Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2010?

Posted in the Cartersville Forum

Comments (Page 1,443)

Showing posts 28,841 - 28,860 of47,389
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30160
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

3

Aggie23 wrote:
And now Obama is attempting to rewrite history in a speech today and claim that what he said all along was "if you had one of these plans before Obamacare became the law, you could keep it IF IT HASN"T CHANGED SINCE THE LAW WAS PASSED." No, Mr Obama, you are a LIAR. Your statement you made time and time again was: "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan, period. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, period." There were no caveats in those statements. Does he really think the American people are that stupid?
Oh, wait. He DID get reelected didn't he?

He's like the fella from dahlonega who count his toes, obama cant count his lies...

Syn has beaten the Butt, but the Butt is too proud to admit a mistake...
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30161
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
You know, despite getting called a JA (J@ckAss), and an AH (azzhole), and a "freedom destroying, lock-step socialist" along with a few other choice words during that conversation I actually kind of like Synergy.
The big point of even having that conversation is that these guys are constantly spewing absolutely insane lies and drivel so often that they actually believe themselves, when there is no basis for reality in their positions.
The things they say aren't actually true here on planet Earth. Usually it's not worth the effort of trying to point it out because they just retort with asinine BS, emotion, and name-calling. But when you actually go through the exercise, it's apparent just how nuts they are, how brain-washed and hateful of their fellow men they are and how fearful they are of ghosts under their beds and commies coming to get them.
If only they could use unbroken logic and actual facts, they would be saying very different things.
Unfortunately, we can't really expect this to happen.

Actually what Syn is saying is, "I've told you so, but you are too blind to see. You will see when after it happens."

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30162
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

4

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Many people in this country would like to see a single-payer health care system. There are quite a few very good arguments to be made in favor of such a system.
Obviously Obama, Reid, Pelosi and others would like to see such a thing become reality. Unfortunately, you don't just get to snap your fingers and "make it so".
The reality is that a bill would have to make it through the Senate, the House, and be signed by the President. When you're talking about an emotionally charged dramatic change from the status-quo that affects every single person in the country, dismantles the medical insurance industry, and forces the medical care industry to play honestly and fairly, it's no easy task to get that bill through those hurdles. Not even with both houses and the president all supporting it.
Even if that bill gets through those hurdles, it will be challenged in courts. Repeatedly. There will be lawsuits. There will be opposition of every kind. You think the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unsettled the insurance industries dust a little? Nothing like telling them to go home, we just don't need their profiteering little vulture butts anymore.
Before this could possibly become a reality, America will have to change. A lot. Sure single-payer probably will become a reality somewhere down the line, but we're talking WAY down the line. By that time people will barely remember Obama, or Reid, or Pelosi. Who knows what the people in place will think then or consider a good idea. Only Synergy has a crystal ball.
Reid can say what he wants and hopes for. That doesn't change reality. The likelihood that everyone in America will have access to equal medical care at reasonable costs when they're sick, regardless of who they are or their income isn't going to happen anytime soon.
If I'm wrong, well, that would be a good thing. But logic and reality say otherwise.
For every "good argument" for single payer, there are more against it. But you keep ignoring the obvious intent behind Obamacare, that it is a first step towards single payer and had Obamacare somehow been able to be implemented without being the disaster that every day brings more sharply into focus, I suspect we may have seen single payer in 10-15 years. However, as those of us with a clue about how the the health care system actually works AND how liberals work knew - Obamacare couldn't fulfill the promises that were made. Obama and his supporters lied and knew they lied about what the end result would be. Democrats are jumping on board in greater numbers trying to get a delay in Obamacare - they see the potential disaster looming in the midterm elections if something isn't done to stop it. But if you want to sit there with your blinders on, we can't stop you.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30163
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok,
Your only source is the link you gave on bills pending in Congress (senate + house)
Bills are created first in the minds of elected officials, who seek support from colleagues first and foremost, before ever going to a committee, which then need to pass out of committee before ever becoming a bill.(in the minds of libroids reside single payer healthcare)
I will use the Georgia legislature as an example…..The planners (those who control the legislature) meet in the months of August and September, before the legislature is called in the first of the following year. Many of the bills to be presented are discussed during that meeting before ever being presented as bills when the legislature is convened. The boys with the power assign the bills to the committees corresponding to the type of bill to be presented, and if enough support is generated in the committee, it comes out as a bill to put on the floor.
The Feds pretty much do the same business, the controlling party decides what goes into the hopper and which bills come out of committee.
You don’t see those bills until they are due to come to the floor, so your link doesn’t tell you anything about what goes into the cow, just what comes out of the cow(in many cases bs)…. When a bill is out of committee, the leaders decide which ones come to a vote in which order. Some bills never reach a vote. We see it often with Reid the manhandler.
I'll give you some credit, you actually tried a rebuttal that included some facts, and you attempted to tie a few logic strings together. You didn't make your case, even remotely, but at least you put together a comprehensible post. That's a huge improvement from what we've seen.

Your argument is that I provided a link that showed pending legislation, and I claimed that no legislation exists based on that.

Your retort is "well, maybe that legislation doesn't exist yet, but they might be THINKING about it!"

ERGO, if we could only read their minds about what they might do in the future, we COULD say that legislation exists (in the future), therefore Synergy MAYBE MIGHT be right, possibly, if all those things existed. You go one step further in that you're offering all of this as proof that Synergy "won" the discussion.

You came up with the best defense you could for a p!ss-poor position. The old "Maybe it might come true if somebody thinks of it in the future" defense.

Not flying. Not gonna work. That dog don't hunt.

Still, you came back with something better than "doo-doo-head!" That's an improvement.
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30164
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

4

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Many people in this country would like to see a single-payer health care system. There are quite a few very good arguments to be made in favor of such a system.
Obviously Obama, Reid, Pelosi and others would like to see such a thing become reality. Unfortunately, you don't just get to snap your fingers and "make it so".
The reality is that a bill would have to make it through the Senate, the House, and be signed by the President. When you're talking about an emotionally charged dramatic change from the status-quo that affects every single person in the country, dismantles the medical insurance industry, and forces the medical care industry to play honestly and fairly, it's no easy task to get that bill through those hurdles. Not even with both houses and the president all supporting it.
Even if that bill gets through those hurdles, it will be challenged in courts. Repeatedly. There will be lawsuits. There will be opposition of every kind. You think the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act unsettled the insurance industries dust a little? Nothing like telling them to go home, we just don't need their profiteering little vulture butts anymore.
Before this could possibly become a reality, America will have to change. A lot. Sure single-payer probably will become a reality somewhere down the line, but we're talking WAY down the line. By that time people will barely remember Obama, or Reid, or Pelosi. Who knows what the people in place will think then or consider a good idea. Only Synergy has a crystal ball.
Reid can say what he wants and hopes for. That doesn't change reality. The likelihood that everyone in America will have access to equal medical care at reasonable costs when they're sick, regardless of who they are or their income isn't going to happen anytime soon.
If I'm wrong, well, that would be a good thing. But logic and reality say otherwise.

Wrong, if the libroids get a good majority in both houses in 2014, a bill will be sent to obama before he leaves office, Obama will sign it; public opinion be dammed, the insurance industry be dammed, and the repubs be dammed. The libroids have proven over and over that this country will be a socialists country come hell or high water....



Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30165
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

3

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Syn has a "save the dumbos of the word" syndrome...
Bless her heart. Her efforts are probably futile, but well intended.

Hi, Syn. ;)
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30166
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

4

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Syn has a "save the dumbos of the word" syndrome...
And then you blew it.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30167
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
He's like the fella from dahlonega who count his toes, obama cant count his lies...
Syn has beaten the Butt, but the Butt is too proud to admit a mistake...
And then you just went and lost your mind. Wait... It was already gone.

Whatever. I've moved you back over to the "delusional dumbazz" column again.
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30168
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

3

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll give you some credit, you actually tried a rebuttal that included some facts, and you attempted to tie a few logic strings together. You didn't make your case, even remotely, but at least you put together a comprehensible post. That's a huge improvement from what we've seen.
Your argument is that I provided a link that showed pending legislation, and I claimed that no legislation exists based on that.
Your retort is "well, maybe that legislation doesn't exist yet, but they might be THINKING about it!"
ERGO, if we could only read their minds about what they might do in the future, we COULD say that legislation exists (in the future), therefore Synergy MAYBE MIGHT be right, possibly, if all those things existed. You go one step further in that you're offering all of this as proof that Synergy "won" the discussion.
You came up with the best defense you could for a p!ss-poor position. The old "Maybe it might come true if somebody thinks of it in the future" defense.
Not flying. Not gonna work. That dog don't hunt.
Still, you came back with something better than "doo-doo-head!" That's an improvement.

We dont have to read their minds dummy, we can read their words, and we can hear their voices say it, What dumb kinda world do you live in?

Syn told you what will happen if the libroids get in power. The Tea Party will do their best to make sure they dont...

Syn kicked your azz, you're just too dumb to know it...
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30169
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

6

4

3

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
And then you just went and lost your mind. Wait... It was already gone.
Whatever. I've moved you back over to the "delusional dumbazz" column again.

glad to be there than in dumbo land....
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30170
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, if the libroids get a good majority in both houses in 2014, a bill will be sent to obama before he leaves office, Obama will sign it; public opinion be dammed, the insurance industry be dammed, and the repubs be dammed. The libroids have proven over and over that this country will be a socialists country come hell or high water....
Odds are kinda slim that the Dems will pick up both houses, for a lot of reasons. It could happen, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Let's say it did happen, a bill passed both houses. Then Obama would be faced with signing it - which would risk giving up the dems hold on the presidency in 2016. A dem president is almost assured for 2016 assuming the republicans put up idiot candidates like Cruz or Rubio (and they just can't help themselves), and the dems don't do anything too radical right before the election.

The risks are too high to gamble with.

Now lets say that dems have both houses, a Rep takes the white house in 2016 (LOL!), Obama could then sign such a bill - but why bother? Odds are it would be repealed before it was ever enacted.

About the earliest you would see a a single payer health care system would be 2017, assuming we have Hillary in office and Dems have both houses. Even then there's so many other factors at play, it's doubtful. More than likely we wouldn't see such a system for another 8 to 10 years. America itself would have to move past this divisive stage we're in with a destructive do-nothing republican party and put the current stage we're in behind us. America is going to have to get smarter. That's going to take some time I think.
Just Plain Dumb

Blairsville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30171
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
glad to be there than in dumbo land....
Come on admit it, CB won... you're just because one of the cheerleaders was your sister and CB wouldn't nail the fattening hog...
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30172
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

3

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
We dont have to read their minds dummy, we can read their words, and we can hear their voices say it, What dumb kinda world do you live in?
Ah - what you're saying is that you've READ that legislation, while not in existence yet, is planned immediately and has support?

Well why didn't you just post that link? Who was it that said they're about to introduce legislation proposing a single-payer health-care system right away?

Still - the arguing about what MIGHT exist in the future doesn't win anything.
whom wrote:
<quoted text>
Syn kicked your azz, you're just too dumb to know it...
And you have to be a raving slobbering idiot to even think that happened.
Just Plain Dumb

Blairsville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30173
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

3

*** you're just mad ***
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30174
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Just Plain Dumb wrote:
*** you're just mad ***
He's off pouting. And trying to see if he can re-write history so he can believe things turned out differently than what really happened. Kind of like they keep doing with Bush. And the Tea Party/Debt Ceiling thing. And how Romney REALLY wanted to take care of the whole country, not just the 1%.

They just tell themselves lies - which of course is what the whole argument was about in the first place.

Damn, Republicans hate facts.
one too many

Cordele, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30175
Nov 4, 2013
 

Judged:

5

3

3

whom wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, if the libroids get a good majority in both houses in 2014, a bill will be sent to obama before he leaves office, Obama will sign it; public opinion be dammed, the insurance industry be dammed, and the repubs be dammed. The libroids have proven over and over that this country will be a socialists country come hell or high water....
.....and if the alternative is you wackos- then the damn sooner the better!
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30176
Nov 5, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Aggie23 wrote:
Thought this was worth repeating, from 4 Jun 2013:
"Speaking on the House floor Monday, Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.) delivered a brief-yet-scathing review of President Barack Obama and his administration. In just over a minute, Bridenstine rattled off the lengthy list of scandals and missteps that have occurred under President Obama. The GOP lawmaker said the fact that his administration is spinning out of control proves Obama is "not fit to lead" as commander in chief.
"The president's Justice Department sold weapons to narco-terrorists south of our border, who killed one of our finest.
The president's State Department lied about Benghazi with false information provided by the White House.
The president's attorney general authorized spying on a Fox News reporter and his family for reporting on a North Korean nuclear test.
The president's Justice Department confiscated phone records of the Associated Press because they reported on a thwarted terrorist attack.
The president's Treasury Department uses the IRS to target political opposition.
The president's Health and Human Services secretary pressures insurance companies she is supposed to regulate to promote 'Obamacare,' which is the same law she uses to force citizens to pay for abortion inducing drugs against their religious liberties."
He then went on to say that the president's "dishonesty, incompetence, vengefulness and lack of moral compass lead many to suggest that he is not fit to lead."
"The only problem is that his vice president is equally unfit and even more embarrassing," Bridenstine concluded."
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The only thing to increase the indictment against Obama is if we find out he beats Bo...named after self, what a moron...


whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30177
Nov 5, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

3

Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for a great example of liberal rewriting of history, it is almost as good as Obama's attempt at rewriting his oft quoted statements about how Americans could keep their insurance plans and their doctors - almost.

can you really expect more from a dumb jock???




whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30178
Nov 5, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

4

ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Odds are kinda slim that the Dems will pick up both houses, for a lot of reasons. It could happen, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Let's say it did happen, a bill passed both houses. Then Obama would be faced with signing it - which would risk giving up the dems hold on the presidency in 2016. A dem president is almost assured for 2016 assuming the republicans put up idiot candidates like Cruz or Rubio (and they just can't help themselves), and the dems don't do anything too radical right before the election.
The risks are too high to gamble with.
Now lets say that dems have both houses, a Rep takes the white house in 2016 (LOL!), Obama could then sign such a bill - but why bother? Odds are it would be repealed before it was ever enacted.
About the earliest you would see a a single payer health care system would be 2017, assuming we have Hillary in office and Dems have both houses. Even then there's so many other factors at play, it's doubtful. More than likely we wouldn't see such a system for another 8 to 10 years. America itself would have to move past this divisive stage we're in with a destructive do-nothing republican party and put the current stage we're in behind us. America is going to have to get smarter. That's going to take some time I think.

As for smarter, with folks like you around, it may take forever.

The rest of your post pure speculation that needs to be dumped in the manure pile....
whom

Baldwin, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30179
Nov 5, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

Just Plain Dumb wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on admit it, CB won... you're just because one of the cheerleaders was your sister and CB wouldn't nail the fattening hog...

Your getting to be as vile as jeb and just as useless in a forum, Take a hike pervert...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 28,841 - 28,860 of47,389
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

21 Users are viewing the Cartersville Forum right now

Search the Cartersville Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
1270 - Off The Air 1 hr Paul 39
Bartow BOE Property Tax Increase 4 hr Larry 11
Dinner theater to benefit Cultural Arts Allianc... 5 hr jo jo whites 1
Ricky Phipps 9 hr Had enough 67
Who is biggest Male Ho in Bartow? 9 hr Had enough 45
looking for Lisa Nicks 10 hr BWD 42
GA Who do you support for Governor in Georgia in 2... (Oct '10) 11 hr Paris 2,036
•••
•••

Cartersville News Video

•••
•••

Cartersville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Cartersville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Cartersville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Cartersville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••