Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201480 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Bently

Carson, CA

#233055 Dec 19, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, it follows that those who pervert marriage have no problem perverting the Constitution.
The reality remains, ss couples are not just inferior to marriage, they are a complete failure of marriage!
No manipulated legal maneuverings will ever change that.
I don't believe the Constitution means anything in my lifetime. Roosevelt used it for a doormat and then shredded it. This is the goon all Democrats praise and worship. Controlled the press, hid information from citizens, put U.S. citizens in concentration camps because of their race, 4 terms in office..........

Judged:

13

13

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
BiblicalTruths

South San Francisco, CA

#233056 Dec 19, 2014
Christ has already made it possible for anyone who wishes to join His church, but instead of doing just that 6 of his chosen prophets sided with Rome and stabbed the rest of Christianity in right in the back. I would estimate, that on the very day of Christ's arrest rogue elements chose to marry one another, yet the Church never had a record of it. This might explain how when elements of Hitler's clique, confessed that he had been married to his cousin, yet the Germans though they'd heard about such nuptials, but they still do not have documentation of such a wedding. In the early 1970's, Stanford routinely performed such marriages, but no one staight was permitted to attend them, even when they were all done on campus. With Saul/Paul in prison, logic should have dictated that Christ would have been saver in prison, but that seems to catagorically a proven fallacy. While four more prophets slept and then openly denied Christ in public, they area each given a pass when nothing proves that while Christiandom was being fed to lions, yet when they each recorded one another's demise, they have their reward......

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
JAX

Los Angeles, CA

#233057 Dec 19, 2014
Joe fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep telling yourself that, every year SS marriage supporters are growing
Keep telling what? That you have a different agenda from what you claim. Pretty clear that is the fact here. If it weren't the conversation would be about stable families and a stronger American society.

Judged:

23

23

23

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233058 Dec 19, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
A duplicate gender couple is only half of marriage. That's not even close to equal! Even if it is a butch lesbian who is almost a man in a relationship with a lesbian who almost wants a man, they STILL are a far cry from the balance of a man and woman.
And no one has yet explained how two lesbians fit together sexually. There is NOTHING there to fit!!! And please don't put my sphincter muscle in a charlie horse by talking about gay anal abuse... The fact is, literally millions of years have evolved the sexual union of a male and female. Marriage literally, visibly, physically FITS!!!
But the epic failure is the absolute, destitution and barrenness of a ss relationship. It NEVER bears any fruit after its kind! Marriage is the perfect, natural, normal birthplace of society. The best origin of every other relationship is society. It is not just an insult to intelligence to equate a sterile ss couple, it is literally a insult to the PARENTS of ss couples!
This is a silly farce that will never survive manipulated force of law. In fact it has never survived any culture in 8,000 years of human history. We will look back in embarrassment at the idiocy and foolishness.
<quoted text>
You are really dense, aren't you, I listed three significant distinctions.
As to procreation, the fair comparison is equating to the norm. Ss couples NEVER procreate, marriage normally does historically over 90% of the time. There could not be a greater distinction!
However you want to use the exception to overrule the norm and thereby allow the completely barren relationship. Couples who have a choice (vs couples who never do), old couples who no longer can procreate (vs couples who never could), and couples with medical conditions (vs couples who have a total evolutionary barrier). Even looking at the exceptions, it is hardly fair or rational to equate ss couples with marriage in that comparison.
But here is another clincher: Couples with a choice can, and often do, change their minds. Medical science is allowing older couples and couples with medical conditions new opportunities to mutually procreate. Ss couples once again? NEVER.
Moreover, why would there need to be a requirement for procreation in marriage? The vast majority of married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate. It is for that reason a 'requirement' was never considered. A ss couple, once again, NEVER needs protection except for anal sex.
Based on these three distinctions, the reality is,'ss marriage' is an epic oxymoron.
SMile.
<quoted text>
LOL, now that is the most detailed denial you've ever posted!
Snicker smile.
Like I said the same old useless nothing. Everything you posted against gay marriage has to do with sex, if that is all you thing marriage is about, I feel sorry for your spouse
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233059 Dec 19, 2014
JAX wrote:
<quoted text>
Keep telling what? That you have a different agenda from what you claim. Pretty clear that is the fact here. If it weren't the conversation would be about stable families and a stronger American society.
. That gay support isn't growing, you just keep that thought in your mind you, it might keep you feeling better as support grows
What agenda would that be? Other than the right for gays to marry. When people are happy we have stable families wether they are straight or gay. By a strong american society, you mean the one that makes you happy, sorry but that's not good enough for me. Do you really thing that gay marriage is going destabilize families, and weaken the American society, if you do then you are the one that is weakening America society.
Cowobunga

Dublin, CA

#233060 Dec 20, 2014
BiblicalTruths wrote:
Christ has already made it possible for anyone who wishes to join His church, but instead of doing just that 6 of his chosen prophets sided with Rome and stabbed the rest of Christianity in right in the back. I would estimate, that on the very day of Christ's arrest rogue elements chose to marry one another, yet the Church never had a record of it. This might explain how when elements of Hitler's clique, confessed that he had been married to his cousin, yet the Germans though they'd heard about such nuptials, but they still do not have documentation of such a wedding. In the early 1970's, Stanford routinely performed such marriages, but no one staight was permitted to attend them, even when they were all done on campus. With Saul/Paul in prison, logic should have dictated that Christ would have been saver in prison, but that seems to catagorically a proven fallacy. While four more prophets slept and then openly denied Christ in public, they area each given a pass when nothing proves that while Christiandom was being fed to lions, yet when they each recorded one another's demise, they have their reward......
Sorry but your religious beliefs have nothing to do with the question of this thread ! This nation is first and foremost a secular nation where the Constitution trumps your fictitious fairy tale the bible every time ! Your religious beliefs end where my beliefs begin and that's what makes this country great ! Besides in another year or 2 this nation will have marriage equality from shore to shore,to bad so sad for you !

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233061 Dec 20, 2014
KiMare wrote:
A duplicate gender couple is only half of marriage. That's not even close to equal! Even if it is a butch lesbian who is almost a man in a relationship with a lesbian who almost wants a man, they STILL are a far cry from the balance of a man and woman.
And no one has yet explained how two lesbians fit together sexually. There is NOTHING there to fit!!! And please don't put my sphincter muscle in a charlie horse by talking about gay anal abuse... The fact is, literally millions of years have evolved the sexual union of a male and female. Marriage literally, visibly, physically FITS!!!
But the epic failure is the absolute, destitution and barrenness of a ss relationship. It NEVER bears any fruit after its kind! Marriage is the perfect, natural, normal birthplace of society. The best origin of every other relationship is society. It is not just an insult to intelligence to equate a sterile ss couple, it is literally a insult to the PARENTS of ss couples!
This is a silly farce that will never survive manipulated force of law. In fact it has never survived any culture in 8,000 years of human history. We will look back in embarrassment at the idiocy and foolishness.
<quoted text>
You are really dense, aren't you, I listed three significant distinctions.
As to procreation, the fair comparison is equating to the norm. Ss couples NEVER procreate, marriage normally does historically over 90% of the time. There could not be a greater distinction!
However you want to use the exception to overrule the norm and thereby allow the completely barren relationship. Couples who have a choice (vs couples who never do), old couples who no longer can procreate (vs couples who never could), and couples with medical conditions (vs couples who have a total evolutionary barrier). Even looking at the exceptions, it is hardly fair or rational to equate ss couples with marriage in that comparison.
But here is another clincher: Couples with a choice can, and often do, change their minds. Medical science is allowing older couples and couples with medical conditions new opportunities to mutually procreate. Ss couples once again? NEVER.
Moreover, why would there need to be a requirement for procreation in marriage? The vast majority of married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate. It is for that reason a 'requirement' was never considered. A ss couple, once again, NEVER needs protection except for anal sex.
Based on these three distinctions, the reality is,'ss marriage' is an epic oxymoron.
SMile.
<quoted text>
LOL, now that is the most detailed denial you've ever posted!
Snicker smile.
Joe fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said the same old useless nothing. Everything you posted against gay marriage has to do with sex, if that is all you thing marriage is about, I feel sorry for your spouse
You are lying.

I gave three distinctions between ss couples and marriage. Only one notes the profundity of a complementary sexual union of a husband and wife vs the half-assed failure of mating behavior by ss couples.

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
BiblicalTruths

Long Beach, CA

#233063 Dec 20, 2014
[QUOTE/][ This is the goon all Democrats praise and worship.]
[/QUOTE]
When FDR and Teddy were undersecretary of the Navy, as Pearl Harbor saw courts martial aplenty that should have sounded alarms aplenty, but with a goose here, a duck there and a bottle of wine in yet another place. When FDR took tax dollars, as he then used it to prop up Adolf, but when the Germans turned right around and blew that idiot up, in 1944, as did also the Italians to Mussolini, well before Hitler's true demise, what is all of this nuttiness about? These days, we have a sea laden oil rig blown up on Hitler's birthday, yet not so much as warm snot was discovered, let alone the proverbial cold body, yet on the very same day a few years later in South America that confessed Nazi who claimed to be not connected to an American whose body in the West Indies has to this very day never been found.......

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233065 Dec 20, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
A duplicate gender couple is only half of marriage. That's not even close to equal! Even if it is a butch lesbian who is almost a man in a relationship with a lesbian who almost wants a man, they STILL are a far cry from the balance of a man and woman.
And no one has yet explained how two lesbians fit together sexually. There is NOTHING there to fit!!! And please don't put my sphincter muscle in a charlie horse by talking about gay anal abuse... The fact is, literally millions of years have evolved the sexual union of a male and female. Marriage literally, visibly, physically FITS!!!
But the epic failure is the absolute, destitution and barrenness of a ss relationship. It NEVER bears any fruit after its kind! Marriage is the perfect, natural, normal birthplace of society. The best origin of every other relationship is society. It is not just an insult to intelligence to equate a sterile ss couple, it is literally a insult to the PARENTS of ss couples!
This is a silly farce that will never survive manipulated force of law. In fact it has never survived any culture in 8,000 years of human history. We will look back in embarrassment at the idiocy and foolishness.
<quoted text>
You are really dense, aren't you, I listed three significant distinctions.
As to procreation, the fair comparison is equating to the norm. Ss couples NEVER procreate, marriage normally does historically over 90% of the time. There could not be a greater distinction!
However you want to use the exception to overrule the norm and thereby allow the completely barren relationship. Couples who have a choice (vs couples who never do), old couples who no longer can procreate (vs couples who never could), and couples with medical conditions (vs couples who have a total evolutionary barrier). Even looking at the exceptions, it is hardly fair or rational to equate ss couples with marriage in that comparison.
But here is another clincher: Couples with a choice can, and often do, change their minds. Medical science is allowing older couples and couples with medical conditions new opportunities to mutually procreate. Ss couples once again? NEVER.
Moreover, why would there need to be a requirement for procreation in marriage? The vast majority of married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate. It is for that reason a 'requirement' was never considered. A ss couple, once again, NEVER needs protection except for anal sex.
Based on these three distinctions, the reality is,'ss marriage' is an epic oxymoron.
SMile.
<quoted text>
LOL, now that is the most detailed denial you've ever posted!
Snicker smile.
<quoted text>
You are lying.
I gave three distinctions between ss couples and marriage. Only one notes the profundity of a complementary sexual union of a husband and wife vs the half-assed failure of mating behavior by ss couples.
. How they fit together, procreation, barren relationship all come down to sex there is know distinction in those three. So what are the other two? Here's a few each have in common, love, share in the joys of life, and support in the hard times. These are some of the more important parts of marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233066 Dec 20, 2014
KiMare wrote:
A duplicate gender couple is only half of marriage. That's not even close to equal! Even if it is a butch lesbian who is almost a man in a relationship with a lesbian who almost wants a man, they STILL are a far cry from the balance of a man and woman.
And no one has yet explained how two lesbians fit together sexually. There is NOTHING there to fit!!! And please don't put my sphincter muscle in a charlie horse by talking about gay anal abuse... The fact is, literally millions of years have evolved the sexual union of a male and female. Marriage literally, visibly, physically FITS!!!
But the epic failure is the absolute, destitution and barrenness of a ss relationship. It NEVER bears any fruit after its kind! Marriage is the perfect, natural, normal birthplace of society. The best origin of every other relationship is society. It is not just an insult to intelligence to equate a sterile ss couple, it is literally a insult to the PARENTS of ss couples!
This is a silly farce that will never survive manipulated force of law. In fact it has never survived any culture in 8,000 years of human history. We will look back in embarrassment at the idiocy and foolishness.
<quoted text>
You are really dense, aren't you, I listed three significant distinctions.
As to procreation, the fair comparison is equating to the norm. Ss couples NEVER procreate, marriage normally does historically over 90% of the time. There could not be a greater distinction!
However you want to use the exception to overrule the norm and thereby allow the completely barren relationship. Couples who have a choice (vs couples who never do), old couples who no longer can procreate (vs couples who never could), and couples with medical conditions (vs couples who have a total evolutionary barrier). Even looking at the exceptions, it is hardly fair or rational to equate ss couples with marriage in that comparison.
But here is another clincher: Couples with a choice can, and often do, change their minds. Medical science is allowing older couples and couples with medical conditions new opportunities to mutually procreate. Ss couples once again? NEVER.
Moreover, why would there need to be a requirement for procreation in marriage? The vast majority of married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate. It is for that reason a 'requirement' was never considered. A ss couple, once again, NEVER needs protection except for anal sex.
Based on these three distinctions, the reality is,'ss marriage' is an epic oxymoron.
SMile.
<quoted text>
LOL, now that is the most detailed denial you've ever posted!
Snicker smile.
<quoted text>
You are lying.
I gave three distinctions between ss couples and marriage. Only one notes the profundity of a complementary sexual union of a husband and wife vs the half-assed failure of mating behavior by ss couples.
Joe fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>. Here's a few each have in common, love, share in the joys of life, and support in the hard times. These are some of the more important parts of marriage.
Most important relationships include those elements, marriage is far more than that.

Um, you keep ignoring the very first one, the complexity of a diverse gender union vs a simple redumbant gender relationship. You also seem ignorant that there is no gender discrimination in marriage.

Here are some other distinctions:

Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.

A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.

Judged:

23

23

23

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233067 Dec 20, 2014
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
A duplicate gender couple is only half of marriage. That's not even close to equal! Even if it is a butch lesbian who is almost a man in a relationship with a lesbian who almost wants a man, they STILL are a far cry from the balance of a man and woman.
And no one has yet explained how two lesbians fit together sexually. There is NOTHING there to fit!!! And please don't put my sphincter muscle in a charlie horse by talking about gay anal abuse... The fact is, literally millions of years have evolved the sexual union of a male and female. Marriage literally, visibly, physically FITS!!!
But the epic failure is the absolute, destitution and barrenness of a ss relationship. It NEVER bears any fruit after its kind! Marriage is the perfect, natural, normal birthplace of society. The best origin of every other relationship is society. It is not just an insult to intelligence to equate a sterile ss couple, it is literally a insult to the PARENTS of ss couples!
This is a silly farce that will never survive manipulated force of law. In fact it has never survived any culture in 8,000 years of human history. We will look back in embarrassment at the idiocy and foolishness.
<quoted text>
You are really dense, aren't you, I listed three significant distinctions.
As to procreation, the fair comparison is equating to the norm. Ss couples NEVER procreate, marriage normally does historically over 90% of the time. There could not be a greater distinction!
However you want to use the exception to overrule the norm and thereby allow the completely barren relationship. Couples who have a choice (vs couples who never do), old couples who no longer can procreate (vs couples who never could), and couples with medical conditions (vs couples who have a total evolutionary barrier). Even looking at the exceptions, it is hardly fair or rational to equate ss couples with marriage in that comparison.
But here is another clincher: Couples with a choice can, and often do, change their minds. Medical science is allowing older couples and couples with medical conditions new opportunities to mutually procreate. Ss couples once again? NEVER.
Moreover, why would there need to be a requirement for procreation in marriage? The vast majority of married couples have to use protection NOT to procreate. It is for that reason a 'requirement' was never considered. A ss couple, once again, NEVER needs protection except for anal sex.
Based on these three distinctions, the reality is,'ss marriage' is an epic oxymoron.
SMile.
<quoted text>
LOL, now that is the most detailed denial you've ever posted!
Snicker smile.
<quoted text>
You are lying.
I gave three distinctions between ss couples and marriage. Only one notes the profundity of a complementary sexual union of a husband and wife vs the half-assed failure of mating behavior by ss couples.
<quoted text>
Most important relationships include those elements, marriage is far more than that.
Um, you keep ignoring the very first one, the complexity of a diverse gender union vs a simple redumbant gender relationship. You also seem ignorant that there is no gender discrimination in marriage.
Here are some other distinctions:
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
. marriage is amirculous Union between two people, a union so profound it is describe as the prefect Union of two people it reunites of two loving people to the roots of a happy relationship.ihave no more room
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233068 Dec 20, 2014
Marriage is a miraculous Union between two people, a Union soporfound it is described as the prefect Union of two happy people it reunites humanity to the roots of happy people. I guess you can see how You post means nothing except in your mind.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233069 Dec 21, 2014
Joe fortuna wrote:
Marriage is a miraculous Union between two people, a Union soporfound it is described as the prefect Union of two happy people it reunites humanity to the roots of happy people. I guess you can see how You post means nothing except in your mind.
Dumbfounded again?

Snicker

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233070 Dec 21, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbfounded again?
Snicker
Yes that sound just what I thought about your post.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233071 Dec 21, 2014
Joe fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes that sound just what I thought about your post.
OH PLEASE, be specific! What exactly were you dumbfounded about?

Smirk.

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233072 Dec 21, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
OH PLEASE, be specific! What exactly were you dumbfounded about?
Smirk.
Really you can't figure that out, they were the same, only difference was your was pro straight marriage and mind was pro loving people regardless of sexual orientation .

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233073 Dec 21, 2014
Joe fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Really you can't figure that out, they were the same, only difference was your was pro straight marriage and mind was pro loving people regardless of sexual orientation .
They clearly were not the same.

Again, please be specific, point by point.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233074 Dec 21, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
They clearly were not the same.
Again, please be specific, point by point.
Of course they were, I used your words expect I put in people instead of diferent gender

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#233075 Dec 21, 2014
Joe fortuna wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they were, I used your words expect I put in people instead of diferent gender
You lie.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Joe fortuna

Portland, OR

#233076 Dec 21, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You lie.
HAHAHA now I know you're just pulling my leg,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chico Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
HANNITY The WELFARE QUEEN 1 hr Dave 7
Hillary Clinton Big Shot Tries to Pull the DO Y... 1 hr Dave 6
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr Anonymous 72,077
Godfrey; At your request your Social Security &... 9 hr Socialism Not The... 18
democrats Now Blaming Jews for Snow 22 hr C Kersey 2
TAX RELIGIONS and all of their Businesses and P... Apr 24 Pay Teachers MORE 5
The RepubliCONS Worst Nightmare; Donald J Trump! Apr 23 Rapture Loser 2

Chico Jobs

Personal Finance

Chico Mortgages