Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
itzwitchy

Durham, NC

#37954 Mar 6, 2013
judiway wrote:
You misspelled"traveler" .
No I didnt.'Irish Traveller' is the proper capitalized name of a specific group and as is the custom? The written English language in Ireland is identical in spellings to that in the UK . Traveller has two l's.

We don't control other country's dictionaries.

itzwitchy

Durham, NC

#37955 Mar 6, 2013
OOOPS...that would be: control other COUNTRIES' dictionaries. My bad.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#37956 Mar 6, 2013
Allen wrote:
<quoted text>
Sweetie you left out.......
I'm plumb tuckered out.
Don't pay me nary bit-o-mind.
Shuckin' a nubbin'(wastin' time)
FYI didn't post that
The real waco

Houston, TX

#37957 Mar 6, 2013
itzwitchy wrote:
<quoted text>
No I didnt.'Irish Traveller' is the proper capitalized name of a specific group and as is the custom? The written English language in Ireland is identical in spellings to that in the UK . Traveller has two l's.
We don't control other country's dictionaries.
Welcome to America.You are no longer in the UK.Learn how to spell.
test

Houston, TX

#37958 Mar 6, 2013
Test
General Grant

Houston, TX

#37959 Mar 6, 2013
You disloyal Carolina scum.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#37960 Mar 6, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>But what your side is doing IS destroying America. This IS the problem with your sides philosophy. Albeit you mean well and your intentions are heartfelt, it's the unintended consequences caused by your heartfelt solutions that are destroying this country.
By pumping millions of "fake" dollars into the economy in order to create a false growth is actually creating an inflation bubble that's eventually going to burst and destroy the value of our currency. When this happens we WILL be doomed. The housing bubble will look like a birthday ballon in comparison.
Your side bailed out GM, why? To save jobs, and to protect the union pensions that were promised to the employees. Unintended consequences, the US taxpayers lost $35-$40 billion in the deal that we will never get back, money that should have never been spent. No company is to big to fail!
Which is what we had with Clinton and his so called "surplus" from the dot.com business boom. The quantitative easing efforts ordered by Obama through "stimulus" packages will be the inevitable death of the American dollar. Not enough gold bullion to support our what is printed now. Our only saving grace, for the moment, is no one has called in their marker to be repaid what they are owed.

I know lefties and democrats are all about humanitarian ideologies over all else. What they fail to understand and or recognize, without the financial ideologies, mostly from the right, are not priority, there are no humanitarian ideologies.

I do agree with TSF we should cut spending to reduce deficit. Increasing the tax rates on the wealthy because they have more to tax is not the way. The wealthy have been paying in all along. The country's problem is spending. Obama can only print so much new money till the global economy implodes and anarchy ensues.
Johnny Yuma

Houston, TX

#37961 Mar 6, 2013
Ease up, General.You got a tomb, and everything.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#37962 Mar 6, 2013
emlu wrote:
Singapore
Price per gallon of gasoline:$6.29
For you Silver:)
Thanks dear. Been busy in the office with a few jobs...That time of year...
Johnny Yuma

Houston, TX

#37963 Mar 6, 2013
Sometimes, things change.No animosity, good memories, things just change.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#37964 Mar 6, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Which is what we had with Clinton and his so called "surplus" from the dot.com business boom. The quantitative easing efforts ordered by Obama through "stimulus" packages will be the inevitable death of the American dollar. Not enough gold bullion to support our what is printed now. Our only saving grace, for the moment, is no one has called in their marker to be repaid what they are owed.
I know lefties and democrats are all about humanitarian ideologies over all else. What they fail to understand and or recognize, without the financial ideologies, mostly from the right, are not priority, there are no humanitarian ideologies.
I do agree with TSF we should cut spending to reduce deficit. Increasing the tax rates on the wealthy because they have more to tax is not the way. The wealthy have been paying in all along. The country's problem is spending. Obama can only print so much new money till the global economy implodes and anarchy ensues.
I agree, raising taxes on the wealthy isn't the answer. According to the CBO, in the 1980s, the top 5% averaged 22.6% of income and paid 28.5% of taxes. In the 1990s, the top 5% averaged 25.3% of income and paid 34.3% of taxes In the 2000s, the top 5% averaged 28.4% of the income and paid 40.3% of the taxes.
In 2007, the bottom 40% received 14.9% of the income (including the value of government benefits) and paid 5.9% of all federal taxes.
A growing number of Americans don't pay any income tax. In 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center, about 46% of households didn't pay any U.S. income taxes. But even in the better years of the mid-2000s, roughly 40% of households didn't pay any federal income tax. About one-fifth of households didn't pay either federal income or payroll taxes. Because the tax code takes more from the top than from the bottom, it significantly reduces inequality. Comparing income before and after taxes, the CBO says the tax system cut the share of income going to the top 20% by about seven percentage points in 2007, everyone else's share of income increased. This year taxes and other receipts will cover only about two-thirds of federal spending, the government will borrow the rest. You can only rob Peter to pay Paul for so long, eventually Peter will be broke! The answer is to live within your means and to quit spending so you don't have to borrow!
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#37965 Mar 6, 2013
TSF wrote:
Could you give details of how Kerry became a "trader". BTW, that 250 millin will be borrowed from China.
<quoted text>
Kerry is a typical progressive with support for communist minded Ideology. It is clear that Kerry's awards was the result of his own negligence, not enemy fire, and that Kerry went to unusual lengths to obtain Vietnam awards after being turned down by his own commanding officer. His whole service was to get points for his election to congress. He did not even finish his Navy service. He asked and got an early out to run for office. Then give support to the communist in Vietnam by using his position to undermine the America fight against communist takeover of that country. Now he is going to give support to another country that wants to destroy America at every chance it gets.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#37966 Mar 6, 2013
http://www.sigir.mil/search/search.html...
Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction
Jeff

Los Angeles, CA

#37967 Mar 6, 2013
Did anyone see the porn film with AZ and Spoon on the internet? I'm going to horsewhip and hang AZ from a tree when I get a hold of his half breed N**GER ass!

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#37968 Mar 6, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>I agree, raising taxes on the wealthy isn't the answer. According to the CBO, in the 1980s, the top 5% averaged 22.6% of income and paid 28.5% of taxes. In the 1990s, the top 5% averaged 25.3% of income and paid 34.3% of taxes In the 2000s, the top 5% averaged 28.4% of the income and paid 40.3% of the taxes.
In 2007, the bottom 40% received 14.9% of the income (including the value of government benefits) and paid 5.9% of all federal taxes.
A growing number of Americans don't pay any income tax. In 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center, about 46% of households didn't pay any U.S. income taxes. But even in the better years of the mid-2000s, roughly 40% of households didn't pay any federal income tax. About one-fifth of households didn't pay either federal income or payroll taxes. Because the tax code takes more from the top than from the bottom, it significantly reduces inequality. Comparing income before and after taxes, the CBO says the tax system cut the share of income going to the top 20% by about seven percentage points in 2007, everyone else's share of income increased. This year taxes and other receipts will cover only about two-thirds of federal spending, the government will borrow the rest. You can only rob Peter to pay Paul for so long, eventually Peter will be broke! The answer is to live within your means and to quit spending so you don't have to borrow!
"In 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center, about 46% of households didn't pay any U.S. income taxes."

This is the key statement. 310 million people living in America in 2011. That means approximately 142.6 million paid no taxes. Income, payroll, capital gains, etc etc etc....According to the Census bureau, 46.2 million lived below the poverty level in 2011. So, if you subtract that 46 million from the 142 million, you have a remaining number of 96.4 million people who did not pay taxes. According to the department of health and human services, administration of aging, 3.5 million elderly lived in the poverty level range. So we subtract that 3.5 million from the 96.4 million and you have a remaining number of 92.9 million Americans who did not pay taxes...

And the solution is to tax the wealthy "a little more?"

Any democrat want to take a stab and explain what entitlement program the 92.9 million Americans are participating in or can anyone explain why they did not pay their taxes?

As I said before, if the government spent as much energy and focus on going after the ones who haven't paid their taxes as they are planning to rob, the country might not be in the division it is in.

Sleeping in the office tonight...gonna hit the couch.
Waco1909

Greenville, SC

#37969 Mar 7, 2013
emlu, emlu where are you emlu?

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#37970 Mar 7, 2013
Orbiting the solar system, no time for you Stupid.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#37971 Mar 7, 2013
Oh well, back to earth, gotta start those .45 230 gr.'s. Can't seem to keep caught up, shelves are almost empty.
Waco1909

Greenville, SC

#37972 Mar 7, 2013
emlu, emlu let me help u emlu
TSF

Clayton, NC

#37973 Mar 7, 2013
The average American pays $8600 of their income in taxes, so 92.9 million X $8600=$798,940,000,000 in tax collections if those persons were average. So you see that even if those people did pay taxes at the average rate (which would be wonderful), the money collected wouldn't even pay the annual interest on the national debt. So now, if we ever pay off the debt, we have to have MORE money. THAT is why we have to return to taxing the rich at rates at least equal to 2000 levels. In reality, many of those 92.9 million you mention didnt make the average of $41,550 and many didn't even make zero dollars, so the actual value would be even less. A bean counter like yourself should be able to understand that. If not, I wouldn't trust you to count my beans.

Assuming impecable accuracy of your numbers
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
"In 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center, about 46% of households didn't pay any U.S. income taxes."
This is the key statement. 310 million people living in America in 2011. That means approximately 142.6 million paid no taxes. Income, payroll, capital gains, etc etc etc....According to the Census bureau, 46.2 million lived below the poverty level in 2011. So, if you subtract that 46 million from the 142 million, you have a remaining number of 96.4 million people who did not pay taxes. According to the department of health and human services, administration of aging, 3.5 million elderly lived in the poverty level range. So we subtract that 3.5 million from the 96.4 million and you have a remaining number of 92.9 million Americans who did not pay taxes...
And the solution is to tax the wealthy "a little more?"
Any democrat want to take a stab and explain what entitlement program the 92.9 million Americans are participating in or can anyone explain why they did not pay their taxes?
As I said before, if the government spent as much energy and focus on going after the ones who haven't paid their taxes as they are planning to rob, the country might not be in the division it is in.
Sleeping in the office tonight...gonna hit the couch.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cherokee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Drug Dealers (Aug '08) 16 hr hahah 43
Anybody find any Morels/ Dry Land Fish yet (Apr '13) May 27 Buford 9
No one cares what florida people want May 24 Sup 2
News Public perspectives on Corridor K (May '11) May 10 Native 12
News Wedding: Brittney Solesby & Charles Surrett May 10 ApePeeD 1
Ramp Festival Apr '15 Native 1
News Officers search for inmate who escaped Greene C... Apr '15 ApePeeD 1
More from around the web

Cherokee People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]