Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15360 May 22, 2013
Well no, I think we've already established that Bush was incapable of getting Bin Laden. If anything, he probably should have asked Obama to do it for him.

Let me make sure I understand. When Clinton was president, he should have killed bin Laden but didn't. When Bush was president and there were specific warnings that Al Qaeda was about to attack it was okay with you that he ignored those warnings.

Is that what you are saying?
Perry wrote:
<quoted text>so bin laden was in the US and bush should have got him? What state was he in?

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15361 May 22, 2013
Brocko Bomma wrote:
<quoted text>i love the way you defend me by ignoring criticisms of me and changing the subject. Always trying to deflect it to show where someone else did something wrong.
Deflection?

No. Just pointing out your hypocrisy.
Brocko Bomma wrote:
<quoted text>You and i both know that just because other people did stuff wrong, it doesn't change the fact that I do stuff wrong and am a terrible president and a weak leader.
No, but it does point out the hypocrisy on the right. You know, little things like the fact that you are outraged about the deaths of 4 people in Benghazi, but 3000 dead on Bush's watch don't bother you at all. Little things like the fact that republicans are outraged by the fact that the IRS under Obama targeted conservative groups, but you are fine with the fact that Bush targeted liberal groups.
Brocko Bomma wrote:
<quoted text>But I appreciate you trying to cover for me even though anyone with at least half a brain can see that you are ignoring my failures and highlighting other people's failures in an effort to cover for me. Thank you for that.
Blame bush, blame bush, blame bush.
Actually, not covering for anyone at all. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of those on the right. It's pretty simple...unless you're simple minded.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15362 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop pretending to be an idiot. You do just fine when you're being authentic. Everybody knows Bush received warnings. There's photographs of him holding his CIA daily brief in BumF_ck, Texas a month before 9/11 titled "Bin Laden determilned to strike inside US." It stated he would use planes. But that wasn't specific enough. Then again, he attacked the wrong country for it, so I doubt anything could be specific enough.
Ummmm....I don't think he's pretending. I'm pretty sure he really is one.
bushman

Huntington, WV

#15363 May 22, 2013
Floyd wrote:
Maybe some should do research on the person who was head of the IRS in Cincinnati. Be sure to notice who appointed this person to his position. Conspiracy perhaps? I really don't know but I'll make up my own mind when all the facts are exposed. Google "Douglas Schulman" and ponder the possibilities. Funny some are convicting Lois Lerner even before the whole story has come out. Oh well, I guess Fox News, Rush "Lameballs" or Glenn Beck said it, so it has to be true. Right? I'm really very conservative so I might be a republican if it weren't for the hypocrisy factor. That and the fact that I do my own thinking and research and don't believe everything Fox, "Lameballs", Beck or anyone says. If we could just get another one like G.W. Bush in the White House we'd all have it made. We working, middle class people wouldn't have any money ( The rich and the corporations would have it all.), we'd be working for minimum wage, our homes would be forclosed upon, our 401K's would be broke, we'd have to work until we're 70 to retire, have no Social Security because it was "privatized", we'd have no medical coverage either, but wouldn't we be so happy doing it just knowing our party was in control? Maybe someday another Ronald Reagan will come along to lead this country. You remember Ronnie don't you? He's the one that the average republican, who does no research and believes every thing he's told by other republicans, will tell you that cut all those taxes. If they had done their research they would know that he raised taxes 7 of the 8 years he was in office. Then we got another "Godsend" in George "Read my lips, no new taxes" H. W. Bush. Wasn't he a jewel too. Also, someone in a prior comment said President Obama didn't take out Bin Laden, that he just happen to be in office when Bin Laden was taken out. I agree with that but does that also mean that Ronnie Reagan just happen to be in office when Russia collapsed or the Berlin Wall came down? He gets credit for it, doesn't he. Earlier, did I say hypocrisy? I read in the Bible where it said some would swallow a camel and then gag on a gnat. I see that more and more every day. And by the way, I didn't vote for President Obama. In fact, I didn't vote for Willard "Nit Wit Mitt" Romney either. I passed up the presidential box and went to the next one on the list. Had I been a true republican I would have automatically voted for any name with a (R) beside of it. However, I'm neither a Democrat, Republican nor an Independent, I am an American and I'll support and hope for the best out of anyone who is elected. Why, because I understand it's not about a pissing contest between political parties, it's the best for my country.
Don't you ever take a break? Your head is going to explode. But, I guess democrats don't do anything wrong. Why don't you blame the whole entire political system. There is just as much corrupt corruption in the democrat part. I can name of one right now. Obama and his Chicago style politics. He is just as corrupt as Nixon ever was.
bushman

Huntington, WV

#15364 May 22, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
<quoted text>I am sure there are plenty of "dirty" things going on. However, when republicans are willing to ignore the fact that Bush's lies cost the lives of 4000 Americans and are willing to ignore Mark Sanford's adultry and re-elect him to public office, I just have a really hard time taking all this whining seriously.

And based on Obama's poll numbers recently, most of America does as well.
The party did not vote Mark Sanford back in. The idiots from S. Carolina did. The great citizens from NY are getting ready to vote whiner Wiener back in office. So there is idiots on both sides of the aisle.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15365 May 22, 2013
Corruption is the name of the game, but as an "independent," perhaps you can tell us why it is that republicans are such hypocrites. Why is it that not one republican bitched when the IRS targeted the NAACP, Greenpeace, or that anti-war church in California? Where was the republican outrage when Bush ignored warnings that got 3000 killed on 9/11? Why was there so much republican outrage over Clinton's affair with Lewenski but then they turn around an elect an admitted adulterer in South Carolina? Why do republicans open themselves up to ridicule by being such hypocrites?
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you ever take a break? Your head is going to explode. But, I guess democrats don't do anything wrong. Why don't you blame the whole entire political system. There is just as much corrupt corruption in the democrat part. I can name of one right now. Obama and his Chicago style politics. He is just as corrupt as Nixon ever was.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15366 May 22, 2013
No, that's bullshyt and you know it. You absolutely know it. South Carolina REPUBLICANS voted him back in. The key word is REPUBLICANS. They voted him in to represent them in Washington. The RNC didn't pull the plug on him UNTIL he was charged with trespassing on his ex-wife's property. But REPUBLICANS in South Carolina STILL elected him. That's the height of hypocrisy.
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
The party did not vote Mark Sanford back in. The idiots from S. Carolina did. The great citizens from NY are getting ready to vote whiner Wiener back in office. So there is idiots on both sides of the aisle.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15367 May 22, 2013
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
The party did not vote Mark Sanford back in. The idiots from S. Carolina did. The great citizens from NY are getting ready to vote whiner Wiener back in office. So there is idiots on both sides of the aisle.
Well hell yes, why wouldn't Wiener run for office? I mean if your party can elect an adulterer who used state tax money to finance a trip to Argentina, why can't someone who took pictures of his Crowley and sent it to someone run for mayor of NYC?

By the way, the "liberal media" is trashing Wiener even as we speak.
bacon hater

Mckeesport, PA

#15368 May 22, 2013
Ha ha. Took pictures of his "Crowley." Classic. What an idiot.
bushman

Huntington, WV

#15369 May 22, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
<quoted text>Ahhhh....so because YOU didn't see them, they don't exist. Is that what you are saying?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the...

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

But, using your "logic" (LOLOLOLOL) I guess we can all let Clinton off the hook for his Lewenski scandal since none of us ever saw her playing tonsil hockey with Bill's....ummmm...stick.
No but we saw the dress. Lolololplol.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15370 May 22, 2013
Who cares? Yeah, the president got a BJ. Big deal. More power to him.

But your party made a big deal out of it and then they turned around and elected an adulterer who lied about his whereabouts, spent state money to finance his trip to Argentina, committed adultery, trespassed on his wife's party and then....your party elected him..LOLOLOLOLOLOL.

Now, come on. Lecture us on morals again, will you?
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
No but we saw the dress. Lolololplol.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15371 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Ha ha. Took pictures of his "Crowley." Classic. What an idiot.
It would have been better if Wiener had been a woman and taken a picture of his "Crowley" because that would have been much more fitting of the name.

;)
bacon hater

Mckeesport, PA

#15372 May 22, 2013
Yeah but that's just proof that women WANT to blow our leaders. Yours tap their feet in bathrooms.

What's up with the scandals? Still not a single link to Obama? Nothing to tie in Clinton? Not even an accuser? This is what you get when you let tea baggers speak. You look like idiots. I just hope they don't fall into obscurity. We need to watch these losers choke on this shit. Demand apologies. Publicize the tea baggers who pretended they saw emails. But just like WMDs in Iraq, most tea baggers will think it's real. Just like most think Noah's Ark ACTUALLY F_CKING HAPPENED. It'd be depressing if it wasn't so hysterical.
bushman

Huntington, WV

#15373 May 22, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
<quoted text>No, that's bullshyt and you know it. You absolutely know it. South Carolina REPUBLICANS voted him back in. The key word is REPUBLICANS. They voted him in to represent them in Washington. The RNC didn't pull the plug on him UNTIL he was charged with trespassing on his ex-wife's property. But REPUBLICANS in South Carolina STILL elected him. That's the height of hypocrisy.
What about whiny Wiener?

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15374 May 22, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Yeah but that's just proof that women WANT to blow our leaders. Yours tap their feet in bathrooms.
What's up with the scandals? Still not a single link to Obama? Nothing to tie in Clinton? Not even an accuser? This is what you get when you let tea baggers speak. You look like idiots. I just hope they don't fall into obscurity. We need to watch these losers choke on this shit. Demand apologies. Publicize the tea baggers who pretended they saw emails. But just like WMDs in Iraq, most tea baggers will think it's real. Just like most think Noah's Ark ACTUALLY F_CKING HAPPENED. It'd be depressing if it wasn't so hysterical.
Poor republicans. If they weren't so worthless, I would feel sorry for them.

Fact is, despite all of their best efforts, they

a.) can't connect any of this to Obama.
b.) can't deny their own involvement in similar scandals during previous administrations (I would have said Bush, but that makes them shyt themselves).
c.) can't deny the fact that throughout all of this, the net result has been that Obama's approval has gone up.
d.)can't deny that the approval of their own party has gone down.

They just can't learn that this tactic is not working. 5 years of the same mindless bullshyt and the end result is that O gets re-elected and his popularity goes up.

God, this must be frustrating the shyt out of them.

LOLOLOLOLOLOL.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#15375 May 22, 2013
bushman wrote:
<quoted text>
What about whiny Wiener?
So wait a minute here.

Your party elects Sanford but YOU have a problem with Wiener?

LOLOLOLOLOL...this is rich. Absoeffinglutely rich.

By the way, Wiener hasn't been elected yet. He's just running.

Sanford has been elected.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#15376 May 22, 2013
The type of comedy that GOP likes is the types that are discriminatory or an element of hate and is ALWAYS unfunny to a normal thinking human, they also like lame jokes from their leaders such as "hyuk hyuk, nope no WMD's under there, huh huh".

But they give US tons of material.
bushman

Huntington, WV

#15377 May 22, 2013
Sundog512, like I said I am an Independent. I said corruption is on both sides. I denounce both sides of corruption and dirty politics. What I think is upsetting is, where each side sits back and runs there mouth about Clinton done this, Bush done this, Reagan done this, George Washington done this. Who cares what Bush, Clinton, and George Washington done. It is 2013. We can't go back and change what has already happened, but we should be smart enough to prevent present and future screw ups by either party's administration. Why do we keep making the same mistakes over and over by both parties. You complain about Mark Sanford then take up for Wiener. I think Sanford was wrong what he done and Wiener too, but I guess it wasn't enough to disqualify them for running. But the people should be smart enough not to vote for them. It is nobody's fault but the citizens that vote for them. I am consistent in saying that both sides are corrupt and point out what I don't like about either side of the isle. That is why there needs to be new rules in place to prevent corrupt people from even qualifying for office. That would allow for a better quality individuals to choose from when voting. This crap of voting for the less of two evils is just wrong.

“Gods Curse On Lazy Hillbillies”

Since: Jun 12

Dale City, VA

#15378 May 22, 2013
Crowley wrote:
<quoted text>
And Butt Crack, I would say that the greatest republican accomplishment ever is blocking as much of the socialist agenda of the Chicago crook, liar and gangster, as possible.
Let Me Make Sure That I'm Understanding You Correctly.....

According To {You}....The Republicans {Greatest Accomplishments} Have Been {Blocking} Agendas....From The Liberal Side When The Liberals Are In charge and running The White House???.....Are You Saying That The Republicans Only {Impressive Achievements} Have Occurred When They're {NOT} In The White House???....

Over The Last 30 Years....We've Had 20 Of Those Years Of Being Under Republican Leadership.....And In {Those 20 Years} Of Republican Leadership....You're Telling Us That You Can't Think Of {one Thing The Republicans Have Done}...That You Can Hang Your Pride On???....

If What {You} Say Is True....Then The Republicans Don't {Need} To Be The Leaders....Because Based On What {You} Say.....Republicans Preform Better In The Back Ground as {Blockers}....

So What The Hell Are You Bitching About?!?!....Your Side Is In The Position That It Excels At....Blockers!!!!....

Do You Agree???...Or Not Agree???....
bacon hater

Mckeesport, PA

#15379 May 22, 2013
Wiener will win easy. New York is populated by educated voters. They know that your genitals and skin color don't have any impact on intelligence or ability to lead. The red state voters disagree with this obvious fact, and that's why they lead the country in poverty, teenage pregnancy rates and the number of millionaire religious leaders. By the way, goddamn his wife is hot! Wiener is a firey leader. His congressional speeches where he spanks tea baggers are hilarious. O'Reilly, Hannity and the What The Fox news people won't have him on anymore because they end up over his knee too. What he did to pornstar Megyn Kelly was downright brutal. "Gotta go, Congressman." Ouch.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Charleston Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Fraud Andrew Palmer collecting donations for fl... 1 min Three strikes 4
310 Hickory Road 6 min Salt 3
Where is the Justice? Hard to let it go! 22 min burgerbob 34
Tom Clark and Josh 1 hr Tom Clark 10
Live On the Levee 1 hr Honestly 6
Hospital Mergers & Acquisitions 3 hr Smoke and Mirrors 13
Hurricane Null (May '15) 3 hr Take it good 91
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Charleston Mortgages