Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 311139 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266564 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>
Look up the RCC teachings(Catholic Catechism) on artificial birth control.
It will always give you biblical proof.
What I mentioned about "church teachings" was instituted by God and Christ.
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....

Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.

Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.

In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.

Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266565 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text>The male or female offspring/child of that woman is just as valuable in the eyes of God. The hospitals job is to save BOTH mom and child.
Bullshit. The hospital's life is to save the life they CAN save.
Again,where is the proof that this woman would have lived had the abortion taken place. I'd like to see it.
Then perhaps you should actually do some research about it. After all, its not like you're going to "see" what I or anyone else shows you that goes against your agenda. You like to ignore what you dont agree with.

In THIS case, you dont know shit about the case at all, and are just mouthing off in your typical ignorance. LOL!
Husker du

United States

#266566 Nov 27, 2012
Long Night Moon 13 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you did not. I wrote that Jesus said nothing about birth control. Where in that scripture does Jesus mention birth control?
Sex is a gift from God, He didn't have to make it so enjoyable, but
He did. Using birth control leads to illicit sex,pornography etc not the way God intended sex to be. Sex is intended to be between husband and wife God made sex fun and for pleasure BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE.and for procreation. Back in Christ's time ,women were called wh*res for having pre marital sex. The ones who would use birth control were the wh*res. The Culture never had to deal with contraception .

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266568 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> No. YOU bashed the Catholics on this thread. You blamed this womans death on us. You lied and THAT is why you refuse to provide the "real facts" of this womans death. You gave TWO different versions of the womans death.
It is YOU that used this poor woman for YOUR agenda...(your bigotry AND your abortion motives).
Shame on you.
Your posts PROVED that you deliberately exploited Ariel too.
Now you can kick and scream ALL you want,but you only have yourself to blame.
You're an idiot SKanky. I gave ONE version of her death - placental abruption and HER refusal to allow an abortion, and some POSSIBLE reasons it MAY have happened the way it did.

Yes we DO know more now and NO I will not share it with the likes of you that has proven you will exploit whatever you can in the pursuit of YOUR agenda. Suffice to say that she died of a placental abruption and her refusal of treatment because of her faith.

I didn't blame YOU at all. I dont believe you are a catholic to begin with, you're nothing but a mouthy and phony POS.

I DO blame a "faith" that puts such fear into women that they would rather die than have their lives saved when they CAN be saved. I blame a "faith" that creates assholes like you that would rather their CHILDREN die than abort. I blame a faith that demands a hospital allow someone to die WHEN THAT PERSON COULD BE SAVED.

I think that ANY faith that thinks their "g-d" would rather his child die than be saved is SERIOUSLY f'd up.

You people want it both ways. YOu dont want to let people die if medical technology of life support can keep them alive, but you wont allow medical technology to save someone if it means something not even born will die. Its F'd up and its STUPID.

Then again, many of these are the same people that thought it was perfectly okay to allow children to be raped by the leaders of the faith, and to keep moving them around to CONTINUE to molest children.

That's my opinion and guess what Skanky, I dont give to shits if you or anyone else likes it or not.
Husker du

United States

#266569 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
Read the whole thing http://www.catholic.com/tracts/birth-control

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266572 Nov 27, 2012
sasssylicious wrote:
<quoted text> I don't support the choices. I don't support the womans *legal* rights.
We know. Fortunately, other than being a willfully ignorant fool on a messageboard, you're meaningless in real life in the scheme of things.
Husker du

United States

#266573 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
Ding dong your wrong.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266574 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text> Read the whole thing http://www.catholic.com/tracts/birth-control
Yes Knutter. I just posted the same thing, without the RCC slant.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266575 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text> Apostolic Tradition
The biblical teaching that birth control is wrong is found even more explicitly among the Church Fathers, who recognized the biblical and natural law principles blah blah blah blah....
FACT: Your Jesus said NOTHING AT ALL about birth control OR abortion.

Period.

You can justify it all you want with the 'teachings' of your faith, but the FACT is that your g-d said NOTHING about it.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266576 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
The apostolic tradition’s condemnation of contraception is so great that it was followed by Protestants until 1930 and was upheld by all key Protestant Reformers. Martin Luther said, "[T]he exceedingly foul deed of Onan, the basest of wretches ... is a most disgraceful sin. It is far more atrocious than incest and adultery. We call it unchastity, yes, a sodomitic sin. For Onan goes in to her; that is, he lies with her and copulates, and when it comes to the point of insemination, spills the semen, lest the woman conceive. Surely at such a time the order of nature established by God in procreation should be followed. Accordingly, it was a most disgraceful crime.... Consequently, he deserved to be killed by God. He committed an evil deed. Therefore, God punished him."
John Calvin said, "The voluntary spilling of semen outside of intercourse between man and woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is doubly monstrous. For this is to extinguish the hope of the race and to kill before he is born the hoped-for offspring."
John Wesley warned, "Those sins that dishonor the body are very displeasing to God, and the evidence of vile affections. Observe, the thing which he [Onan] did displeased the Lord—and it is to be feared; thousands, especially of single persons, by this very thing, still displease the Lord, and destroy their own souls." (These passages are quoted in Charles D. Provan, The Bible and Birth Control, which contains many quotes by historic Protestant figures who recognize contraception’s evils.) from the link I posted.
Thank you for proving your faiths leaders and their offshoots were nuts.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266577 Nov 27, 2012
Husker du wrote:
<quoted text>Ding dong your wrong.
Yet the spam you just posted was EXACTLY what I just posted you MORON.

Ding Dong, you're drunk again I see.

That Mad Squirrel 20/20 is rotting that brain cell Knutbar.
Husker du

United States

#266578 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Knutter. I just posted the same thing, without the RCC slant.
You didn't read whatI posted.
Husker du

United States

#266579 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet the spam you just posted was EXACTLY what I just posted you MORON.
Ding Dong, you're drunk again I see.
That Mad Squirrel 20/20 is rotting that brain cell Knutbar.
You didn't understand , did you.
Husker du

United States

#266580 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
FACT: Your Jesus said NOTHING AT ALL about birth control OR abortion.
Period.
You can justify it all you want with the 'teachings' of your faith, but the FACT is that your g-d said NOTHING about it.
If you think that, you are very shallow and extremely stupid.
Husker du

United States

#266581 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, prove that your Jesus said ANYTHING about birth control.....
Oh wait, you cant so you deflect because he NEVER said shit about it.
Your RCC, like you, makes things up as they go along.
In FACT, the RCC didn't have an offical stance on BC at ALL until 1930, when at the same time, they declared that beating off was tantamount to murder.
Catholics have been ignoring the RCC on that issue before that and ever since.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/peopleevent...
Actually He did, we are to give ourselves fully when we marry, that is man and woman, you can't do that using birth control.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266582 Nov 27, 2012
Husker dunce wrote:
<quoted text>You didn't read whatI posted.
Yes actually I did. It said the same thing my link did, AGAIN without the RCC or religous stance & agenda.

Since: Sep 08

Location hidden

#266583 Nov 27, 2012
Husker dunce wrote:
<quoted text>If you think that, you are very shallow and extremely stupid.
Feel free to show us where your jesus said ANYTHING about birth control. OR insurance for that matter.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266584 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Actually I not only did, I still do - she and I have kept in touch and are closer now than we were then. Thankfully she's grown up a lot in the last two years, unilke you for example.
She's my best friend and ex's neice, so F ** K you and the horse you rode in on Lynne. Seriously, you can take a very long walk off a very short pier and drop dead for all I care about YOU and your completely meaningless bullshit however.
I'm VERY sorry I'd never known anyone with a missing child before, and if I did the wrong things in your estimation when posting about it at the time, but FORTUNATELY she was found in large part TO people posting about her and getting her picture out there.
NO Lynne, I didn't know about age limits on amber alerts, and YES I posted her wrong age accidently at the time. BIG DAMN DEAL. A womans CHILD was missing, and her family, who I'm very close to, was frantic, we were ALL using the resources that we had of the internet and more to try our best to help her.
As a mother and a grandmother (as SICKENING as that concept is), YOU should not only know better, you should be ashamed to try to demean ANYONE for doing their best to help find a mothers missing child. Did I misspeak about her age? YES. And YES I said I was going to mention the Amber Alert to her mom when I spoke to her, and AGAIN - I never had to have the knowledge that there was an age limit on that - I know that NOW, but didn't then.
Big damn deal Lynne, I made a few mistakes, but I was TRYING. We did a LOT that helped directely at the time yes, and I'm PROUD of that. I arranged for her mom and aunt to stay with J's brother in Atlanta while they were looking for her, I helped with bus fare and plane tickets - and you're G-ddammed right I'm PROUD of that. Its more than YOU would do apparently. In fact, the woman that died a few weeks ago, was my BIL's husband's sister, and Ariel knew HER too, which is why she was just here for the memorial service.
But hey, guess we shouldn't expect better from a common CU Next Tuesday like you.
"As a mother and a grandmother (as SICKENING as that concept is), YOU should not only know better, you should be ashamed to try to demean ANYONE for doing their best to help find a mothers missing child."

Oh please. That coming from someone who frequently tries to demean another human being, who as a teen was pregnant, abused and miscarried due to abuse, and for which you so gleefully call the miscarriage "toilet twins"?

You're going to try to appeal to me about being sensitive, when you're the most abusively insensitive poster here? THAT's funny.

Also funny is how you're so desperately trying to make it appear as though my posts display a lack of care for some girl, when my posts only display a lack of care for your attempts to distance yourself from your own lies posted. Using the most inept excuses that no one with any intelligence or sense would buy.

The lies you posted weren't because of your inexperience in dealing with someone who was missing, because you've lied on every single topic you've ever posted on, and I've provided so many of your posts as proof of the lies you posted, on various topics, I've lost count.

Your "CU Next Tuesday", was just another psychological projection from you, Toots.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266585 Nov 27, 2012
LiIrabbitfoofoo wrote:
<quoted text>]
One last time for the stupid bitch. I wasn't lying then, and I'm not lying now. That said, I am NOT going to go over every detail again and again so YOU can feel like you've achieved some goal.
If you want to delude yourself, more power to you honey, you've been deluding yourself here for years.
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO Only YOU Lynne can contradict yourself twice in two sentences. You stupid shit.
"One last time..."

How many "one last times" are you going to post? lol

"I am NOT going to go over every detail again and again..."

You don't have to because the details don't help you. You LIED IN the details first, second third and subsequent times you posted.

I posted:

"My posts have nothing to do with the situation, as you like to try to make it appear. My posts are about your lies posted, that just so happen to be about that particular situation."

You reply, "Only YOU ... can contradict yourself twice in two sentences. You stupid shit."

Still displaying you can't read for comprehension.

I said, my posts are about YOUR LIES, not about the situation.

Meaning for those who can't read for comprehension; Posts about that situation are yours. My posts are only about your lies, regardless of what the subject matter is.
Just so happens YOUR LIES included being in posts about a particular situation, one in which YOU explopited someone here for your own self-serving agenda to feel important. Turned out, you weren't too quick to let everyone here know she had been found, because THAT wasn't important to you. I don't care about the details, I don't care about your excuses or anything you have to say on that subject, because that situation isn't what the topic of my posts is about. The topic of my posts is your lies in your posts, and proving you lied by displaying all the discrepancies in your posts that didn't add up to being truthful.

“Pro-Life”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#266586 Nov 27, 2012
Point about the whole thing, Foo is a drama queeen who looks to feel relevant in stories she brings here.

Then like the drama queen she is, she uses DRAMA to try to excuse herself from her lies posted.

No, Foo, regardless of what the situation is, no matter how dramatic, people who aren't pathological liars and drama queens don't LIE in what they post. You did. No reason excuses that.

You said she was 14; LIE. She was 19-20, and one would think if you're that close to the people you'd at least know she was an adult and not a young teen.

You said recently that you corrected the age error the next evening; LIE. You didn't correct anything. A pro-lifer caught you in the lie and you were left to make excuses for the age you posted and never corrected.

The list of lies went on and on and using the excuse that you were so frantic is bullshit. People who are not liars don't make it up as they go along, as you did, and continued to do these 2 years later.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Catasauqua Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min An NFL Fan 1,382,532
News A different type of winery coming to Allentown 2 hr silly rabbit 9
News Homicides down across Lehigh Valley in 2016 15 hr silly rabbit 6
News Get furnace checked or face a fine (Nov '14) Mon silly rabbit 74
News Lawmakers, health officials in Allentown to dis... May 21 silly rabbit 2
News Hogar Crea, regional drug rehab group, ripping ... (Apr '08) May 20 Mari 169
News Man accused of sexually assaulting boy at libra... May 20 silly rabbit 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Catasauqua Mortgages