Criminal FDA must be charged with cancer quackery.

Another article on cancer appeared in the New York Times October 26, 2009 by Gina Kolata "Cancers Can Vanish Without Treatment, but How?" Here are my comments to this article:
The scientific facts developed from the experiments and facts developed by the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. from roughly 1923 to his death in 1970, confirmed in other laboratories around the world, but denied by the cancer generals at the NIH, NCI and FDA, and most of the cheerleaders in the medical "profession" of the U.S., provide a natural explanation for remission of various types of cancer in the human body.
As Dr. Warburg proved, with experiments and facts, not genetic speculations, cancer is caused by an impairment to the oxygen energy supply of all living cells. Adequate oxygen must be continually supplied to every one of the roughly 100 trillion cells in your body every instant of time, from the outermost cells of your skin to the inner most cells in the deepest bone of your foot. Dr. Warburg invented the tissue slice technique and a special instrument called the Warburg Manometer, to measure the oxygen uptake of living cells in living tissue, not dishes under an artificial energy supply.
He proved that all cancer is caused, at a fundamental level, by a reduction in the oxygen supply of about 35%. When this happens, the cells became cancerous. He also found that when they became cancerous, they switched from running on oxygen to running on glucose mainly in the absence of oxygen, anerobically, often also called the fermentation of glucose. However, the time for the cells to make the switch from obtaining their energy from oxygen to obtaining their energy from fermentation completely, i.e., the final onset of cancer, may take a long period of time like decades in humans. This time frame is what he referred to as "sleeping cancer cells" which he suggested would be the natural period to intervene to kill or reverse the cancer process back to normal. Other conditions of the body could also reverse a sleeping cancer cell back to normal before it finally reaches the irreversible final state of fermentation or clinical cancer that can only be killed or excised from the body. Sleeping cancer cells are also not speculations, but actually observed in Dr. Warburg's time.
The war on cancer is a dismal failure because the scientific method has not been followed by the negligent criminals running it. They have prejudically denied the experiments and facts developed by Dr. Warburg decades ago, and proved and confirmed by other laboratories around the world. They obviously do not know what they are doing. They hated Dr. Warburg, a genius, and refuse to give him the credit he is due for discovering the prime cause of cancer decades ago: Oxygen deficiency to living cells over a long period of time or respiratory impairment or the wrong energy supply. It is also an experimental fact that all cancer cells metabolize by anerobic glycolysis as first proved by Dr. Warburg. All cancer is is the reversion of the world we know created from oxygen, back to the world without oxygen of the lowest living forms "before one's very eyes" as Dr. Warburg so elegantly stated over and over again. Every time some scientist, like Van Potter in Wisconsin came along and claimed to have found a cancer that did not ferment, Dr. Warburg and his associates would prove him wrong.
Continued below.

Winfield J Abbe

Continued from above: The Cancer Generals have either not read his numerous hundreds of scientific papers and/or not understood what they read. Ms. Kolata and her cronies in the media have most certainly not read and comprehended any of this true science. All this cancer nightmare is a consequence of failure to follow the scientific method and prejudice by the cancer generals and their cronies at so-called "universities" or "institutions of higher learning" around the country. This is why they not only must be fired, but prosecuted for scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity.
Reference: "The Hidden Story of Cancer" by Brian Peskin, E.E. and Amid Habib, M.D., Pinnacle Press, Houston, 2006-2008.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
UC Riverside, 1966
Athens, GA.

Winfield J Abbe

While it is true that observation and experimentation are a central part of the Scientific Method, they are only one part of that process which involves many principles. Galileo
Galilei (1564-1642) from Pisa, Italy, the greatest physicist in the world, is usually credited to be the father of the Scientific Method. He made enormous contributions to virtually every branch of physics and astronomy.
The most comprehensive statements of the Scientific Method I have read are published in the book “Physics A Textbook for Colleges” by Professor Oscar M. Stewart, Ginn & Co., 1924-1944. This book was reviewed by Nobel Laureate Robert Millikan (1868-1953), from Morrison, Illinois, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1923 for his seminal experiment called “The Millikan Oil Drop Experiment” which proved, among other things, that all electric charge exists in discrete units of the fundamental charge on an electron. That experiment can still be performed today about a century later on any kitchen table. The following statements are quoted from pages 756-760 “Notes on the Scientific Method” from this book.

“Fundamental Assumptions of the Scientific Method
1. The first assumption is that there exist certain ideas, or concepts, which are useful and apparently necessary tools in understanding nature. For example, such things as force, mass, energy, temperature, and electrical charge are fundamental concepts. These have been chosen through long experience, by keeping those that were useful and discarding those that were not.
2. The second assumption is that all physical or material things are governed by definite laws, or principles, which can be stated in terms of our fundamental concepts. The acceptance of this doctrine abolishes superstition and mysticism…
3. A third assumption is that the number of fundamental concepts and fundamental principles, or laws, is small. This assumption is sometimes called ‘the law of parsimony’…

Methods
4. The importance of accurate definitions.
5. The use of quantitative methods.
6. Explanations. Each student of science soon learns what a scientist means by ‘Explain’ or ‘Why.’ To a scientist an explanation is an attempt to show that the occurrence is a special case of one or more of the general principles…The habit of trying to explain things in terms of general principles is one of the important attitudes of a good scientist.
7. Experimentation. The basis of all knowledge is experience. In science it is experimentation. There is a vast difference between good experimentation and tinkering. A good experiment is one that adds something to our knowledge of facts or fundamental principles. Usually many different factors in an experiment may affect the results. It is always important to see to it that the conditions of the experiment are so controlled that there are no concealed factors and that the influence of all except those under direct test is reduced to a minimum… It is important to remember that experimentation is one of the best tests of the truth. One should never accept a statement of facts unless he feels confident that it is in agreement with experiment. Practically all the common superstitions can be tested experimentally. Correct and accurate observation is one of the first demands of science. There are three tests of the value of any set of observations:
a. Reproducibility. Different observers obtain results which agree.
b. Agreement and congruity of observations with each other.
c. Utility of observations in establishing principles or in supporting theories.
8. The formulation of principles.
9. Tests of laws. a. A statement of a law, or principle, must follow by rigorous reasoning from accepted principles. b. The law must be verified directly or indirectly by numerous experiments.
10. Theories of Processes.
11. Theoretical Physics."
Continued below

Winfield J Abbe

Continued from above:
"12. Intellectual Honesty.In the interpretation of observations and in the acceptance of principles a maximum amount of fairness and open-mindedness is essential. Prejudice must not enter. Furthermore, one should never make up one’s mind so positively that it is impossible to change it….
13. A summary of the fundamental habits necessary in using a scientific attitude toward a problem.(Adapted from V. H. Noll.) a. the habit of accuracy; b. the habit of intellectual honesty; c. the habit of open-mindedness; d. the habit of suspended judgment; e. the habit of looking for cause and effect relations; f. the habit of criticism, including self-criticism. If a person carries all these habits over into the solutions of everyday problems he meets, he is using a scientific attitude.”

Few students, even college graduates and even university professors and researchers truly follow all these principles. Many “scientists” often have conflicts of interest usually revolving around money and who is paying for their “research”. For example, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is a corrupt cesspool, bought and paid for by food processing companies and drug companies. This is documented in numerous books and articles. The important thing for young students to always remember is that no matter what others may do, even your “teachers”, you are always responsible for rigorously following the above rules 24 hours a day of your life. If you do you will be a good scientist and a good citizen too. If you violate the above rules do so at your peril as if you violate the laws of physics.
As Dr. Gold has clearly demonstrated (www.hydrazinesulfate.org ), the NIH and the NCI have clearly violated these rules.
Many of these "scientists" hold Ph.D. degrees. They have betrayed the public trust. They have sold out humanity for money. Shame is too polite a word to describe their unconscionable behavior which continues unpunished and virtually unchallenged by the ignorant cowards in the U.S. Congress.

Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962
Ph.D., Physics UC Riverside, 1966
Low Temperature Experimental Physics and Theoretical Elementary Particle Physics.
150 Raintree Ct.
Athens, GA 30607
wjabbe@aol.com

Winfield J Abbe

Douglasville, GA

The above moving statement by Dr. Gold at www.hydrazinesulfate.org regarding the lies about hydrazine sulfate by government agencies and the officials running them is also supported by a quotation by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D. in his book "The Cancer Industry", Equinox Press, N.Y., 1996, also published under various names in 1989 and 1980. About 23 pages are devoted to this subject in his book.
In the 1989 version on page 191, he quotes Dean Burk, Ph.D., former head of cell chemistry at the NCI and himself a genius level scientist and former member of the Palace of Cell Physiology operated by Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D in Germany.
"In mid-August 1973, Burk met with top officials of Sloan-Kettering Institute in New York to tell them about hydrazine's successes..:
Let me tell you this perfectly true story. There is nothing mystical or poetic about it-and I could give you many (such stories).
A woman with Hodgkin's disease who had been flat on her back for seven weeks, who had no appetitie and who had lost all her weight-a 'paper thin' patient-took hydrazine sulfate. One week later she was shopping in the grocery store with her own bag; five days later she was spending most of the day in her garden. I don't give you that as any miraculous story-it is simply the plain truth (Burk, 1974)."

Winfield J Abbe

If you were not convinced that Gina Kolata was little more than a cheerleader for the failed cancer industry, her current propaganda piece in the New York Times should convince you at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/health/rese... .

Ms. Kolata only talks to members of the group of cancer researchers which have failed so miserably now for so long . She carefully avoids mentioning that Vitamin C kills cancer cells at high doses, a fact discovered and reported two years before the failed war on cancer was started in 1969. While there is a literal mountain of evidence that the mineral selenium prevents all types of cancer, she only quotes prejudiced studies by the prejudiced non scientists in the medical orthodoxy who falsify data to “prove” otherwise.
Obviously they do not want to stop the money machine with cancer prevention.
Drug prevention and machine prevention is all Ms. Kolata can comprehend. The doctors recommended that my wife take Tamoxifen following her inflammatory breast cancer about ten years ago, but fortunately she took my advice and did not take it. Had she done so her life and quality of life would likely have been lessened and she might have even contracted uterine cancer. She also saved many thousands of dollars for her insurance companies and for us too. So far she is a success story without this worthless and dangerous drug.
Ms Kolata obviously has not read the numerous books and articles that document fraud and corruption and falsifying scientific data, such as that provided by Dr. Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org , in the failed war on cancer since she routinely fails to mention any of it, beginning with the “scientist” at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York years ago who painted spots on the backs of lab rats in order to fool others about their worthless cancer research. Yet she continues to act as a cheerleader for all this medical quackery and corruption with billions of dollars of public and private money. Ms Kolata obviously loves to fool herself and others too. Just remember, Ms. Kolata, one day you may be one of the victims you and your employer have so vigorously sought to fool.
The war on cancer is the biggest scam in the world today. The cancer generals of that war obviously do not know what they are doing. They routinely approve quack drugs and medical treatments that even kill patients from the treatment. Obviously if you kill the patient you kill the cancer. That seems to be the business and medical model of the cancer generals. Many years ago a distinguished professor of medical physics and physiology and an expert in medical statistics at UC Berkeley, Hardin Jones, Ph.D., proved that those who refused any of the orthodox cancer treatments lived up to 4 times longer than those who were treated.. Nothing has changed today. Cancer treatment is the biggest scam in the world today. It makes huge amounts of money for all involved while bankrupting the patients and their insurance companies. Shame, shame, shame on Ms. Kolata and her reprehensible employer the NYTimes for their continual denial of these indisputable facts. Numerous references have been provided here and elsewhere to prove these statements. Unfortunately Ms. Kolata and her employer choose to violate all the rules of journalism and fail to read them and continue to keep themselves ignorant. Ignorance is bliss isn't it Ms. Kolata and NYTimes editors. Why would you keep quoting those who have failed so dismally and miserably for so long?

Winfield J Abbe

Comment to another propaganda article by cheerleader Gina Kolata in the NYTimes 11/16/09:
Some of these comments show how brainwashed most women are about the efficacy of mammograms versus other means of detecting cancer. I read only one post wich mentioned thermography. While a number of posters did mention self examination, virtually none questioned mammograms although some criticized them as being painful or causing discomfort.
First, everyone should remember that mammograms are high energy x- rays sent directly into the tissue. X-rays can harm tissue and yes, even cause cancer itself. This has been known for many years. So, the higher the frequency of mammograms the higher the probability they may be the cause of the breast cancer you fear! Think about that. Your breast cancer could be caused by the x-rays used to detect it and your doctor and the medical orthodoxy recommended the procedure. Naturally the medical orthodoxy does not want to admit a procedure recommended by them causes cancer itself (iatrogenically caused or doctor caused).
Even if your doctor claims the probability of contracting cancer from a single mammogram is small, unlikely events happen every day don't they? After all, the probability of winning the lottery is small too, isn't it, but someone usually wins every day? It is unlikely to be struck by lightening but people die from this every day.
Second, it has been known since 1928, when medical articles were first published in the medical literature about it, that pressing hard on the breasts may in fact spread any existing cancer around and cause it to spread to other organs. A number of posters have complained about this and how painful it was and how they dreaded a mammogram.
There are other just as effective or more effective ways to detect breast cancer than mammography. Responsible medical doctors like Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. have disussed them. But mammography is a well established business and makes big money for the cancer industry. The equipment cost many millions of dollars. Do you think a doctor is going to invest in a million dollar machine and then fail to recommend his patients use that machine especially when the cancer generals support his decision to use that machine, and when it is virtually impossible for a cancer victim to prove he or she contracted breast cancer from the use of that machine or possibly had existing cancer spread around by the hard pressure exerted on the breasts during the procedure? For some references on this subject see www.preventcancer.oo m and other articles by Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. on this subject.
These articles by the cheerleader of the cancer generals, Ms. Kolata, further prove that the cancer generals do not know what they are doing after squandering multi billions of public and private dollars. They can't even tell you what cancer is, let alone how to cure and prevent it. Everyone is virtually on their own and must become their own doctor. Everyone must become their own expert since no expert can be believed due to confliscts of interest and corruption and violations of the scientific method. Rather than protecting the public from medical quackery with the power of government, the power of government is corruptly used to sanction it everywhere. It is like the situation that existed and still exists with stomach ulcers and the medical orthodoxy did not understand they were caused by a bacterial infection and most medical doctors killed or harmed millions of unwitting patients due to the power and ignorance of the medical orthodoxy. Some still do. The same is true today with the cancer generals of the failed war on cancer. They do not know what they are doing and should be charged with scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity by the U.S. Justice Department.

Winfield J Abbe

Continued from above.
By the way, anyone who believes the cancer generals at the NIH, NCI and FDA objectively evaluate different proposals fairly and objectively according to the scientific method, just read the article by Joseph Gold, M.D. "The Truth About Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks" at www.hydrazinesulfate.org . Incidently, it has been known since 1969, two years before the war on cancer was begun, that Vitamin C at high doses kills cancer cells; yet the FDA has only approved its use in the tiny amount of 60 milligrams per day to prevent the disease of scurvy! Tens to hundreds of grams of Vitamin C are necessary to be maintained in the human body to prevent cancer and the human body does not manufacture it like most higher animals do. Take your heads out of the sand folks; your government protectors are not your protectors at all, but your killers. They learned well from their teachers in Nazi, Germany some of our brave ancestors fought so hard to rid the world of.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA
Note: To the best of my knowledge the above comment was censored from over 600 mostly meaningless comments by anonymous posters by the NYTimes propaganda editors who use mostly meaningless comments to increase readership and aid and abet the corrupt criminal activities of the cancer generals of the war on cancer. Everyone should observe that the medical "profession" is the only one in the world that still receives payment for services rendered even if those services were not only fraudulent and meaningless, but also harmed or killed the patient. No refunds or even apologies are ever offered by those "compassionate" but usually very rich medical "doctors" engaged in this unconscionable conduct and sanctioned by the Gestapo agencies of the federal government. If anyone else in society engages in such improper medical conduct they are condemned as "medical quacks" but if orthodox medical doctors and nurses do the same thing it is called "medicine".

Winfield J Abbe

“Breaching a barrier to fight brain cancer” by Dinese Grady is the title of the latest propaganda article by the NYTimes promoting the failed war on cancer in the U.S. Nov. 17, 2009.
Cancer patients are all very desperate individuals. They will agree to almost anything if told it might cure them of their cancer if they indeed have cancer. The concept of “informed consent” is virtually meaningless with any cancer patient.
Furthermore if anyone outside the medical orthodoxy seeks to perform any “unproved” procedure or treatment, they are required to prove efficacy or proof of success before treatment will be approved by the Gestapo FDA or NIH or NCI, which it never is. However, if any orthodox medical “doctor” seeks to do experimental procedures, like the ones described in this article, that are also totally unproven and which efficacy has not only not been proved, but a patient already died evidently from the procedures as described in the article, rather than labeling this as medical fraud and quackery as the criminals at the FDA routinely do for alternative medicine, this is called “experimental studies” and sanctioned by the same criminals that outlaw anyone else from doing exactly the same thing! Absolutely no proof of efficacy was demonstrated before these described experiments with unwitting brain cancer patients were performed as required of all alternative medicine proponents. Only the “doctors”, if they can be called that, that are licensed by the criminals in the medical orthodoxy of the U.S. are authorized to basically experiment with unwitting cancer victims who obviously would agree to anything; there is no such thing as “informed” consent in such situations.
Everyone should also observe that these cancer quacks in the medical orthodoxy are only seeking to use dangerous and unproven drugs for their experiments, as they totally disregard the experiments and facts of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., who proved that all cancer cells metabolize by anerobic glycolysis, and as they also disregard the experiments and facts proving that Vitamin C at high doses of the order of grams to hundreds of grams kills cancer cells, known since 1969, two years before the war on cancer was even begun! It is obvious that the cancer generals do not know what they are doing and must not only be fired, but prosecuted for scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity. Shame, shame shame on them who have no conscience.“Conscience doth make cowards of us all”.
When you are engaged in medical quackery and fraud, it helps to have powerful media partners aiding and abetting you in fleecing and fooling a gullible and unwitting and stupid American Public. Anyone who foolishly believes the cancer generals are objectively looking at all scientific aspects of the cancer problem must read the article “The Truth about Hydrazine Sulfate-Dr. Gold Speaks” by Joseph Gold, M.D. at www.hydrazinesulfate.org .
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA

Winfield J Abbe

Response to an Op-Ed piece "The Breast Cancer Brouhaha" by Gail Collins, NYTimes, Nov. 19, 2009:
This is a completely unenlightening article. The NYTimes editors and writers obviously have their heads in the sand and refuse to acknowlege the fact that the cancer generals clearly do not know what they are doing and no longer deserve any artificial protection from a cowardly and lying media. The gloves must be taken off and soon.
Multi billions of public and private dollars squandered on a failed war on cancer and the cancer generals not only are unable to tell us what cancer is scientifically, but cannot tell us how to cure and prevent cancer in the human body either. They routinely violate the scientific method by disregarding the experiments and facts of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. while falsifying data to obstruct anyone outside the medical orthodoxy who seeks to use natural substances like Vitamin C to cure and prevent cancer or selemium to prevent it like iodine prevents goitre or cheap and inexpensive drugs to aid patients like hydrazine sulfate obstructed by the non scientists at the NIH, NCI and FDA who lied about it on a government website. It has been known since 1969 that Vitamin C kills cancer cells at high doses of the order of grams or more. See www.hydrazinesulfate.org by Joseph Gold, M.D. The cancer industry is a cesspool. The American public has been brainwashed by the failed media, like the NYTimes for so long, they don't know up from down or right from wrong and are impotent to distinguish failure from success. Their "higher" education failed to instill any critical abilities in them. But if you continue to spend enormous sums of money and enormous numbers of cancer victims continue to be harmed and die, often from the toxic treatments themselves, this is clear failure, not success. The cancer generals obviously do not know what they are doing.
Adolph Hitler once said that "the people will more readily accept a big lie than a small one". The big lie in America today, 2009 is that the war on cancer is not a failure. How long do we as a society, continue to reward failure? America is, or should be, about success not failure. This is why the cancer generals must not only be fired, but prosecuted for scientific misconduct, fraud, medical quackery and crimes against humanity. Most Americans would not continue to reward failure in other aspects of their lives; why continue to reward the failed criminal cancer generals?

Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA
Notice the deafening silence of all the "scientists" to dispute, with facts and experiments, any of my comments above. Yet, the ignorant members of our non representatives in Congress continue to support their foolish and failed ways. Tragically, America has lost its way.

Winfield J Abbe

Comment to article "Regents Set to Raise Tuition in California by 32%" by Tamar Lewin, NYTimes, November 19, 2009:
I grew up in Sierra Madre, California, near Pasadena in the foothills just below Mt. Wilson. The State of my childhood is now basically bankrupt in more ways than just fiscally. My alma mater, the once crown jewel of "higher" education is no more a jewel in the crown. It has become a politically correct cesspool with a student body largely from foreign countries and a research faculty corrupted by federal dollars.
Most of them will do anything for federal government money. Rather than leaders in basic research in cancer, for example, they are followers blindly following the blind failed genetics research of the cancer generals of the war on cancer, and violating the scientific method by neglecting the experiments and facts of the genius in Germany Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D. whom most of the "professors" there have either not heard of or failed to read his hundreds of scientific papers and formed prejudiced opinions based on hearsay and innuendo from other non scientists.
John LeConte, M.D. "Father of the University of California", from Savannah, Georgia, who was first president and first professor of physics at UC Berkeley in 1868, would be ashamed at what has transpired at his legacy. Despite their basic bankruptcy the selfish groups at UC Riverside still demand a new medical school; this must be revoked and cancelled immediately. This proposed medical school will still provide that pre med students be treated to a watered down set of introductory physics classes as has been done for roughly the past 50 years. It was approved just before the fall last year in June, 2008. Because, as usual, you know who will be expected to pony up to bail California out of their bankruptcy: The rest of us of course. The orgy is over citizens of California. You must get your act together and begin paying your bills and living like ordinary citizens for a change. Unfortunately, if California falls, it may take down the rest of us too. Shame, shame, shame on California for failing to get its act in order.
Winfield J. Abbe
A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961
M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962
Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966

Winfield J Abbe

A genius level scientist and medical doctor, Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D. died in May, 2009. Everyone should read this last interview of him:

An Interview with Abram Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D., 1917-2009 by Andrew W. Saul

http://www.townsendletter.com/Nov2009/hoffer1...

Here is a brief quotation from the interview:

“Some years ago, as I sat at lunch with Dr. Abram Hoffer, I took some vitamin pills. Dr. Hoffer leaned over towards me and said, "You know, you're going to live a lot longer if you take those." As I looked at him, he added, "I guarantee it. If you don't, come back and tell me."

So said the founding father of orthomolecular medicine.

It was nearly 60 years ago when Abram Hoffer and his colleagues began curing schizophrenia with niacin. While some physicians are still waiting, those who have used niacin with patients and families know the immense practical value of what Dr. Hoffer discovered. Abram Hoffer's life has not merely changed the face of psychiatry. He has changed the course of medicine for all time. His 30 books, 600 scientific papers, and thousands of cured patients have yet to convince orthodox medicine. Dr. Hoffer has said that it takes about two generations before a truly new medical idea is accepted. Perhaps in the case of megavitamin therapy, maybe it is three generations…”

Winfield J Abbe

On November 30, 2009
AOL news published an article “Magnetic Disks Could Kill Cancer Cells”at this link;
http://webmail.aol.com/29202/aol-1/en-us/Suit... . Here is my reply to this claim:

It has been known since 1969, two years before the so-called war on cancer was declared by President Nixon, that Vitamin C at high doses kills cancer cells. The exact chemical mechanism for this is also known. The Vitamin C is brought into the cells via the glycolysis they operate by, and forms hydrogen peroxide, which kills the cancer cells.
All cancer cells metabolize by anerobic glycolysis as proved by the experiments and facts of Otto Warburg, M.D., Ph.D., the genius in Germany many years ago.
Here is a current reference with all the facts about this wonderful discovery which has been negligently disregarded by the criminals running the war on cancer:
“Cancer and Vitamin C Therapy for Patients” by Reagan Houston, Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Aug./Sept. 2007, page 92. This article contains the original reference to the research which proved Vitamin C kills cancer cells, and a recent reference where it was used to treat terminally ill cancer patients successfully.
This is all about money. There is no money for quack doctors and quack medical treatments if cancer can be cured by a vitamin is there? Americans need to wake up from the football games on television and stop being fooled by the criminals running the failed war on cancer.
Winfield J. Abbe, Ph.D., Physics
Athens, GA

Winfield J Abbe