Another Harassment Lawsuit
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#21 Aug 3, 2013
Doris Borgelt wrote:
Lookie Here said:
"That's all we need is another lawsuit, but nobody can say they didn't see this coming."
For the record, I went to the courthouse and requested the depositions given on this case, as I felt the city council needed to know the true FACTS of the case instead of the fiction we were fed. Although I was unable to get them and the council NEVER had the opportunity to review any of the facts, I was able to obtain a copy of the request for damages and had it posted on line for all to see. Why did the city keep this from the full council? Don't you think they needed to know about this? I certainly do. I can honestly say that had I known I would NEVER have appointed him to take over the additional duties of Interim City Administrator, a position that he currently holds until September 1st.
And yet he will no longer hold that position. It was interim...temporary. So you no longer have to worry about it. Especially since you are no longer on the council.

To me the "we" sounds like they are referring to the city and its citizens. In the English language it refers to a group of people, hence the citizens are a group of people. For you to nitpick that is pretty petty in my opinion. We're you going to use that one word to accuse them of having a mental disorder?
Melvin Sherrer

Saint Louis, MO

#22 Aug 3, 2013
You don't know me but I know you. Remember EyeSeeU
Doris Borgelt

Arnold, MO

#23 Aug 3, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
And yet he will no longer hold that position. It was interim...temporary. So you no longer have to worry about it. Especially since you are no longer on the council.
To me the "we" sounds like they are referring to the city and its citizens. In the English language it refers to a group of people, hence the citizens are a group of people. For you to nitpick that is pretty petty in my opinion. We're you going to use that one word to accuse them of having a mental disorder?
He continues in that position until September 1st.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#24 Aug 3, 2013
Doris Borgelt wrote:
<quoted text>He continues in that position until September 1st.
And there is an end date for it so give it up. Why can't you just be happy that there is an end date set?

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#25 Aug 3, 2013
Melvin Sherrer wrote:
You don't know me but I know you. Remember EyeSeeU
I know you. Give it up.
dori

Salt Lake City, UT

#26 Aug 3, 2013
Doris are you transgender, just curious?
Really

Arnold, MO

#27 Aug 3, 2013
I'm sure that is the case, she must have adopted all of those kids. Could it possibly be that her courage and tenacity threaten your very manhood? That sounds more like it. You must feel little more than inadequate and no match for her.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#28 Aug 3, 2013
You only wish.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#29 Aug 6, 2013
I see the Chief sues thread was removed. Was there something incriminating posted on it? Perhaps.
Good Morning

Arnold, MO

#30 Aug 7, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
I see the Chief sues thread was removed. Was there something incriminating posted on it? Perhaps.
Perhaps the something incriminating was the link to the lawsuit he filed against the city:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/157498620/Shockey-L...
Delusion

Arnold, MO

#31 Aug 7, 2013
Perhaps one of the defendants had it removed.

I think this will come down to the City settling for a small amount, the Chief and Moss both dropping their lawsuits against one another in a deal and Doris, well, I don't know about Doris. I haven't figured that part of the lawsuit out yet. I think she would actually rather see it go to court.
Eileen

Arnold, MO

#32 Aug 7, 2013
Perhaps a majority of people are like me, and don't want to comment any longer on the nonsense coming from some of the officials in Arnold.

I'm embarrassed for the people of Arnold, who I used to believe deserve better. Now I'm not so sure. I conclude that they DO deserve to be overrun by self-aggrandizing fools who are sucking them dry.

Doris is the victim.

Most people see that. They are simply too afraid to say so for fear of being the next target.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#33 Aug 7, 2013
Eileen wrote:
Perhaps a majority of people are like me, and don't want to comment any longer on the nonsense coming from some of the officials in Arnold.

I'm embarrassed for the people of Arnold, who I used to believe deserve better. Now I'm not so sure. I conclude that they DO deserve to be overrun by self-aggrandizing fools who are sucking them dry.

Doris is the victim.

Most people see that. They are simply too afraid to say so for fear of being the next target.
She is far from the victim. She would like you to believe she is the victim, but she isn't. Most people know better. If she had any shred of decency she would show the proof of her allegations on here so the citizens could take care of it. However, despite repeated requests for the proof all I get are excuses. She isn't giving the citizens a chance to take care of it when she refuses to publish her proof on here.

Since: Feb 13

Jefferson County

#34 Aug 8, 2013
Remember how Susie Boone's first MCHR complaint was sent back, because she did not claim membership in a protected group? As a result, she added "gender discrimination" to her complaint, even though there was no evidence of gender discrimination. Well, Shockey learned a lesson from this, and he put "age discrimination" in his suit, even though his age has nothing to do with his allegations. This is a money grab, pure and simple.
Jerry K

Saint Louis, MO

#35 Aug 11, 2013
All just another cover up like unrein getting paid off. The problem is they covered for him and his antics too long until they had to pay him to go away. It will happen again now.

Just be transparent and tell the truth and move on. I someone does wrong, let them live by their mistakes, don't protect them. Of course, unless they all have dirt on each other? Hmmmm???? Maybe that's the real issue?

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#36 Aug 11, 2013
Jerry K wrote:
All just another cover up like unrein getting paid off. The problem is they covered for him and his antics too long until they had to pay him to go away. It will happen again now.

Just be transparent and tell the truth and move on. I someone does wrong, let them live by their mistakes, don't protect them. Of course, unless they all have dirt on each other? Hmmmm???? Maybe that's the real issue?
Another allegation. Can you back that up with proof?

Still waiting for someone to post all of their proof for ALL Arnold citizens to see. Seems the only people that have seen it are the "blind followers". All I have see are blog posts by them, news articles not about Arnold and a court filing (not even close to proof something is true). So where is all of this claimed proof? I'm starting to think it is non-existent.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carondelet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Where do the Afican Americans hang out in Arnol... (Aug '10) Aug 26 Wake Up 38
News Lawsuit accuses municipalities of targeting the... Aug 22 VeeBee 6
Revival Aug 13 Pastor Anthony Pe... 1
What happened to Kimmswick? (Jan '06) Aug 13 Addit 790
Is fenton a racist city Aug 11 Funny 7
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) Aug 2 VeeBee 1,482
SB40 JCDDRB County Tax Levy - Funding & Service... (Nov '15) Aug 2 VeeBee 28

Carondelet Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Carondelet Mortgages