Church, state agency deal with activities of former priest
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Iobserve.
#1 Jun 7, 2010
The answer to the questions they present all lie in the confidentiality clauses contained within these agreements. The Church and the victim were prevented from telling anyone, including his employer DSS, that he had reached a settlement agreement. He obviously did not tell them either and the secrecy of his abuse continued for all these years. Others are taking the blame when in fact the blame lies with Blanchard and the Bishop, both whom should have known the situation and followed Church policy. It is why the Diocese needs to release a list of all credibly accused priest so that this situation never happens again. Even Msgr. Farland did not know.
Add your comments below
|Hillcrest buys St. Mark's School||19 hr||Cops are degenerates||2|
|Pittsfield could see dozens of Syrian, Iraqi re...||Wed||The Worlds Bigges...||24|
|the music thread (Mar '12)||Wed||Musikologist||21|
|Leroy Cortes of Greenfield dead, Luis Rivera of... (Sep '10)||Nov 25||Maria||23|
|New Pittsfield to Welcome Syrian RefugeesSeptem...||Nov 22||Ficken in German||117|
|CPA will soon begin paying dividends for Pittsf...||Nov 20||the city I hate||1|
|George W. Bush did not vote for Hillary Clinton||Nov 18||Mohammad Ahsanul ...||1|
Find what you want!
Search Chicopee Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC