Channahon police violate fourth amend...

Channahon police violate fourth amendment

Posted in the Channahon Forum

Channahon Police

Braidwood, IL

#1 Nov 5, 2012
Channahon police department illegally placed a GPS tracking device on vehicle while parked in a driveway. The Channahon police also arrested this individual based on the information obtained from this illegally placed device. The Supreme Court says a search warrant is required when police use GPS devices to track suspects; it is a violation of the fourth amendment (United States vs. Jones). The Channahon police never had a search warrant to place such a device on this individualís vehicle nor did they have the right to enter the driveway where this vehicle was parked. It should be pointed out that the vehicle was jointly owned and they asked the girlfriend whom never had possession of this vehicle from the day it was bought. The vehicle was registered to both parties but the address associated with the vehicle and the loan was in the alleged suspectís address not the girlfriend. The alleged suspect whom was taken into custody was found not guilty by a jury of his peers and is currently seeking a lawsuit against the municipality. As well as the person whom stated he was committing this crime when this individual knew he was not.
bbb

Westmont, IL

#2 Nov 5, 2012
Channahon Police wrote:
Channahon police department illegally placed a GPS tracking device on vehicle while parked in a driveway. The Channahon police also arrested this individual based on the information obtained from this illegally placed device. The Supreme Court says a search warrant is required when police use GPS devices to track suspects; it is a violation of the fourth amendment (United States vs. Jones). The Channahon police never had a search warrant to place such a device on this individualís vehicle nor did they have the right to enter the driveway where this vehicle was parked. It should be pointed out that the vehicle was jointly owned and they asked the girlfriend whom never had possession of this vehicle from the day it was bought. The vehicle was registered to both parties but the address associated with the vehicle and the loan was in the alleged suspectís address not the girlfriend. The alleged suspect whom was taken into custody was found not guilty by a jury of his peers and is currently seeking a lawsuit against the municipality. As well as the person whom stated he was committing this crime when this individual knew he was not.
ok now what?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Channahon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jeremy Boshears 13 hr fake news 10
Elwood destroyed by Northpoint Thu Hammer 25
Naked Sun Thu Becky 33
Coal City Varsity Basketball Feb 21 pippen 14
Things I remember (Feb '09) Feb 19 YO MAN 59
Does anyone know of a Bakery that sells Potica? (Sep '10) Feb 15 Susan Sikora 12
News A Big Fish in a little marina (Jan '09) Feb 15 ritchierat 20

Channahon Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Channahon Mortgages