Arnold police chief

Posted in the Carondelet Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Daddy

Warrensburg, MO

#1 Aug 14, 2013
They should fire this nut to many law suits going on in arnd government
Concerned Citizen

Anonymous Proxy

#4 Aug 28, 2013
An honest police chief that wants to clean up corruption?

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-p...

Don't you wish we had someone like this in our town? Instead of a chief who's front and center in the ongoing shenanigans and corruption.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#5 Aug 28, 2013
The only reason he is front and center is because of your shenanigans. Don't you realize that if you would have ignored him instead of running your mouth to every news agency you could find that this would all be a non issue?
URALoon

Arnold, MO

#6 Aug 28, 2013
Do you realize had everyone been informed of his involvement in a sexual harassment suit, he never would have been appointed to the position of City Administrator? Then he would have no complaints!

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#7 Aug 28, 2013
Do you realize that Ott asked you to cease and desist from talking about it any further?

You claim to know her but her post on here shows otherwise.
URALoon

Arnold, MO

#8 Aug 28, 2013
Do you realize Mrs. Ott asked YOU to cease and desist because you don't know her or her husband and you were making false statements? In other words don't make statements when you don't know what you are talking about. You don't know her father-in-law and you didn't check with him.
Luther

Cantonment, FL

#9 Aug 28, 2013
You crackers crack me up.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#10 Aug 28, 2013
URALoon wrote:
Do you realize Mrs. Ott asked YOU to cease and desist because you don't know her or her husband and you were making false statements? In other words don't make statements when you don't know what you are talking about. You don't know her father-in-law and you didn't check with him.
Actually, yes I do know him. I have sat and talked with him during lunch on several occasions. You can ask Steve, the bartender/waiter, Frank and the couple of other people that frequent the lunch establishment. They all verified his identity.

My statements were not false. I have witnesses as to the conversation. The statements were true and if he lied (as I'm sure he didn't) then it is now on him and he needs to explain his actions to her.

Her statement was to EVERYBODY. She made it clear in her post that she wants EVERYBODY to quit discussing it.

Now, before you were claiming it was Moritz posting using her name. Now you are claiming it was indeed her. Which is it?

It's seems to me that you claimed something that wasn't true and now that someone else has gotten the inside scoop you are quickly trying to cover your tracks. But that's just my opinion.

Now quit discussing her case.
Arnold Granny

Arnold, MO

#11 Aug 28, 2013
Old News lets drop it!
URALoon

Arnold, MO

#12 Aug 28, 2013
I haven't claimed anything except that you are posting lies. You are the one who makes all of the claims and demands around here. Steve the bartender, OK, now that sounds credible, NOT and Frank who? Which establishment? I'm not trying to cover anything. Just letting you know you don't know what you are talking about. If you did, you would know her father in law's name and would at the very least post his initials, but you haven't done that because you don't know.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#13 Aug 28, 2013
You got that right. Seems as though someone was schooled that someone else has connections, too. Maybe Ms. Ott should verify that her relatives haven't been blabbing before threatening and telling someone they don't know their family.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#14 Aug 28, 2013
I have a solution that would prove that the council won't release the details and that Ott wants them released. Or, it may prove that you are lying.

I would like Ms. Ott to show up to the next council meeting. I will be bringing copies of the posts where you state that she insists that she wants the details to be made public (if you haven't had them removed yet). I will speak in business from the floor and show them the posts and ask the information be released. I would like her to prove she wants the details made public by speaking in business from the floor and asking the council to make them public as the posts indicates she wants them to be(verifying the statements in the posts to be true). You claim she really wants the information released so this would be her way of helping get it released.

If the council says no, then we know it is the council. If the council says yes, then everyone wins. Is she refuses or doesn't show then I would have to question your credibility.

Does that sound fair? I know you want the details really bad. Do you think she would be willing to help you out in getting them?

This would be a win-win for everyone if you are telling the truth.
Truth Is

Arnold, MO

#15 Aug 28, 2013
What was said in post six is a true statement! If the council had know of his involvement in a sexual harassment case, as they should have, he never would have been appointed to take on an additional position even temporarily, as city administrator. That position would have been bestowed on someone else. Had the truth been known then, he would not have been in a position to make the decisions he is now claiming cause him to suffer from anxiety and depression.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#16 Aug 28, 2013
Way to divert attention again. So will Ms. Ott go as requested or not? Don't divert this time.
Truth Is

Arnold, MO

#17 Aug 28, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
Way to divert attention again. So will Ms. Ott go as requested or not? Don't divert this time.
Just who do you think you are? It is not your place to make arrangements for anyone, let alone Mrs. Ott. You are the one who made the claims that you spoke to her father in law, then you said that Doug needed to keep his mouth shut. Who is Doug? Who is her father in law, you never said, but you claim to have talked to them. Then when someone rightly points out that the chief never would have been appointed had the council been informed of his involvement in a sexual harassment suit, you hop on them and tell them to stop talking about it like you are in charge. You are not in charge! The subject was not Mrs. Ott, you brought up her name. You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. You keep sticking your nose where it doesn't belong, you keep providing inaccurate information. Then you try to seem like you are one upping someone stating you have connections. No one cares about your supposed connections, all they care about is true and accurate information going out to the public.
Fly a Kite

Arnold, MO

#18 Aug 28, 2013
Arnold Granny wrote:
Old News lets drop it!
Instead of that, why don't you drop a bowling ball on your toe?

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#19 Aug 28, 2013
Truth Is wrote:
<quoted text>Just who do you think you are? It is not your place to make arrangements for anyone, let alone Mrs. Ott. You are the one who made the claims that you spoke to her father in law, then you said that Doug needed to keep his mouth shut. Who is Doug? Who is her father in law, you never said, but you claim to have talked to them. Then when someone rightly points out that the chief never would have been appointed had the council been informed of his involvement in a sexual harassment suit, you hop on them and tell them to stop talking about it like you are in charge. You are not in charge! The subject was not Mrs. Ott, you brought up her name. You don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. You keep sticking your nose where it doesn't belong, you keep providing inaccurate information. Then you try to seem like you are one upping someone stating you have connections. No one cares about your supposed connections, all they care about is true and accurate information going out to the public.
You need to go back and read who said what. There is a lot of misinformation in your post. And ALL OF ARNOLD now sees it.

You all claim to have a relationship with Ms. Ott. Ask her to come and ask the council to release the information. Anything less would show no relationship exists.

And I'm not the one who claimed to have talked to anyone named Doug. You should check yourself.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#20 Aug 28, 2013
Fly a Kite wrote:
<quoted text>Instead of that, why don't you drop a bowling ball on your toe?
The old gang will never let this drop Granny. They keep bringing it up every chance they get. They were the first to publicize it and they will keep bringing it up because they have nothing else.
oh my

United States

#21 Aug 28, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
The old gang will never let this drop Granny. They keep bringing it up every chance they get. They were the first to publicize it and they will keep bringing it up because they have nothing else.
Would he or would he not (the chief) gotten the city admin. job if the harassment suit had been in the paper?
Why was this lawsuit hidden from the public?
oh my

United States

#22 Aug 28, 2013
I also want to know why this mentally disturbed (his words) chief is still in charge of a police station?
If he is so depressed and disturbed does he still have his gun? Who wants to work for someone claiming to be off their rocker?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carondelet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who is better for the people of Arnold? 25 min ArnoldCC 16
MO Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 7 hr Yellow Dawg Democrat 97,281
MO Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... 10 hr Foster 3,191
MO Ferguson Police Chief Just Shocked Everyone Wit... 11 hr Go Blue Forever 590
County Councilman Boyer 18 hr Oh Boy 109
Fox High School Superintendent (Sep '10) 19 hr ECR 1,463
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion 19 hr ECR 503

Carondelet Jobs

Carondelet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Carondelet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Carondelet

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]