Why is this 3ed degree sexual assault?

Posted in the Charleston Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
1 4 Justice

Beckley, WV

#1 Nov 21, 2011
Seems this should be FIRST DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT..

A Putnam County woman is behind bars after she allegedly admitted to having sex with a teenage boy.

34-year-old Summer Burford, of Winfield, is charged with six counts of 3rd degree sexual abuse and six counts of 3rd degree sexual assault.

The 14-year-old boy's mother told police of the alleged abuse.

When they interviewed Burford, police say she admitted to having sexual intercourse and oral sex with the teenager.

She is currently in the Western Regional Jail on a $100,000 bond.

INTERCOURSE WITH A MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF CONSENT... 3ED DEGREE??????????

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#2 Nov 21, 2011
1 4 Justice wrote:
Seems this should be FIRST DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT..

A Putnam County woman is behind bars after she allegedly admitted to having sex with a teenage boy.

34-year-old Summer Burford, of Winfield, is charged with six counts of 3rd degree sexual abuse and six counts of 3rd degree sexual assault.

The 14-year-old boy's mother told police of the alleged abuse.

When they interviewed Burford, police say she admitted to having sexual intercourse and oral sex with the teenager.

She is currently in the Western Regional Jail on a $100,000 bond.

INTERCOURSE WITH A MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF CONSENT... 3ED DEGREE??????????
This only applys if it were a man with a girl. Then it would be 1st degree assult. Wrong is wrong but the laws are very biased when it comes to sex violations.
wow

United States

#3 Nov 21, 2011
abbagoochie wrote:
<quoted text>This only applys if it were a man with a girl. Then it would be 1st degree assult. Wrong is wrong but the laws are very biased when it comes to sex violations.
You're an idiot. It has nothing to do with a man or a woman. The law is not biased. Read the laws before posting about them.
1st and 2nd degree has to do with forcing another person to have sexual intercourse. The 14-year-old was not forced, he was willing but underage, so therefore it is 3rd degree.
1 4 Justice

Beckley, WV

#4 Nov 21, 2011
wow wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot. It has nothing to do with a man or a woman. The law is not biased. Read the laws before posting about them.
1st and 2nd degree has to do with forcing another person to have sexual intercourse. The 14-year-old was not forced, he was willing but underage, so therefore it is 3rd degree.
1) You have an anger issue. Get help fast.
2) Yes, it DOES have a LOT to do with the gender of the perpetrator, as we all know what would happen if the perpetrator was a male.
3) Yes, you might be correct in how the law is written, but I don't have access to a WV law library.. so I won't contradict you.
4) Be careful who you call and idiot, and make damned sure you are behind the safety of your computer. Some people would snap your neck for hurling such egregious labels.
5) A 14 year old cannot give consent, therefore can't be willing to participate in carnal knowledge with an adult.
Touche!
wow

United States

#5 Nov 21, 2011
WTH is wrong with people, your telling me a woman couldn't go out and find someone remotely her own age??? Seriously something wrong with this picture that she picked a 14 yr old. Heck she coulda went to sneakers to get her freak on if she was that hard up.
JMoney

United States

#6 Nov 21, 2011
1 4 Justice wrote:
<quoted text>
1) You have an anger issue. Get help fast.
2) Yes, it DOES have a LOT to do with the gender of the perpetrator, as we all know what would happen if the perpetrator was a male.
3) Yes, you might be correct in how the law is written, but I don't have access to a WV law library.. so I won't contradict you.
4) Be careful who you call and idiot, and make damned sure you are behind the safety of your computer. Some people would snap your neck for hurling such egregious labels.
5) A 14 year old cannot give consent, therefore can't be willing to participate in carnal knowledge with an adult.
Touche!
Sorry, but no it does NOT have anything to do with gender. It may seem that way because when the roles are reversed, the girl in the situation might break down and say she didn't intend to have sex with the older adult male. I am sure this boy didn't mind laying the lumber and he probably bragged about it and his mom found out and was digusted by it and called the police.
And yes you do have access to the WV "Law Library" how did you get on Topix today? My guess is the Internet, whether it was by PC or by Smartphone, you can access the law the same way.
Also, just because the 14 year old boy could not legally give consent does not mean he wasn't willing to participate, which is why there are 6 counts on one of the charges, the boy kept coming back for seconds!
I understand you are disturbed by the story, but you still can't back your theory up that it should be 1st degree.

-J$$$$$
1 4 Justice

Beckley, WV

#7 Nov 21, 2011
There is another example in Bluefield/Princeton area of two different women molesting underage boys in the recent past--

Here is the story on that:

Princeton, W.Va.(WVVA)- A former teacher's aide pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual abuse involving inappropriate sexual contact with a student.

40-year-old, Courtney Wallace, pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, punishable by one to three years behind bars. Wallace also pleaded guilty to one count of sexual abuse in the third degree, and could spend 90 days in jail for the charge.

Wallace worked at an alternative school in Bluefield, West Virginia during the 2008-2009 school year.

__________

Seems to me she was in a custodial relation with the student as a teachers aide. Aide means just that- aide. That doesn't sound like it excludes custodial as I am sure aides help watch and supervise with "children"

...Sooooooooooooooooooooo..... ...

WHY does she get 1-3 years, and 90 days (instead of 10-20 years in the penitentiary if the victim was under 16, or 5-15 year if over 16 as stated in the law at- Sexual Abuse by Parent, Guardian or Custodian:61-8D-5) JUST because the court is showing favoritism to female perpetrators of abuse??? Is that WHY???

This is an OUTRAGE. 2 counts of First degree abuse, TWO - and she has plead GUILTY. Seems to me a similar incident happened with a female church chaparone who sexually abused a 15 year old boy on a church outing in Mercer Co, last year. She got 90 days in jail.

Females don't get the punishment male offenders get. I do see bias in the courts.
MANUTE JOHNSON

Charleston, WV

#8 Nov 21, 2011
ANDRE LINOGE wrote:
Seems this should be FIRST DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT..
A Putnam County woman is behind bars after she allegedly admitted to having sex with a teenage boy.
34-year-old Summer Burford, of Winfield, is charged with six counts of 3rd degree sexual abuse and six counts of 3rd degree sexual assault.
The 14-year-old boy's mother told police of the alleged abuse.
When they interviewed Burford, police say she admitted to having sexual intercourse and oral sex with the teenager.
She is currently in the Western Regional Jail on a $100,000 bond.
INTERCOURSE WITH A MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF CONSENT... 3ED DEGREE??????????
ANDRE LINOGE hates women, he is gay and is only disappointed because he wasn't with the boy. His pals at Penn State got busted and he is angry. That nasty queer needs to crawl back under his rock.
Haha

United States

#9 Nov 21, 2011
1 4 Justice wrote:
There is another example in Bluefield/Princeton area of two different women molesting underage boys in the recent past--

Here is the story on that:

Princeton, W.Va.(WVVA)- A former teacher's aide pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual abuse involving inappropriate sexual contact with a student.

40-year-old, Courtney Wallace, pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, punishable by one to three years behind bars. Wallace also pleaded guilty to one count of sexual abuse in the third degree, and could spend 90 days in jail for the charge.

Wallace worked at an alternative school in Bluefield, West Virginia during the 2008-2009 school year.

__________

Seems to me she was in a custodial relation with the student as a teachers aide. Aide means just that- aide. That doesn't sound like it excludes custodial as I am sure aides help watch and supervise with "children"

...Sooooooooooooooooooooo..... ...

WHY does she get 1-3 years, and 90 days (instead of 10-20 years in the penitentiary if the victim was under 16, or 5-15 year if over 16 as stated in the law at- Sexual Abuse by Parent, Guardian or Custodian:§61-8D-5) JUST because the court is showing favoritism to female perpetrators of abuse??? Is that WHY???

This is an OUTRAGE. 2 counts of First degree abuse, TWO - and she has plead GUILTY. Seems to me a similar incident happened with a female church chaparone who sexually abused a 15 year old boy on a church outing in Mercer Co, last year. She got 90 days in jail.

Females don't get the punishment male offenders get. I do see bias in the courts.
You're an idiot too, come snap my neck now moron. Was different circumstances in that case. Those juveniles in that case didn't want to have sexual intercourse and felt forced too. In the case that just came about, the 14 year old was more than willing to participate.
The law is written for a reason. Learn the circumstances behind the crime instead of just reading that an act was committed.
Obviously the reason you ask questions because you don't know the answer. But you get the answer, and you don't like it, so you post another story that sounds the same but had different circumstances in the crime. Do you research before speaking anymore please. You only see what you want to see, hence why I am thankful you're not a lawyer or a cop because you'd be a total screw up.
1 4 Justice

Beckley, WV

#10 Nov 21, 2011
Haha wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot too, come snap my neck now moron. Was different circumstances in that case. Those juveniles in that case didn't want to have sexual intercourse and felt forced too. In the case that just came about, the 14 year old was more than willing to participate.
The law is written for a reason. Learn the circumstances behind the crime instead of just reading that an act was committed.
Obviously the reason you ask questions because you don't know the answer. But you get the answer, and you don't like it, so you post another story that sounds the same but had different circumstances in the crime. Do you research before speaking anymore please. You only see what you want to see, hence why I am thankful you're not a lawyer or a cop because you'd be a total screw up.
It appears YOU are the idiot. There is nothing in this string of whether any juveniles consented or not. In fact, you would not know what ANY juvenile position was unless you had a transcript of the court record of discovery in these cases. Excuse me, but you need to wipe the "idiot" off of YOUR face.
Haha

United States

#11 Nov 21, 2011
1 4 Justice wrote:
<quoted text>It appears YOU are the idiot. There is nothing in this string of whether any juveniles consented or not. In fact, you would not know what ANY juvenile position was unless you had a transcript of the court record of discovery in these cases. Excuse me, but you need to wipe the "idiot" off of YOUR face.
This coming from someone who doesn't even know the laws. Too late to act like you know something, when the reason for this post was because you know nothing.
Next time, make a post on something you actually have some knowledge of. Because obviously, the laws and researching past crimes is out of your league. When doing research, try looking for more than just the brief short story with not all the facts. Just some advice before you sound like a total retard again.
1 4 Justice

Beckley, WV

#12 Nov 22, 2011
Haha wrote:
<quoted text>
This coming from someone who doesn't even know the laws. Too late to act like you know something, when the reason for this post was because you know nothing.
Next time, make a post on something you actually have some knowledge of. Because obviously, the laws and researching past crimes is out of your league. When doing research, try looking for more than just the brief short story with not all the facts. Just some advice before you sound like a total retard again.
Did I hurt your wee wee feelings by calling you out? I guess I did. You talk big, but seem to have NO EVIDENCE to back up your preposterous claims.
I have researched, and NOW I am waiting for you to produce the evidence you seem to have. Trouble is, you don't have any. You sound like a filthy cop to me. Someone known for telling lies and macing peaceful protestors. Get a life, son. Come back when you can play with the big boys.
Haha

United States

#13 Nov 22, 2011
1 4 Justice wrote:
<quoted text>Did I hurt your wee wee feelings by calling you out? I guess I did. You talk big, but seem to have NO EVIDENCE to back up your preposterous claims.
I have researched, and NOW I am waiting for you to produce the evidence you seem to have. Trouble is, you don't have any. You sound like a filthy cop to me. Someone known for telling lies and macing peaceful protestors. Get a life, son. Come back when you can play with the big boys.
My evidence is in the charges that have been pressed against the offenders. If you researched, this post would have never of been made because you would've known the answer. Instead you make false statements to try to undermine others in your lack of knowledge and research abilities. Now you want me to post what I have found because you're not smart enough to do it yourself. And you try to make personal attacks because I know what are unable to comprehend. Now I sound like a cop because you're small minded? And now cops are liars? Wow, get a life dude. I'm sure you tell them that when you call 911 or while they're taking you to jail. My comment that you're an idiot wasn't a personal attack, was just the truth which you can't handle.
Arch Moore

Beckley, WV

#14 Nov 24, 2011
Haha wrote:
<quoted text>
My evidence is in the charges that have been pressed against the offenders. If you researched, this post would have never of been made because you would've known the answer. Instead you make false statements to try to undermine others in your lack of knowledge and research abilities. Now you want me to post what I have found because you're not smart enough to do it yourself. And you try to make personal attacks because I know what are unable to comprehend. Now I sound like a cop because you're small minded? And now cops are liars? Wow, get a life dude. I'm sure you tell them that when you call 911 or while they're taking you to jail. My comment that you're an idiot wasn't a personal attack, was just the truth which you can't handle.
You have mental problems. Get help, fast.
baby raper

Hurricane, WV

#15 Oct 17, 2012
u are one nasty bich to have sex wih a boy ur sons age......u need to ro in jail....kara will ge u back!!
ur a mooney not a Burford

Hurricane, WV

#16 Oct 17, 2012
i hope u and ur supporters eat dog shit and rot in jail where u belong...u think kids are hot and look at hem like steak?? wow really...u need to loose the last name BURFORD....u are not a burford and really never was or ever will b again.......in fact u are slandering the name....Ur skanky ass is a MOONEy....no man of age will or has ever wanted u....so that is why u look at babies in asexual manner?well i pu nohing past an alcholic like u hat tryed to kill herself and her kids in a car........u are a nasty baby sex offender..I feel sorry for ur parents who have to acknoledge that u are heir kid....of course here is no much u can do with a face like that anyyway
nvr blk & wht

Culloden, WV

#17 Oct 18, 2012
1 4 Justice wrote:
<quoted text>1) You have an anger issue. Get help fast.
2) Yes, it DOES have a LOT to do with the gender of the perpetrator, as we all know what would happen if the perpetrator was a male.
3) Yes, you might be correct in how the law is written, but I don't have access to a WV law library.. so I won't contradict you.
4) Be careful who you call and idiot, and make damned sure you are behind the safety of your computer. Some people would snap your neck for hurling such egregious labels.
5) A 14 year old cannot give consent, therefore can't be willing to participate in carnal knowledge with an adult.
Touche!
No, it doesn't !
DANI

Charleston, WV

#18 Feb 5, 2013
ur a mooney not a Burford wrote:
i hope u and ur supporters eat dog shit and rot in jail where u belong...u think kids are hot and look at hem like steak?? wow really...u need to loose the last name BURFORD....u are not a burford and really never was or ever will b again.......in fact u are slandering the name....Ur skanky ass is a MOONEy....no man of age will or has ever wanted u....so that is why u look at babies in asexual manner?well i pu nohing past an alcholic like u hat tryed to kill herself and her kids in a car........u are a nasty baby sex offender..I feel sorry for ur parents who have to acknoledge that u are heir kid....of course here is no much u can do with a face like that anyyway
SOOO MEAN BUFORD FAM HOW SWEET U ALL R TELL JASON TRY BEING A MAN AN TAKE CARE OF HIS KIDS NO EXCUSES FOR THIS BUT SHES A GREAT HEARTED CHRISTIAN NOW NOT JUDGING BUT IM TAKING UR NOT
nick

Charleston, WV

#19 Feb 5, 2013
1 4 Justice wrote:
Seems this should be FIRST DEGREE SEXUAL ASSAULT..

A Putnam County woman is behind bars after she allegedly admitted to having sex with a teenage boy.

34-year-old Summer Burford, of Winfield, is charged with six counts of 3rd degree sexual abuse and six counts of 3rd degree sexual assault.

The 14-year-old boy's mother told police of the alleged abuse.

When they interviewed Burford, police say she admitted to having sexual intercourse and oral sex with the teenager.

She is currently in the Western Regional Jail on a $100,000 bond.

INTERCOURSE WITH A MINOR UNDER THE AGE OF CONSENT... 3ED DEGREE??????????
It's 3rd degree because he only put the tip in.
winning

Charleston, WV

#20 Feb 7, 2013
baby raper wrote:
u are one nasty bich to have sex wih a boy ur sons age......u need to ro in jail....kara will ge u back!!
she has bad brain damage it was wrong so dont judge

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charleston Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
couple in city park 18 min curious 1
cap vs. sc 22 min wootang 14
Jon canterbury of South Charleston 45 min get a real life 12
Vote for Natalie Tennant 51 min Dan 23
Golden Coral restaurant 52 min Miss Manners 10
Travis Cummings 1 hr lol 7
WV Who do you support for U.S. Senate in West Virg... (Oct '10) 1 hr Mgtn Res 58,835
So Trivillians was a pill mill afterall 2 hr Jewow 38
Boom's First Impression 4 hr Wat 45

Charleston Jobs

Charleston People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Charleston News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Charleston

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]