|
“WAXMAN NOSURPRIZE_ JIMMY TOO”
Since: Feb 13
From CT. to JUDGE your posts!
|
Please wait...
Black Mamba wrote: <quoted text> Hi you big ole' banana cream pie you! I forgot to ask, you're definitely Jewish, right. Not that I'm adverse to mixin' it up, but I just don't like the anteaters! If you let me know your address, I'll send you a wheel of gouda! My first judgit for you today is a great big HEART! Don't you agree that this is a great place to meet folks. I think it's our last hope for ever getting a republican into the oval office again. We just have to get our mind off the part in our pants and on to organization. Here's to us doing just that! I try and keep my religious persuasions to myself until I'm intimate!!!!! Let it be a surprise!! I'm with you on the Republican push. This is a fabulous place to mingle with 'manly' Republican men!! So exciting!! We can organize a gay grass roots "push" right from Topix!!! Gouda is my very favorite cheese, though I am also a big fan of head cheese!!! Thank you doll!
|
|
PDUPONT
United States
|
John Galt wrote: <quoted text> Dumbass Dave unable to assess the enhanced risk to children presented by homosexuals compared to normal men and women. Hey dumbass! Most pedophiles are heterosexual males like Jerry Sandusky. You're an idiot!
|
|
sonicfilter
Indianapolis, IN
|
Can GOP end the ‘carnival of the crazy’? Meaning not simply the Grand Old Party, but more specifically the bacchanal of the bizarre and carnival of crazy to which it has lately devolved. So obvious has this devolution become that even Republican stalwarts have been heard to decry the parody of a party the GOP has become. Except now we see signs suggesting maybe a corner has been turned. There was, for example, that surprising bipartisan consensus on immigration reform, which one would have thought about as likely as a Ted Nugent concert on the White House lawn. And Politico reports Karl Rove has started a super PAC whose mission is to keep the more . . . ahem, colorful candidates from winning Republican primaries. Politico also quotes what it calls a high-profile strategist who said party leaders are now trying to “marginalize the cranks, haters and bigots” they until recently portrayed as courageous truth tellers. There’s more. Fox “News,” for many years the communications arm of the GOP, just ditched two of its fieriest firebrands: Dick Morris and Sarah Palin, who, like Linus in the pumpkin patch, kept assuring true believers of the Great Pumpkin of a Mitt Romney victory. This comes as Fox, though it still has numbers CNN would kill for, sees its ratings fall to a 12-year low among a key demographic. A new Public Policy Polling survey finds trust in Fox at the lowest level in the short (four years) history of the survey. Then there is Bobby Jindal. The Louisiana governor, widely considered a rising star of the GOP has, since the election, been preaching with evangelistic zeal that Republicans must “stop being the stupid party.” Which could be a reference to Herman Cain, presumably still poring over a map looking for “U-beki-beki-beki-becki-stan-s tan.” Or to Michele Bachmann, perhaps still searching out terrorists in the office of the secretary of state. Or to any of a series of GOP candidates who made statements on rape so spectacularly ignorant they would stun even the men in those dusty places where wives are bought like cattle. So yes, signs are plentiful that something is afoot among the Republicans. But what does it mean? One might hope it signifies the party’s decision to abandon its alternate universe, offer reasonable alternatives to those voters not convinced that any one party or ideology has all the answers. One might hope it means an orderly retreat from the hard edge of coded racism, gay bashing, Mexican electrocuting, anti-intellectualism and fact avoidance that have been passed off as wisdom in recent years. One might hope it means a return of grown-ups, pragmatism, reason — and reasonableness. One might hope. But one might be well-advised to gird that hope with wariness, given that this is the same party whose leaders, as reported on PBS’ Frontline, held a meeting in 2009 and chose obstructionism as a political strategy. Note that, even while repeating his “stupid party” admonition at a GOP meeting in Charlotte last month, Jindal assured his audience this did not mean rethinking or even moderating the party’s hardcore — and frankly, out of touch — stands on issues such as abortion and marriage equality. No, he explained, he’s talking about changing the packaging — not what’s in it. Putting lipstick on the proverbial pig, in other words. That will inevitably disappoint those longing for a new GOP. One hopes the party’s soul searching eventually leads it to understand the need for evolution. It should not — and does not need to — become simply a pale imitation of the other party. But it also should not — and better not — settle for being simply a prettied-up version of the extremist outlier it has become. Because you know what you call a pig with lipstick on? A pig with lipstick on. Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/02/09/3224335...
|
|
PDUPONT
United States
|
John Galt wrote: <quoted text> Dorner's manifesto expresses admiration for Obama. I've read the manifesto and nowhere does he even mention Barack Obama. ktla.com/2013/02/07/read-christopher-dorners-... You're a goddamned liar but then again you're a right wing imbecile so why would I expect anything else?
|
|
Yeah
Mililani, HI
|
mdbuilder wrote: <quoted text> Sorry pal, I don't accept anything I don't like, much less with grace. That's a position reserved for you and the rest of the liberal a**monkeys. lol! I noticed a while back you don't accept much with grace or class. Brains either for that matter.
|
|
Stoneman
Boise, ID
|
GOPIdiots wrote: <quoted text> If we're so stupid, then why can't the GOP win a Presidential election, in a down economy,two times running? Maybe, just maybe YOU'RE the dumbass! When Reagan beat Carter, the economy was in a freaking disaster: double digit inflation, unemployment and interest rates were in the high teens. When GWB took office in 2001 the economy was already in a recession. Maybe YOU'RE the dumbass.
|
|
news flash
Wichita, KS
|
Shakalaka wrote: <quoted text> Why? They are to blame! They want to shift their screw ups on Obama and Not Bush and company. Obama is in his SECOND term, geesh when are you idiots going to start thinking just some of what is going on just might be on him, not a president from 5 years ago? The fact is you blame him for NOTHING and as usual for you progressives everything is someone else's fault. Obama is even continueing Bush's policies on alot of stuff and you still blame Bush.
|
|
REPEAL SECOND
Wingate, NC
|
President Obama will have children and victims of gun violence in the gallery when he proposes repealing and/or modifying the second amendment in his state of the union address. This will focus attention on children being killed at places like Sandy Hook CT and people will sympathisize with the little children and cry when the president says get rid of guns. We must take guns out of the hands of everyone except law enforcement and the military. Guns should not be possessed by ordinary citizens. People and wildlife are being killed. Some people think they need to hunt. Those days are over. There is no need to hunt for your food like your old ancestors once did. You would be healthier if you did not eat meat anyway. We can eliminate gun violence by doing away with guns. The second amendment needs to be repealed NOW
|
|
|
|
Since: Oct 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
PDUPONT wrote: <quoted text> Hey dumbass! Most pedophiles are heterosexual males like Jerry Sandusky. You're an idiot! Hey Petey, How do you know Sandusky is hetrosexual? Because he has his wife's permission to say so??
|
|
news flash
Wichita, KS
|
REPEAL SECOND wrote: President Obama will have children and victims of gun violence in the gallery when he proposes repealing and/or modifying the second amendment in his state of the union address. This will focus attention on children being killed at places like Sandy Hook CT and people will sympathisize with the little children and cry when the president says get rid of guns. We must take guns out of the hands of everyone except law enforcement and the military. Guns should not be possessed by ordinary citizens. People and wildlife are being killed. Some people think they need to hunt. Those days are over. There is no need to hunt for your food like your old ancestors once did. You would be healthier if you did not eat meat anyway. We can eliminate gun violence by doing away with guns. The second amendment needs to be repealed NOW Sorry but you are one screwed up individual if you think that just because you don't like people hunting or others having a means to protect themselves against criminals that you can just repeal our right to have guns. Everyone already knows the president uses kids to his advantage when asking for crap like healthcare and gun rights issues so no ones really pays attention except idiots like you. No one will cry with you and no way will the American people allow our government to disarm us. They are the ones we need to have protection from the most! The fact is we should have the right to have any arms that our military does just so we don't end up being ruled by our military like Eygpt and we aren't giving up our guns so we can end up like the citizen's of Syria either.
|
|
Since: Dec 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Stoneman wrote: <quoted text> When Reagan beat Carter, the economy was in a freaking disaster: double digit inflation, unemployment and interest rates were in the high teens. When GWB took office in 2001 the economy was already in a recession. Maybe YOU'RE the dumbass. So if they win during economic hard times why are they losing now? I believe that was GOPidiots point.
|
|
JerryD
Los Angeles, CA
|
The right to bear arms is in the Constitution. A disarmed citizenry will create a government drunk with power. Glad you trust the cops and the military. I sure don't.
|
|
sonicfilter
Indianapolis, IN
|
news flash wrote: <quoted text> Obama is in his SECOND term, geesh when are you idiots going to start thinking just some of what is going on just might be on him, not a president from 5 years ago? The fact is you blame him for NOTHING and as usual for you progressives everything is someone else's fault. Obama is even continueing Bush's policies on alot of stuff and you still blame Bush. Finally, conservatives blame George W. Bush for something OK, you know how when the Supreme Court does something you like, it’s “strict constitutionalist,” but when it’s something you don’t like, they’re an “activist court”? Well today, we heard from the George W. Bush court. George W. Bush. The man whose time in the White House brought America two wars and Medicare Part D (all off the books), who had us spending $1 billion a week and losing more than 4,000 soldiers in Iraq while cutting taxes excessively for the wealthiest Americans who needed a tax cut the least. That wasn’t a trickle down, that was a gush up. According to the Nonpartisan Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, the Bush wars and tax cuts are going to account for nearly half of all American public debt in the year 2019. Of course, if you ever bring up how some of these Bush policies are still hurting our American economy, you’re going to hear our friends on the right screaming,“There you go, blaming Bush. When are you going to stop blaming Bush for bad Obama policies, you freedom-hating liberals? Where’s the birth certificate?” Now, when your right-wing friends say this, you could counter with saying,“When are we going to stop blaming Bush? Hey, man, when are you going to start blaming Bush? If your captain hit the iceberg, pal, you don’t get to blame the rescue boat.” We were losing 750,000 jobs a month when Obama took office. So blaming Obama for the economy he inherited is like blaming your hangover on the guy making breakfast. Or you could try to explain to your right-wing friends that there aren’t many liberals who blame Bush for bad Obama policies, but I know quite a few liberals who blame Obama for continuing some bad Bush policies. Or you could just say what I say:“Yeah, I do still blame Bush. I still blame George Lucas for Jar Jar Binks, too.” Of course, none of that works. The party of personal responsibility still can’t bring itself to take any responsibility for the Bush administration’s spending money like Courtney Love her first night in Amsterdam. Remember 9/11 was Clinton’s fault, but Bush gets credit for getting bin Laden. You know the drill, my friends. Until today. Because George Bush is the man who put John Roberts on the Supreme Court. And today Chief Justice Roberts became the swing vote to uphold the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, which has gotten him permanently thrown off Grover Norquist’s Christmas card list. And the tea partiers are furious. This evil, socialist, Democratic health care plan that was actually created by Republicans — it was — is now the law of the land, and it’s all because of this activist chief justice. And that’s why, my friends, today really is one for the history books. Bush-appointee John Roberts managed to do something that up to today seemed impossible. He finally got the right wing to blame Bush for something Bush did. http://current.com/shows/viewpoint/videos/fin...
|
|
Since: Dec 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
HANG OBAMA asap wrote: All political parties are crooked and controlled by powerful Jews like Disney . This is why Hitler was killing these filthy bastards in Germany . Obama is own by Disney and is a know cocaine homosexual predator . Execute this black pig . Pink Triangle’ Disney While support for homosexuals has been widespread in Hollywood for years, under Eisner the Disney company — in the words of the American Family Association — has become “one of the leading promoters of the homosexual lifestyle, as well as the homosexual political and social agenda in America today.” Eisner himself is a board member of “Hollywood Supporters,” an influential and aggressive homosexual advocacy organization. The Disney company advertises in homosexual publications such as Out magazine, and has given financial support to at least one benefit for the “National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.” In 1996, actress Ellen DeGeneres “came out” as openly homosexual, both personally and as the lead character on the “Ellen” sitcom series, broadcast on the Eisner-controlled ABC television network. Eisner introduced insurance benefits for same-gender partners of Disney’s homosexual employees. For some years now, he has sanctioned “Gay Day” at Disney World, an event that each year draws throngs of boisterous “in your face” homosexuals. “In the interest of full disclosure,” quipped Boston Herald columnist Don Feder,“Disney should change its corporate logo to show a pink triangle flying over Cinderella’s castle.” He went on to refer to Disneyland as “The Magic Kink-dom.” JEWS ARE EMPOWERING CRIMINALS AND SCUMBAGS TO HELP THEM ROB AND DESTROY AMERICA ! Until you can rid yourself of this kind of crazy the GOP must necessarily remain the "Stupid Party". You can't keep inviting crazy cousin Eddie (who always ends up covering his head with mashed potatoes and gravy) to Thanksgiving dinner end deny you're related.
|
|
“WAXMAN NOSURPRIZE_ JIMMY TOO”
Since: Feb 13
From CT. to JUDGE your posts!
|
Please wait...
Hello my friends! I am warming up for another marathon round of judging posts!! Would anyone like to challenge me to a judging tourney?? I'm more than game! One requirement is you must wear depends!! That is my secret!(and eating copious amounts of cheese). If you are interested leave me your phone number!!! May the best and fastest poster win!!! Hugs, Waxturds!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Dorner Fan Club
Los Angeles, CA
|
Go, Chris, go! Teach the LAPD what it's like to be terrorized themselves.
|
|
Manfred
Los Angeles, CA
|
GOPers are crybabies. Wahhhh! No fair blaming Bush for all his screw-ups! Wahhh! I insist we blame Obama for all of Bush's screw-ups instead! Wahhhh! And if you don't, I'll hold my breath until I turn blue. WAHHH!
|
|
Since: Dec 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
news flash wrote: <quoted text> Sorry but you are one screwed up individual if you think that just because you don't like people hunting or others having a means to protect themselves against criminals that you can just repeal our right to have guns. Everyone already knows the president uses kids to his advantage when asking for crap like healthcare and gun rights issues so no ones really pays attention except idiots like you. No one will cry with you and no way will the American people allow our government to disarm us. They are the ones we need to have protection from the most! The fact is we should have the right to have any arms that our military does just so we don't end up being ruled by our military like Eygpt and we aren't giving up our guns so we can end up like the citizen's of Syria either. I'm all for it, I think your proposal is brilliant. If you're allowed any of the weaponry possessed by the US military then we no longer need the US military. We can return to the concept of the citizen soldier and the $700 billion cost of "defending" the US can then be assumed by those of you with an yen to own your own nuclear submarine. You could form your own 501(c)3 fund and operate your submarine. Make sure you don't lose control of your board though so they don't go attacking Texas. Unless of course you're in favor of attacking Texas. Who could blame you right?
|
|
DBWriter
Los Angeles, CA
|
We need good old-fashioned conservative government. That's why I endorse Adolf Hitler.
|
|
sonicfilter
Indianapolis, IN
|
let the games begin.... Fox Vs. Fox: Frequent Fox Guest Mark Levin Denounces Karl Rove The war of words on the right continues to escalate, with radio host Mark Levin becoming the latest Fox News figure to attack Fox political analyst Karl Rove. In a February 8 post on his Facebook page, Levin accused Rove of lying about conservative Rep. Steve King (R-IA). Earlier in the week on his radio show, Levin claimed Rove is "despised by the grassroots" and said Rove's name and new political group "are poison in conservative and Republican circles in many respects." Rove has recently been at the center of a conservative firestorm over the announcement of his new group, Conservative Victory Project, which the New York Times explains will work "to recruit seasoned candidates and protect Senate incumbents from challenges by far-right conservatives and Tea Party enthusiasts." http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/02/09/fox-v... Levin also labeled Rove a "propagandist." well i'm really enjoying myself watching the flailing of those who were so uber-confident just a few months ago. as i'm sure we all are, or at least those of us(the majority) who matter.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|