Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52051 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#41275 Jul 9, 2013
Sparkle_is_stripper wrote:
<quoted text>morazzagenda.... yep that fits you perfect
Agenda bad girl.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#41276 Jul 9, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Fortunately, the Court says you can't prove a word of your claims, but then that's no surprise.
If you wish to get along, perhaps you should begin by educating yourself, instead of spewing non-sense. NOBODY is going to allow children to marry. Pets can't get married, silly, so grow the fuck up.
You lecturing someone about how to get along. Priceless!
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41278 Jul 9, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You lecturing someone about how to get along. Priceless!
You still breathing... CRIMINAL!
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41279 Jul 9, 2013
AGENDATHREAT Reported!
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
You still breathing... CRIMINAL!
CDC

Chicago, IL

#41280 Jul 9, 2013
CDC wrote:
AGENDAFULL - The full of it agendist.
not to be confused with AGENDAFOOL.
<quoted text>
AGENDATROLL - The tedious troll who thinks he's clever.
Not bto be confused with AGENDTURD.

Yeah, that's some funny schtick right there. Funny.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#41281 Jul 9, 2013
Nose UpThereToo wrote:
<quoted text>
You still breathing... CRIMINAL!
Like you care.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41282 Jul 9, 2013
AGENDASS - a repeat but fits the bill.
CDC wrote:
<quoted text>
AGENDATROLL - The tedious troll who thinks he's clever.
Not bto be confused with AGENDTURD.
Yeah, that's some funny schtick right there. Funny.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#41283 Jul 9, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
You still breathing... CRIMINAL!
Death threat! Reported!

Relax fruitloops.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#41284 Jul 9, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
CDC is an agenda-agendist
And a bit of a poop-ist.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41285 Jul 9, 2013
AGENDACRAPPER - that would be me :)
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
And a bit of a poop-ist.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41286 Jul 9, 2013
Wow! No wonder you idiots strike out every time you're at bat. One look at these ridiculous accusations is enough to convince ANYONE what neurotic drama queens you are. HILARIOUS!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#41287 Jul 9, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
Wow! No wonder you idiots strike out every time you're at bat. One look at these ridiculous accusations is enough to convince ANYONE what neurotic drama queens you are. HILARIOUS!
It is? Give us that insane cackle. ahahahahaha. Like that. But insane.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41288 Jul 9, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It is? Give us that insane cackle. ahahahahaha. Like that. But insane.
Yes, Frankie. It is. You've single-handedly turned hyperbole into an art form. All hail Frankie, Queen of the whiney hineys.
laughing man

Luton, UK

#41289 Jul 9, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
Wow! No wonder you idiots strike out every time you're at bat. One look at these ridiculous accusations is enough to convince ANYONE what neurotic drama queens you are. HILARIOUS!
Like you care.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#41290 Jul 9, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, Frankie. It is. You've single-handedly turned hyperbole into an art form. All hail Frankie, Queen of the whiney hineys.
She said, whining.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41291 Jul 9, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
Wow! No wonder you idiots strike out every time you're at bat. One look at these ridiculous accusations is enough to convince ANYONE what neurotic drama queens you are. HILARIOUS!
And you still have no counter to the essence of marriage.

A cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Making ss couples a defect failure of mating behavior.

Or, that children prefer mom AND dad.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

[email protected]

#41292 Jul 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>And you still have no counter to the essence of marriage.
What's to counter? Marriage is a civil contract between two people who thereby become each other's legal next of kin.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>A cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Where did you ever come up with that nonsensical phraseology (not even a complete sentence)? A "constraint" is a limit or restriction on something. Are you saying in your own form of gibberish that marriage is a limit or a restriction on evolutionary mating behavior? Just curious.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>Making ss couples a defect failure of mating behavior.
What the he11 is a "defect failure"? The way you phrased it (in yet another incomplete sentence), it sounds like a defect that failed. Isn't that a contradiction in terms?
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>Or, that children prefer mom AND dad.
Can you write in complete sentences? Three consecutive incomplete sentences does not a concise point make. If you want people to take you seriously, try making sense. Try, "Oh, MirthMenace, you're a big ignorant idiot!" That would be a complete - if nonsensical - sentence.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41293 Jul 9, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>What's to counter? Marriage is a civil contract between two people who thereby become each other's legal next of kin.<quoted text>Where did you ever come up with that nonsensical phraseology (not even a complete sentence)? A "constraint" is a limit or restriction on something. Are you saying in your own form of gibberish that marriage is a limit or a restriction on evolutionary mating behavior? Just curious.<quoted text>What the he11 is a "defect failure"? The way you phrased it (in yet another incomplete sentence), it sounds like a defect that failed. Isn't that a contradiction in terms?<quoted text>Can you write in complete sentences? Three consecutive incomplete sentences does not a concise point make. If you want people to take you seriously, try making sense. Try, "Oh, MirthMenace, you're a big ignorant idiot!" That would be a complete - if nonsensical - sentence.
You don't want to admit it, but somehow through your confusion, you got it.

"that marriage is a limit or a restriction on evolutionary mating behavior?"

As to ss couples, let me make it simple for you; It is totally impossible for them to fulfill evolutionary mating behavior.

But you and I both know you understood it perfectly already.

Smile.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

[email protected]

#41294 Jul 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't want to admit it, but somehow through your confusion, you got it.
"that marriage is a limit or a restriction on evolutionary mating behavior?"
As to ss couples, let me make it simple for you; It is totally impossible for them to fulfill evolutionary mating behavior.
But you and I both know you understood it perfectly already.
Smile.
Marriage is a cultural tradition whereby two people, regardless of their genders or orientations, can become each other's legal next of kin. That's it. If you prefer to regard it as sacramental or holy or an institution administered by your god, that is your perogative. Your view or definition of marriage is not one that everyone shares. What you hope to achieve here by relentlessly insisting you are correct and everyone who disagrees with you is stupid is a mystery to me. But you are tenacious; I'll give you that. Your definition of marriage, indeed your entire debate strategy, is steeped in your religious convictions. That is where your major disconnect lies. It is also the source of your endless stream of attempted insults and condescension. There are two things that rob people of their ability to empathize; extreme wealth and extremist religious views. My hunch is that you are not extremely wealthy.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41296 Jul 10, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>Marriage is a cultural tradition whereby two people, regardless of their genders or orientations, can become each other's legal next of kin. That's it. If you prefer to regard it as sacramental or holy or an institution administered by your god, that is your perogative. Your view or definition of marriage is not one that everyone shares. What you hope to achieve here by relentlessly insisting you are correct and everyone who disagrees with you is stupid is a mystery to me. But you are tenacious; I'll give you that. Your definition of marriage, indeed your entire debate strategy, is steeped in your religious convictions. That is where your major disconnect lies. It is also the source of your endless stream of attempted insults and condescension. There are two things that rob people of their ability to empathize; extreme wealth and extremist religious views. My hunch is that you are not extremely wealthy.
You lie. Blatantly. Knowingly.

Cultural traditions worldwide throughout human history have not viewed marriage 'regardless of their gender'.

Then you deliberately attempt to shift the point to religion, knowing that nothing I said was based on religion.

Why? Because you cannot dispute the scientific basis of marriage.

I insist nothing. My tenacity has nothing to do with the issue. Reality is blocking you. The simple, unadulterated truth.

I have put my finger on just a couple basic, simple facts about marriage and orientation. They become unmovable mountains in the fallacy of calling ss couples married, and denying the sexual defect of homosexuality.

Here is another reality. You deny reality out of a misplaced empathy for your child. Psychology calls that enablement. The denial of reality as a false expression of love. That requires that you slander my empathy and words to justify your denial.

You are in a very difficult position. You have rejected the faith you were raised in, now you are rejecting the science you claim to base your reality on. All you have is YOUR tenacious claim that a clearly distinct relationship isn't.

I, on the other hand, stand firmly in the full support of both faith and science.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christopher Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Red hed 59 min Yogi 3
National anthem 2 hr Frank and beans 11
Demetria Patalano 2 hr Frank and beans 3
Scared 3 hr Lord I swear 1
Jeff 3 hr Lord I swear 18
I dreamed about u last night 7 hr Love lives 3
Bearcat football sucks 18 hr Booger 42

Christopher Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Christopher Mortgages