Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313988 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266608 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Lynne, YOUR list of LIES is almost 7 years long and began the day you started posting here in 2006, and continues to this day - so the irony of your bitching about what you THINK are lies from me is amusing at best. LOL!!
I may have made a few mistakes when I was posting about this back then, but I wasn't then, and am not now trying to exploit that girl for ANY reason.
YOU on the other hand are MORE than willing to in order to use her as a 'weapon' in your pitiful and pretty pathetic arsenal against me. So have at it Lynne and your suck fellow suck buddies, that you think its an appropriate thing to do says MUCH more about you than your percieved "lies" about me.
Have a good day all!! I'm off to help set up for what I'm hoping will be a rockin estate sale this weekend!
You didn't make mistakes, Toots, you lied. I'm not using anyone as a weapon. You exploited this girl here. I have only been using your own words posted as proof that you lie. The only weapon used against you are your own lying posts. Trying to USE Ariel the way you're doing now, trying to claim any of my posts are about her and using that excuse to try to shield yourself against the things we've proven about you and your lies is just more exploitation of her, by YOU.

As for lies I supposedly posted, again, where are they? Where's your proof that I posted lies.

You bring up stupidity that proves you can't read for comprehension, and that's the best you've been able to do.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266609 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
@@ No what's "sick" are idiots like you still trying to exploit that girl over two years later as a way to "get" to me. And you FAIL at that too.
What's STUPID is expecting that I'd post anything after the way you freaks react to someone trying to help someone else. Some people asked in private, and what was going on was shared in private. After all, its not like you or Lynne gave a shit beyond what you thought you could use it for your own agenda.
Its kind of like your "religion" that way, you only break it out when you want to weild it as a weapon, otherwise, you can't be bothered.
You lied & embellished the situation of a 20 y/o for your own perverse gain.

Now, you try to blame YOUR abnormal behavior on others.

Which.....is typical for you and your kind.

It's always somebody else's fault..........
grumpy

Pomona, NY

#266610 Nov 28, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text> Apostolic Tradition
The biblical teaching that birth control is wrong is found even more explicitly among the Church Fathers, who recognized the biblical and natural law principles underlying the condemnation.
In A.D. 195, Clement of Alexandria wrote, "Because of its divine institution for the propagation of man, the seed is not to be vainly ejaculated, nor is it to be damaged, nor is it to be wasted" (The Instructor of Children 2:10:91:2).
Hippolytus of Rome wrote in 255 that "on account of their prominent ancestry and great property, the so-called faithful [certain Christian women who had affairs with male servants] want no children from slaves or lowborn commoners,[so] they use drugs of sterility or bind themselves tightly in order to expel a fetus which has already been engendered" (Refutation of All Heresies9:12).
Around 307 Lactantius explained that some "complain of the scantiness of their means, and allege that they have not enough for bringing up more children, as though, in truth, their means were in [their] power ... or God did not daily make the rich poor and the poor rich. Wherefore, if any one on any account of poverty shall be unable to bring up children, it is better to abstain from relations with his wife" (Divine Institutes 6:20).
The First Council of Nicaea, the first ecumenical council and the one that defined Christís divinity, declared in 325, "If anyone in sound health has castrated himself, it behooves that such a one, if enrolled among the clergy, should cease [from his ministry], and that from henceforth no such person should be promoted. But, as it is evident that this is said of those who willfully do the thing and presume to castrate themselves, so if any have been made eunuchs by barbarians, or by their masters, and should otherwise be found worthy, such men this canon admits to the clergy" (Canon 1).
Augustine wrote in 419, "I am supposing, then, although you are not lying [with your wife] for the sake of procreating offspring, you are not for the sake of lust obstructing their procreation by an evil prayer or an evil deed. Those who do this, although they are called husband and wife, are not; nor do they retain any reality of marriage, but with a respectable name cover a shame. Sometimes this lustful cruelty, or cruel lust, comes to this, that they even procure poisons of sterility [oral contraceptives]" (Marriage and Concupiscence 1:15:17).
The Pope suggested that male prostitutes use condoms. Doesn't that indicate the Pope allows sex for pleasure and profit?
And birth control if a woman happens to use the services of a male protitute.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266611 Nov 28, 2012
The only arsenal against you, Foo, are your own posts filled with lies. The subject matter of your posts is irrelevant to that, except to distinguish which topic you were posting about when you posted particular lies. The only thing any of us has done in mentioning Ariel is distinguishing which subject matter these particular lies you posted were about.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266612 Nov 28, 2012
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
And the fact remains that I don't "support" the choices. I support a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own choice. Period.
I'm sorry you're too stupid to understand.
Bhitler: I don't "support" the choices. I support a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own choice.

You are only kidding yourself.

The frontal lobe of your brain is misfiring.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266613 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow...have to explain everything to you fools.
Ayakaneo: "Well yes you have, if you don't say it's your opinion then you're declaring it as a fact."
No, it's not. Anyone with an IQ above double digits knows that a fact is something you can prove. Without proof, it's only opinion. It's pro-choice ignorant buffoons who think that just by declaring someone is who they declare, that it makes it a fact. I'm not one of those people.
You're not one of those people with an IQ in the double digits. If you don't know for a fact someone is not posting as another then don't accuse or make assumptions LYNNED cuz it just makes you look a fool.
lil Lily wrote:
Foo posted: "...as the other girl is a minor, and isn't being very forthcoming, and her parents aren't helping so far."
MEANING: The "minor" (no age given and could have been 17 for all we know), wasn't with Ariel when Foo posted about this. She was already with her parents and not being forthcoming with info.
The ONLY time Foo mentioned the age "14" was in reference to Ariel, and she proved you wrong in what you thought she meant, each time she claimed she "misspoke" about the age.[/Quote]Regardless of the age, fact is you said Foo never mentioned another girl. You lied and you said you never lied. So you lied about that too. Or could you have just been mistaken?
[QUOTE who="lil Lily"]Your opinion of what Foo was talking about is ignorant and displays you can't read for comprehension. Your ignorant opinion is NOT fact. What I posted in her words were the facts she posted, and people who can read for comprehension know what she said and meant.
Ah sweety, you're just pissed cuz you got pwned.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266614 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL WTH kind of out of the blue stupidity is that, NC?
I post a fact about Foo's sickening and abusive insensitivity about someone who was abused and miscarried due to the abuse,(mentioned because she's posted those types of things in the recent past); in reply to Foo saying I should be sensitive to some girl in a story she told, when all I'm doing is calling Foo on her lies and saying nothing nasty or insensitive about the girl; and that's what you think is an appropriate response to that?
You are not playing with a full deck, Toots.
She's knows the girl is you and you continue to deny it all the while calling her a liar. Lynne/Persevere/Lil.

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266615 Nov 28, 2012
lil Lily wrote:
The only arsenal against you, Foo, are your own posts filled with lies. The subject matter of your posts is irrelevant to that, except to distinguish which topic you were posting about when you posted particular lies. The only thing any of us has done in mentioning Ariel is distinguishing which subject matter these particular lies you posted were about.
Need I mention your lie..........again?
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266616 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an even bigger moron No Relevance. Not all 100 women will even be going to PP because they're pregnant anymore. In FACT, 76 % of their clients are receiving services to PREVENT unwanted and unintended pregnancies.
Foo-L: Not all 100 women will even be going to PP because they're pregnant

Pregnant women sure do go to Planned Parenthood. Killing their babies in their wombs is how it brings in 40% of its operating income.

A deathscore like you already knows this.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#266617 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Bhitler: I don't "support" the choices. I support a woman's legal, and moral, right to make her own choice.
You are only kidding yourself.
The frontal lobe of your brain is misfiring.
LOL, no.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266618 Nov 28, 2012
*deathscort*

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#266619 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You lied & embellished the situation of a 20 y/o for your own perverse gain.
Now, you try to blame YOUR abnormal behavior on others.
Which.....is typical for you and your kind.
It's always somebody else's fault..........
Lynne lied, whose fault is that?

Since: Jun 08

Location hidden

#266620 Nov 28, 2012
Conservative Democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
In a manner of speaking, yes. What, you don't care for animals as you care for children? Or do you deny that animals are also creatures of G-d?
I, personally, put human life above other animal life. That's because I'm a human. That doesn't mean that humans are intrinsically more valuable than other animals.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266621 Nov 28, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think so, she's not the one bringing up the past about this. Two years later and you're trying to prove she lied about it then and she continues to lie about it now. She has said repeatedly she misspoke the age but you can't accept that, and at the same time you misspoke by saying Foo never mentioned another person being with Ariel when in fact she did. She admitted her mistake, it takes integrity to do that.
<quoted text>She didn't continue she has said over and over recently that it was typo. Now what say you about your big ol blunder after you yourself provided the post where Foo says another girl was with Ariel and you claim she never said it?
I say you're an ignorant kiss up who can't read for comprehension.

It's obvious to anyone with intelligence that what Foo did was not that she misspoke, she lied and kept misleading people, never correcting the lie. Saying she misspoke is just the excuse she's using that a kiss up like you just takes her at her word, when it's been proven repeatedly her word isn't credible.

When Foo was talking about Ariel being missing, there was no "minor" with the 19-20 yr. old at the time Foo posted about it here and she mentionede Ariel was 14. That minor person was already back home.

Ayakaneo: "She has said repeatedly she misspoke the age but you can't accept that,..."

You just said that Foo said she misspoke about the age. The age in question is Ariel's, not the minor she ran away with. The other person is irrelevant to any of this not only because the age of 14 mentioned wasn't about her, but that girl was already home when Foo posted the age of (the missing person she was trying to help find) as being 14.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266622 Nov 28, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Need I mention your lie..........again?
I didn't lie, dimwit. That minor (whose age was NOT mentioned by Foo at all) was irrelevant because she wasn't missing when Foo posted about Ariel being missing. She was already home.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266623 Nov 28, 2012
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You lied & embellished the situation of a 20 y/o for your own perverse gain.
Now, you try to blame YOUR abnormal behavior on others.
Which.....is typical for you and your kind.
It's always somebody else's fault..........
People like Ayakaneo will defend the lies no matter what, actually trying to find some loophole to the lie. As long as Foo has ignorant enablers like that, she'll keep deluding herself that she's fooling people with her lies.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266624 Nov 28, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>You're not one of those people with an IQ in the double digits. If you don't know for a fact someone is not posting as another then don't accuse or make assumptions LYNNED cuz it just makes you look a fool.
<quoted text>Ah sweety, you're just pissed cuz you got pwned.
"If you don't know for a fact someone is not posting as another then don't accuse or make assumptions LYNNED cuz it just makes you look a fool."

You'll have no idea why that statement is so funny, and why you look like a fool for making it.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266625 Nov 28, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>She's knows the girl is you and you continue to deny it all the while calling her a liar. Lynne/Persevere/Lil.
Again, funny stuff. You think declaring it makes it fact. As I said, only pro-choicers...

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266626 Nov 28, 2012
AyakaNeo wrote:
<quoted text>Lynne lied, whose fault is that?
YOU keep lying, Toots. You're so stuck up Foo's butt, you'll try to find any loophole to the lies she posted, and it's been an epic fail each time.
Not our fault you're too stupid to see that.

Also, you lie every time you call me Lynne, because I'm Lily.
No Relativism

Chicago, IL

#266627 Nov 28, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh look, No Relevance is misquoting again.
Now funny, this is the ACTUAL report, and it doesn't say any such thing.
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/P...
Gee No Relevance and his little anti-choice site was lying again.
Is ANYONE shocked??
Foo: Oh look, No Relevance is misquoting again.

You wanted the article and link. I provided article title and link.

You are wrong...constantly. Being wrong is part of your nature and who you are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Catasauqua Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Grey Ghost 1,522,920
Bethlehem Man Raped 12-Year Old Boy, Police Say 9 hr WNC 1
7th century goat molesting barbarians 12 hr silly rabbit 15
News Oprah Winfrey says she weighs 200 pounds (Dec '08) 16 hr silly rabbit 1,085
News Man guilty in fatal home invasion for K2 and money 16 hr silly rabbit 15
News Theater: Muhlenberg ties past to present with n... Thu silly rabbit 1
News Teacher in Alleged Sex Assault Gets Court Date (May '13) Thu silly rabbit 13

Catasauqua Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Catasauqua Mortgages