Who do you support for U.S. Senate in North Carolina in 2010?

[Mike Du]

waco1909 wrote:

<quoted text> It doesn't take blind faith to figure out that you're looking for a fight, Michael.I feel way too good today for an altercation old boy.So, find someone else, I'll bet Silvercoast is rarin'to go!

No one has the courage to debate me head on about religion here, no matter the day. Not that I am looking for this today. But if you hand me a good pass, I am likely to take a shot as I did. I think I made my point about blind faith.

[Allen]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>Waco, I put full blame for Gail being and staying here upon you. Why in the world would you respond to this person? These posts are just gross. I try to skip reading them,but I accidently start reading some and am disgusted very quickly. You just keep egging her on for some reason.
Then you had the nerve to tell someone else to ignore her. Take your own advice please. This is just getting insane.

Yes you are so correct. Was it not Waco who stated that he has a relative that works for Topix and that is how he gets away with his profanity? Well I believe if it were me and a vulgar poster were making these kinds of statements about my girlfriend, I would be contacting my relative who works for Topix in hopes that this person/persons would be removed. I certainly do not agree with alot of Emlu's posts but, she is undeserving of this kind of abuse.

[waco1909]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>Waco, I put full blame for Gail being and staying here upon you. Why in the world would you respond to this person? These posts are just gross. I try to skip reading them,but I accidently start reading some and am disgusted very quickly. You just keep egging her on for some reason.
Then you had the nerve to tell someone else to ignore her. Take your own advice please. This is just getting insane.

Gail, is that you? Haaaa!

[Mike Du]

waco1909 wrote:

<quoted text> Those dimensions you were referring to Mike, are the dimensions of my bed.Since I can't detect any feeling in you, You may already have passed away yourself, and this is actually atheist"heaven"..... or hell?

Why was Emlu talking about your bed?

You once said I was to emotional, now you say I have no feeling. I get it, you contradict yourself on a regular basis and are clueless about it.

This is not the matrix. Just have faith.

[Mike Du]

Can't you people get it? When you die, you're DEAD DEAD DEAD! You ignorant pigs! And I'm not scared of any stinking GAIL! I'm sick of that WORD!

[Makin bacon]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>You said "big new contract" not "military work". So change the story to fit the actual facts now.
Again, if it was "big" I would assume one person working a bit extra would not be "big". If it were a "contract" I would expect them to know for how long or how much might be expected to produce.

Since you know so much Mike, how long is our country going to be engaged in war and when will there be a need to cease making equipment needed? Since our government can't give a definitive date to end war, maybe you ought to step in and give them some more of your usual inane advice on a timeline.

Guess you can't understand when different companies bid for contracts. I would think making parts for tanks, planes, ammunition etc would be considered "military work" since their contract is with the military. I'll let you figure this one out on your own as I've drawn you a road map. Start by getting your head out of your butt and you may can think.

[Mike Du]

waco1909 wrote:

Mike you have an inability to anger me today.Sometimes, that's the way it is! You see Michael Duquette, I'm learning how to control my temper! If you weren't such a negative person, you'd be happy for me, old boy.

But, but god said an eye for an eye? Oh, that was the fallible god of the old testement. What god should we chose to follow? Maybe just flip a coin.

Actually, all joking aside, it is good to see you are trying to control your temper.
It does not take a god to tell us humans this is good to do.

[waco1909]

Allen wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes you are so correct. Was it not Waco who stated that he has a relative that works for Topix and that is how he gets away with his profanity? Well I believe if it were me and a vulgar poster were making these kinds of statements about my girlfriend, I would be contacting my relative who works for Topix in hopes that this person/persons would be removed. I certainly do not agree with alot of Emlu's posts but, she is undeserving of this kind of abuse.

Allen I prevaricated.I actually own Topix.Yes, it's true, now my cover is blown! I'm actually a billionaire with industrial concerns in countries the world over.Topix is how a busy billionaire lets off steam!

[Allen]

Pro-American wrote:

<quoted text>AGAIN, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH MINIMUM WAGE, my problem is with increasing the wage in a down economy, IT CUTS JOBS!
You act as if we're still in 1913! Do you really think that if an employer required his employees to work 16 hr days with no xtra compensation that they would actually go for it? If so, either those employees are stupid or you are stupid! Your failure to comprehend my point time and time again doesn't mean I'm making your point for you, it means your insane!
Yes, LABOR LAWS ARE NEEDED because the govt educated workforce aren't competent enough to say no! If employees refused to work those hours uncompensated, what do you think would happen? Can they not say no without the govt's backing? It cost an employer more money to hire new employees than it does to pay overtime, therefor he would pay the overtime instead of risking losing his business due to the products or services not being provided at all! It's not rocket science! You, and most Americans, have been brainwashed to the point to where you can't wipe your own ass without govt approval! Quit sucking the govt tit and stand up for yourself!
Commucrats=govt robots
"What good fortune for governments that the people do not think."
- Adolf Hitler

Companies have reasons for not hiring and empolyees have reasons not to accept overtime. http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/w... . Quit letting the govt. su$k your tit and stand up for yourself.

[Silvercoastcorks]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>No one has the courage to debate me head on about religion here, no matter the day. Not that I am looking for this today. But if you hand me a good pass, I am likely to take a shot as I did. I think I made my point about blind faith.

Nah Waco...I know he brings nothing to the table for an intellectual debate. Simply, if he does not agree with anyones point of view, instanteously, they are wrong and he is right.

Anyone else see that Miley is the foremost expert on EVERYTHING? don't believe me? Just ask him.

[Pro-American]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>I note how the republicans all hate MLK. The trend is clear.

I note how Commucrats cherry pick MLK's platform to support theirs when they were against everything he stood for....seeing how he was a Republican!
Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964 even though opposed the passing of Civil Rights legislation in the decades leading up to his presidency! It was actually Republican Senator Everett Dirksen that drafted and pushed through congress the Civil Rights Act.
The Ku Klux Klan, the disgraced racist organization to which even Democratic President Harry Truman belonged, was founded by Democrats and, in a sense, operated at one point as the de facto militant branch of the party.
Pastor C. L. Bryant, director of the provocative documentary “Runaway Slave” and a former NAACP leader himself, acknowledged that it was in fact Democrats who “stood in the way” of civil rights and progress with their collective push for Jim Crow laws, poll taxes and at the University of Alabama in 1963, when then-Democratic Governor George Wallace, in a symbolic protest against desegregation, stood in the doorway of Foster Auditorium to affirm his pledge of “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”
The Commucrat Party has been stellar at spinning a revisionist history where the righteous among their ranks fought “tirelessly” to further the cause of Civil Rights! What a joke! I note they've been successful at indoctrinating the dumb masses to believing such propaganda!

[waco1909]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>Why was Emlu talking about your bed?
You once said I was to emotional, now you say I have no feeling. I get it, you contradict yourself on a regular basis and are clueless about it.
This is not the matrix. Just have faith.

hmm, to be more precise, I should have said that irritation and anger seem to be your only emotions.I stand corrected! emlu was talking about my bed, because well, that's an"inside"joke between us!

[waco1909]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>But, but god said an eye for an eye? Oh, that was the fallible god of the old testement. What god should we chose to follow? Maybe just flip a coin.
Actually, all joking aside, it is good to see you are trying to control your temper.
It does not take a god to tell us humans this is good to do.

Thanks for the encouragement, I'll take all I can get!

[Mike Du]

Makin bacon wrote:

<quoted text>
Since you know so much Mike, how long is our country going to be engaged in war and when will there be a need to cease making equipment needed? Since our government can't give a definitive date to end war, maybe you ought to step in and give them some more of your usual inane advice on a timeline.
Guess you can't understand when different companies bid for contracts. I would think making parts for tanks, planes, ammunition etc would be considered "military work" since their contract is with the military. I'll let you figure this one out on your own as I've drawn you a road map. Start by getting your head out of your butt and you may can think.

So you are now claiming the contract has no specific amounts? Of course a contract may be renewed after the old one expires if the need is still here due to prolonged war. But I have never heard of a contract with no specific order amounts.

The claim of this being a military contract is not relevant. A contract is a contract. You said it was "big". Now maybe you think a big contract means an order for ten cookies?

[Makin bacon]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>I note how the republicans all hate MLK. The trend is clear.

You do know I was speaking about Jesse Jackson Jr and not MLK don't you? Pretty certain Jesse Jackson Jr would be the son of Jesse Jackson Sr and not Martin Luther King Jr.

The trend of your ignorance is clear. Stay in the bubble.

[emlu]

waco1909 wrote:

<quoted text> hmm, to be more precise, I should have said that irritation and anger seem to be your only emotions.I stand corrected! emlu was talking about my bed, because well, that's an"inside"joke between us!

that's right. me and my man had to get a bigger bed to accommodate my planet rump.

[waco 1909]

Makin bacon wrote:

<quoted text>
You do know I was speaking about Jesse Jackson Jr and not MLK don't you? Pretty certain Jesse Jackson Jr would be the son of Jesse Jackson Sr and not Martin Luther King Jr.
The trend of your ignorance is clear. Stay in the bubble.

Is your name gail too. Cuz every dam body on here is gail in my psychotic mind.

[Pro-American]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text>The difference is, our team(democrats) do not all support the ideas of policing soft drink and painkillers. BTW, your team is agains the painkiller marijuana. Our team is not.
Seems your team is for anything that makes it hard to vote, our team is for making voting easier.
I think the lack of people voting is more of a problem than the idea some may be voting that should not be. As studies keep showing your fears are not warrented anyways. Just as with marijuana.
Your team is always in fear of what has no evidence, yet your team is in denial of what has evidence. The trend is clear.

I love how the Commucrats "think" they know how everyone else thinks!
Not all Republicans are against marijuana and painkillers, that's a broad brush you paint with!
The real problem isn't with how hard or easy it is to vote, it's with the voters themselves!

"The best argument against democracy
is a five minute conversation with the average voter."

- Winston Churchill

[Pro-American]

Mike Du wrote:

<quoted text> I hear heaven is actually very, very cold. Like the opposite of hell. Prove me wrong if you can.

Prove that hell is hot.

[Mike Du]

waco1909 wrote:

<quoted text> hmm, to be more precise, I should have said that irritation and anger seem to be your only emotions.I stand corrected! emlu was talking about my bed, because well, that's an"inside"joke between us!

Oh, so like heaven is being in bed, like as in having sex? You naughty kids.
But I can agree that heaven is here on earth. At least this is kind of how I view life. I do not wait for death to be in heaven.

I get I likely seem pretty pissed off most of the time. But maybe you should think about why that is also. Ever think some of that anger is due to what others say here?
Maybe I am wrong, but I feel like most of the post directed towards me are in anger. Maybe it is due to my anger at them. Maybe it is a vicious circle that is hard to pinpoint the start of it.
You make a lot of vicious statements towards me.