Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311496 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275598 Jan 10, 2013
zef wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has the right to kill anybody, anywhere.
Yes we do.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973); McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010).

If you still disagree, then you can cite the case, statute, or section of the U.S. Code that says "[n]o one has the right to kill anybody, anywhere."

Get the corn cob out of your a$$ zef. This is not Utopia; it's the United States of America, and in the U.S.A., we have a right to kill.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275599 Jan 10, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
On the floor, or ground, usually. Though sometimes I have to stand on a step stool to reach everything in my kitchen that's above my reach.
Happy, Moron? Be more specific next time.
Since my support is of a woman's RIGHT to make her own choice, where I stand on all the various choices is irrelevant. What part of that don't you understand?
Still, since I haven't said, what you have done, is lied. You've put words in my mouth, when you don't KNOW my thoughts on the matter. Your lame, witless attempt at deflection won't change that.
In the past, you have also said partial birth abortion should be allowed because it isn't a baby until she breathes.

I would say you have an extreme position on abortion.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#275600 Jan 10, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!
Sentinence has NOTHING to do with being able to SAY something Lynne you MORON!!
OMG you're priceless in your ignorance!!
sen┬Ětient adj.
1. Having sense perception; conscious: "The living knew themselves just sentient puppets on God's stage" (T.E. Lawrence).
2. Experiencing sensation or feeling.
Since NOBODY has ever been born in a PVS (like you've lied about when you claimed it) if they're born and living, they're sentient.
Now, run off like a good puppy, and see if you can find a definition that suits you better, so you can argue about it for the next week or so. LOL
Foo: "Sentinence has NOTHING to do with being able to SAY something ."

You idiot. It's Junket who used the "saying something" as her argument.

I know what sentient is and proof of that is in my post following the one you took that sentence from. The post where I said,

~"A child on life support who is in a coma can't feel pain either. But is it okay to rip that child apart limb from limb? The obvious answer; NO.

It has nothing to do with whether or not the pain is known and felt. It's the ACT itself that's wrong, whether or not the victim is concious and can feel pain. "~

You have zero impulse control, like a child. You JUMP to post something just to argue with pro-lifers, and you don't ever know what you're talking about.

This time it's you jumping on your belief that I don't know what "sentient" means, when I do.

You made a raging fool of yourself again.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275601 Jan 10, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Before I was 6'3" tall, I had to be 5'0" tall.....and before that 1 foot tall.......and before that 1" tall......and before that a Tic Tac tall.
You discriminate to death based on size?
Hitler did it based on race.
Feel the desperation!

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#275602 Jan 10, 2013
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG it gets better and better!!
Who says that people in a coma cant feel pain?????
<quoted text>
An obvious answer to a MORONIC question.
Nobody's going to rip ANYONE living apart "limb from limb" when they're in a coma Lynne you jackwit!
^^^There she goes again, makiing a stupid fool of herself. The ignorant buffoon.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275603 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly how does that sound like an agreement? You said we "all" agree with it, so prove it. Show posts where we specifically stated we agree with it.
Looks to me like you're just trying to cover your ass by claiming that it "sounds like an agreement".
It is a new issue. If you respect the woman's right to choose for any reason and this would be a reason, than you support a woman's right to choose for gender selection. Otherwise you wouldn't be pro choice.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275604 Jan 10, 2013
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> This Katie is a Mother. Imagine?
I can't imagine her reaction to finding out that she was pregnant or during her pregnancy. Did she rub her belly and talk /sing to her unborn baby like most moms do? Did she get excited when her Dr said "katie, your baby is about this big....or that big.....or do you want to know the sex of your baby?". Did she :::gasp ::: the very first time that she felt her baby move/kick.(and all the other MILESTONES that Katie cherishes).
She's so cold.
So sayeth the "mother" who wishes her own daughter dead.
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275605 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Only to ignorant buffoons would ability to suffer or not suffer while being PUT TO DEATH, make some difference in the killing.
Normal people would be just as disturbed by the killing of children who were sentient, as those who lie helplessly in a bed unaware that someone is killing them.
So executions have moved from all kinds of torturous devices to hanging/shootings to lethal injections because "ability to suffer or not suffer while being PUT TO DEATH, make some difference in the killing[?]"

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275606 Jan 10, 2013
sassylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I am not impressed.
Now...
Question....did you ever sing or talk to your babies while in the womb?
How trivial; you're trying to validate your opinion of what's in a pregnant woman's womb, by appealing to what a mother would have called her unborn! That would almost be the same as if I told you about many women who called their unborn "this f*cking bastart," or ever expressed themselves by saying "get this sack of sh*t out of me now!"

Question; did you tell your "daughter in the womb" you'd wish her dead if she had an abortion when she grew up?

“It's all good!”

Since: Sep 09

Or it doesn't matter.

#275607 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course I understand what sentient is. I'm not like you people. I actually understand the terms and understand what I read.
I posted about a non-sentient child on life support TEMPORARILY, because the non-sentience of the human life in utero is only temporary, and do you thiunk it would be okay to just kill that person because they're temporarily unconcious and can't feel anything?
You can take that and your stupidity to the bank, pea brain.
I know you are not a brain-dead buffoon, but you come across as one. What exactly is a "non-sentient" child that temporarily requires life support. A z/e/f?

Your ability to post without insulting others casts you in a poor light, LynneD.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275608 Jan 10, 2013
sassyliciouus wrote:
God says no to sex before marriage. I think he knows what he's talking about. I think it's sad when we dont listen. Going against our loving God brings self inflict hardships. Unfortunately, young kids are exposed to sex shoved down their throats.....movies tv shows (that most of the time the Parents allow) and divorced parents living with or spending sleepovers with their S.O. These kids think having casual sex is normal..My suggestion would be to address that and we won't have to worry about pregnant teens.
Your approach is useless to kids . Sex is beautiful within the boundaries thst God set up for us. I don't believe scaring the crap out of a teenager is affective
.<quoted text>
Maybe when marriage gets a little tough sometimes but not unsolveable, they should think about the example they are setting for their children. Don't you think people give up on their marriages much too easily.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275609 Jan 10, 2013
Tom Tom wrote:
<quoted text>
More of your anti-Chrisitan hate. I am sure your Rabbi is proud of his little faux member.
Very.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275610 Jan 10, 2013
elise in burque wrote:
<quoted text>You answered your own question. It's none of your business nor anyone else's why the woman wants an abortion. Therefore it isn't an issue. If one has a problem with one reason or another, one doesn't have to abort a pregnancy for that reason. Why do you keep asking?
You would be one that would say whatever reason is okay.

See Katie?

“It's all good!”

Since: Sep 09

Or it doesn't matter.

#275611 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Foo: "Sentinence has NOTHING to do with being able to SAY something ."
You idiot. It's Junket who used the "saying something" as her argument.
I know what sentient is and proof of that is in my post following the one you took that sentence from. The post where I said,
~"A child on life support who is in a coma can't feel pain either. But is it okay to rip that child apart limb from limb? The obvious answer; NO.
It has nothing to do with whether or not the pain is known and felt. It's the ACT itself that's wrong, whether or not the victim is concious and can feel pain. "~
You have zero impulse control, like a child. You JUMP to post something just to argue with pro-lifers, and you don't ever know what you're talking about.
This time it's you jumping on your belief that I don't know what "sentient" means, when I do.
You made a raging fool of yourself again.
Please do not mischaracterize my post. I said nothing of the sort. I stated "sentient", nothing more, nothing less. Rusty, btw is the man that married Andrea, and for whatever reason believed that her post partum depression (if that's what it was) would be cured with a good dose of "Eve was evil" and of course another baby (Mary) in her arms. Guess he was wrong.
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275612 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ink claimed we "all agree" with it so let her dig herself out of her own shitpile and prove it.
Let's see ink pull up posts from "all" of us clearly stating that we "agree" with it.
And BTW, you've asked me this a couple of times before and then ignored my answers.
Elise already said any reason is fine. So has Bitner. If you dfeel different, say so.

“2014 TDF”

Since: Mar 09

Boca Raton, FL.

#275613 Jan 10, 2013
Forum carlsbad nm wrote:
Ask the babies if they would like to live.
"Baby, do you want to live?"

Wahh Wahh Wahh!!!!

Sorry, speak English; do you want to live?

Wahh Wahh Wahh!!!
Katie

Seattle, WA

#275614 Jan 10, 2013
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"I cry when I read about how hard he fought."
You HYPOCRITE!
You people have spent countless pages arguing that {manner of death} doesn't matter, because the END RESULT is the same; death. There you are proving [manner of death] DOES matter, and are proving why it matters.
It matters just as much when a fetus dies by natural causes or is killed by abortion. The result is the same, the MANNER OF DEATH is the difference. You just proved it with your own words.
Boneheads.
Your anger is misplaced.
As is your "argument".

Do you know how to properly debate?
Or just fling ad homs like monkeys fling sh*t?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275615 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
I find it a bit ironic that for the women 'who never wanted to GET pregnant in the first place' made the decision to have sex with a man. If they truly never want to get pregnant, the most logical solution is not to have sex with a man.
What planet are you from?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#275616 Jan 10, 2013
BraveCon wrote:
<quoted text>
I would say that every time a woman has sex she should expect to get pregnant. Being shocked that you've become pregnant, even though you're taking contraceptives or the man always uses condoms, still shouldn't shock any woman because having sex with a man always carries with it the possibility of pregnancy.
So the reality is no pregnany is truly 'unplanned' or 'unwanted'.
Any sexually active woman who is shocked by pregnancy is really either pretty naive about sex or just pretty stupid.
Who says a woman is shocked when she gets pregnant? The fact is that she doesn't have to stay pregnant if she doesn't want to. Why do you think you have a right to make law forcing her to stay pregnant against her will?
Ink

Bensalem, PA

#275617 Jan 10, 2013
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
You made the claim that we "all agree" with it. You do the work to prove it. Show a post for each of us stating that we each "agree" with it. We don't have to shit for you.
If you don't think that gender selection is acceptable, say so.

Otherwise supporting abortion on demand includes aborting one sex for the other.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Catasauqua Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min Obama is a joke 1,406,600
News Cops: Pa. Woman Laced Baby's Formula With Drug ... 9 hr palumpskioxicandyman 7
News Nassau County Court and Family Court judges (Nov '08) 15 hr LAWYERS GONE WILD 82
News Pa. Arson Suspects: Ghosts Ordered Barn Fire 15 hr silly rabbit 16
Construction to start on 33-story Allentown Lan... (Jun '15) 15 hr silly rabbit 16
News Muhlenberg withdraws honorary degree to Cosby (Oct '15) Fri silly rabbit 10
News Allentown police working to improve community r... Fri silly rabbit 23

Catasauqua Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Catasauqua Mortgages