Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1374819 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#815569 Dec 3, 2012
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Raising the taxes on the wealthiest is only one part of the equation you simple minded twit.
We also need to invest in infrastructure like roads and bridges that are necessary for commerce. Each $1 invested in infrastructure returns $1.44 to the GDP.
www.newsday.com › Opinion
Investment in education and research also have positive returns on investment whereas tax cuts for the wealthiest are a drain on the economy. At least when you put extra money in middle class workers' pockets which Obama did,they spend it and stimulate demand and growth.
So your answer is to spend our way out of debt? With this type of logic one has to wonder can any of you liberals even balance your checkbooks?
Impeach Obama

Virginia Beach, VA

#815570 Dec 3, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so what do conservatives nowadays say about those who complain about so called racism?
they call them racists.
Dems want everybody to believe that if they don't support Obama's policies, it's because they hate blacks. Same with Susan Rice. They say that the many black Republicans simply suffer from "white envy". They throw race into the equation every chance they get while accusing Republicans of being the "Party of Racists". Liberals are so full of sh't.
sonicfilter

United States

#815573 Dec 3, 2012
The Fiscal Legacy of George W. Bush

Putting all the numbers in the C.B.O. report together, we see that continuation of tax and budget policies and economic conditions in place at the end of the Clinton administration would have led to a cumulative budget surplus of $5.6 trillion through 2011 – enough to pay off the $5.6 trillion national debt at the end of 2000.

Tax cuts and slower-than-expected growth reduced revenues by $6.1 trillion and spending was $5.6 trillion higher, a turnaround of $11.7 trillion. Of this total, the C.B.O. attributes 72 percent to legislated tax cuts and spending increases, 27 percent to economic and technical factors. Of the latter, 56 percent occurred from 2009 to 2011.

Republicans would have us believe that somehow we could have avoided the recession and balanced the budget since 2009 if only they had been in charge. This would be a neat trick considering that the recession began in December 2007, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research.

They would also have us believe that all of the increase in debt resulted solely from higher spending, nothing from lower revenues caused by tax cuts. And they continually imply that one of the least popular spending increases of recent years, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, was an Obama administration program, when in fact it was a Bush administration initiative proposed by the Treasury Department that was signed into law by Mr. Bush on Oct. 3, 2008.

Lastly, Republicans continue to insist that tax cuts are highly stimulative, often saying that they add nothing to the debt, when this is obviously ridiculous.

Conversely, they are adamant that tax increases must not be part of any deficit-reduction package because they never reduce deficits and instead are spent. This is also ridiculous, as the experience of the Clinton administration clearly shows. The new C.B.O. data confirm these facts.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/12/...
sonicfilter

United States

#815574 Dec 3, 2012
Impeach Obama wrote:
<quoted text>Dems want everybody to believe that if they don't support Obama's policies, it's because they hate blacks. Same with Susan Rice. They say that the many black Republicans simply suffer from "white envy". They throw race into the equation every chance they get while accusing Republicans of being the "Party of Racists". Liberals are so full of sh't.
He's Back..."Colorblind" Herman Cain Plays the Race Card Banjo While Stumping to Republicans in New Hampshire

Like an expert at Three-card Monte or a proverbial "race pimp," Herman Cain expertly dealt from the bottom of the "race card" deck during a fund raising appearance before Republicans in Nashua, New Hampshire. There, Cain explained that white people should not have buyer's remorse over the election of Barack Obama, America's first black President. Instead, Cain suggested that (white) voters should realize that:

"...there are some people who will say,'I'm not going to vote for another black guy because this one didn't work out.' "And my response is,'Well, what about those 43 white guys you put in there? How did they work out?' "Don't condemn me because the first black one was bad."

The levels of hypocrisy demonstrated by Cain and his supporters in this moment are so glaring as to almost not merit comment for they are so utterly obvious. Presumably, Conservatives are colorblind. Yet, race is central--as it was in his minstrelesque CPAC speech several weeks ago--to Cain's performance. Again, Herman Cain suggests that he is "one of the good ones." Ultimately, Herman Cain is not like "those other blacks over there."

For a political ideology that ostensibly embraces individualism and rejects the politics of group identity, grievance, and victimology, it is ironic then that Cain has to signal that he is a different type of black man from President Barack Obama. That Cain needed to explain to a Republican audience that black folks are individuals, and not a nameless, faceless, horde of negritude that all walk lockstep like zombies is frightening to say the least--and a damning indictment of those that Cain would call political allies.

http://wearerespectablenegroes.blogspot.com/2...

Throwing race.
Impeach Obama

Virginia Beach, VA

#815575 Dec 3, 2012
Part of the new Defense Budget includes a clause which will ban returning veterans with head injuries or P.T.S.D. from owning firearms. The V.A. is currently required to submit the names of these veterans to the Criminal Background Check System. Supporters of the bill says it will cut down on suicides. Opponents say it will discourage veterans from seeking help. I say that no restriction is ever going to keep anybody from getting a gun.
GOPidiotsx

Melrose Park, IL

#815576 Dec 3, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, let's see if you answer these questions honestly:
Can you strengthen the weak by weakening the strong?
Can you lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer?
Can you help the poor by destroying the rich?
Can y
ou further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred?
Yes or No?
I know you haven't figured this out yet, so I'll help you out.
wage payer' AKA job creator is simply a euphemism for GOP donor.
The wealthy will hardly be destroyed by a marginal tax increase of 3%. It's the poor and working class that drive the economy by spending all their wages.
No business owner, faced with increased demand for goods will refuse to hire more workers.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#815577 Dec 3, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I heard that Mitch McConnell has vowed to make Obama a two-term President. Any truth to the rumor?
President Obama needs to be a three or four term President. Nobody can be expected to fix everything Bush screwed up in just eight years. America needs to repeal the antiquated 22nd Amendment, and the deadly 2nd Amendment too.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#815578 Dec 3, 2012
Impeach Obama wrote:
Part of the new Defense Budget includes a clause which will ban returning veterans with head injuries or P.T.S.D. from owning firearms. The V.A. is currently required to submit the names of these veterans to the Criminal Background Check System. Supporters of the bill says it will cut down on suicides. Opponents say it will discourage veterans from seeking help. I say that no restriction is ever going to keep anybody from getting a gun.
You advocate people with mental illness have guns? You must have a mental illness too.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#815579 Dec 3, 2012
Impeach Obama wrote:
<quoted text>Dems want everybody to believe that if they don't support Obama's policies, it's because they hate blacks. Same with Susan Rice. They say that the many black Republicans simply suffer from "white envy". They throw race into the equation every chance they get while accusing Republicans of being the "Party of Racists". Liberals are so full of sh't.
If this country was led by more people of color and less old white men we'd be a lot better off.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815580 Dec 3, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just a bunch of hogwash. How can that list published by someone you acknowledge as credible be wrapped in a lie if he wrote them?
You just keep backing yourself in a corner for argument's sake.
I don't acknowledge him as credible, never heard of him. That was tongue firmly in planted in cheek so naturally you missed it completely.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815581 Dec 3, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never heard of schizophrenics taking showers with exterminators.
Any numbers to go with that factoid?
You're so confused. Its late.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#815582 Dec 3, 2012
GOPidiotsx wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you haven't figured this out yet, so I'll help you out.
wage payer' AKA job creator is simply a euphemism for GOP donor.
The wealthy will hardly be destroyed by a marginal tax increase of 3%. It's the poor and working class that drive the economy by spending all their wages.
No business owner, faced with increased demand for goods will refuse to hire more workers.
If greedy corporations like Walmart and Mcdonalds would pay their slave workers a decent wage consumer spending would go up and the economy would improve dramatically. President Obama needs to look into the way these conglomerates treat their employees in the name of obscene profits and pass some legislation, like limiting CEO compensation. They're not going to do it on their own.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815583 Dec 3, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Raising taxes on the 1% with a $16 trillion debt, a higher than acceptable unemployment rate and additonal taxes and regulations levied on businesses in 2013 isn't going to matter without drastic cuts and major reforms.
This president is stifling the private sector, creating class warfare, proposing even more spending - and Obamacare is right around the corner. You honestly can't believe raising taxes on a mere 1% will make any difference or the middle class will be immune.
Evidently it IS an acceptable unemployment rate. Of course the right believes Obama defied history in being the only POTUS in history to be re-elected with unemployment so high (they're wrong of course but they tend to be wrong about anything to do with facts).

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815584 Dec 3, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
And you're living in La La Land if you think this country isn't in deep doo-doo with a $16 trillion debt and a president who wants to punish the private sector instead of provide incentives.
Changed the subject AGAIN.

Sheesh!
nj Jersey raider 1

United States

#815585 Dec 3, 2012
He's definately not like Barack Obama! Obama is 2for2. Herman is a measily 0 for 0. He couldn't defeat me in a presidential race. Someone please tell me how being a pizza store owner qualifies someone to be president. Might as well allow a shoe salesman be president next.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#815586 Dec 3, 2012
GOPidiotsx wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you haven't figured this out yet, so I'll help you out.
wage payer' AKA job creator is simply a euphemism for GOP donor.
The wealthy will hardly be destroyed by a marginal tax increase of 3%. It's the poor and working class that drive the economy by spending all their wages.
No business owner, faced with increased demand for goods will refuse to hire more workers.
An annual "Wealth Tax" on the super rich would fix the economy. Not just a tax in their income, but an annual tax on their wealth too. A 50% inheritance tax would also help and it would keep people like Rmoney, who inherited all his money, from ever getting rich and bankrupting all his companies to get even richer.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815587 Dec 3, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares? What's your point?
It should still be engraved into every Liberal/Socialist's forehead.
Always looking for fine print or some completely irrelevant tangent to pull a hissy fit with, eh? You need better bait, Dood.
If it doesn't matter why do y'all falsely attribute it to Lincoln? Why do y'all falsely attribute anything to anybody? Because y'all are so stupid if there isn't instant name recognition y'all don't know whether its a good thing or a bad thing and Lincoln just happens to be one of your favorites. Y'all do the same thing with communist rhetoric, it has to be Lenin, Marx, Stalin or a prominent Democrat saying it or y'all don't know its bad.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#815588 Dec 3, 2012
GOPidiotsx wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine all that, even with a top marginal tax rate of 90%. How did all the 'job creators' survive?
Deduction. Lots of deductions.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#815589 Dec 3, 2012
Impeach Obama wrote:
Part of the new Defense Budget includes a clause which will ban returning veterans with head injuries or P.T.S.D. from owning firearms. The V.A. is currently required to submit the names of these veterans to the Criminal Background Check System. Supporters of the bill says it will cut down on suicides. Opponents say it will discourage veterans from seeking help. I say that no restriction is ever going to keep anybody from getting a gun.
Nobody cares what you say. Your ignorent.
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#815590 Dec 3, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>If greedy corporations like Walmart and Mcdonalds would pay their slave workers a decent wage consumer spending would go up and the economy would improve dramatically. President Obama needs to look into the way these conglomerates treat their employees in the name of obscene profits and pass some legislation, like limiting CEO compensation. They're not going to do it on their own.
Yeah thats sounds great. Lets pay those with no skills even more for the skills that they do not have nor have the motivation to achieve.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Catasauqua Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 42 min Three Days 310,976
Vote For Donald Trump 5 hr Richard Kranium 4
News Get furnace checked or face a fine (Nov '14) 15 hr silly rabbit 68
Not Hillary Please 15 hr silly rabbit 4
News 15th Street rental project goes before Allentow... 21 hr silly rabbit 5
News Great Allentown Cleanups seeks volunteers Mon Richard Kranium 2
News Olympus Corporation Promotes Donna Miller to He... Sun Ainu 14
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Catasauqua Mortgages