40 Armed Gun Advocates Intimidate Mot...

40 Armed Gun Advocates Intimidate Mothers Against Gun Violence In A Restaurant Parking Lot

There are 119 comments on the ThinkProgress story from Nov 10, 2013, titled 40 Armed Gun Advocates Intimidate Mothers Against Gun Violence In A Restaurant Parking Lot. In it, ThinkProgress reports that:

On Saturday, nearly 40 armed men, women, and children waited outside a Dallas, Texas area restaurant to protest a membership meeting for the state chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America , a gun safety advocacy group formed in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at ThinkProgress.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#45 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
You shouldn't project having things crammed up your own tailpipe
I don't have to.

You now have Oklahoma, Idaho, and Georgia around your ankles and you picked them.

PICK A STATE, Vince.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#46 Nov 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to.
You now have Oklahoma, Idaho, and Georgia around your ankles and you picked them.
PICK A STATE, Vince.
Wow, you lack of intelligence level is approaching a new low.

FIEND STILL
HAUNTS MURRAY

Tries to Enter Two
Houses.

With Maniacal Cunning He1
Eludes All Attempts to
Capture Him.

Every Home Contains Firearms, and
Every Citizen Is a Volun-
teer Detective.

Murray's fiend is still prowling through that suburb at night. Several houses have been attacked during the past week by a man who is supposed to have been the assailant of airs, Gustave Schwan. As a result every home in the residence section, almost without exception, contains firearms, and it is a dangerous matter to wander into strange dooryards after nightfall. In this district a veritable reign of terror exists.

Made Two Attempts.

Two nights ago this man tried to break into two houses on Main street, close to the Schwan home. He made the attempts during the early hours of the morning and picked out homes from which the men were absent. In each case he was frightened away because he awakened the occupants.

Shortly after 3 o'clock the prowler was heard trying the doors of Mrs. Ford's house, Just off Main street, about a block southeast of its junction with State street. Mrs. Ford was awakened and made some noise. The man ran away across the lawn.

Went for a Weapon.

At about 4 o'clock the same morning Mrs. Whitehead, who lives almost opposite Mayor Stratton, was aroused by her young son. The boy had awakened from a sound sleep and heard some one trying to raise one of his bedroom windows. He hastened to his mother's room to get a revolver. As he did so, glancing back, he saw a man's form standing out in relief against his window. He got the weapon and hastened back, but the man had vanished.

For about ten days after the Schwan outrage everything remained quiet in Murray. Then the attempts at breaking into houses began again. These last two have aroused the citizens, and the man-hunt still continues, although each of the hunters is working by himself. Women who stay alone at night are armed and ready to shoot at any attempt to enter their homes.

[The Salt Lake Tribune, Salt Lake City, Utah, Saturday Morning, December 3, 1904. Vol. LXX. No. 50. Pg. 12]

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#47 Nov 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to.
You now have Oklahoma, Idaho, and Georgia around your ankles and you picked them.
PICK A STATE, Vince.
That's true only in your own perverse mind, troll. Everyone else knows that you were SLAMMED down hard,[as always].

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#48 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you lack of intelligence level is approaching a new low.
Yours hasn't budged, GumsShow.

Even after you change your alias.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#49 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
December 3, 1904.
Why is it Called Spam?
Why is it Called Spam?

There is some debate about the source of the term, but the generally accepted version is that it comes from the Monty Python song, "Spam spam spam spam, spam spam spam spam, lovely spam, wonderful spam". Like the song, spam is an endless repetition of worthless text. Another school of thought maintains that it comes from the computer group lab at the University of Southern California who gave it the name because it has many of the same characteristics as the lunch meat Spam:

• Nobody wants it or ever asks for it.
• No one ever eats it; it is the first item to be pushed to the side when eating the entree.
• Sometimes it is actually tasty, like 1% of junk mail that is really useful to some people.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#50 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Everyone else knows that you were SLAMMED down hard,[as always].
You mean like when you quoted the Oklahoma libel law and didn't notice that you included the line where it was found unconstitutional?

Putting aside you still don't know that libel and slander are two different things?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#51 Nov 16, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like when you quoted the Oklahoma libel law and didn't notice that you included the line where it was found unconstitutional?
Putting aside you still don't know that libel and slander are two different things?
Really troll? "Unconstitutional", you wrote? Funny, because that's NOT what the court ruled:

"The Oklahoma statute contains the language “blackens the name of the dead,” which alludes to a cause of action for a deceased individual or their relatives. However, in Turner v. Crime Detective, 34 F.Supp. 8 (N.D. Okla. 1940),

>>>>>the court held that a common law recovery for libel was not available to a deceased individual nor could the deceased individual’s estate or relatives recover for the libel.<<<<<

The Oklahoma statute does not include language that expressly changes the common law requirement that the individual be living nor does the statute language expressly create a right for a deceased individual or their relatives to recover for the libel. >>>>>Therefore <<<<<, the court held that in Oklahoma an action for libel cannot be brought on behalf of a deceased individual. >>>>>Nonetheles s, the statute language has remained unchanged.<<<<< "
www.firstamendmentcenter.org/criminal-libel-s...

BIG DIFFERENCE, you lying and deceptive troll. The court was basically instructing the legislature to change the expression of the law in order to be in line with the intent of it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#52 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<
>>>>>the court held that a common law recovery for libel
Libel is not slander and slander is not libel.

Now you want to argue about whether or not I libeled Homo Hamilton, that's fine but you lost the slander bet.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#53 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
>>>>>the court held that a common law recovery for libel was not available to a deceased individual nor could the deceased individual’s estate or relatives recover for the libel.<<<<<
because it would be unconstitutional.

You are really bad at this.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#54 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
>>>>>Nonetheles s, the statute language has remained unchanged.<<<<< ".
So what?

It's also against the law for women to do their own hair in Oklahoma.

Mississippi did not abolish slaver until February of this year.

Blasphemy was illegal in my state when I was in high school.

So what?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#55 Nov 16, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
The court was basically instructing the legislature to change the expression of the law in order to be in line with the intent of it.
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

When was this, troll?

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

The court was saying the law as written was UNCONSTITFUCKIONTUTIONAL.

Not "basically" saying: SAYING.

Putting aside, ya dumbsh!t, this was about LIBEL.

You do remember saying you could prove SLANDER.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#56 Nov 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
When was this, troll?
HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!
The court was saying the law as written was UNCONSTITFUCKIONTUTIONAL.
Not "basically" saying: SAYING.
Putting aside, ya dumbsh!t, this was about LIBEL.
You do remember saying you could prove SLANDER.
Take a hike, you mindless troll.

"The presence of arms and of armed men is often the presence of peace.... Which will you have, for you must in the end, take your choice--a standing army or armed citizen soldiery? The one is a blessing in its place, and may prove a blessing to the country, while the other is but a curse, and no other name."--Mr. Oliver of Lawrence, June 20, 1853.[OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE DEBATES AND PROCEEDINGS IN The State Convention ASSEMBLED MAY 4TH, 1853, TO REVISE AND AMEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE Commonwealth of Massachusetts. VOLUME SECOND. BOSTON: WHITE & POTTER, PRINTERS TO THE CONVENTION, 1853.]

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#57 Nov 17, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
June 20, 1853
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam...

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#58 Nov 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam...
Spam-bot warning.

Every time this troll loses, it reverts to spam-bot mode.
Interesting facts

Greenville, TX

#60 Nov 17, 2013
This whole story was faked and never happened. Nothing about it is true, it was only published on a couple leftist news sites that are about equal to the National Enquirer, and the picture they used is completely unrelated. No reports or calls were made to the DPD either. Nuff said, just more lies by the Bloomberg group.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#61 Nov 17, 2013
Interesting facts wrote:
This whole story was faked and never happened. Nothing about it is true, it was only published on a couple leftist news sites that are about equal to the National Enquirer, and the picture they used is completely unrelated. No reports or calls were made to the DPD either. Nuff said, just more lies by the Bloomberg group.
"Interesting facts" indeed. Thanks for the tip.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#62 Nov 17, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
Take a hike, you mindless troll.]
Wipe your chin, you queer little Phoenix fairy.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#63 Nov 17, 2013
Interesting facts wrote:
This whole story was faked and never happened. Nothing about it is true, it was only published on a couple leftist news sites that are about equal to the National Enquirer, and the picture they used is completely unrelated. No reports or calls were made to the DPD either. Nuff said, just more lies by the Bloomberg group.
Forbes:

"Texas Gun Bullies Use Semi-Automatics To Terrorize Mothers Against Guns-NRA Remains Silent

On Saturday, the Texas chapter of “Moms Demand Action For Gun Sense In America”(MDA) was holding a membership meeting at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington when a convoy of cars and trucks carrying members of “Open Carry Texas”—a group supporting open carry of weapons in the state—pulled into the restaurant’s parking lot.

The ambassadors of Open Carry had come to let their objection to MDA be known, electing to so by pulling weapons from their vehicle trunks and parading menacing..."

Those lefty wacos at Forbes magazine...

USA TODAY:

The sudden appearance of about 40 armed men outside a Dallas-area restaurant this weekend was the latest confrontation between an open-carry gun-rights group and a mothers group advocating gun control that was meeting inside.

Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas.

"We are aware that a group did gather in a shopping area in Arlington Saturday," Tiara Ellis Richard of the Arlington Police office of communication said in an e-mail to USA TODAY. "Officers were notified and arrived at the location. There were no ..

++

THE BLAZE... leftists for sure...

A group of open carry gun advocates in Texas stood in a restaurant parking lot over the weekend, exercising their Second Amendment right to bear arms. Inside the restaurant, a group of moms against gun violence was meeting.

The Texas chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America held a membership meeting at the Blue Mesa Grill in Dallas. Outside, a group of about 40 people with Open Carry Texas gathered, according to the liberal blog Think Progress.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#64 Nov 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wipe your chin, you queer little Phoenix fairy.
Falling back on projecting your gay fantasies again, eh troll? What's the matter,'shug'? Didn't get a tip from your last trick?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#65 Nov 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Forbes:
"Texas Gun Bullies Use Semi-Automatics To Terrorize Mothers Against Guns-NRA Remains Silent
On Saturday, the Texas chapter of “Moms Demand Action For Gun Sense In America”(MDA) was holding a membership meeting at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington when a convoy of cars and trucks carrying members of “Open Carry Texas”—a group supporting open carry of weapons in the state—pulled into the restaurant’s parking lot.
The ambassadors of Open Carry had come to let their objection to MDA be known, electing to so by pulling weapons from their vehicle trunks and parading menacing..."
Those lefty wacos at Forbes magazine...
USA TODAY:
The sudden appearance of about 40 armed men outside a Dallas-area restaurant this weekend was the latest confrontation between an open-carry gun-rights group and a mothers group advocating gun control that was meeting inside.
Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas.
"We are aware that a group did gather in a shopping area in Arlington Saturday," Tiara Ellis Richard of the Arlington Police office of communication said in an e-mail to USA TODAY. "Officers were notified and arrived at the location. There were no ..
++
THE BLAZE... leftists for sure...
A group of open carry gun advocates in Texas stood in a restaurant parking lot over the weekend, exercising their Second Amendment right to bear arms. Inside the restaurant, a group of moms against gun violence was meeting.
The Texas chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America held a membership meeting at the Blue Mesa Grill in Dallas. Outside, a group of about 40 people with Open Carry Texas gathered, according to the liberal blog Think Progress.
"Intimidate Mothers" REALLY?

"Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas."

"Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas."

"Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas."

"Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas."

"Police monitored the incident at the Blue Mesa Grill in Arlington, Texas, but took no action because it is legal to carry long guns openly in Texas."

"Intimidate Mothers" REALLY? Apparently the POLICE didn't think so....

Take a hike, loser.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carrollton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
18 hr Conet wee 1
Highway 75 yesterday (Jun '10) Feb 15 his daughter 43
Change A Letter Game (Nov '12) Feb 15 texas pete 1,159
Mary Ellen Sneed Feb 14 Jean 1
News Atheist couple wants 'God' out of Texas pledge (Aug '07) Dec '17 American 177
Why are there no reports of the constant car br... Nov '17 Crazy guy 2
Storage units Sep '17 Jonas 1

Carrollton Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Carrollton Mortgages