Historical context is fully relevant, except to idiots, like you, that wish to eliminate wisdom, in order to pave the way for ignorance. We can see how the wisdom that we have collected, over eons, has given you obstacles. Sorry 'bout that...<quoted text>
Historical context is the argument of fools. Women can vote, blacks are free and gays can marry. Sorry that disappoints you so.
You are correct. No wrist splitting needed since Prop 8 is dead.
Your belief that you define what is normal doesn't bother me at all! It simply makes you look pathetic and sad.
Why did you switch from normal to norm? They are two different things. Desperate much?!
Wow. Rant much? Hon, I have no fears about being gay. What a stupid comment. You're beginning to sound as stupid as Brian_G the village idiot. There is nothing factual in your last statement whatsoever. Do you like making a dumbass out of yourself? Sure seems that way.
We do define what normnal is, it is your task to attempt to dispute it. Sorry 'bout that, too....
Splitting hairs is a mark of losing an argument.
Rants? Where? Oh, you might be ranting, but we understand your flaws...
No-one fears your being gay, any more than we fear dog poo. We don't fear it, but no-one is going to play in it, either, without some sort of break from reality...
It sure seems that you need someone to insult, in order to make any kind of a weak point.