First Prev
of 2
Next Last
nosy

Saint Louis, MO

#1 Jun 13, 2013
Where did the thread about schools and liquor laws go?

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#2 Jun 13, 2013
nosy wrote:
Where did the thread about schools and liquor laws go?
Gone apparently. I can see my replies but I don't see the thread in the list and I get an error accessing it through my replies.
nosy

Saint Louis, MO

#3 Jun 13, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>Gone apparently. I can see my replies but I don't see the thread in the list and I get an error accessing it through my replies.
Me too...I guess it struck a nerve!

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#4 Jun 13, 2013
Guess so.

“Funny lady”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#5 Jun 14, 2013
Yeah it's amazing how things disappear off of here. So much for free speech

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#9 Jun 14, 2013
remember when wrote:
With out question little miss pi$$y pants swirl and twirl had it deleted. She always does. It didn't just strike a nerve it whacked that nail. Everyone cheering for a run away hubby is fairly unusual isn't it?
Anyhooo...before nutty nancy crashed the train we did get some good info on distance between liquor stores and schools
Why don't you put the truth out there? He wasn't run away. Check case net. He was cut loose and for good reason. I gave him a great son story to tell though, didn't I?

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#10 Jun 14, 2013
Sob story, not son story.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#12 Jun 14, 2013
I actually could give a rats rear what you "think" we should/shouldn't discuss on this thread. This isn't your chat board. If you want to be that controlling then start your own.

I also have heard that you've tried to start s**t with my ex. So you are instigating trouble through a third party. Tell me, how did that work out for you? He didn't care, did he? Just as I don't. You keep doing it. People see through you. Too bad his gf can't see through you, but he had you pegged the first time he met you as an instigator. Is your life that miserable that you have to try to make other's lives miserable? Too bad it's not working here.

Why don't you ask your "source" about the nurse? If you need more dirt for her you just let me know because I have plenty to give her.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#13 Jun 14, 2013
And one more thing, do you ever get in trouble for instigating things in an attempt to destroy people's lives? You have no ethics or self-respect. At least our current Mayor doesn't go out of his way to destroy people's lives.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#15 Jun 14, 2013
I never posted that. I didn't even say that. All I've said is that he got a gf right after the separation. I now know EXACTLY who you are because you jut gave yourself away with that little piece of information.
Infected with Insanity

Arnold, MO

#16 Jun 14, 2013
Aha! You have just proven that ArnoldCC is LUNN! So Sybil is an accurate description. By the way you would have to give it away because no one would buy it from you, Doc.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#18 Jun 14, 2013
remember when wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't give away squat!!!!
You absolutely did post it! I read it. It was at the same time you were claiming to be a lesbian and denying you were lunn/cc. There will be snowmen in hell before I go back digging for it. You can if you like or maybe you are sure it was in another you had deleted.
Oh well.....how about that liquor store?
You won't dig for it because it never happened and you know it. You're just trying to cover your rear end at this point. I suggest you start digging to find it.

And to the other person, I didn't prove anything. But you can attempt to help remember when try to save face and find that post. But you'll never find it because I never posted it.
Infected with Insanity

Arnold, MO

#19 Jun 14, 2013
Isn't it funny, you NEVER do anything, yet you accuse EVERYONE else? You never had any credibility anyway so no big deal.

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

#20 Jun 14, 2013
Infected with Insanity wrote:
Isn't it funny, you NEVER do anything, yet you accuse EVERYONE else? You never had any credibility anyway so no big deal.
No, it's you who never had any credibility. I have documentation on my side.

Are you willing to try to prove your statements about who left who? You can't because they're lies and you know it. You just spout and hope for what sticks. Now you just proved you post under multiple aliases. You're a very sad human being. I will pray for you.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#21 Jun 14, 2013
You need more than prayers.
Get Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#22 Jun 15, 2013
ArnoldCC wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it's you who never had any credibility. I have documentation on my side.
Are you willing to try to prove your statements about who left who? You can't because they're lies and you know it. You just spout and hope for what sticks. Now you just proved you post under multiple aliases. You're a very sad human being. I will pray for you.
You have documented NOTHING! Not one thing. There is documentation posted on threads within topics, some on Scribd and links to other documentation to back up what other people have said, but not you. You just spout wildly and demand proof from everyone else and never provide any yourself. You are a joke. On this thread and one just like it, there were state laws posted and you ruined that, then feign innocence when it is removed. You are the biggest whiner on here along with the rest of the alter-egos that come out of your head.
There are many people that are upset that the City would allow a liquor store to go in right next door to a school. Yes the Service Center is a school. It officially holds that designation due to the fact that teachers conduct classes that children attend there. That constitutes a school. Was everyone within a 100 feet of the premises(not just the front door)notified properly? The City has the option of expanding the no liquor store zone distance to 300 feet if they choose, they chose not to do so.
june

Mount Vernon, AR

#23 Jun 15, 2013
i think i

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#24 Jun 15, 2013
Get Back on Track wrote:
<quoted text>You have documented NOTHING! Not one thing. There is documentation posted on threads within topics, some on Scribd and links to other documentation to back up what other people have said, but not you. You just spout wildly and demand proof from everyone else and never provide any yourself. You are a joke. On this thread and one just like it, there were state laws posted and you ruined that, then feign innocence when it is removed. You are the biggest whiner on here along with the rest of the alter-egos that come out of your head.
There are many people that are upset that the City would allow a liquor store to go in right next door to a school. Yes the Service Center is a school. It officially holds that designation due to the fact that teachers conduct classes that children attend there. That constitutes a school. Was everyone within a 100 feet of the premises(not just the front door)notified properly? The City has the option of expanding the no liquor store zone distance to 300 feet if they choose, they chose not to do so.
They chose not to because they don't have to. That would hurt Walgreens. Would you like to lose the Walgreens at that corner? Keep in mind that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

And the service center is technically not a school building. That must be defined in the statutes somewhere. Should go look it up.

And posting a lawsuit on scribd is not proof. It is merely a list of allegations that are being taken to court. Maybe we should look at scribd to see what date that lawsuit was posted. That would be plenty of proof that you knew about it and had time to act BEFORE the election, not after like has been claimed. As for the rest of the proof...where is it? There is none because despite being repeated asked to post it or post the links you have refused to do so or used the line of telling us to do our own research.

Maybe you need to learn what proof is. It shows a fact, not allegation. Get that through your thick skull. Until the lawsuit goes to court and guilt is determined by a trial or judgement then it is all allegation.

I have provided proof of my allegation against out county councilman not paying his personal property tax ON TIME (it was late). I've told you were to go find it. See, unlike you I don't post links that contain private information like addresses. A search for Arnold's county council representative on the assessor's website will show last year's personal property wasn't paid until January this year. You shouldn't pay late and then ask for people to be removed from the ballot for late payment. That's being a hypocrite. There are other of our representatives that pay late. However, if you are going to jump up and down about late payment of other elected officials, you shouldn't be late yourself.
Names Named

France

#25 Jun 15, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
And posting a lawsuit on scribd is not proof. It is merely a list of allegations that are being taken to court.

Maybe you need to learn what proof is. It shows a fact, not allegation. Get that through your thick skull. Until the lawsuit goes to court and guilt is determined by a trial or judgement then it is all allegation.
The proof is in the payout. The city doesn't pay Ott nearly a half million dollars of our tax money if her claims had no merit against Shockey. The fact that the city wouldn't turn over documents relative to the case also proves the lawsuit had merit. These cases almost never go to trial as the parties usually settle. They settle because one side has been wronged. The other side knows it and would rather pay a known amount than risk even more in a trial. There are exceptions like the Suzie Boone case. The facts are all out there and if you read them you would see that she had no true claim. Unlike the Shockey case that Counts hid the documents and won't let the public see them.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#26 Jun 15, 2013
Names Named wrote:
<quoted text>The proof is in the payout. The city doesn't pay Ott nearly a half million dollars of our tax money if her claims had no merit against Shockey. The fact that the city wouldn't turn over documents relative to the case also proves the lawsuit had merit. These cases almost never go to trial as the parties usually settle. They settle because one side has been wronged. The other side knows it and would rather pay a known amount than risk even more in a trial. There are exceptions like the Suzie Boone case. The facts are all out there and if you read them you would see that she had no true claim. Unlike the Shockey case that Counts hid the documents and won't let the public see them.
You are so full of it settlement doesn't prove any of that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carondelet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
MO Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Missouri ... (Oct '10) 15 min Yellow Dawg Democrat 97,043
MO Ferguson Police Are Being Relieved Of Their Dut... 32 min Seriously 2,862
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion 1 hr FredFromArnold 475
MO Powerful Photos Blast The Media's Portrayal Of ... 2 hr grave digger 303
Fox High School Superintendent (Sep '10) 3 hr youngpam2 1,405
MO Ferguson Police Chief Just Shocked Everyone Wit... 5 hr OOTA 528
Nepotism on Fox schoolboard (Dec '12) 8 hr Eileen 2,791
•••
•••
•••

Carondelet Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Carondelet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Carondelet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Carondelet
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••