Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 314719 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266883 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what I told you idiots from the beginning.
A D&C is a dilation and curettage, no matter what it's used for. It's not "an abortin procedure" as you prochoicers have claimed it is, since it's used for many other uterine issues as well, not relating to pregnancy. I've already proven you've called it an abortion procedure.
It was you ignorant pro-choice buffoons calling it an "abortion" procedure when used after miscarriage, and you were wrong. I said it was a dilation and curettage procedure regardless of what it's used for, and medically a D&C would not be called an abortion procedure when used for incomplete miscarriage.
You try to say what I've said all along about it; that a D&C is a D&C and not say it's an abortion procedure, as you have said before? What a bunch of fools you are to think that your posts with the truth of you views, claims and arguments can't be brought up to show you're claiming something different now than you did back when the discussions took place before.
Lily to Foo: It was you ignorant pro-choice buffoons calling it an "abortion" procedure when used after miscarriage, and you were wrong.
__________

NR: In one D&C scenerio, preborn baby is alive & intentionally & directly killed (abortion). In the other situation, the preborn baby died naturally, & D&C removes his body.

Katie: So? Abortion is abortion is abortion regardless. It's the ending of pregnancy prior to term.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833 ...

Derp.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266884 Nov 30, 2012
Kenose wrote:
<quoted text>
You know what you did, you deceitful abortroll. You're a liar and a scumbag, at best. Have a wonderful day.
Where's your proof? Non-existant. See how valuable the ability to prove what someone posted is? I know the value and is why I can and will always prove my claims of what someone posted with post numbers and the post.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266885 Nov 30, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>His point makes no sense anyway. Providing the means to prevent pregnancy is what PP is there for and of course healthcare and testing. But actually taking birth control as prescribed is the responsibility of the person it is prescribed to. If that isn't done 100% of the time then logically there are going to be unwanted pregnancies resulting in abortion. It is no way the fault of the physician and if he were actually or had ever been a med student at one time he would know this.
Um, what Planned Parenthood claims and what reality demonstrates don't add up. Maybe you should talk to PP and tell them to pipe down on their false claims & advertising? TIA.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266886 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes you have, and I can prove it just as easily now as I have before.
You lied when you claimed you did NOT support a woman's (right) to abortion, OR when you later claimed you DID support a woman's (right) to abortion, because those 2 views contradict one another. You're lying in saying one or the other.
I challenge you to now deny you said BOTH of those things. I have the proof that you did.
I never said "I don't support a woman's right to have an abortion". There is no proof that I did.

Now, are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere?

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266887 Nov 30, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>If she says nothing at all, in her mind it doesn't mean a damn thing lol.
10 Ways to Avoid the Truth Without Lying
1. Change the subject.
2. Tell a preferably-long, possibly-"cute," supposedly-related-subject anecdote.
3. Use the always-reliable "I'm sorry but we are out of time."
4. Delegate the matter to someone else, pass the buck or blame another person.
5. Answer the question with another possibly-rhetorical question.
6. Don't say anything. Sometimes, silence is the best option available.
7. Simply avoid the people who may ask the questions you do not want to answer.
8. Give a mumbo-jumbo, rambling, impossible-to-decipher response.
9. Use legal "crutches."
10. Appeal to people's sense of loyalty, patriotism, and responsibility, rather than answering any questions or directly confronting the issue at hand.
LOL, takes a pro-choicer to post "ways to avoid the truth". ALL things pro-choicers have done here.

I have answered that question, Toots, Bitner's lying, again.

No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266888 Nov 30, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
And this tells you the practice is 51.5% abortions? LMAO!! Don't you know the Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of tax payer funds for abortions, except for those in the case of rape and incest? How much do you think an abortion costs, as compared to a pap smear, or a breast cancer screening, or a pack of lo-ovral, for which the guvmnt already has negotiated reduced pricing?
<quoted text>
Well, if you're going to throw lifenews.com at me as your source of authority, allow me to dismiss it as quickly as you would dismiss if I threw plannedparenthood.org at you as the source of mine.
I say this, because it was lifenews.com the site that chanted the proverbial "victory" on the SCOTUS ruling on the HHS issue, when victory has not even gotten her bra on for the party.
Try again.
1) CD: And this tells you the practice is 51.5% abortions? LMAO!!

Um, as I said already, it tells you that 52.5% of PP's operating income is from abortions.(you know, the bottom line?$ Cha-Ching $)

2)CD: Well, if you're going to throw lifenews.com at me as your source of authority, allow me to dismiss it as quickly as you would dismiss if I threw plannedparenthood.org at you as the source of mine.

Actually, I cited PP's 2010 services document several times yesterday.

3) Have at it: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/P...

Derp.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266889 Nov 30, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Or, you can do what she does, and say you've already answered the question, when what you answered was a question that was worded in such a way it doesn't have the same meaning.
Example: "Are you Lynne"? That question can be answered honestly with a no, because her name is NOT Lynne.
However, the question "Are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere?" is a different question, one she has NEVER answered.
She thinks she's fooling people, but is only highlighting her own dishonesty.
You people have worded the question several different ways. I have answered the same answer all along. I'm not Lynne.

You can obsess all you want about it, change the wording any which way you want and you'll still get the same answer, because the question is stupid no matter how you word it, and it has already been answered no matter how it's worded.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#266890 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
"No one should be disputing what a D&C is."
Yet pro-choicers have disputed what a D&C is. That's the issue. Anyone who tries to argue that a D&C is not just a dilation and curettage procedure to treat an incomplete miscarriage to prevent sepsis, and claims it's an abortion after miscarriage in early pregnancy,(like you have claimed) is wrong, and is proving they aren't credible to state facts in what they post. Something pro-choicers here prove on a daily basis.
It isn't an issue. You just fancy it as some monumental turning point in the discussion of abortion. It's not. Relax.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266891 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
So? Abortion is abortion is abortion regardless. It's the ending of pregnancy prior to term. You'll never be faced with that type of decision nor will you befriend any woman who has ... unless she's been indoctrinated into your cult-like thinking. jmo
Doctors don't perform abortions on what already spontaneously aborted. They treat to prevent infection.

There's no "so?" about it. Either you people know the facts or you don't, and you keep displaying you don't.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266892 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
NR, terminating pregnancy prior to term is called an abortion. In the long run it doesn't matter if it's spontaneous or induced. Abortion is a cure for pending rupture of embryo implanted outside the uterus. Embryo may be super healthy and going strong, but once it outgrows its space, it'll rupture, more than likely cause the woman to bleed internally and cause other internal injuries. If it's aborted prior to this point, do you still equate it with blowing off gramma's head?
Katie: NR, terminating pregnancy prior to term is called an abortion. In the long run it doesn't matter if it's spontaneous or induced.

In the long run, we're all dead. Doesn't mean I can shoot grandma's head off w/ a 12 guage shot gun.

Spontaneous: Grandma dies naturally.

Indused: Katie shoots grandma's head off w/ a shot gun.

Spontaneous: miscarriage

Indused: sharp curette, forceps, suction dismember & intentionally kill preborn baby.
________

Derp.

“Proud to be a Wiccan Priest”

Since: Jul 09

Jonesboro AR

#266893 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
Just 25 minutes ago, Katie called a D&C following a miscarriage an "abortion."
----------
NR: In one D&C scenerio, preborn baby is alive & intentionally & directly killed (abortion). In the other situation, the preborn baby died naturally, & D&C removes his body.
Katie: So? Abortion is abortion is abortion regardless. It's the ending of pregnancy prior to term.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Derp.
Ahh are antichoice fools still not getting it? No kidding, huh?

At the end of the day. You, myyself, and any one else not the woman does not get a say as to what or which decision she makes..

DURRRRR

That is your argument really.. Arguing over the reasoning or why it was/is some time necessary is just a an act of futility.

Roe V Wade makes it clear that the woman owns her decision. Not you, me or any one else. The case in Ireland point out the very real reason why Roe V Wade is necessary.

But then you little idiots, there is no the polite way to describe you fools, want to control a woman decision. It really is not religious either, in my opinion. It is really being frustrated that you can not control people at all.

And I say GOOOD!
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266894 Nov 30, 2012
*induced*

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266895 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, takes a pro-choicer to post "ways to avoid the truth". ALL things pro-choicers have done here.
I have answered that question, Toots, Bitner's lying, again.
You have never answered this question; Are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere? Are you saying you have answered THAT question? Because if you are, then you HAVE posted a direct lie.

What YOU'VE answered is the question "Are you Lynne?". And of course, no you're not, because that is not your real name.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266896 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
You people have worded the question several different ways. I have answered the same answer all along. I'm not Lynne.
You can obsess all you want about it, change the wording any which way you want and you'll still get the same answer, because the question is stupid no matter how you word it, and it has already been answered no matter how it's worded.
Of course you're not Lynne. That is not your name. We all know that.

However, you have NEVER answered the question "Are you the same person who used to post here on Topix under the screen names of LynneD and Persevere? Not once have you answered it. You've danced around it, as you're doing now.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266897 Nov 30, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
A treatment is not necessarily a cure.
Where did I used the word "cure"? I didn't. I have always said treatment.

NR said "cure" but he just misspoke, which was obvious since he used the word "treatment" in the paragraph prior.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266898 Nov 30, 2012
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
NR, terminating pregnancy prior to term is called an abortion. In the long run it doesn't matter if it's spontaneous or induced. Abortion is a cure for pending rupture of embryo implanted outside the uterus. Embryo may be super healthy and going strong, but once it outgrows its space, it'll rupture, more than likely cause the woman to bleed internally and cause other internal injuries. If it's aborted prior to this point, do you still equate it with blowing off gramma's head?
Katie regarding ectopic pregnancy: If it's aborted prior to this point, do you still equate it with blowing off gramma's head?

Yes.

And the links I provided explain why. Of course, that would require you to read the one-page links. But, alas.....
________

Derp.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266899 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
-------
Just 25 minutes ago, Katie called a D&C following a miscarriage an "abortion."
----------
NR: In one D&C scenerio, preborn baby is alive & intentionally & directly killed (abortion). In the other situation, the preborn baby died naturally, & D&C removes his body.
Katie: So? Abortion is abortion is abortion regardless. It's the ending of pregnancy prior to term.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833...
Derp.
Exactly, but do you think Ayakaneo will pick up on that? I doubt it. If she does, she'll ignore it and try to come back again claiming no pro-choicer has ever said that.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266900 Nov 30, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Lily to Foo: It was you ignorant pro-choice buffoons calling it an "abortion" procedure when used after miscarriage, and you were wrong.
__________
NR: In one D&C scenerio, preborn baby is alive & intentionally & directly killed (abortion). In the other situation, the preborn baby died naturally, & D&C removes his body.
Katie: So? Abortion is abortion is abortion regardless. It's the ending of pregnancy prior to term.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/abortion/T833 ...
Derp.
Think Ayakaneo will understand what's posted? I doubt it.

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#266901 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's your proof? Non-existant. See how valuable the ability to prove what someone posted is? I know the value and is why I can and will always prove my claims of what someone posted with post numbers and the post.
You take yourself way too seriously, sweetheart. This is Topix, for crying out loud. Tell me, how valuable is what you post here? What do you do in real life that an internet forum is somber business? Pulleeze...

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266902 Nov 30, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did I used the word "cure"? I didn't. I have always said treatment.
NR said "cure" but he just misspoke, which was obvious since he used the word "treatment" in the paragraph prior.
Then why did you respond to the question "Who said abortion is a CURE for a miscarriage", with "You did, Fool", when what the other poster had responded to was the word treatment?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Catasauqua Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Cheech the Conser... 1,549,434
weaponX is just silly rabbit 2 hr Muhamd the Profart 28
News Pa. man accused of showing up drunk at work get... 4 hr Wow123434 1
News Penns dad sentenced after allowing daughter to ... 5 hr sally Smegma 10
News Allentown mayor vetoes bill putting term limits... 7 hr weaponX 6
News Insider's Guide: Exploring Bethlehem's National... 8 hr weaponX 1
anyone remember Herpse elementary school on 5th... (Jun '11) 13 hr weaponX 11

Catasauqua Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Catasauqua Mortgages