in good jobs w/benefits while repairing/maintaining and expanding our infrastructure.
This administration wants to keep teachers, police and firefighters in their jobs.
My friends, this administration is trying to stop the 1% from sending anymore of the 99% below the poverty line.
Don't fall for all the political drama.
#3 May 14, 2013
This admin. is run by thugs and crooks. Their dirty little secrets are piling up by the day.
#4 May 14, 2013
DOJ was investigating a leak from the White House to AP and AP is crying "foul".
AP Phone Records Seized By Justice Department As War On Leaks Continues
Though DOJ did not give the AP a specific reason for the seizure, the dates of the phone calls it targeted offered a clear tell. On May 7, 2012, AP reporters Adam Goldman and Matt Apuzzo, citing anonymous sources, reported that the CIA had thwarted a plot by an al-Qaeda affiliate to "destroy a U.S.-bound airliner using a bomb with a sophisticated new design around the one-year anniversary of the killing of Osama bin Laden."
The AP acknowledged then that it had agreed with the White House and CIA requests "not to publish" its story "immediately because the sensitive intelligence operation was still under way." But "once officials said those concerns were allayed," the news organization went ahead with its story rather than wait for the Obama administration's official announcement.
It was later revealed that the "would-be bomber" was actually a U.S. spy planted in the Yemen-based group Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. On May 18, U.S. and allied officials suggested to Reuters that the leak to the AP had forced the end of an "operation which they hoped could have continued for weeks or longer."
AP hands are NOT clean in this! AP should be reporting the News, not making it! It is amazing what you lean when you search for the truth!
#5 May 14, 2013
Where was all this RAGE when "voter rights" were being tampered with in the last two years?
IRS is an independent agency and a small group of people did this. It will be investigated and corrective action will be taken; just like with vote tampering.
On one hand you want the Gov't to go in with guns and on the other hand you want other agencies to get away with murder.
If it is wrong, it is ALL THE WAY WRONG, not just when it is happening to your party! Divide and conquer is how battles are lost. Regarding the issues at hand, ALL Americans should be outraged at ALL of the issues!
#6 May 14, 2013
One more thing not mentioned here is WE ARE A WHOLE LOT BETTER OFF THAN WE WERE AT THE END OF THE LAST ADMIN.
Keep in mind, Valerie Plame was a CIA Agent who was outed by the last Admn. because her husband told the truth about "NO WMD in Iraq" (he was just doing the job they told him to do). Look at the EXTREME loss of life and cost to the American taxpayer in Iraq. Mitt Romney changed to intended mission of the Iraq invasion from "WMD" to "freeing the Iraqi people". Did you not catch that?
You were screaming about Benghazi, but AP reported a story, based on a WH leak, after promising NOT to and it ended a mission and possibly put an American spy's life in danger. You CANNOT have it both ways. Choose one. The DOJ was investigating the leak. Isn't that what you want them to do?
#7 May 14, 2013
One targeted man's story about the thugs in Adolph Obama's admin.
#8 May 14, 2013
Let me educate you...
figured since it's from your liberal bible, you might see the light.
#9 May 14, 2013
Libs are jumping into the water like rats on a sinking ship!!!!
#10 May 15, 2013
Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/14/191235/...
The person that should have testified is Army Gen. Carter Ham, then the head of the U.S. Africa Command.
The one that testified (Hicks) said he "did not know" that Stevens turned down two offers of additional security by Ham.
#11 May 15, 2013
As far as the AP issue.
You do realize that AP published "classified" info after saying they would not? That they screwed up the mission and possibly created a security issue? or don't you care?
The thing about this is if they HAD NOT gone after the source of the "classified leak", you people would go after POTUS and DOJ for that.
Which is it?
No, the Libs are not jumping into the water!
You, Sarah Palin and Darrell Issa have one thing in common, you talk too fast and deny too often.
#12 May 15, 2013
All Americans should be outraged at what happened at the IRS. One thing that does concern me, is the number of "exempt status" that are handed out. No wonder we don't have tax revenue to pay our bills.
But, where was this "outrage" when there was "VOTE TAMPERING" by the Repubs for the past two years? Where were the parades with people in costume then?
Cat got your tounge? Didn't you say you were Americans?
#14 May 15, 2013
White House Releases Benghazi Emails
"Republican lawmakers have argued that the State Department was attempting to alter the talking points for political reasons. In particular, they have pointed to the fact that references to al Qaeda and previous security warnings were removed. But senior administration officials stressed on Wednesday that such language was taken out at the request of the CIA."
#15 May 15, 2013
Someone suggested, and I agree, only personal/individual campaign contributions up to $100 should be "tax exempt". All other funds, taxable. People, we need the money to pay our bills!!!! This is as out of control as sales tax exemptions are in the State of LA.
Anyone placing an ad on the internet, radio, TV (public media) would have to register with Gov't and be held 100% accountable for the content. Some better get insurance to cover the false ads.
This would limit the number of ads too!
#16 May 16, 2013
The senior administration was found to have lied about the CIA,little did they know there is proof that they lied.This was brought to light by reports from all of the major networks,even the beloved liberal msnbc reported this.
#17 May 16, 2013
Early E-Mails on Benghazi Show Internal Divisions
In releasing the e-mails, the White House was hoping to show that intelligence officials, not political advisers, drove the debate over the talking points. It drew attention to a draft of the talking points the only document provided by the White House that was not part of an e-mail chain in which Mr. Morell, in his own writing, crossed out five lines that referred to C.I.A. warnings about the threat of attacks by Al Qaeda-linked extremists in Benghazi and eastern Libya.
REPUBS in Congress started the hearings with the full intent that "it was a political cover-up". Finding no evidence of this, have they changed their minds again?
#18 May 16, 2013
Boehner demands that someone go to jail for the what happened at the IRS office.
For once I agree with him. Let's go get George W. Bush. After all, he hired the director of the IRS who oversaw, or didn't oversee, the IRS.
It is kinda like O J Simpson. Couldn't get him over the murders, but maybe we can put him away for "inappropriate" actions at the IRS.
They are looking into the actions of the IRS employees now, but thus far cannot find where they BROKE THE LAW.
#19 May 16, 2013
Taking from the NY Times article, see above post for link.
"In a report that set off the latest tempest over the talking points, ABC News reported incorrectly that Mr. Rhodes had emphasized the need to protect the State Departments interests."
#20 May 16, 2013
Where were you during the Obama election, did someone remove your power pak?
#21 May 16, 2013
I wonder how the families of the others killed felt when they heard that Ambdr. C. Stevens turned down military help "twice" from the main man in Africa?
I guess the Repubs did find the "smoking gun" after all!
Such a shame.
POTUS asked Congress for add'l money for foreign Embassies. I wonder how many of the Repubs will SAY NO AGAIN?
Add your comments below
|hot cops||7 hr||bown sugar bear||5|
|nasty white women (Jul '14)||23 hr||Yeah||11|
|Who will be next police chief||Jul 25||lol||9|
|Brad Higginbotham (Jan '14)||Jul 22||Oneday||18|
|Murder Arrests Made in 2005 Cold Case (Aug '08)||Jul 22||Ridiculous||20|
|Danielle @ First Student||Jul 21||what about the baby||4|
|Garage sale Saturday||Jul 15||Flash_62||3|
Find what you want!
Search Church Point Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC