Chino Hills man convicted of sexually abusing relatives

Full story: Inland Valley Daily Bulletin

A Chino Hills man has been convicted by a jury of sexually abusing two underage female relatives over a period of several years.
Comments
1 - 20 of 21 Comments Last updated Oct 29, 2011
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
McLovin

Ontario, CA

#2 Mar 30, 2009
Hey Spicolli- Do you have fantasies of being incarcerated?
Tortuga

AOL

#4 Mar 30, 2009
No McLovin, I suspect he just has fond memories . . . . . . .

“na”

Since: Oct 08

na

#6 Mar 30, 2009
you are a Necropedophiliac and you need to turn your self in.
McLovin wrote:
Hey Spicolli- Do you have fantasies of being incarcerated?
matthew

United States

#8 Mar 30, 2009
I hope when this guy goes to prison people do to him what he did to those girls.
matthew

United States

#9 Mar 30, 2009
this man is a waste of tax payers money just finish him off.he is a child molester that is the worst crime in my eyes.im glad those girls told somebody because he would still be a free man playing with other kids.
Luiz

Chino, CA

#10 Mar 30, 2009
i am surprised there are no nasty racial comments here anymore,this man is latino but there arent any because he made a six figure salary so that shut Spicolli and others up.
Luiz

Chino, CA

#11 Mar 30, 2009
Jeff Spicolli -Upland wrote:
Castration followed by life in prison , followed by rape by inmates on a daily basis. To me this is justice, when can it begin!!
That road doesnt seem far for you...
papa

Upland, CA

#12 Mar 30, 2009
this is not child abuse per say,this is sexual assault and rape of some young people whose lives will never be the same.life in prison would be appropriate.
Tortuga

AOL

#13 Mar 30, 2009
Seymour Butts, maybe you better check yourself while you're at it. McLovin and I were amused at Spicolli's talk of Gang-Rape and Castration in prison. It's a far stretch for you to twist that around an insinuate that as a defense of child molester. If you invision someone making fun of Spicolli's talk of prison rape and violence as defending a child molester you have a vivid imagination. Neither I nor McLovin made even the slightest reference to the abuser. Explain how you interpret anything that I or Mr. McLovin said as "standing up for a child molester". Like I said, check yourself mr. Seymour or See More Butts. You're an idiot. Both our references were about Spicolli, not the child molester.
uncle_vito

La Mirada, CA

#16 Mar 31, 2009
This man and gays are all sick.

Vito
Luiz

Los Angeles, CA

#17 Mar 31, 2009
Jeff Spicolli - Upland wrote:
<quoted text> You just made one Luiz, guess you're the racist.
This Man wont be shining your shoes or cutting your grass is he ???
Calle Doce

AOL

#18 Mar 31, 2009
Count yourself in to make three idiots Ben Dover. Or does your alter-ego count as an extra person? I read nothing in either McLovin or Tortugas posts that stick up for a molester. You're hallucinating. You and Spicolli can both go and jerk each other off if it makes you feel better. But since you're both the same person that would make it difficult.
wet backs

Cedar Park, TX

#19 Mar 31, 2009
they are the problem
Luiz

Chino, CA

#21 Apr 1, 2009
Wasnt going to pay you guys in cash...just feed you leftover tortillas and beans,eat up gringos.
Arlen

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#22 Apr 1, 2009
I was on Mr. Sosa's first jury trial...I along with seven others thought he was innocent.
TrialWatcher

San Bernardino, CA

#23 Apr 1, 2009
This comment is for Arlen. I watched both trials in their entirety. What you didn't hear in the first trial is that a "Top Secret" security clearance at Raytheon is given to anyone who applies; Mr. Sosa NEVER has taken a lie detector test; Mr. Sosa was regularly at home from work while the victim's mother worked during the time the crimes were being committed; The victim's mother very often worked late and was frequently home much later than Mr. Sosa when he did got to work (The work attendance records for both Mr. Sosa and the victim's mother were introduced at the 2nd trial, not the first); The "Phyisological" test administered to Mr. Sosa by his retained psychologist measures the time somebody looks at pictures of small girls in bathing suits and his been widely discredited in the psychological community as inaccurate; This "Physiological" test you heard about at the first trial was administered several days before the Dr.'s testimony - At the second trial the prosecution was able to introduce the testimony of a psychologist familiar with the tests administered to Mr. Sosa and that Dr. testified Mr. Sosa appeared to be cheating on each test; Mr. Sosa was untruthful to the jury at the fisrt trial about his fidelity to his first wife, when he arrived at home from work each day, the time period between his marraige to the victim's mother and when he first revealed that to his friends and co-workers; and at the second trial Mr. Sosa was caught in an outright lie to the jury. Had you attended the second trial you may have had your opinion changed, although maybe not.
Arlen

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#24 Apr 1, 2009
I hope you're right. After listening to the whole first trial I felt that not only had he not been proven guilty but that he was an innocent person caught up in a web of lies. My hope is I'm wrong and he is guilty because he's in for a living hell if he's innocent.
The Truth Came Out

Chino, CA

#25 Apr 1, 2009
Arlen wrote:
I hope you're right. After listening to the whole first trial I felt that not only had he not been proven guilty but that he was an innocent person caught up in a web of lies. My hope is I'm wrong and he is guilty because he's in for a living hell if he's innocent.
Arlen, We too were there both trials and the second trial explained the truth of what happened more clearly than the first. The victims were never caught in ANY lies while David was caught in a magnitude of lies which is why he was found guilty at the second trial. The victims never waivered during their testimony while David kept changing his story once he was caught in a lie. He is a guilty man who is finally being brought to justice! While you never got to hear the truth in the second trial, we did and there is nothing innocent about him! He deserves everything he gets and more. These victims were robbed of their childhood and they will never be able to get that back. Hopefully this will help you understand that he really is a guilty man and he is where he belongs. He will never again hurt another child.
THERE THRU IT ALL

Chino, CA

#26 Apr 2, 2009
I can tell u all the problem we have with our victms getting justice, THE SYSTEM. In this case the defense had 2 1/2 years to prepare, the prosecuter was handed the case two weeks before the 1st trial started. Then the 'Jerry Springer' or 'Oprah' mentality of that 1st jury bought into the 'smoke screen' tactics of the defense attorney instead of just LISTENING to the FOUR victims that testified, in a public courtroom, to things that were done to them by David Sosa that no one should ever have to reveal. It was tragic enough that IT HAPPENED, but then to have to discuss it in vivid detail to strangers is something no one does by choice.
The victims, all of them, did not choose to be molested by Sosa nor be traumatized again to do what had to be done, tell everyone what he did to them.
dont worry about it

New York, NY

#27 Dec 14, 2009
Arlen wrote:
I was on Mr. Sosa's first jury trial...I along with seven others thought he was innocent.
Well its a good thing you werent on his second jury trial cause this sick excuse for a man is GUILTY!!!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chino Hills Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Vagos motorcycle club targeted in Southern Cali... (Mar '06) 1 hr 2nd Gen Biker 4,790
CA Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 1 hr RiccardoFire 200,586
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 2 hr PEE PEE PETE 27,082
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 11 hr Macko mono 5,000
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 20 hr Tank ever 7,926
Teacher's aide who sought sex with girl gets pr... (Mar '11) Thu UrAsickFuck 5
Before and after school daycare in Pomona Thu Mayra Jimenez 1
•••

Chino Hills News Video

•••
•••

Chino Hills Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chino Hills People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chino Hills News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chino Hills
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••