Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,917)

Showing posts 158,321 - 158,340 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181406
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok .. You donít care enough to do anything about it, and so far no one else does either
do you like that better?
Same Sex marriage will continue to become legal in more states and nations
Same old schtick.

You can talk of travel to Mars without actually traveling to Mars. I can talk about rights for poly without actively going out in the streets for it. And besides, I am doing something about it, I'm arguing with bigots and idiots.

You don't care enough to do anything about SSM. Do I use that against you when you discuss SSM?

Same old tired schtick over and over again, And then again. like it's going to work one if these times! I won't it's stupid and no argument against equal rights at all.

What a jackass.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181407
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
So far no one cares enough about Poly ( including you ) to do the legwork to get things started, it is nothing but a poly for your hostility to supporters of Same Sex Marriage
It wonít work of course, Same sex marriage will continue to expand across states and nations.
Really Big D? You seem like a reasonable....fella? Anyway...every victory for SSM is also a victory for plural marriage. The standard's been changed.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181408
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Really Big D? You seem like a reasonable....fella? Anyway...every victory for SSM is also a victory for plural marriage. The standard's been changed.
according to you

but SSM was legal in California before prop 8, not poly

SSM is legal in some 10 states now, and DC, is poly?

SSM has had a LOT of victories lately

How many has Poly had?

You are under the delusion that one goes hand in hand with the other. Not at all true, and you are failing to frighten anyone with that crap.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181409
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on mating behavior.
What does that mean in part?
It means you are an idiot.
KiMare wrote:
A constraint on the evolutionary PRIORITY to pass DNA
You have two sets.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
KiMare wrote:
along to as many as possible. Marriage actually constrains the evolutionary desire for numerous mates, and requires the male care for their offspring and support the mother.
What you actually point out is clear evidence that homosexuality is a genetic DEFECT.

Moreover, homosexuality is a far more promiscuous orientation than heterosexuality.
Smile.
Speaking of genetic DEFECTS, do you think chimeras should be aborted?
:)
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181410
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít see signatures on a ballot measure yet, and nothing is in the news about legal action or their gaining any ground
Just a lot of private websites you are posting, I can create those for $5
I am talking serious here
OK I'll go along with your stupid straw man argument for a moment and humor you.

Let's say only 3 people in the whole world want a poly marriage. Is that a reason to deny poly marriage?

HOW MANY PEOPLE WANT IT IS IRRELEVANT.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181411
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
It will immediately follow any legalization of ss 'marriage', along with a host of other issues. Oh, and distainingly calling it the 'slippery slope' argument doesn't change it's validity.
Already, the extension of spouse benefits in the military to gay couples has caused a legitimate claim of discrimination by heterosexual couples living together outside of marriage.
The fact is, if committed relationship of any gender is redefined as marriage, the number certainly must also be designated as discrimination. A fundamental reason marriage constrained gender and number was this; A child has one mother and one father. Never any more or less.
Smile.
You think our rights should depend on our genes.
Should you be allowed to marry? Do you think you should have been aborted? You are kind of worthless.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181412
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
according to you
but SSM was legal in California before prop 8, not poly
SSM is legal in some 10 states now, and DC, is poly?
SSM has had a LOT of victories lately
How many has Poly had?
You are under the delusion that one goes hand in hand with the other. Not at all true, and you are failing to frighten anyone with that crap.
There is an arcahic 100+ year old federal law against poly. That's based on hatred and prejudice and should be gone.

Then it will be just like SSM. Up to the states. Good thing PROP 8 is being struck down because it won't stand in the way of poly in CA.

And there's your topic.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181413
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Rosie we weren't. First, not every racial combination was prohibited, only certain ones. It wasn't applied equally. Second, who or what determined "race"?. Third, there are numerous races/ethnic groups, but only two sexes. Lastly, how is a person who is half of one and half of another classified in terms of who they can marry?
<quoted text>
You are pretty stupid. I should have figured the point would go ever your head.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Physically impossible. A man can marry a woman and vice versa.
<quoted text>
No, it's not. Gay marriages are happening in several states and countries.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Actually they can, its just not legally recognized.
<quoted text>
True, its as old as monogamous marriage.
Typical fundie, so stupid you don't know the difference between "its" and "it's". A typo is one thing, you folks just don't know the difference.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181414
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Frankie Rizzo is just a troll who is against gay marriage pretending to be in favor of it. He keeps flooding the forum with posts about red herrings, like polygamy, because he doesn't have a real argument against gay marriage. And he is so dumb, he thinks the term "red herring" means a fish.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181415
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Dorn wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage was probably invented by men because of a shortage of women as other men had too many wives.
Yeh, I see that problem all the time...

Snicker.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181416
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rose_NoHo wrote:
Frankie Rizzo is just a troll who is against gay marriage pretending to be in favor of it. He keeps flooding the forum with posts about red herrings, like polygamy, because he doesn't have a real argument against gay marriage. And he is so dumb, he thinks the term "red herring" means a fish.
Says the troll who is too scared to respond to me directly.

Priceless!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181417
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
according to you
but SSM was legal in California before prop 8, not poly
SSM is legal in some 10 states now, and DC, is poly?
SSM has had a LOT of victories lately
How many has Poly had?
You are under the delusion that one goes hand in hand with the other. Not at all true, and you are failing to frighten anyone with that crap.
Ohhhhh.....so the "D" stands for denial? What frighten? Why would it matter to you if plural marriage in some form was given legal recognition? Would it crash your Big Fat Gay Wedding?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181418
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
It means you are an idiot.
<quoted text>
You have two sets.
Do you think you should have been aborted?
<quoted text>
Speaking of genetic DEFECTS, do you think chimeras should be aborted?
:)
Isn't she great ladies and gentlemen. She'll be here all week, so please be kind to your waitress, waiter, or androgynous waitperson.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181419
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is an arcahic 100+ year old federal law against poly. That's based on hatred and prejudice and should be gone.
Then it will be just like SSM. Up to the states. Good thing PROP 8 is being struck down because it won't stand in the way of poly in CA.
And there's your topic.
Yeahhhhh....Get 'em Frankie..what a bunch of chooches

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181420
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Rose_NoHo wrote:
Frankie Rizzo is just a troll who is against gay marriage pretending to be in favor of it. He keeps flooding the forum with posts about red herrings, like polygamy, because he doesn't have a real argument against gay marriage. And he is so dumb, he thinks the term "red herring" means a fish.
That would be pesce Rosa.....delicious over pasta.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181421
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

A detailed look into polygamy from an Islamic point of view. It is also a good description of various forms of poly marriage and their good and bad points.

(Not an evil Fundie Mormon point of view! Relax put down that weapon!)

http://www.al-islam.org/WomanRights/11.htm

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181422
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, you left out the first logical step.
In reality, it's the current ability of heterosexuals to marry that is the leading cause for other groups to demand the right to legally marry. Same sex couples are only asking for the SAME right to marry just one person.
However, same sex couples wanting the SAME right to marry one that already exists for ever heterosexual in the country is not similar to straight people demanding the right to marry, not only ONE, but many at one time.
Separate issues. Separate effects on society.
Actually, YOU left out the first logical step.

In reality, marriage always has included the likelihood of procreation. So much so that the instances where it did not occur were ignored.

Moreover, you then simply argue tradition, without a valid reason to discriminate.

The only reason marriage was restricted to one man and one woman, was the very issue of procreation. By removing that element, you leave the setting of a natural family undefined, horn in on the protection and support designed for that foundational societal relationship, and open the door to simply any committed relationships. ANY restrictions of number and type must show harm, and children cannot be considered.

Smirk.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181423
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There is an arcahic 100+ year old federal law against poly. That's based on hatred and prejudice and should be gone.
Then it will be just like SSM. Up to the states. Good thing PROP 8 is being struck down because it won't stand in the way of poly in CA.
And there's your topic.
No the topic is Prop 8 and its being overturned in the California courts.

here let me post the topic header for you

"Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage"

You should start a Poly topic
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181424
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
OK I'll go along with your stupid straw man argument for a moment and humor you.
Let's say only 3 people in the whole world want a poly marriage. Is that a reason to deny poly marriage?
HOW MANY PEOPLE WANT IT IS IRRELEVANT.
Are they working on getting petitions? Are they making a case in court? Or are they just using it in random internet forums to attack people in favor of other topics like Same Sex marriage?
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181425
Feb 26, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Ohhhhh.....so the "D" stands for denial? What frighten? Why would it matter to you if plural marriage in some form was given legal recognition? Would it crash your Big Fat Gay Wedding?
Oh it doesnít frighten me, neither does SSM, but there are people it would frighten, and they are easily led which is why this argument is used.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 158,321 - 158,340 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Cerritos Discussions

Search the Cerritos Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Coachella Cabbies and Their Amazing Stories 6 min Guest 1
Old Folks Shopping 45 min Long Beach Native 2
Long Beach Insane Crip gang members arrested in... 59 min sheriff 4
Police Corner Negroes in Lakewood - Save Easter 1 hr sgt pepper 3
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 1 hr Open Market Canada 15,673
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 1 hr Scrubbers 7,306
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 7 hr Fight On 26,099
•••
•••

Cerritos News Video

•••
•••

Cerritos Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Cerritos People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••