Pigs have no say about our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms.Wow. You must have a problem with discerning fact.
Not only does the article emphatically state that law enforcement is against this measure...
If pigs are afraid of danger they should seek other employment. Our rights trump the pigs' safety.It is very clear common sense-wise that such a provision would directly increase an officer's danger when they come to the scene...
Men don't need a gun to kill their wives, Liar.very similar to domestic disputes--the officer must deal with additional "unknowns"
Not true, liar. Criminals have guns and are unknown to the pigs, who cares anyway....the officer must deal with additional "unknowns" coming to a drinking establishment with an indeterminable number of guns inside...just like arriving at a home with weapons inside. Domestic disputes are the most deadly situations officers routinely face;
Are they really YOUR police ? Our danger is much more important than is the danger of pigs. Only a nazi would believe pigs' safety is more important than others.with this legislation,the bar scene will quickly rachet up in its level of danger to our police.
Finally, the FOP & other police organizations express the will of its membership.So how could one read anything less into the factual statements in the article?
Such FALLACY you engage in with your statements!