Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52051 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37457 Feb 4, 2013
Blair wrote:
Luke Posted:
**
Gay Sexual Practices Lead
publichealth.lacounty.gov/acd/docs/Shigellosi...
Thanks for the reminder, Kimare.

Did your pick up the douche that I asked for?
Save alot

Joliet, IL

#37459 Feb 4, 2013
This is just not necessary. Marriage is man and woman

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37460 Feb 4, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
What's hilarious is the fact that you think that this is a good argument.
AND STILL!

no logical counter to this fact;

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.

STILL no logical counter to this fact;

A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!

Ho, Ho, Ho, Hilarious!!!

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#37461 Feb 4, 2013
Save alot wrote:
This is just not necessary. Marriage is man and woman
Except for those places where it can also be a man and a man or a woman and a woman.

Not really that complicated...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37462 Feb 4, 2013
Save alot wrote:
This is just not necessary. Marriage is man and woman
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
Except for those places where it can also be a man and a man or a woman and a woman.
Not really that complicated...
Those are counterfeit marriages. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are a direct defective failure of the primary purpose of evolution.

It's not that complicated...

Smile.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#37463 Feb 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
Save alot wrote:
This is just not necessary. Marriage is man and woman
<quoted text>
Those are counterfeit marriages. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are a direct defective failure of the primary purpose of evolution.
It's not that complicated...
Smile.
You're that odd smirky/bazinga/lesbian trapped in a man's body thingy, right?

As previously stated on numerous occasions, you should feel free to never respond to my comments.
Samatha

Dallas, TX

#37464 Feb 4, 2013
Dissecting the 'gay' marriage charade

Published: 03/07/2012 at 7:51 PM

Anyone in the United States can participate in the institution of marriage Ė if they choose to do so.

Homosexuals donít usually choose to do so because they usually donít want to be married to members of the opposite sex. But itís their choice.

So why do homosexual activists make this claim? And how do they get away with making a patently false charge against a 6,000-year-old religious institution and the civil laws that it inspired?

Same-sex marriage advocates no more care about the legality of same-sex marriage than Hamas cares about the creation of a Palestinian state.

Neither is interested in creating something new Ė something that has never been before. Instead, what same-sex marriage advocates and the terrorists of the Gaza Strip have in common is their desire to destroy something they find repulsive. In Gaza, itís the Jewish state of Israel. Among homosexual activists, itís the institution of marriage.

By making the bogus claim that marriage, as it has been known through the eons, is inherently unfair because some people donít want to participate in it as it has always been defined, homosexual activists are able to establish for themselves what appears to be the political high ground of the victim. In exactly the same way, Arab terrorists are able to portray themselves as the victim by claiming they have been denied a state.

But scratch beneath the surface of these two movements and you will soon learn that their objectives go far beyond same-sex marriage and a Palestinian state.

For instance, letís examine the logic of the victimization homosexuals claim as the basis for pushing same-sex marriage. If it is true that limiting the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman is inherently a violation of civil rights, wouldnít it also be true that defining marriage as a union between just two people is equally discriminatory?

The advocates of same-sex marriage hate this challenge, because they have no intelligent response to it. By default, a capitulation to the same-sex marriage advocates represents future capitulation to the logic they use. That means support of same-sex marriage, to be consistent, must translate into support of polygamy and group marriages of any combination.

Recently, a columnist for the Huffington Post tried to make the case that, unlike same-sex marriage, which has never existed in the history of the world anywhere at any time, polygamy represents a clear and present danger to society. Thatís the distinction, he claimed. He cites one infamous polygamist leader charged with sexual assaults and incest-related felony counts as examples of how this works. Of course, he ignores a virtual epidemic of violence and molestation in the homosexual community in favor of one isolated case in the polygamy community.

Eliyahu Federman also states:ďThere isnít a shred of modern sociological evidence to support the claim that gay marriage is harmful to society, whereas there is a plethora of historical and contemporary evidence to illustrate the dangers associated with polygamy.Ē

Ten years ago, the notion of same-sex marriage was scarcely even discussed, let alone performed. So the absence of a body of evidence is a red herring. In the case of polygamy, however, we have thousands of years of history to examine.

It is amazing how quickly the same-sex marriage advocates have been able to rally support from the media, the cultural establishment, the government elite and the judiciary for a radical social experiment that challenges the fundamental building block of human civilization Ė the family.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37465 Feb 4, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
You're that odd smirky/bazinga/lesbian trapped in a man's body thingy, right?
As previously stated on numerous occasions, you should feel free to never respond to my comments.
Please keep the hate language to yourself.

You have no logical argument to address the basic essence of marriage. Instead, you try to leap frog over the facts, and dumb down marriage to a friendship and impose it by a twirl of the law.

The end result? The closer this silly imposition gets to reality, they more it's fake identity is exposed.

Smile.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37466 Feb 4, 2013
Samatha wrote:
Homosexuals donít usually choose to do so because they usually donít want to be married to members of the opposite sex.
Neither does a straightie want to marry a gay person
.
So now that we're organized; what do we do?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37467 Feb 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Please keep the hate language to yourself.
You have no logical argument to address the basic essence of marriage. Instead, you try to leap frog over the facts, and dumb down marriage to a friendship and impose it by a twirl of the law.
The end result? The closer this silly imposition gets to reality, they more it's fake identity is exposed.
Smile.
Nobody puts Mangina in a corner!
Ugly CC

United States

#37468 Feb 4, 2013
I was told I could not have my son because I was a homosexual, but I am not a homosexual. Does this violate my civil liberties? Who are the best gay rights advocates in Illinois? They should have a parade where I live. If they are going after people they wrongfully think are gay, I know they are going after real homosexuals.
G-Wiz

Belleville, IL

#37469 Feb 4, 2013
so gays want what straight people already have right? impossible until scientists make it possible for them to bear children. sorry you guys will have to live in sin until then. waa, we cant be married waaa

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#37470 Feb 4, 2013
Marriage is a fundamental right of the individual, as affirmed 14 times by the Supreme Court. This applies only to humans, not to trees.

Everyone qualifies for fundamental rights by virtue of being alive, though a fundamental right may be denied or delayed, but only if the government can demonstrate a compelling and legitimate government interest for doing so.

Procreation ability, intent, or even desire has never been a requirement for marriage, yet is often offered as an excuse to deny equality, ignoring that gay people do raise children both biologically related or adopted. Denial of equal treatment provides nothing to opposite sex couples, while harming same sex couples needlessly. For these reasons the procreation excuse is irrational.

Prejudice and tradition also fail to qualify as legitimate governmental interests sufficient for denial of equal treatment as required by the 5th and 14th amendments.

ďThese matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define oneís own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.Ē
Not a Requirement

Tempe, AZ

#37471 Feb 4, 2013
G-Wiz wrote:
so gays want what straight people already have right? impossible until scientists make it possible for them to bear children. sorry you guys will have to live in sin until then. waa, we cant be married waaa
Well golly G-Wiz buddy! I wasn't aware that procreation was a requirement of marriage? Who knew! I guess all those older married couples who can't have kids and couples who decide not to have children will NO longer be allowed to Wed anymore! Now see how stupid you sound? Bone head!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37472 Feb 5, 2013
Not Yet Equal wrote:
Marriage is a fundamental right of the individual, as affirmed 14 times by the Supreme Court. This applies only to humans, not to trees.
Everyone qualifies for fundamental rights by virtue of being alive, though a fundamental right may be denied or delayed, but only if the government can demonstrate a compelling and legitimate government interest for doing so.
Procreation ability, intent, or even desire has never been a requirement for marriage, yet is often offered as an excuse to deny equality, ignoring that gay people do raise children both biologically related or adopted. Denial of equal treatment provides nothing to opposite sex couples, while harming same sex couples needlessly. For these reasons the procreation excuse is irrational.
Prejudice and tradition also fail to qualify as legitimate governmental interests sufficient for denial of equal treatment as required by the 5th and 14th amendments.
ďThese matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define oneís own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.Ē
You dishonesty is exposed;

SCOTUS affirmed marriage BECAUSE of procreation.

Why is that deception necessary for your argument.

I never said marriage applies to trees. I used the procreation of trees or the lack thereof as an analogy to the procreation or lack thereof with humans.

You know that, but again used deceitful gay twirl to avoid dealing with reality.

Why is that necessary for a legitimate position?

Honest minds want to know. Is that too much for you???

Snicker.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37474 Feb 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Honest minds want to know. Is that too much for you???
Honest minds don't talk about fruits and nuts, and then claim that they're being clever.

Why do you refuse to listen to internal lesbian?
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#37475 Feb 5, 2013
G-Wiz wrote:
so gays want what straight people already have right? impossible until scientists make it possible for them to bear children. sorry you guys will have to live in sin until then. waa, we cant be married waaa
Gays do not have abortions
.
Gays do not use birth control
.
Gays do not have accidental pregnancies
.
Gays 'do' have absolute control over our baby making process without the need for straight people or sorry-ass homophobes; sugar
http://www.quitecurious.com/wp-content/galler...
Andrew Singer

Morgan Hill, CA

#37476 Feb 5, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Honest minds don't talk about fruits and nuts, and then claim that they're being clever.
Why do you refuse to listen to internal lesbian?
The factless QUEEN listens to HIS internal lesbian every day, thus explaining his whiny little bitch posts!(S)he is "stamping her wittle feeties" as she reads my post hammering factless' bitchy "wittle" ass this very minute!!

LMFAO!!!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37477 Feb 5, 2013
Andrew Singer wrote:
<quoted text>
The factless QUEEN....
LMFAO!!!
Calling kimare a factless queen is pretty bitchy.

I love it.

His posts are as barren as my mangina.
Illegal

Joliet, IL

#37479 Feb 5, 2013
Nothing legal about being gay.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Christopher Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Any Students At Morthland Collage? 1 hr MammaBear 6
Downtown Gary Brown 1 hr Moe 19
Opies 2 hr Your mom 2
Kendra 2 hr Whi 5
Kimmy (Mar '17) 8 hr PanterA 47
Bearcat football sucks Sep 17 Austin 19
Ex. Hubby and son Sep 16 Hahahaha 3

Christopher Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Christopher Mortgages