LB City Council May Be Full of Weasel...

LB City Council May Be Full of Weasels Implies Councilwoman Shipske

Posted in the Cerritos Forum

LB Reader

United States

#1 Apr 2, 2013
(April 1, 2013)-- As part of "Open Up Long Beach," a project to make the City of Long Beach more open and transparent, I monitor the efforts of organizations that are working on transparency in government, such as the Sunlight Foundation. Recently, that organization announced that the District Court in the District of Columbia upheld the long time ban on political contributions from any person negotiating or performing a federal government contract stating:

The ban on such contributions guards against "pay-to-play" arrangements, in which people seeking federal contracts provide financial support to political candidates in return for their help securing government business. It also protects such contractors from pressure to contribute or risk losing their work.
The Court further stated that it was not the "courts' practice to 'second-guess a …[legislative] determination as to the need for prophylactic measures where corruption is the evil feared'."

It seems then it might be time for the City of Long Beach to enact a similar contribution ban. Conceivably, that ban could be applied to those who seek approval for a development, an entertainment permit or those who are lobbying for a specific ordinance. Some would argue that it should extend to employee unions who are under contract with the City.

I was particularly taken back when year ago on February 14, the City Council voted on whether or not to ban operation of medical marijuana collectives.

Why? Because in excess of $8,000 had poured into the campaign and officeholder accounts of several Council members from businesses and lobbyists representing the medical marijuana industry. Now that may not sound like a lot of money. But considering that contributions are limited to $350 for a campaign and $500 for an officeholder account, this is a considerable sum.

City Attorney Robert Shannon told the City Council over the past several months that we needed to ban the operation of medical marijuana collectives because the court ruled on a case specifically involving the City of Long Beach’s regulation of medical marijuana collectives. The court held that the City cannot regulate that which is illegal. Marijuana is still illegal under federal law. A ban not only impacts access to medical marijuana by residents but stops an extremely lucrative revenue stream for those who operate the collectives. Some of these lobbyists who gave contributions also sent Council members language they wanted inserted into the City’s ordinance -- a fact never disclosed during the discussion or the vote.

Long Beach should handle this situation in one of two ways: Either ban the contributions from anyone who is negotiating with the City or doing work for the City and/or require the elected official to disclose before voting at City Council if he or she has received a contribution and a statement that he or she does not believe there is a conflict of interest. Plain and simple.

Several cities have enacted laws which disqualify a council member from participating in decisions affecting his or her campaign contributors. These laws disqualify the council member from participating in certain proceedings if the official has received campaign contributions from a party, participant or their agents within the 12 months preceding the decision. They also require disclosure on the record of the proceeding of all campaign contributions received from these persons during that period. In addition, these laws prohibit solicitation or receipt of campaign contributions during such proceedings, and for three months after the decision, from parties, participants or their agents.


United States

#2 Apr 5, 2013
Mayor Foster, Lizardman Garcia, and others have long been passionately against having their official emails recorded on a server, for possible later review. We need to get that server going immediately.
Think of all the recalls we could have had if we only had access to the emails they made while on the city dime.
Let's get the city council more transparent so it is less attractive to sociopaths.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cerritos Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
LMSA Soccer (Feb '10) 31 min The legend 6,502
gangs in Norwalk (Jun '12) 19 hr Billy 67
News Making sure parents can hold schools accountable 20 hr mar 1
NY Senate Passes Bill to Criminalize Begging Wi... 21 hr Ronald 2
senatory lowenthal voted yes on iran "deal" - d... 22 hr digginpurple 2
Elephant Bar Hoots, Specially with the Hostess Sat America lover 2
News Thousands of Jehovaha s Witnesses will kick off... Sat aadrivers 16
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Cerritos Mortgages