Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010?

[Pops]

PG13forU wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's just not forget that the people who do believe in the effects of climate change double your IQ. Go throw rocks at the moon, mountain boy. The thinky folks have a world to save from greedy minded morons like yourself.

Now this would be funny if it weren't so sad. Climate change?...dbl IQ?"...throw rocks at the moon."?
And you call someone else a moron?? How entertaining.

[Pops]

d-pants wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ mobileweb/2012/06/25/trans-pac ific-partnership-documents-she rrod-brown-jeff-merkley-ron-wy den-robert-menendez_n_1624956. html

TY. Democratic senators seeking info from the most "transparent" president ever!!Amazing.
He is now showing his true true colors. Socialist, divisive, secret agenda, constitution bending/breaking, tax raising, debt increasing lying sack of cow flop.

[d-pants7]

Pops wrote:

<quoted text>TY. Democratic senators seeking info from the most "transparent" president ever!!Amazing.
He is now showing his true true colors. Socialist, divisive, secret agenda, constitution bending/breaking, tax raising, debt increasing lying sack of cow flop.

croni capitalism.

[Yup]

No doubt

[Anonymous of Indy]

d-pants7 wrote:

<quoted text> croni capitalism.

Crony Capitalism is American Capitalism which is just another form of Socialism applied here in the US that is sold as Capitalism which True Capitalism rejects everything about it including our Federal Government & its involvement.

[UdintBuildThat]

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
What a fool. After Reagan's first half of his first term, unemployment went down along with interest rates. DumBama has had unemployment over or around 8% for over four years. The only reason it's not over 8% today is because they keep calculating all those people who quit looking for work. That figure artificially brings down the unemployment rate.

.
The straight forward number of people working in the labor force can't hardly be rigged though and its at its lowest in a long time.

[UdintBuildThat]

PG13forU wrote:

<quoted text>
Let's just not forget that the people who do believe in the effects of climate change double your IQ. Go throw rocks at the moon, mountain boy. The thinky folks have a world to save from greedy minded morons like yourself.

Only the window lickers believe in climate change!

[lila]

if you ask me they all suck a uneducated person could do what they have done so i vote neither we need someone new

[UdidntWinThat]

UdintBuildThat wrote:

<quoted text>
Only the window lickers believe in climate change!

You mean like those kooks at NASA? Stick to being a hillbilly.

[xxxrayted]

UdintBuildThat wrote:

<quoted text>
.
The straight forward number of people working in the labor force can't hardly be rigged though and its at its lowest in a long time.

Exactly. Even the U-6 unemployment number hasn't changed all that much.

[xxxrayted]

UdidntWinThat wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean like those kooks at NASA?

They must be kooky if they are fighting with their satellite data:

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
By James Taylor | Forbes – Wed, Jul 27, 2011

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.

"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans."

In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-h...

[UdintBuildThat]

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa

[GetOutofOurCount ry]

UdintBuildThat wrote:

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aa

Here's who wrote your little anti-climate change propaganda...

James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News.

The Heartland Institute is a Conservative "think tank" directly funded by the oil billionaire Koch brothers known for spreading anti-climate change propaganda.

Ahhhhh ha ha ha ha! Nice try. Eat those facts. You lose again little hillbilly.

[GetOutofOurCount ry]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_In...

Not only does the Koch brother sponsored Heartland Institute deny climate change, they were also responsible for a campaign to disprove the harmful effects of second hand smoke.

How did that turn out? Boy, I'm glad you posted that link on NASA and global warming. It allows me to point out just how stupid you tea baggers really are. Jump through the hoop for the oil billionaires, little tea bagger.

[xxxrayted]

GetOutofOurCountry wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T he_Heartland_Institute#Smoking
Not only does the Koch brother sponsored Heartland Institute deny climate change, they were also responsible for a campaign to disprove the harmful effects of second hand smoke.
How did that turn out? Boy, I'm glad you posted that link on NASA and global warming. It allows me to point out just how stupid you tea baggers really are. Jump through the hoop for the oil billionaires, little tea bagger.

Ah, so I guess you never clicked on any of the many links that substantiate the findings, huh?

But if you want to associate money with findings, can you tell me who funds NASA? Are they not funded by the same politicians getting rich off this global warming nonsense? While you're at it, can you tell me who funds these so-called America global warming scientists and their studies? I'm sure it's a non-profit organization of some kind. LOL!

Oh dear, reading the weather, I found out we are going back below normal temperatures once again after our nice weekend and Monday. in fact, we will be under normal for at least another week or so.

[Angel 1]

GetOutofOurCountry wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T he_Heartland_Institute#Smoking
Not only does the Koch brother sponsored Heartland Institute deny climate change, they were also responsible for a campaign to disprove the harmful effects of second hand smoke.
How did that turn out? Boy, I'm glad you posted that link on NASA and global warming. It allows me to point out just how stupid you tea baggers really are. Jump through the hoop for the oil billionaires, little tea bagger.

Good Lord, you libtrads really are a pathetic pile of dung; the numbers simply do not add up to what YOU said they would. But that is ok, because logic and common sense have never been nor ever will be concepts you understand. The world would truly be a better place if all libtards would spontaneously combust; at the very least they should all be prevented from reproducing so they cannot continue to infect the world with their disease. The cycle of ilk must stop before we go by the wayside like the Greeks, Carthiginians, and Romans - all destroyed by libtards. But that is ok; it makes us all warm and fuzzy inside.

[UdintBuildThat]

The world is our oyster for those of us truly conservative. We can migrate to a new country and make it the new United States which is going by way of the roman empire thanks to libtards.

[Anonymous of Indy]

UdintBuildThat wrote:

The world is our oyster for those of us truly conservative. We can migrate to a new country and make it the new United States which is going by way of the roman empire thanks to libtards.

depends if you are talking Sociologly or Ideaology.

Modern liberalism is not completely collectivist; nor is it completely individualistic. It has elements of both doctrines. The same is true of Modern conservatism. Neither view provides a coherent approach to politics, built up from first principles. Instead, they both reflect a process that is akin to picking items from a dinner menu. What is chosen is a matter of taste rather than a matter of thought. Just as people with similar tastes in food tend to frequent the same restaurants, people with the same tastes in politics tend to vote for the same candidates.

Classical Liberalism vs. Modern Liberalism and Modern Conservatism

[Anonymous of Indy]

Classical Liberalism vs. Modern Liberalism and Modern Conservatism

http://www.ncpa.org/pub/classical-liberalism-...

[xxxrayted]

Angel 1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Good Lord, you libtrads really are a pathetic pile of dung; the numbers simply do not add up to what YOU said they would. But that is ok, because logic and common sense have never been nor ever will be concepts you understand. The world would truly be a better place if all libtards would spontaneously combust; at the very least they should all be prevented from reproducing so they cannot continue to infect the world with their disease. The cycle of ilk must stop before we go by the wayside like the Greeks, Carthiginians, and Romans - all destroyed by libtards. But that is ok; it makes us all warm and fuzzy inside.

His response about second-hand smoke is interesting though.

As a truck driver, I'm required to take random drug screenings. One time in that process, I questioned the nurse about second-hand marijuana? She told me that even if I was in a room filled with marijuana, there would be no trace in my urine or blood. Smoke is not that toxic or powerful enough to be detected by a drug screen.

Okay, if pot can't be detected in urine, how is second-hand smoke killing people? I mean, I have never been to a funeral where the cause of death was second-hand smoke. And even if death were possible by second-hand smoke, that would mean that tobacco is so toxic that the user would die in a matter of seconds after the first puff.

Of course, liberals don't want to consider that. Instead, they find ridiculous biased articles to support their point without question. The liberal article says this or that, so it must be true. Forget common sense. It doesn't apply in the liberal world.