Fox High School Superintendent
in sam i trust

Tucker, GA

#1273 Nov 24, 2013
Sam Ferry wrote:
<quoted text>Please don't tell me you actually teach....I'll lose faith. The issue is not can she purchase whatever she wants with her paycheck? The issue is how did she obtain the paycheck in the first place? Let's assume you get your paycheck because you actually did the work and are worth what you are paid. With the super that is not the case. Her pay.........over 250,000.....came about because she played a school board that should be ashamed of themselves! You dispute that? Then you simply have not done your homework! No one is able to defend the outrages amount she receives. You need comparative numbers? Read Fox C-6 Watchdog, it can not be disputed!
You are picking on the wrong people here, and had you actually READ why he said what he said you might have a clue! You are a teacher for goodness sakes, read a little context here before you call for police to come and help silence the critics!
Let's go with this Sam. I see that you have proof of collusion.
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1274 Nov 24, 2013
in sam i trust wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's go with this Sam. I see that you have proof of collusion.
Oh I see....now that you think I can not back up what I speculate you want to actually be a part of the discussion? She is a politician more than she is anything else! Back scratchers, you know the type. Just because you have given up your right to common sense does not mean I have! You have a super that backed jobs for board member's family as well as ex-board members, and all the while slam dunking jobs for her family and friends! As if that is not bad enough it was done with many who were either under qualified or not qualified at all. Now all that is left to decide is motive? You want to think she did it for "the students", or the betterment of the district, or some other altruistic reason? Prove it! I choose to think she did it for much more selfish reasons. Reasons that kept her unquestioned by the only seven who could have prevented it.( Maybe they were too busy thanking her for everything she has done for them and thiers, or maybe they just got lazy.) Reasons that increased her family income big time! I say she is greedy and selfish. Everybody here knows what I think. She knows, the board knows, the lawyers know, other critics know, and now you know!

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#1275 Nov 24, 2013
So what is the full story? Is the superintendant retiring and if so, when?
in sam i trust

Imperial, MO

#1277 Nov 24, 2013
Sam Ferry wrote:
<quoted text>Oh I see....now that you think I can not back up what I speculate you want to actually be a part of the discussion? She is a politician more than she is anything else! Back scratchers, you know the type. Just because you have given up your right to common sense does not mean I have! You have a super that backed jobs for board member's family as well as ex-board members, and all the while slam dunking jobs for her family and friends! As if that is not bad enough it was done with many who were either under qualified or not qualified at all. Now all that is left to decide is motive? You want to think she did it for "the students", or the betterment of the district, or some other altruistic reason? Prove it! I choose to think she did it for much more selfish reasons. Reasons that kept her unquestioned by the only seven who could have prevented it.( Maybe they were too busy thanking her for everything she has done for them and thiers, or maybe they just got lazy.) Reasons that increased her family income big time! I say she is greedy and selfish. Everybody here knows what I think. She knows, the board knows, the lawyers know, other critics know, and now you know!
Seems like an open and shut case! Please go for it! You are our Messiah! We worship you! You have the guys to accuse the super of all of her illegal acts. You have more info than anyone! Thank you!!!
77warrior

Saint Louis, MO

#1278 Nov 24, 2013
Well Sam, apparently everybody knows, but no one gives a crap! Except, that is, morons like you!
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1279 Nov 24, 2013
in sam i trust wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems like an open and shut case! Please go for it! You are our Messiah! We worship you! You have the guys to accuse the super of all of her illegal acts. You have more info than anyone! Thank you!!!
I did not say it was illegal, I said it is what was done. Board members as well as her family received high paying positions. Some, unqualified without dispute,It was unethical . You claim the motive was pure, I do not. I do not need "guys" to accuse her of benefiting personally from a shcool board that followed along like the shhep they were. I'll do it myself!
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1280 Nov 24, 2013
77warrior wrote:
Well Sam, apparently everybody knows, but no one gives a crap! Except, that is, morons like you!
You said "morons"..........pl ural? You mean I am not alone, thank God Almighty I am not alone! Oh thank you, thank you, thank you!
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1281 Nov 24, 2013
Obviously I did some kind of no no by puting on here some of the figures that are on the watchdog blog. My apologies to whoever took it down, I must have broken some sort of rule....I'm sorry if I did.
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1282 Nov 25, 2013
Now I understand there is a lot of speculation as to why she is retiring at this juncture, but let me just add to that! Is it possible that the BOE did not renew her contract? It is just a rumor I know, but if valid at all I will have new hope in the BOE!
no name

United States

#1283 Nov 25, 2013
Sam Ferry wrote:
Now I understand there is a lot of speculation as to why she is retiring at this juncture, but let me just add to that! Is it possible that the BOE did not renew her contract? It is just a rumor I know, but if valid at all I will have new hope in the BOE!
Spare your hope. Don't believe that's the case. You may never know since it's a "personnel issue". Only she can disclose that information. Give it a rest.
no name

United States

#1284 Nov 25, 2013
Sam Ferry wrote:
Obviously I did some kind of no no by puting on here some of the figures that are on the watchdog blog. My apologies to whoever took it down, I must have broken some sort of rule....I'm sorry if I did.
Don't believe you're sorry. Don't patronize please.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#1285 Nov 25, 2013
Looks like Sam might have taken a page from someone else's play book. Take the news and start making a bunch of insinuations regardless if they are true or false.
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1286 Nov 25, 2013
no name wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't believe you're sorry. Don't patronize please.
Well it is a good thing your beliefs don't define me then. I said it, I meant it. Everything was complete public knowledge provided by DESE, it would have never entered my mind someone would want it removed. It really is just common knowledege. But if you took it down, and you thought the apology was to you, then just don't accept it, that's okay. If you did not have it taken down then it is not you I would be "patronizing, even had you said pretty please. Now you can go back and look at her pay over her tenure and ask yourself? What the holy hell was the board thinking? If you are lazy, like me, just go to Fox C-6 Watchdogs and scroll down to the bottom, click next page and scroll down about half way and it is all there for you! But I would never do that without thanking Rich Simpson for his tireless work in helping to wake up anyone who is unaware. You're good with all that......right?
no name

United States

#1287 Nov 25, 2013
Sam Ferry wrote:
<quoted text>Well it is a good thing your beliefs don't define me then. I said it, I meant it. Everything was complete public knowledge provided by DESE, it would have never entered my mind someone would want it removed. It really is just common knowledege. But if you took it down, and you thought the apology was to you, then just don't accept it, that's okay. If you did not have it taken down then it is not you I would be "patronizing, even had you said pretty please. Now you can go back and look at her pay over her tenure and ask yourself? What the holy hell was the board thinking? If you are lazy, like me, just go to Fox C-6 Watchdogs and scroll down to the bottom, click next page and scroll down about half way and it is all there for you! But I would never do that without thanking Rich Simpson for his tireless work in helping to wake up anyone who is unaware. You're good with all that......right?
What I know is that stating my opinion is not fact. No I did not have anything removed. I Sam state my opinion all day long and it's merely that, my opinion. Yes, I know Rich, have for many yeas, good friends with his parents, and we have talked. We have agreed to disagree. He gives facts and I see them, but my opinion of them is different. I have that right as do you. Your passion with your opinion sometimes borders on trying to force your opinion on others. Fortunately for you most on this post agree work you. I just don't happen to be one of them. I guess that's what makes this country so great! USA!!!
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1288 Nov 25, 2013
no name wrote:
<quoted text>
What I know is that stating my opinion is not fact. No I did not have anything removed. I Sam state my opinion all day long and it's merely that, my opinion. Yes, I know Rich, have for many yeas, good friends with his parents, and we have talked. We have agreed to disagree. He gives facts and I see them, but my opinion of them is different. I have that right as do you. Your passion with your opinion sometimes borders on trying to force your opinion on others. Fortunately for you most on this post agree work you. I just don't happen to be one of them. I guess that's what makes this country so great! USA!!!
Always thought that was understood....it is what "I" think. However it is not opinion that she helped family and friends as well as family of board members, who at times were either underqualifed or not qualified at all obtain key paying positions. That's a fact! You have no frame of reference for "my passion" and whether or not it borders on anything. But I can easily tell you I do not want to force anyone to do anything. Conversely I will stand up to anyone who tries to shut me up. Simple enough?

Well I guess that is why those that agree stay on this particular post, we agree! Here is the rub though....guys like you, people who are convinced she did right by all parties,(students, employees, board members, taxpayers) I do not for the life of me see why you don't really stand up for her. If you are an employee you have complete protection, if you are not then why fear? My opinion, what I think, what I say is fact, those things I say out in the open, and I am an "enemy". Admitedly I do not have many friends, and that is probably my fault, but I would never consider not standing completely up for them. So when people don't I automatically get a bit defensive......if someting is true and you know it's true......then you'd simply say "I Sam Ferry say this is true." Does that make sense? Seems like only those who would hurl stones from the shadows present a much greater risk of saying thkngs that are not true? But that is just me, I'm pretty sure I am in the minority. Thanks for being civil!
in sam i trust

Imperial, MO

#1289 Nov 25, 2013
Sam, you are so attractive. When will you be back on the tv
no name

United States

#1290 Nov 26, 2013
Sam Ferry wrote:
<quoted text>Always thought that was understood....it is what "I" think. However it is not opinion that she helped family and friends as well as family of board members, who at times were either underqualifed or not qualified at all obtain key paying positions. That's a fact! You have no frame of reference for "my passion" and whether or not it borders on anything. But I can easily tell you I do not want to force anyone to do anything. Conversely I will stand up to anyone who tries to shut me up. Simple enough?

Well I guess that is why those that agree stay on this particular post, we agree! Here is the rub though....guys like you, people who are convinced she did right by all parties,(students, employees, board members, taxpayers) I do not for the life of me see why you don't really stand up for her. If you are an employee you have complete protection, if you are not then why fear? My opinion, what I think, what I say is fact, those things I say out in the open, and I am an "enemy". Admitedly I do not have many friends, and that is probably my fault, but I would never consider not standing completely up for them. So when people don't I automatically get a bit defensive......if someting is true and you know it's true......then you'd simply say "I Sam Ferry say this is true." Does that make sense? Seems like only those who would hurl stones from the shadows present a much greater risk of saying thkngs that are not true? But that is just me, I'm pretty sure I am in the minority. Thanks for being civil!
I will always be civil. It's the only way the system can continue to work. It's all about the Democratic process. I don't remain anonymous for myself. Do it for my children who work In the district. I wouldn't care for myself. Don't trust those who follow you in the least. They have shown their malice for those who disagree with them. You I know would never take it out on them. Nor would I your family.
Ssdd

Imperial, MO

#1291 Dec 1, 2013
I was moved to tears reading about Diane's impending retirement. How she met her soul mate while being paid by tax dollars. How she worked in her community. Blah blah blah. I wonder how his ex wife feels about step mommy wanting to be there for his kids God help them now. She's fake. She also doesn't think we need to hire out of the district. RED FLAG PEOPLE! Yes we do. There is only one person qualified in my eyes and she doesn't work in central office. They all need their walking papers.
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1292 Dec 1, 2013
no name wrote:
<quoted text>
I will always be civil. It's the only way the system can continue to work. It's all about the Democratic process. I don't remain anonymous for myself. Do it for my children who work In the district. I wouldn't care for myself. Don't trust those who follow you in the least. They have shown their malice for those who disagree with them. You I know would never take it out on them. Nor would I your family.
Wow.........A man who is not willing to reveal himself telling me who I should or should not trust? I am truly backwards. First off, I do not hang out with anyone who would show malice towards others. Secondly, no one "follows" me! Seriously, I would think you a fool if you did! BUT there are many people that post here, and many others that read here that I completely agree with, and who agree with me. The reason it appears to the casual observer that people follow me is because I put my name out there. That is pretty simple stuff. I am willing to accept all of the criticism and heckling because most of them that feel as I do about this super are employed by the district. They can not reveal themselves because they would actually suffer some sort of repercussions if they did. Ask your children. You have to actually work there, or have worked there, or have close family work there to really understand that. I have never accused anyone of doing anything that I have not personally witnessed or been a part of.

I also want to say I am not real good at this cloak and dagger stuff. I prefer everything to be open and honest. Believe it brother......if everyone had to first disclose who they were before they spoke here this would be a completely different conversation!
Sam Ferry

Saint Louis, MO

#1293 Dec 1, 2013
Ssdd wrote:
I was moved to tears reading about Diane's impending retirement. How she met her soul mate while being paid by tax dollars. How she worked in her community. Blah blah blah. I wonder how his ex wife feels about step mommy wanting to be there for his kids God help them now. She's fake. She also doesn't think we need to hire out of the district. RED FLAG PEOPLE! Yes we do. There is only one person qualified in my eyes and she doesn't work in central office. They all need their walking papers.
Totally agree! However I do think you are being way to kind by calling her "fake." Physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually......fake,fake,fak e,fake! I am sure you read that she did not even want the super job. Heck had it not been for that damn Jim Chellow mentoring her we would not even be in the mess we are in. Here's a fact for you all......when Chellow was super there was not a single person FIRED in the district. Did Dianne follow his mentoring advise? He also had an open door policy, I know because I had walked through it! As soon as she could she slammed and bolted that door like a frightened apartment dweller in New York City. There are manequins that are less fake than she is!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carondelet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What happened to Kimmswick? (Jan '06) 8 hr anonymous 788
Just keep it up darkies Mon Sick of darkies 1
SB40 JCDDRB County Tax Levy - Funding & Service... (Nov '15) Mon Sheesh 20
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) Mon auditboy 1,399
News Brutcher gets life plus 109 years (Sep '06) Apr 28 Brutchers Awesome 173
Have you seen this man? Apr 22 Victim 1
Arrest warrant for grandma over 12-year-old ticket (Mar '09) Apr 20 bloyd 26
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Carondelet Mortgages