FactCheck.org IS A Conservative Bias...
First Prev
of 4
Next Last
1961 Alumni ROLLA MO

Rolla, MO

#61 Oct 15, 2012
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
On behalf of Comrade Wilson and myself, please, keep your pearls covered up
When you quit responding to my post with lies & hyprocey & ignorance, I will!
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#62 Oct 16, 2012
Alumni,

I have posted hard facts from non-biased sources and you have never posted a hard fact for anywhere. You have parroted the parroted the party line and the only references you have cited are parts of the left wing propaganda machine.

If you want to talk about hypocrisy (remember the spelling as mine is correct and yours isn't) let's talk about you. Let's talk about how you had posted lies in the defense of your candidate after your candidate has broken more promises than anyone I can think of, has twisted the truth so far out of shape it can't be recognized, after your VP candidate came across as an arrogant, sneering, smiling buffoon.(Hey all you who want to yell racist over that word it is a standard word, look it up.)

Ignorance: You support a candidate who doesn't want to take responsibility for anything. He wants to blame those who had held his office in the past instead of manning up and taking responsibility. You want to see your candidate gain ten points in the polls, let him man up and take responsibility. He can't do it. He's too much of narcissist.

You are the one who is failing to wake up reality and only spouts a party line. I am a conservative independent. I don't care two shakes in Hades for Republican or Democrat. I'm interested in the truth and the candidate who can do the best for the country. I know who that is and unless there is a significant change or some significant FACTS that came out to change things, I'm fairly sure of who I will vote for.
justFYI

Shelbyville, KY

#63 Oct 16, 2012
Ummmm. Walter Annenburg is dead. He is not running anything, he has been dead for 10 years. Wow fact check that one.
Just the first line says enough about your level of truth.
Lalala

North East, MD

#64 Oct 17, 2012
The Annenberg Foundation was originally founded by Walter J. Annenberg, a conservative who supported Ronald Reagan. However, when Walter Annenberg died, his family took over the management of the foundation and it took a turn to the far left and has ties to radical left individuals such as Bill Ayers and his friend and fellow left wing radical collegue Barack Obama. How is factcheck.org associated with these people:

To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.

Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org . The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#65 Oct 17, 2012
We have really jumped down into the weeds on this when there is one fact that we are overlooking.

Both CNN and Fox cite factcheck.org as a valid source. When both sides are using one site as a valid, non-biased and nonpartisan source, that alone should prove that the site is indeed non-biased and nonpartisan.
check this

Honolulu, HI

#66 Oct 17, 2012
Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group

To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.

Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org . The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.

http://www.matchdoctor.com/blog_141905/Factch...
HazeZilla

Philadelphia, PA

#67 Oct 18, 2012
You can't debate people that ask why corporations use factcheck. They think the corporations that made the triggers for our nukes are liberal. They think the banks and corporations whom OWN us are Liberal/Socialist/ Communist also that tell Obama what to do. lol This is pointless.
Watch the peons bend over even faster this election cycle.
1961 Alumni ROLLA MO

Rolla, MO

#68 Oct 18, 2012
check this wrote:
Factcheck.org -- A Fraudulent "Fact Check" Site Funded By Biased Political Group
To start, Ayers was the key founder of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which was a Chicago public school reform project from 1995 to 2001. Upon its start in 1995, Obama was appointed Board Chairman and President of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. Geesh, that alone connects all three. Well, it branches out even more from there.
Ayers co-chaired the organization’s Collaborative, which set the education policies of the Challenge. Oddly enough, Obama was the one who was authorized to delegate to the Collaborative in regards to its programs and projects. In addition to that, Obama often times had to seek advice and assistance from the Ayer’s led Collaborative in regards to the programmatic aspects of grant proposals. Ayers even sat on the same board as Obama as an “ex officio member”. They both also sat together on the board of the CAC’s Governance Committee. Obama and Ayers were two parts of a group of four who were instructed to draft the bylaws that would govern the CAC. Keep in mind that the “A” in CAC is for Annenberg, the owners of FactCheck.org . The funding for Ayer’s projects and those of his cronies was approved by Board Chair, Barack Obama.
http://www.matchdoctor.com/blog_141905/Factch...
What you are talking about is ancient history for the Annenberg Foundation. The Annenberg Foudation is now soley run by the Annenberg family! The Annenberg is a very conservative family - they supported & financially supported John McCain in the 2008 election.
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#69 Oct 19, 2012
1961 Alumni ROLLA MO wrote:
<quoted text>
What you are talking about is ancient history for the Annenberg Foundation. The Annenberg Foudation is now soley run by the Annenberg family! The Annenberg is a very conservative family - they supported & financially supported John McCain in the 2008 election.
Alumni,

He says that they are a liberal biased site and you say they are a conservative biased site. And yet, CNN and Fox both quote the site on air as factual. Isn't it amazing a left leaning news organization and an a right leaning news organization both consider the site unbiased?

Oh and before you jump on Fox news here. Remember that MSNBC is out there.
slick

Memphis, TN

#70 Oct 19, 2012
HazeZilla wrote:
You can't debate people that ask why corporations use factcheck. They think the corporations that made the triggers for our nukes are liberal. They think the banks and corporations whom OWN us are Liberal/Socialist/ Communist also that tell Obama what to do. lol This is pointless.
Watch the peons bend over even faster this election cycle.
Are your initials D.H.? just curious
dcicconi

San Pedro, CA

#71 Nov 4, 2012
John Doe wrote:
Alumni,
I swear, when you grasp at straws you really go for it.
If factcheck.org is this disreputable, conservative based organization why does ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN cite information from the factcheck as being valid, hard facts?
Do you care to mention that George Soros, a noted and disreputable progressive billion who started his fortune by working with the Nazi's funds Huffington Post, THINK PROGRESSIVE, Media matters and others?
The truth is this. You're man, President Obama, screwed up the debate and lost. He was royally trounced and now the left propaganda machine is spreading more slanted stories and out right lies than any other organization in history. You being a brainwashed democrat liberal are buying everything they tell as being the truth.
The truth is that your THINK PROGRESSIVE is a partisan site and because factcheck does not agree with you and THINK PROGRESSIVE you are now using the old Democrat trick of trying slander the messenger.
Good God, to pull and try to be even semi convincing in your raving here you had better contact the news divisions of ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN and try to get them to stop using factcheck.org information as valid hard facts.
And for the record let me state I did go look at THINK PROGRESSIVE. How do you think I learned about it being a partisan, liberal, left wing progressive site?
I have one word for you Joe Doe: Jeep
John Doe

Poplar Bluff, MO

#72 Nov 5, 2012
dcicconi wrote:
<quoted text>
I have one word for you Joe Doe: Jeep
http://factcheck.org/2012/10/whoppers-of-2012...

Perhaps you need to read that and see that FactCheck.org points out fallacies from both sides of the aisle. Were they this big conservative site, they would only point the fallacies of President Obama but they call out both sides. That's called non-partisan.
carol

Panama City, FL

#74 Apr 15, 2013
Factcheck.org is not a reliable conservative group. It was put by the Annenberg foundation.Both Obama and Bill Ayers the terrorist who was Obama's friend. Obama's first political fundraiser was in Bill Ayers home. Annenberg were the first ones to validate having seen Obama's real birth certificate from Hawaii. Which we all know is not true now. It has been proved it is false. They actually said they inspected the document.We also know now that five different times before Obama was elected the democrats tried to have the constitution changed. The part dealing with the a natural born citizen and they never received enough votes to make the change.They had been planning for a long time to put Obama forward. They knew he was corrupt enough to do it. Look at the first videos of Obama without his teleprompter he could hardly speak a full sentence.
guest

Steele, MO

#75 Apr 15, 2013
carol wrote:
Factcheck.org is not a reliable conservative group. It was put by the Annenberg foundation.Both Obama and Bill Ayers the terrorist who was Obama's friend. Obama's first political fundraiser was in Bill Ayers home. Annenberg were the first ones to validate having seen Obama's real birth certificate from Hawaii. Which we all know is not true now. It has been proved it is false. They actually said they inspected the document.We also know now that five different times before Obama was elected the democrats tried to have the constitution changed. The part dealing with the a natural born citizen and they never received enough votes to make the change.They had been planning for a long time to put Obama forward. They knew he was corrupt enough to do it. Look at the first videos of Obama without his teleprompter he could hardly speak a full sentence.
YOu have done it now you will have people on here calling you a racist.
1961 Alumni Rolla MO

Rolla, MO

#76 Apr 15, 2013
carol wrote:
Factcheck.org is not a reliable conservative group. It was put by the Annenberg foundation.Both Obama and Bill Ayers the terrorist who was Obama's friend. Obama's first political fundraiser was in Bill Ayers home. Annenberg were the first ones to validate having seen Obama's real birth certificate from Hawaii. Which we all know is not true now. It has been proved it is false. They actually said they inspected the document.We also know now that five different times before Obama was elected the democrats tried to have the constitution changed. The part dealing with the a natural born citizen and they never received enough votes to make the change.They had been planning for a long time to put Obama forward. They knew he was corrupt enough to do it. Look at the first videos of Obama without his teleprompter he could hardly speak a full sentence.
Carol,
Looks like you have fallen prey to some of that radical right-wing B.S - and you have my sympathies!

I don't know where you found your information about Annenberg being one of the first ones to validate having seen Obama's birth certificate - and your insinuations that Obama's birth certificate is fake. But, I found somewhat the same lies on a website called "Free Repubic".

Now, upon further checking - I also found that "Free Republic" is on a list (compiled by a conservative website) of the Top 50 Websites. This is a radical right-wing web-site devoted EXCLUSIVLY to bashing Obama & the Democrat party & policies!

To find out more about this list of 50 top conservative websites - just check out my new thread on this forum entitled: "Top 50 Conservative Websites Reveal Alarming Patterns".

Since: Feb 09

Raleigh, NC

#78 Feb 4, 2014
John Doe wrote:
<quoted text>
http://factcheck.org/2012/10/whoppers-of-2012...
Perhaps you need to read that and see that FactCheck.org points out fallacies from both sides of the aisle. Were they this big conservative site, they would only point the fallacies of President Obama but they call out both sides. That's called non-partisan.
Just when it was getting good this whole thread came to an abrupt end. What happened? Was it because Obama destroyed Ro-money in the next two debates? Or that Obama was re-elected? Very curious.
Mr_Consequence

Winthrop, ME

#79 Mar 23, 2014
At the risk of tooting my own horn I wanted post a copy of my blog post on this subject.
http://siclogica.wordpress.com/2014/03/23/fac...
HarveyMushman

Santa Monica, CA

#80 Sep 26, 2016
This is ridiculous..............The Annenberg foundation is a liberal entity now that Walter Annenberg is dead....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Caruthersville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wheretheygo 1 hr Be Quiet 15
Lee Hawks 6 hr Maybe 2
Casino closing? 12 hr Nevergoinback 8
Lowering Child Support if your having a second ... (Aug '08) 21 hr guest 480
billy joe taylor (Jun '12) Wed Jeff Foxworthy 4
News A Caruthersville man arrested after throwing a ... (May '11) Wed zakaya watson 32
Alex Jones fans Wed Lori 3

Caruthersville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Caruthersville Mortgages