Nazi Gun Control Act Of 1938

Nazi Gun Control Act Of 1938

Posted in the Charleston Forum

Face

Vienna, WV

#1 Dec 29, 2012
Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 (Translated to English)

Classified guns for "sporting purposes".
All citizens who wished to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and have a background check.
Presumed German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazis from the gun control law.
Gave Nazis unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not be owned by private persons.
The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by bureaucrats.
Juveniles under 18 years could not buy firearms and ammunition.
Skunk holler bill

Troy, VA

#2 Dec 29, 2012
Face wrote:
Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 (Translated to English)
Classified guns for "sporting purposes".
All citizens who wished to purchase firearms had to register with the Nazi officials and have a background check.
Presumed German citizens were hostile and thereby exempted Nazis from the gun control law.
Gave Nazis unrestricted power to decide what kinds of firearms could, or could not be owned by private persons.
The types of ammunition that were legal were subject to control by bureaucrats.
Juveniles under 18 years could not buy firearms and ammunition.
Sounds like Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Civilian Militia

United States

#3 Dec 29, 2012
Skunk holler bill wrote:
<quoted text>Sounds like Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Fkn right it sounds like him.we need to take back our country...
Face

Vienna, WV

#4 Dec 30, 2012
Yes, it is interesting to see the similarities between what our government is telling us now and what the Nazi government told them then. Hitler told the German people that since he disarmed Germany they would be more safe than ever before, and they believed it. We all know where that got them. History repeats itself, I don't know about you guys but I refuse to march into a death camp like the unarmed German Jews did. Molon Labe.
Gun Owner

Dewitt, MI

#5 Dec 30, 2012
Face wrote:
Yes, it is interesting to see the similarities between what our government is telling us now and what the Nazi government told them then. Hitler told the German people that since he disarmed Germany they would be more safe than ever before, and they believed it. We all know where that got them. History repeats itself, I don't know about you guys but I refuse to march into a death camp like the unarmed German Jews did. Molon Labe.
What they are saying now is identical to Hitler. The new Holocaust will be here I bet. FEMA camps are already built all over America and they are using our taxes to build more. You know what FEMA camps are for? Concentration camps.
Lunatic Fringe

Charleston, WV

#6 Dec 30, 2012
Gun Owner wrote:
<quoted text>
What they are saying now is identical to Hitler. The new Holocaust will be here I bet. FEMA camps are already built all over America and they are using our taxes to build more. You know what FEMA camps are for? Concentration camps.
Until you posted, we had the fundamentals for a good arguement and conversation. But, there is always someone from the lunatic fringe babbling nonsense. Are you people on drugs when you get these ideas?
Thanks

Charleston, WV

#7 Dec 30, 2012
Face wrote:
Yes, it is interesting to see the similarities between what our government is telling us now and what the Nazi government told them then. Hitler told the German people that since he disarmed Germany they would be more safe than ever before, and they believed it. We all know where that got them. History repeats itself, I don't know about you guys but I refuse to march into a death camp like the unarmed German Jews did. Molon Labe.
This is really a different take on conversations about gun control and ownership. Its very intersting and thanks to the poster who started the thread. But lets remember that Hitler pulled the wool over the eyes of the Jews who did not know they were being sent to death camps. And let's also remember than there was Jewish armed resistence to the Nazi's particularly in Warsaw, Poland.
Face

Vienna, WV

#8 Dec 31, 2012
Thanks wrote:
<quoted text>
This is really a different take on conversations about gun control and ownership. Its very intersting and thanks to the poster who started the thread. But lets remember that Hitler pulled the wool over the eyes of the Jews who did not know they were being sent to death camps. And let's also remember than there was Jewish armed resistence to the Nazi's particularly in Warsaw, Poland.
Yes but obviously there wasn't enough of an armed resistance, eh? Too many of them willingly gave up their weapons. Look at America today, if our government had the same set-up would most of us know? Let's face it, your average person isn't too bright, it wouldn't take much to "pull the wool over their eyes". If you really think about it there are many similarities between modern America and Nazi Germany, and it isn't just the gun control issue.

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#9 Dec 31, 2012
Face wrote:
Yes, it is interesting to see the similarities between what our government is telling us now and what the Nazi government told them then. Hitler told the German people that since he disarmed Germany they would be more safe than ever before, and they believed it. We all know where that got them. History repeats itself, I don't know about you guys but I refuse to march into a death camp like the unarmed German Jews did. Molon Labe.
So you are saying that president Obama wants to turn America into an aryan nation.
You are completely beyond insane.
Ghetto Valley

Vienna, WV

#10 Dec 31, 2012
WDRussell wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are saying that president Obama wants to turn America into an aryan nation.
You are completely beyond insane.
No I am not saying that at all. I'm not sure how you could even possibly get that from my statement. Reading comprehension must not be your strong suite.
Ghetto Valley

Vienna, WV

#11 Dec 31, 2012
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms, disarm only those who are neither inclined, nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants. They serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
– Thomas Jefferson, 1764

What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.
– Thomas Jefferson

rms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property… Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.
–Thomas Paine

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.
– George Washington

Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.
–Patrick Henry.

Are we at last brought to such an humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our own defense? Where is the difference between having our arms under our own possession and under our own direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?
– Patrick Henry

The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms.
–Samuel Adams, debates & Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

The right of the people to keep and bear…arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country…
–James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434 (June 8, 1789).

(The Constitution preserves) the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation…(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
–James Madison.

If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government…
– Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist (#28).

The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.
–Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-B.

To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them.
– George Mason

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.
–Noah Webster,“An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (1787) in Pamplets on the Constitution of the United States (P.Ford, 1888)

[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or the state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.
– Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.
Dave

San Angelo, TX

#12 Jan 1, 2013
You mean Obama's gun control of 2013
Robert

Crown Point, IN

#13 Mar 30, 2013
Face wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes but obviously there wasn't enough of an armed resistance, eh? Too many of them willingly gave up their weapons. Look at America today, if our government had the same set-up would most of us know? Let's face it, your average person isn't too bright, it wouldn't take much to "pull the wool over their eyes". If you really think about it there are many similarities between modern America and Nazi Germany, and it isn't just the gun control issue.
What does the lack of resistance of the Jewish citizens of Poland have to do with Hitler's "Gun control?" Nothing. Over 99% of the Jews that died in the fire pits, gas chambers, or of starvation and exhuastion in the concentration camps were from countries that Hitler invaded and not affected by Germany's gun laws.
Wendell

Troy, VA

#14 Mar 30, 2013
Robert wrote:
<quoted text>What does the lack of resistance of the Jewish citizens of Poland have to do with Hitler's "Gun control?" Nothing. Over 99% of the Jews that died in the fire pits, gas chambers, or of starvation and exhuastion in the concentration camps were from countries that Hitler invaded and not affected by Germany's gun laws.
So! What is your point?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#15 Mar 30, 2013
Hitler's Gun Control, Hitler armed 18.2 million German Citizens, this was just the German Army. The Army was well regulated.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charleston Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Korea 25 min Vet 35
Fannie gets busted 32 min More2Come 4
Who has Tom Clark phone number 40 min Jack 4
Was Tom Clark a deacon at a church in Lincoln c... 1 hr Tom Clark 7
Hey could you do me a favor? 1 hr Tom Clark 5
Who is selling heroin in south ruffner 1 hr I heard 4
Larry Flint has learned to shut his mouth 1 hr Tom Clark 1

Charleston Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charleston Mortgages