Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 310476 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267201 Nov 30, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you didn't prove it. Sorry. LOL, how am I supposed to prove what I meant other than by telling you it's what I meant? Oh, please, do give me a suggestion, Moron. What do you want, a CT scan of my brain at the time I posted? What a loon you are.@@
Now, are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere?
People who post lies can't ever prove what they claim. People who don't post lies, can prove what they claim.

Your claim about what you supposedly meant is proven untrue by the mere fact that Doc's statement is too clear for anyone to misread. Therefore, you can't claim you meant you wouldn't say you supported abortion, when he made it very clear that's NOT what he was saying. He was saying RIGHT TO ABORTION.

That's 1st. Your claim about what you meant is senseless and desperate.

Next is your claim, "This particular conversation started when I said of course I support a woman's right to have an abortion, and was accused of lying because earlier, someone said, I had stated that I did not support her right to do so. "

That IS something you could prove if it were true. Go back before you made the post saying you wouldn't say what's not true, and find the post where "this particular conversation started", and prove you made a post saying you support a woman's right to abortion, and then the post accusing you of lying about it.

If you think saying that you don't have to find those posts, you know they're there, or anything equally inept is going to prove anything but that you can't prove your claims, you're nuts.

I have found posts needed to prove my claims about what people have posted here, because I know what I read here, and know what I've posted. You're able to do the same IF what you claim is the truth.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267202 Nov 30, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't lied. That's why I keep saying it, because it's true.
But, we all know you're just deflecting from your dishonesty. Apparently, in your warped mind, if you can prove I've lied it somehow mitigates your own dishonesty. It doesn't.
Now, are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere?
I don't need to deflect from anything, I'm not the one who hasn't provided posts to prove my own claims. That's you, and you're the one deflecting with your childishness and obsessiveness.

You can SAY you haven't lied until you're blue in the face. It's not true, it's not proof, and I know it as well as you do.
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#267203 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, why is it that when truth about what you've posted is provided,(your posts in your words), and you people argue and try to claim it's not proof of what you've posted, that it's something you pro-choicers want us to move on from?
While you people post lies about what you've posted and about pro-lifers posted, you don't provide proof of your claims of what's been posted and pro-choicers keep posting lies about what was supposedly posted years ago, and none of you move on from that?
I do understand why you pro-choicers would want us to move on from the proof we provide of the stupidity and lies you people post. It's not going to happen, but I do get why you'd want us to.
I answered a hypothetical of exact moment fetus becomes baby. There is no *exact* moment, it's a process. IF there were an *exact* moment, I'd say it was after delivery, after cord is cut and baby breathing. I'd say this based on the medical fact that a stillborn is technically a dead fetus because it didn't breathe. We all call stillborns babies, but technically it's a dead fetus.

So you keep going on about it and acting like you've exposed something horrid and awful about me. Act like you're exposing some deranged "truth" about me. All you do is expose yourself.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267204 Nov 30, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Again for the stupid bitch Lynne D:
ITS THE EXACT SAME PROCEDURE. YOu can call it whatever the hell you want, but the MEDICAL FACT is that the D&C as an abortion is the SAME MEDICAL PROCEDURE as the D&C used to evacuate the uterus after a miscarriage.
An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo, resulting in or caused by its death.
A miscarriage is an abortion. A miscarriage where the dead fetus is not expelled is still a pregnancy, and the D&C used to expel the dead fetus is the SAME PROCEDURE used to expel a LIVE fetus from a first trimester abortion D&C.
Call it a cumquat. Its the same thing.
<quoted text>
Lynne, Skanky doesn't know more than I do on this topic. Hell, she doesn't know more than the average 6th grader about it. For that matter, neither do you. The ONLY ones looking stupid here are you and the Skank.
You can post whatever bullshit you want, Toots. You claimed a D&C after a miscarriage is an "abortion procedure", we said it's not, which you idiots kept arguing back then. It's still a DILATION and CURETTAGE procedure which is what we said, no matter what it's used for. It won't be listed as "an abortion procedure" after miscarriage, it's not medically considered an abortion procedure after a miscarriage, because the pregnancy already spontaneously aborted. Doctors don't perform abortions for what already spontaneously aborted, dimwit. You can act like you knew this all along, but you're looking more stupid each time you try.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267205 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"Move the hell ON already. Dont you get tired of making an ass of yourself day in and day out? The ONLY thing you've proven is that you're an obsessive/compulsive mess."
Yet another example posted by you of a psychological projection. Do you ever tire of posting psychological projection? Apparently not, as you do it constantly.
LOL Sorry Lynniekins, much as you WANT that to be true, it simply isn't. Good try tho ya pathetic thing.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267206 Nov 30, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I'm not demanding. I'm getting a great deal of pleasure watching you squirm, actually. It's amusing. But still, I'm just asking.
Now, are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere?
LOL! I'M squirming? Toots, I've been OWNING you this whole time and it's you squirming from the lies you posted that I proved were lies.

I don't care about any of your questions because I've already said I'm not Lynne. There's nothing for me to squirm about. I don't care how else you word it, I don't care what you think or believe. That's your dysfunction to deal with, not mine to deal with.

I've left the question alone every time you've posted it since I answered the question you asked from the beginning, because it displays in such a glorious fashion what an obsessed nutcase you really are. lol

Your constant posting of your stupid question doesn't do a thing to prove that what I post is untrue.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267207 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"Aren't you usually the militant one insisting nobody has a right to tell you how or what to post? Such a hypocrite."
I told you what you replied to, MC, because you posted a reply that wasn't about the post, and gave advice on how NOT to make yourself look ignorant.
I already said how they're different medically. One is induced, one is spontaneous. They're as different as a person dying from a heart attack and one being shot in the heart.
If you can't see a difference in the MANNER OF DEATH, then you're hopeless.
Dead is dead Lynne you dumbass. BOTH are abortions.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267208 Nov 30, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>And given that's roughly when you dropped out (by 1970's standards) of course that's the best you can come up with. Its clear that's when you're intelligence level stopped Lynne.
If you're talking about me, prove I ever posted I dropped out of school in junior high. If you're talking about Lynne, prove she posted she dropped out of school in junior high.

As I said, your mentality and insults are of an intelligence level no higher than junior high, and your accusations are always just lies.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267209 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You can post whatever bullshit you want, Toots. You claimed a D&C after a miscarriage is an "abortion procedure", we said it's not, which you idiots kept arguing back then. It's still a DILATION and CURETTAGE procedure which is what we said, no matter what it's used for. It won't be listed as "an abortion procedure" after miscarriage, it's not medically considered an abortion procedure after a miscarriage, because the pregnancy already spontaneously aborted. Doctors don't perform abortions for what already spontaneously aborted, dimwit. You can act like you knew this all along, but you're looking more stupid each time you try.
AGAIN for Lynne the MORON.

What's its "listed as" is immaterial you idiot. ITS THE SAME PROCEDURE. Nobody cares what its "listed as".

An abortion procedure is STILL an abortion procedure no matter WHAT procedure is being done. ITS THE SAME PROCEDURE.

You can twist and spin all you want Lynne, but you're just making yourself look ........

well, as usual. Like an idiot. Same shit, different day.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267210 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
You let him know? Two hours after I asked in the post where your above response applies? Gee, thanks.
He replied about my post, I responded only when I was here and as soon as I saw his post. You're welcome, MC.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267211 Nov 30, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I'm not pretending that. I'm saying outright that my second sentence was not about his comment at all, but the earlier charges, from the conversation as a whole, that I support abortion. That is a fact.
Again, how would you suggest I "prove what I meant" other than by saying so, Moron?
Now, are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere?
"No, I'm not pretending that. I'm saying outright that my second sentence was not about his comment at all, but the earlier charges, from the conversation as a whole, that I support abortion. That is a fact."

Prove it was about the earlier charges. You replied to HIS post, not to the earlier charges with the statement that you wouldn't say what's not true. If you were replying to the earlier charges, why would you do so in a post where Doc stated "RIGHT to abortion"? Doesn't make sense, and it doesn't make sense because it's not true.

People who aren't pro-choicers here aren't stupid.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267212 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! I'M squirming? Toots, I've been OWNING you this whole time and it's you squirming from the lies you posted that I proved were lies.
I don't care about any of your questions because I've already said I'm not Lynne. There's nothing for me to squirm about. I don't care how else you word it, I don't care what you think or believe. That's your dysfunction to deal with, not mine to deal with.
I've left the question alone every time you've posted it since I answered the question you asked from the beginning, because it displays in such a glorious fashion what an obsessed nutcase you really are. lol
Your constant posting of your stupid question doesn't do a thing to prove that what I post is untrue.
Lynniekins, the ONLY thing you "OWN" is your narcissistic behavior. Hell bitch, you can't even OWN you history here. You're a COWARD and EVERYONE knows it.

Do you think if you keep repeating the same tired phrase, someone will believe you? That it will magically become true? ROFLMAO! Please, you're ONLY kidding yourself, and you can't even OWN that.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267213 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The one regarding D&Cs that I was not discussing. You, yourself, just chastised me for it. Short-term memory problems or too lazy to look for yourself?
Katie, you're an idiot who plays word games because you never know what you're talking about.

There was no false premise.

You replied to a post about D&Cs, and claimed your response had nothing to do with D&Cs. You then made a post to me about D&Cs asking a ridiculous hypothetical question.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267214 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're talking about me, prove I ever posted I dropped out of school in junior high. If you're talking about Lynne, prove she posted she dropped out of school in junior high.
As I said, your mentality and insults are of an intelligence level no higher than junior high, and your accusations are always just lies.
Read for CONTEXT stupid Lynnie. LOLOLOLOL!!!

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#267215 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're talking about me, prove I ever posted I dropped out of school in junior high. If you're talking about Lynne, prove
You ARE the same OP that posted as Lynne D. That is not up for debate Lynne. Its known by EVERYONE and you prove it the more you babble on.

Carry on stupid.
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#267216 Nov 30, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dead is dead Lynne you dumbass. BOTH are abortions.
She and NR make a big deal outta nothing. Manner of death does not change the medical definition of death. Just like manner of abortion does not change the medical definition of abortion.

But boy they're sure desperately wanting it to mean something.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267217 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you'll have no problem proving death by gunshot is medically defined differently than death by heart attack. So far you've described two different causes of death.
Of course death by gunshot is defined differently medically than death by heart attack, and easily proven.

http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.c...
"gunshot wound (GSW),
penetration of the body by a bullet...", dimwit. Heart attack wouldn't say that.

Just like a spontaneous abortion is a different "cause of death" than an induced abortion and is defined differently medically.
Katie

Federal Way, WA

#267218 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie, you're an idiot who plays word games because you never know what you're talking about.
There was no false premise.
You replied to a post about D&Cs, and claimed your response had nothing to do with D&Cs. You then made a post to me about D&Cs asking a ridiculous hypothetical question.
You asked my input and I provided it. I try to ignore your insults. But sometimes it's easier than others. I was only commenting to NR about his mistaken belief that induced and spontaneous abortions were different abortions. Medically speaking, an abortion is the end of pregnancy prior to term. The manner of abortion is not being defined. Only what abortion is... and that's the end of pregnancy prior to term.

Got it finally?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267219 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that so? Do you mean your posts to sound so ugly? Why bother if you have no interest? What do you get out of it? Is Foo right?
Yes, I do mean for my posts to sound as they do. You're not someone who is deserving of any respect by me, and you won't be getting any. Don't like it, tough. I don't like how you've posted to me or others.

I bother to prove what a bunch of arrogant, lying little twits people [here] who are pro-CHOICE and who support the right to abortion are, and I do it for anyone who has intelligence and integrity in discussion who happens upon this thread and reads the posts.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#267220 Nov 30, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text> Where does it state I said "cure". I understand my post perfectly you're the one who does not.
I misspoke. I apologize.

See how easy that was? That's what people do when they misspeak. They acknowledge it [to the person] they misspoke about when that person is here, and the one who misspoke apologizes for having said something that was incorrect.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Catasauqua Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min TSM 1,275,086
Review: Majestic Interiors Inc (Feb '09) 50 min Former employee 34
Is 40 Below the best club in the Lehigh Valley?? (Apr '08) 15 hr Lucy 74
News 'Skeevy' man who groped teen he met at church c... 18 hr silly rabbit 1
Silly Rabbit has ruined this Topix Forum 21 hr silly rabbit 26
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) Thu Norbert of Norview 71,944
News Upside Allentown strengthens NIZ neighborhoods Thu silly rabbit 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Catasauqua Mortgages