What extensive research have you done on this case? I'm just curious because on the web I can find nothing contradicting the version of this story that most know and accept.Wondered about that. There are so many twists and turns in that case that it makes your head spin. Manson was a poor man with a long petty crime record. He had no influential family. Those around him, with the possible exception of Sadie, came from affluence, or were in prominent positions. Who would most likely be blamed and easiest to prosecute? It is done frequently. Bugliosi even said he killed no one. But the question is did he really order the killings?
Charles P was an apparent witness to the conversation between Polanski and Manson when he was a child. This, plus massive research leads me to question the offical version.
If there is more truth, it needs to be told. If Charlie is a stand-in, is it by choice or coersion? It also makes little sense that Polanski would flee when, at the time, he would've done little jail time. Just more than meets the eye here.
Please provide a link or two -- as I'm unable to find any information implying that Polanski was ever a suspect in Sharon Tate's death.